THE POLICY LANDSCAPE
Rights, restrictions & the places between.
Federal HR294 (2025)
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Anti-LGBTQ+
Summary
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: V…
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Session
- 119th Congress
- Stage reported
- Introduced
- First recorded action
- Latest action
- : Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
- Record retrieved
Bill types
As labelled in the project's tracker.
Anti-LGBTQ Resolution
Links
- As introduced (PDF, hosted here)
- LegiScan record(opens another site)
- Official legislature page(opens another site)
- Introduced text (Apr 8, 2025) at Congress.gov(opens another site)PDF, external
- Engrossed text (Apr 9, 2025) at Congress.gov(opens another site)PDF, external
- Bill page on this site
Recorded actions
| Date | Chamber | Action |
|---|---|---|
| House | The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx. | |
| House | The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. | |
| House | Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15. | |
| House | Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480) | |
| House | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294. | |
| House | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. | |
| House | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481) | |
| House | On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91). | |
| House | On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473) | |
| House | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
Legislative status and legal enforcement are different. See the policy areas and the court sources they cite for enforcement.
Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. Used here in modified form.