{"found":true,"summary":{"name":"Olympus Spa v. Armstrong","court":"9th Cir.","level":"Circuit","circuit":"9th","issue":"Public accommodations","issues":["Public accommodations","Bathrooms & facilities","Speech & religious objections"],"outcome":"Favorable"},"cite":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, 138 F.4th 1204 (9th Cir. 2025)","proceedings":[{"court":"9th Cir.","year":2023,"n_docs":14,"docket_id":"69162936","cl_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. filed Dec. 8, 2023)","citeNote":"the case itself; cite a decision in it where there is one"},{"court":"9th Cir.","year":2025,"cl_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10594868/olympus-spa-v-armstrong/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, 138 F.4th 1204 (9th Cir. 2025)"}],"dockets":[{"docket_number":"23-4031","date_filed":"2023-12-08","date_last_filing":"2026-09-04"}],"counsel":[],"recentUpdates":[{"date":"2026-09-04","description":"Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed.  [Entered: 09/04/2026 11:31 AM]","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/70/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","entryNumber":70,"hasText":false,"available":false},{"date":"2026-07-17","description":"Supreme Court Letter Received. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:02 PM]","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/69/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","entryNumber":69,"hasText":false,"available":false},{"date":"2026-04-13","description":"Supreme Court Letter Received. [Entered: 04/14/2026 01:43 PM]","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/68/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","entryNumber":68,"hasText":false,"available":false},{"date":"2026-03-20","description":"MANDATE ISSUED M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE.  The judgment of this Court, entered 5/29/2025 and amended 3/12/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 03/20/2026 09:01 AM]","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/67/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","entryNumber":67,"hasText":false,"available":false},{"date":"2026-03-12","description":"UPDATED ORDER FOR PUBLICATION FILED. (M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE) Attached reformatted order and webcite.  [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:06 AM]","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/66/1/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","entryNumber":66,"hasText":false,"available":false},{"date":"2026-03-12","description":"ORDER and AMENDED OPINION (M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE) The opinion filed May 29, 2025, and reported at 138 F.4th 1204 is hereby amended. The dissent is unchanged. The amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. Judge McKeown and Judge Gould voted to deny appellants’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Lee voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Gould and Judge Lee vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge McKeown so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40. Accordingly, the petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. No. 56, are DENIED. AFFIRMED. Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN; Dissent by Judge LEE; Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN; Additional Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN; Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge OWENS; Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge VANDYKE; Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge TUNG; Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge COLLINS. [COURT UPDATE (3/12/26): due to technical issues, the court is unable to attach PDFs to the docket; court will manually email PDFs to parties and district court; docket will be updated as soon as technically issues are resolved] [COURT UPDATE: Order and Amended Opinion Attached]. [Entered: 03/12/2026 07:34 PM] [Edited: 03/12/2026 08:01 PM]","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/65/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","entryNumber":65,"hasText":false,"available":false}],"oral":[{"audio_id":95291,"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/95291/olympus-spa-et-al-v-armstrong-et-al/","cl_case_name":"Olympus Spa v. Armstrong","date_argued":"2024-11-18","duration":2609,"n_chars":32390,"bluebook":"Oral Argument, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 2024)","citeNote":"the recording; a transcript of it cites as “Transcript of Oral Argument at [page], …”"}],"scotus":[],"filings":[{"doc_id":"d9ccec632e40d","docket_id":"69162936","dkt_no":10,"att_no":1,"pages":53,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.10.1.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 10-1"},{"doc_id":"d89c307685b56","docket_id":"69162936","description":"AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF WOMEN’S DECLARATION INTERNATIONAL USA IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY","dkt_no":13,"pages":36,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.13.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"Brief of Women’s Declaration International USA as Amicus Curiae, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 13"},{"doc_id":"d93f8d4316ec5","docket_id":"69162936","description":"JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ................................................... 4","dkt_no":25,"att_no":1,"pages":65,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.25.1.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 25-1"},{"doc_id":"d0d661497110c","docket_id":"69162936","description":"BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON, AND AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE","dkt_no":28,"pages":33,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.28.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 28"},{"doc_id":"d85e32b73ea1d","docket_id":"69162936","dkt_no":31,"pages":33,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.31.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 31"},{"doc_id":"d68bebcd091ed","docket_id":"69162936","description":"BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES AND AFFIRMANCE","dkt_no":32,"pages":40,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.32.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Affirmance, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 32"},{"doc_id":"d7a9d8232f2aa","docket_id":"69162936","dkt_no":42,"pages":36,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.42.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir.), ECF No. 42"},{"doc_id":"d627c0651c76e","docket_id":"69162936","doc_type":"Opinion","filing_date":"2025-05-29","dkt_no":52,"att_no":1,"pages":45,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.52.1.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031, ECF No. 52-1 (9th Cir. May 29, 2025)"},{"doc_id":"dbf0bb2600d99","docket_id":"69162936","doc_type":"Web Cite","filing_date":"2025-05-29","dkt_no":52,"att_no":2,"pages":36,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.52.2.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"Web Cite, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. May 29, 2025), ECF No. 52-2"},{"doc_id":"ddc1443d3ea90","docket_id":"69162936","description":"PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC","filing_date":"2025-06-25","dkt_no":56,"pages":66,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.56.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"Petition for Rehearing En Banc, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. June 25, 2025), ECF No. 56"},{"doc_id":"dd715238b7769","docket_id":"69162936","description":"RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR REHEARING .............................. 2","filing_date":"2025-08-20","dkt_no":64,"pages":22,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.64.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"Response to Petition for Rehearing, *Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2025), ECF No. 64"},{"doc_id":"d07c105844c76","docket_id":"69162936","description":"ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION","filing_date":"2025-05-29","dkt_no":65,"pages":105,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.65.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031, ECF No. 65 (9th Cir. May 29, 2025)"},{"doc_id":"dd5c3f238d0f7","docket_id":"69162936","description":"Supreme Court Letter Received. [Entered: 04/14/2026 01:43 PM]","filing_date":"2026-04-13","dkt_no":68,"pages":2,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.68.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026), ECF No. 68"},{"doc_id":"d0c7b62b9d530","docket_id":"69162936","description":"Supreme Court Letter Received. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:02 PM]","filing_date":"2026-07-17","dkt_no":69,"pages":2,"doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d/gov.uscourts.ca9.9e78ae1c-72b4-45f3-988e-b0e097be3a3d.69.0.pdf","docket_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69162936/","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. July 17, 2026), ECF No. 69"},{"doc_id":"db617f6ba7d59","filing_date":"2025-05-29","doc_url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/pdf/2025/05/29/olympus_spa_v._armstrong.pdf","bluebook":"*Olympus Spa v. Armstrong*, 138 F.4th 1204 (9th Cir. 2025)"}]}