Separations take effect; DHS simultaneously posts notices stating the three offices are not being abolished
Data/communicationsCOURT
- Date
- Actor
- DHS; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Reyes, J.)
- Agency
- Federal court (COURT)
- Type
- Data/communications
Summary
On the RIF separation date, and after Judge Reyes instructed DHS counsel at a hearing to say so publicly, DHS posted brief notices on each of the three offices' webpages indicating that they would remain operational — reversing the department's earlier position that the offices had been "abolished" and were "no longer operational." The court denied plaintiffs' same-day motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF 34) without prejudice, in part for failure to show irreparable harm. The layoffs themselves proceeded; the reversal was of the label, not the personnel action. Plaintiffs' counsel responded that saying the offices continue to exist "isn't enough" and that DHS must allow them to do their jobs.
Status
The disclaimer of abolition stands as to CRCL and CISOM. It did not survive as to OIDO, which DHS closed on May 4, 2026.
As recorded in the data of . Check the sources for anything newer.
Related litigation
-
Challenged in
CourtListener docket 69938653
Sources
- kennedyhumanrights.org/press/dhs-reverses-decision-to-abolish-three-key-civil-r…(opens another site)
- citizen.org/news/dhs-reverses-decision-to-abolish-three-key-civil-rights-offices(opens another site)
- courtlistener.com/docket/69938653/kennedy-human-rights-center-v-us-department-o…(opens another site)