Robert W. Otto v. City of Boca Raton, Florida

11th Cir. · 9:18-cv-80771 · 2023 · CourtListener

Cite as Otto v. City of Boca Raton, 981 F.3d 854 (11th Cir. 2020)

Circuit11th Cir.Conversion therapy Speech & religious objectionsFavorable

Also filed as: Otto v. City of Boca Raton; Otto v. City of Boca Raton, Florida; Robert Otto v. City of Boca Raton, Florida

The outcome is this project's own coding of how a case turned out, made from the court's record; it is not the court's finding. How it is coded, and how to ask for a correction, is on the About page.

Docket

No. 19-10604

Nature of suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights
Date filed: 2019-02-14
Last filing: 2022-07-20
Terminated: 2020-11-20

No. 9:18-cv-80771

Assigned to: Ed Artau
Referred to: Bruce E. Reinhart
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury demand: None
Date filed: 2018-06-13
Last filing: 2026-06-12
Terminated: 2023-04-11

Proceedings

11th Cir. · No. 19-10604 · Docket on CourtListener

6 documents

Otto v. City of Boca Raton, No. 19-10604 (11th Cir. filed Feb. 14, 2019)

SD Fla · No. 9:18-cv-80771 · Docket on CourtListener

26 documents

Otto v. City of Boca Raton, No. 9:18-cv-80771 (S.D. Fla. filed June 13, 2018)

11th Cir. · No. 19-10604 · Docket on CourtListener

Otto v. City of Boca Raton, No. 19-10604 (11th Cir.)

Opinion: District Court, S.D. Florida · On CourtListener

The court's opinion, in full text on this site

Otto v. City of Boca Raton, 353 F. Supp. 3d 1237 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

Opinion: 11th Cir. · 2020-11-20 · On CourtListener

The court's opinion, in full text on this site

Otto v. City of Boca Raton, 981 F.3d 854 (11th Cir. 2020)

Timeline

2018-06-13 Filed: SD Fla, No. 9:18-cv-80771
2019-02-14 Filed: 11th Cir., No. 19-10604
2020-02-11 Oral argument, 11th Cir.
2020-11-20 Closed: 11th Cir., No. 19-10604
2020-11-20 Opinion, 11th Cir.
2023-04-11 Closed: SD Fla, No. 9:18-cv-80771

Oral argument

11th Cir. · read transcript

2020-02-11 · 36 min

Oral Argument, Otto v. City of Boca Raton, No. 19-10604 (11th Cir. Feb. 11, 2020)

Filings on file (34 in 31 docket entries)

Filings on file
Date	No.	Document	Type	Pages	Source
	6	Main document not on file

	6-1	Motion to Expedite		16	PDF CL
	25	Main document not on file

	25-2	Court Order Filed		1	PDF CL
	32	Appellant's brief filed by Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. O		81	PDF CL
2019-04-16	35	Main document not on file

	35-1	Appendix filed [11 VOLUMES] by Appellants Julie H. Hamilton and Robert W. Otto	Filing	258
	35-1	Plaintiffs-Appellants' Appendix Volume I		258	PDF CL
	39	Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee City of Boca Raton, Flori		61	PDF CL
	1	Complaint		60	PDF CL
	3	Motion for Preliminary Injunction		29	PDF CL
	8	Motion for Preliminary Injunction		29	PDF CL
	25	Order		2	PDF CL
	34	Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim		23	PDF CL
	50	Order		2	PDF CL
	52	Motion for Extension of Time to Mediate		3	PDF CL
	55	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Mediate		1	PDF CL
	62	Response in Opposition to Motion		35	PDF CL
	69	Pretrial Order		8	PDF CL
	96	Main document not on file

	96-1	Affidavit Declaration of Plaintiff Julie H. Hamilton, Ph.D.,		6	PDF CL
	97	Notice of Filing Discovery		2	PDF CL

	97-1	Exhibit 1	Exhibit	4	PDF CL
	105	Exhibit and Witness List		2	PDF CL
	141	Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction		60	PDF CL
	149	USCA Mandate		50	PDF CL
	168	Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction AND Order on Moti		3	PDF CL
	176	- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)		2	PDF CL
	182	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal		68	PDF CL
	205	Report and Recommendations		2	PDF CL
	211	Judgment		2	PDF CL
	213	Main document not on file

	213-1	filing		3	PDF CL
	221	Attorney Fees		15	PDF CL
	240	Report and Recommendations		42	PDF CL

	240	REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 221 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Nontaxable Expenses filed by Julie H. Hamilton, Robert W. Otto. Recommending District Court award Plaintiffs $736,887.45 in costs under §1	Motion	42
	259	Order Adopting Report and Recommendations AND Order on Motio		2	PDF CL
		Document
2020-11-20		Document			PDF CL

Browse and search the 34 court documents in the archive for this case.

Litigation

Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts

Cases tracked

Case name Court Level Issue / type Circuit Outcome Year ≥ Year ≤

loading…

Case	Court	Level	Cir.	Year	Issue / type	Outcome	Docs

Every case in the corpus. Click a case name for its overview; click any column to sort, again to reverse. Each case has one main issue and may raise others (shown as "also…"); the Issue filter finds a case by either. Issues were checked case by case in September 2026. Level, circuit and outcome come from the coded caselaw dataset, so some rows are blank where a case hasn't been coded yet.

Archive stats

Group by

Direct counts from the archive index — instant and exact. Counts are FILINGS (docket entries); the distinct-case figure is shown alongside.

Cases by issue

Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.

Loading…

Reached a final ruling

The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.

Loading…

Case duration

Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.

Loading…

Cases by circuit

A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.

Table view (stages, durations and circuits)

Expert witnesses

Filter Appears in

A curated roster of the recurring expert witnesses in this litigation, with every declaration, expert report, affidavit, deposition and trial-testimony document the corpus holds for each, grouped by case. Coverage is limited by what has been pulled: expert material is heavily attachment-borne, so a witness who testified in ten cases may show fewer here, and some documents are marked in a larger filing — the testimony sits inside an appendix or exhibit set rather than as its own entry.

Judges

Filter Appointed by Coded rulings

The record counts how the judge voted, not how the case came out. Dissents and concurrences are parsed from the opinions themselves ("NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting"), so a judge who dissented is scored against the panel's result — without that, Judge Niemeyer read 4–3 favorable to trans claimants. Partial dissents are shown but left out of the tally. Votes come from separate-writing headings and from the opinion's own joinder block ("Judge Richardson wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson, Judge Niemeyer… joined"), so a judge who joins a dissent without writing one still counts. Judges are resolved to real people against the Federal Judicial Center directory using the deciding court — there are 32 federal judges named Smith, and two Judge Pryors on the Eleventh Circuit. 195 ambiguous name/court pairs were dropped rather than merged, and a case with no opinion text in the corpus keeps the panel result for want of anything better. Small numbers are small numbers: three rulings is not a tendency.