Helen Doe v. Thomas Horne

Court
9th Cir.
Docket number
23-16030
Filed
Terminated
Last filing
Nature of suit
3440 Other Civil Rights
Case
Helen Doe v. Thomas Horne
Cite
Doe v. Horne, No. 23-16030 (9th Cir. filed July 25, 2023)
Source
Docket on CourtListener(opens another site)

The 2 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.

Docket entries

The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.

Clear
Docket entries
No.DateDescriptionDocument
101Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Warren Petersen and Ben Toma in 23-16026, Appellant Thomas C. Horne in 23-16030. Date of service: 11/07/2023. [12821020] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Sauer, Dean) [Entered: 11/07/2023 01:44 PM]Open(opens another site)
102Filed clerk order: The reply brief [101] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12821119] [23-16026, 23-16030] (KT) [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:40 PM]Open(opens another site)
103Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [101] filed by Appellants. [12823176] [23-16026, 23-16030] (SD) [Entered: 11/13/2023 01:54 PM]Open(opens another site)
104Notice of Oral Argument on Thursday, March 14, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA.The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location.View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here.NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using the CM/ECF filing event "Motion for any relief (other than reconsideration or to seal)" and selecting the appropriate relief. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel.Please note however that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so.Be sure to review the GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible).If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Thursday, March 14, 2024. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12843141]. [23-16026, 23-16030] (KS) [Entered: 12/31/2023 06:17 AM]Open(opens another site)
105Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants’ Petition for Initial En Banc Consideration and for En Banc Consideration of Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, Docket No. [15], is DENIED. [12844503] [23-16026, 23-16030] (OC) [Entered: 01/04/2024 04:20 PM]Open(opens another site)
106Filed (ECF) Appellant Thomas C. Horne in 23-16030 Motion to appear remotely for oral argument. Date of service: 01/10/2024. [12846369] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Wilenchik, Dennis) [Entered: 01/10/2024 02:38 PM]Open(opens another site)
107Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellant Horne moves for permission to appear remotely by video. Under this court’s Argument Protocols, “all unrepresented parties and counsel invited to argue before the court are expected to appear in person. If an in-person appearance would pose a hardship, the unrepresented party or counsel may file a motion to appear remotely.” Appellant’s motion does not demonstrate hardship. Accordingly, the motion, Dkt. [106], is DENIED. [12858477] [23-16026, 23-16030] (AF) [Entered: 02/12/2024 09:37 AM]Open(opens another site)
108Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Justin R. Rassi for Appellees Helen Doe, James Doe, Kate Roe and Robert Roe. Hearing in San Francisco on 03/14/2024 at 09:00 A.M (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 20) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 02/13/2024. [12859040] [23-16026] --[COURT UPDATE: Spread to case 23-16030. 02/13/2024 by TYL] (Rassi, Justin) [Entered: 02/13/2024 09:21 AM]Open(opens another site)
109Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Justin D. Smith (James Otis Law Group, LLC, 13321 N. Outer Forty Road, Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63017) for Appellants Warren Petersen and Ben Toma in 23-16026. Date of service: 02/15/2024. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12860324] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Smith, Justin) [Entered: 02/15/2024 11:23 AM]Open(opens another site)
110Added Attorney Justin D. Smith for Appellants Ben Toma and Warren Petersen, in case 23-16026. [12860363] [23-16026, 23-16030] (HH) [Entered: 02/15/2024 11:42 AM]Open(opens another site)
111Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Justin D. Smith for Appellants Warren Petersen and Ben Toma in 23-16026. Hearing in San Francisco on 03/14/2024 at 9:00 a.m. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1, 3rd Floor Rm 338). Filer sharing argument time: Yes. (Argument minutes: 10) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 02/15/2024. [12860448] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Smith, Justin) [Entered: 02/15/2024 02:15 PM]Open(opens another site)
112Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Maria Syms (Arizona Department of Education 1535 W. Jefferson St. Bin #50 Phoenix, AZ 85007) for Appellant Thomas C. Horne in 23-16030. Date of service: 02/15/2024. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12860586] [23-16030, 23-16026] (Syms, Maria) [Entered: 02/15/2024 05:18 PM]Open(opens another site)
113Added Attorney Maria M. Syms for Appellant Thomas C. Horne, in case 23-16030. [12860660] [23-16026, 23-16030] (HH) [Entered: 02/16/2024 09:33 AM]Open(opens another site)
114Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Ms. Maria M. Syms for Appellant Thomas C. Horne in 23-16030. Hearing in San Francisco on 03/14/2024 at 9-10am (Courtroom: Ctrm 1, 3rd flr, rm 338 95 7th Street, San Fran 94103). Filer sharing argument time: Yes. (Argument minutes: 5) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 02/16/2024. [12860798] [23-16030, 23-16026] (Syms, Maria) [Entered: 02/16/2024 12:17 PM]Open(opens another site)
115ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and DAVID A. EZRA. The audio and video recordings of this hearing are available on our website at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [12869356] [23-16026, 23-16030] (BJK) [Entered: 03/14/2024 03:18 PM]Open(opens another site)
116Filed (ECF) Appellant Thomas C. Horne in 23-16030 Motion to take judicial notice of. Date of service: 04/04/2024. [12875130] [23-16030, 23-16026] (Wilenchik, Dennis) [Entered: 04/04/2024 04:07 PM]Open(opens another site)
117Filed (ECF) Appellees Helen Doe, James Doe, Kate Roe and Robert Roe in 23-16026, 23-16030 response opposing motion ([116] Motion (ECF Filing), [116] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 04/15/2024. [12877481] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Fraser, Eric) [Entered: 04/15/2024 02:50 PM]Open(opens another site)
118Filed (ECF) Appellees Helen Doe, Kate Roe, James Doe and Robert Roe in 23-16026, 23-16030 citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 04/17/2024. [12878088] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Fraser, Eric) [Entered: 04/17/2024 03:09 PM]Open(opens another site)
119Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Petersen and Ben Toma in 23-16026 Correspondence: Response to Appellees' Rule 28(j) letter. Date of service: 04/18/2024 [12878286] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Sauer, Dean) [Entered: 04/18/2024 12:15 PM]Open(opens another site)
120Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellant’s motion to take judicial notice, Dkt. [116], is denied. [12905795] [23-16026, 23-16030] (AH) [Entered: 09/09/2024 09:00 AM]Open(opens another site)
121FILED OPINION (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and DAVID A. EZRA) AFFIRMED. Judge: MBC Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12905803] [23-16026, 23-16030] (AH) [Entered: 09/09/2024 09:03 AM]Open(opens another site)
122Filed (ECF) Appellees Robert Roe, James Doe, Helen Doe and Kate Roe in 23-16026 bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of 45.30 USD. Date of service: 09/23/2024 [12908229] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Fraser, Eric) [Entered: 09/23/2024 03:43 PM]Open(opens another site)
123MANDATE ISSUED.(MMM, MBC and DAE) Costs taxed against Appellants in the amount of $45.30. [12909213] [23-16026, 23-16030] (HH) [Entered: 10/01/2024 09:58 AM]Open(opens another site)
124Filed (ECF) Appellees Helen Doe, James Doe, Kate Roe and Robert Roe in 23-16026, 23-16030 Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Transfer Consideration of Attorneys' Fees on Appeal to the District Court]. Date of service: 10/07/2024. [12909920] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Fraser, Eric) [Entered: 10/07/2024 11:46 AM]Open(opens another site)
125Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Petersen and Ben Toma in 23-16026 response to motion ([124] Motion (ECF Filing), [124] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 10/17/2024. [12911341] [23-16026, 23-16030] (Sauer, Dean) [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:00 PM]Open(opens another site)
126Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 24-449 Filed on: 10/17/2024 Cert Petition Action 1: Pending [12912089] [23-16026, 23-16030] (RL) [Entered: 10/23/2024 11:09 AM]Open(opens another site)
127Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and DAVID A. EZRA): Plaintiffs-Appellees move to transfer consideration of attorneys’ fees on appeal to the district court under Circuit Rule 39-1.8. Dkt. [124]. We deny the motion as unnecessary. If plaintiffs ultimately achieve prevailing party status, they may ask the district court to award them attorneys’ fees associated with this interlocutory preliminary injunction appeal. See Yamada v. Snipes, 786 F.3d 1182, 1207–10 (9th Cir. 2015). No order from this court transferring fees to the district court is required. See id. MOTION DENIED. [12912421] [23-16026, 23-16030] (AF) [Entered: 10/24/2024 04:53 PM]Open(opens another site)