In Re Administrative Subpoenas to Children's Hospitals
Docket
- Assigned to
- Stephanie A. Gallagher
- Cause
- Motion to Quash
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other Statutory Actions
- Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Defendant
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 2026-05-08
- Last filing
- 2026-05-09
- Assigned to
- Julie Rebecca Rubin
- Cause
- Motion to Quash
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other Statutory Actions
- Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Defendant
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 2026-05-08
- Last filing
- 2026-06-18
- Terminated
- 2026-06-18
Proceedings
Recent docket activity
- 2026-05-09 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonyms, to Waive Requirement Under Local Rule 102.2(a) to Provide Addresses in Complaint Caption, and For Protective Order by In Re Administrative Subpoenas to Children's Hospitals, Parent I.I., Parent J.J., Parent K.K., Parent L.L., Parent M.M., Parent N.N., Parent O.O., Parent P.P., Parent Q.Q., Parent R.R., Parent S.S. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law ISO Movants' Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonyms, etc., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hill, Eve) (Entered: 05/09/2026)#2
- 2026-05-09 COMPLAINT - Motion for Class Certification, to Quash Requests 11-13, and for PI Enjoining DOJ from Seeking Compliance with or Enforcing Subpoena Requests 11-13 against U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Justice Management Division ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-12740053.), filed by Parent M.M., Parent N.N., Parent J.J., Parent O.O., Parent Q.Q., Parent R.R., Parent I.I., Parent P.P., In Re Administrative Subpoenas to Children's Hospitals, Parent K.K., Parent S.S., Parent L.L.. (Attachments: # 1 Motion for Class Certification, to Quash Requests 11-13, and for A Preliminary Injunction Enjoining DOJ From Seeking Compliance With Or Enforcing Subpoena Requests 11-13, # 2 Memorandum of Law ISO Motion, # 3 Exhibit 1 - Parent I.I. Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 2 - Parent J.J. Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 3 - Parent K.K. Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 4 - Parent L.L. Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 5 - Parent M.M. Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 6 - Parent O.O. Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 7 - Parent P.P. Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 8 - Parent Q.Q. Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 9 - Parent S.S. Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 10 - Youth I.I. Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 11 - Youth N.N. Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 12 - Youth R.R. Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 13 - Declaration of Eve L. Hill ISO Motion for Class Certification, # 16 Exhibit 14 - Declaration of Josh Rovenger ISO Motion for Class Certification, # 17 Exhibit 15 - Declaration of Shannon Minter ISO Motion for Class Certification, # 18 Exhibit 16 - Subpoena Duces Tecum, # 19 Text of Proposed Order)(Hill, Eve) (Entered: 05/09/2026)#1
Timeline
- 2026-05-08 Filed: No. 1:26-cv-01834
- 2026-05-08 Filed: No. 8:26-cv-01834
- 2026-06-18 Closed: No. 8:26-cv-01834
Filings on file (32 in 12 docket entries)
Browse and search the 32 court documents in the archive for this case.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.