Evancho v. Pine-Richland School District
The outcome is this project's own coding of how a case turned out, made from the court's record; it is not the court's finding. How it is coded, and how to ask for a correction, is on the About page.
Proceedings
Filings on file (5 in 5 docket entries)
| Date | No. | Document | Type | Pages | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion for Omar Gonzalez-Pagan to Appear Pr | 1 | PDF CL | ||
| 38 | Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by NANCY BO | 18 | PDF CL | ||
| 39 | Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by JULIET E | 29 | PDF CL | ||
| 76 | OPINION. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/27/17. (bdb) (E | 48 | PDF CL | ||
| Document |
Browse and search the 5 court documents in the archive for this case.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.