Chicago v. Noem
Docket
- Assigned to
- Manish S. Shah
- Cause
- 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
- Nature of suit
- 899 Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
- Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Defendant
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 2025-10-20
- Last filing
- 2026-11-02
Proceedings
Recent docket activity
- 2026-11-02 Entry 144#144
- 2026-10-07 ORDER : The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by its attorney, ANDREW S. BOUTROS, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, having filed its Omnibus Motion to Withdraw Designations of Former Assistant United States Attorneys, and having shown good cause in support of its motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the government is granted leave to withdraw the designation of the attorneys identified in its motion as counsel for the United States in the matters identified in Exhibit A to this Order and those counsel shall be removed from the electronic notification list for those matters. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/7/2026: Mailed notice. (tg, ) (Entered: 10/09/2026)#143
- 2026-09-29 MEMORANDUM by Department of Homeland Security in support of motion for summary judgment 141 (Hartzler, Alex) (Entered: 09/29/2026)#142
- 2026-09-29 MOTION by Defendant Department of Homeland Security for summary judgment (Hartzler, Alex) (Entered: 09/29/2026)#141
- 2026-09-11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time 138 is granted, and no appearance is necessary. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is due on or before September 29, 2026; plaintiffs' consolidated response and cross-motion is due on or before November 10, 2026; defendants' consolidated reply and response to plaintiffs' cross-motion is due on or before December 8, 2026; and plaintiffs' reply is due on or before January 6, 2027. Notices Mailed. (psm, ) (Entered: 09/11/2026)#140
Show 1 more
Filings on file (64 in 54 docket entries)
Browse and search the 64 court documents in the archive for this case.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.