Jackson-Edney v. Labrador
Docket
- Assigned to
- Amanda K. Brailsford
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
- Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutional - State Statute
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 2026-04-29
- Last filing
- 2026-07-17
Proceedings
Recent docket activity
- 2026-10-15 ORDER GRANTING STAY - Defendants Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. 59 ) is GRANTED. All proceedings and deadlines in this case are STAYED until issuance of the Ninth Circuits decision in the matter. Within fourteen (14) days of any substantive decisions made by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that materially affect this case, the parties shall file a joint status report advising the Court of the appellate disposition and addressing the status of litigation of remaining issue(s). Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)#71
- 2026-08-17 SCHEDULING ORDER TRACK - The telephonic scheduling conference set for August 20, 2026, is VACATED. To further the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this matter. All dispositive motions and motions for punitive damages, must be filed by June 3, 2027. Motions to amend the pleadings, except for allegations of punitive damages, and motions to join parties must be filed on or before November 20, 2026. All fact discovery must be completed by April 20, 2027. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (lm)#70
- 2026-08-14 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL as Attorney by Qian Zhe Zhang. Request to Turn Electronic Noticing OFF (no longer receive NEFs in this case only). (Zhang, Qian Zhe)#69
- 2026-08-14 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL as Attorney by Qian Zhe Zhang. Request to Leave Noticing ON for this case. (Zhang, Qian Zhe)#68
- 2026-08-13 DISCOVERY PLAN by Daniel Doe, Diego Fable, Emilie Jackson-Edney, Amelia Milette, Peter Poe, Zoey Wagner re 66 Scheduling Conf Form/Litigation Plan (JOINT). (Rosen, Jacob)#67
Show 1 more
Filings on file (13 in 12 docket entries)
Browse and search the 13 court documents in the archive for this case.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.