Stefanick v. Uinta County School District Number One
Docket
- Assigned to
- Scott W. Skavdahl
- Referred to
- Scott P. Klosterman
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
- Nature of suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Non-Prisoner
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 2026-10-29
- Last filing
- 2026-11-02
Proceedings
Recent docket activity
- 2026-11-02 Entry 8#8
- 2026-10-29 Notice of Pro Hac Vice Attorney Appearance by Stephanie Wise on behalf of Kurtis Stefanick Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AWYDC-2852421. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Attorney Appearance (PHV)) (Wise, Stephanie) (Entered: 10/29/2026)#7
- 2026-10-29 ORDER by the US Magistrate Judge Scott P Klosterman granting 2 and 3 MOTIONS for Stephanie Wise and Iris Halpern to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiff Kurtis Stefanick. Email sent to counsel. (Court Staff, smms) (Entered: 10/29/2026)#6
- 2026-10-29 Two (2) Summonses Issued. (Court Staff, shnc) (Entered: 10/29/2026)#5
- 2026-10-29 Notice of Judge Assignment and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Scott W. Skavdahl, Presiding Judge and the Honorable Scott P. Klosterman, Referral Judge. (Court Staff, shnc) (Entered: 10/29/2026)#4
Show 1 more
Filings on file (11 in 7 docket entries)
Browse and search the 11 court documents in the archive for this case.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.