Bernier v. Turbocam, Inc.
Docket
- Assigned to
- Landya B. McCafferty
- Referred to
- Andrea K. Johnstone
- Cause
- 28:451 Employment Discrimination
- Nature of suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Defendant
- Date filed
- 2023-11-21
- Last filing
- 2026-10-26
Proceedings
Recent docket activity
- 2026-10-23 Entry 112#112
- 2026-10-20 Entry 111#111
- 2026-10-13 Entry 110#110
- 2026-09-28 ORDER RE: 66 Motion for Summary Judgment; 74 Motion for Summary Judgment. Turbocam's cross-motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 74) is granted with respect to Bernier's ADA claim (Count IV) but denied with respect to her Title VII claim (Count I). Bernier's cross-motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 66) is denied. Count I is the only count remaining for trial. Within fourteen days, the parties shall submit a new joint proposed scheduling order. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de) (Entered: 09/28/2026)#109
- 2026-09-04 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot 97 Motion to Strike. Text of Order: Bernier moves to strike (doc. no. 97) a declaration Turbocam attached to its reply brief in support of its summary judgment. Turbocam states that the declaration at issue is only relevant to defend against liability for a mixed-motives claim under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(m). The court does not read Bernier's complaint or her summary judgment briefing as attempting to raise such a claim. As the declaration is not relevant to any issues to be addressed at summary judgment, Bernier's motion to strike (doc. no. 97) is denied as moot. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)
Show 1 more
- 2026-07-14 Entry 108#108
Filings on file (89 in 54 docket entries)
Browse and search the 89 court documents in the archive for this case.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.