Tirrell v. Edelblut
- Docket number
- 1:24-cv-00251
- Filed
- Last filing
- Assigned judge
- Landya B. McCafferty
- Referred judge
- Talesha L. Saint-Marc
- Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutional - State Statute
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Cite
- Tirrell v. Edelblut, No. 1:24-cv-00251 (D.N.H. filed Aug. 16, 2024)
The 254 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.
Docket entries
The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.
| No. | Date | Description | Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| 135 | ANSWER to 95 Amended Complaint,, by Female Athletes United.(Widmalm-Delphonse, Johannes) (Entered: 07/23/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 136 | Assented to MOTION to Clarify Endorsed Order granting 134 Motion to Extend Time filed by Pamela Bondi, Denise L Carter, Donald Trump, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Justice.(Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 07/25/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 137 | REPLACED BY DOCUMENT 139 . Joint Motion to Hold in Abeyance by Kate Cassady, Andrew Cline, Frank Edelblut, James Fricchione, James Laboe, Ann Lane, Rajesh Nair, Philip Nazzaro(DeGrandis, Michael) Modified on 8/14/2025 to correct event from Misc. Filing to Motion (de). Modified on 8/15/2025 to add: REPLACED BY DOCUMENT 139 (de). (Entered: 08/13/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 138 | MOTION to Extend Time to Object/Respond to 129 MOTION to Dismiss, 128 MOTION to Dismiss to two weeks after resolution of Motion to Hold in Abeyance filed by Parker Tirrell, Iris Turmelle.Follow up on Objection on 8/27/2025. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Erchull, Chris) (Entered: 08/13/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 139 | Amended Assented to MOTION Hold Case in Abeyance Jointly Amending & Substituting ECF No. 137 filed by Kate Cassady, Andrew Cline, Frank Edelblut, James Fricchione, James Laboe, Ann Lane, Rajesh Nair, Philip Nazzaro. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A: Civil Form 3)(DeGrandis, Michael) (Entered: 08/14/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 140 | NOTICE of Attorney Withdrawal by Brandon Francis Chase on behalf of Frank Edelblut(Chase, Brandon) (Entered: 09/03/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 141 | NOTICE of Withdrawal of counsel by Pamela Bondi, Denise L Carter, Donald Trump, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Justice.(Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 10/22/2025) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 142 | ///STIPULATION of Dismissal as to All Claims Against All Defendants by Parker Tirrell, Iris Turmelle(Erchull, Chris) (Entered: 07/08/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| No description | |||
| ENDORSED ORDER granting 134 Motion to Extend Time to Object/Respond re 128 Motion to Dismiss, 129 Motion to Dismiss. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc.Follow up on Objection on 8/22/2025. (de) | |||
| No description | |||
| ENDORSED ORDER granting 136 Motion to Clarify. Text of Order: Granted. The United States shall have 21 days from the date of Plaintiffs' filing their opposition to file its reply. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc.(vln) | |||
| No description | |||
| No description | |||
| ENDORSED ORDER granting 138 Motion to Extend Time to Object/Respond to 129 MOTION to Dismiss, 128 MOTION to Dismiss; granting 139 Assented to Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de) | |||
| Current deadlines terminated and trial date continued per Endorsed Order granting motion to hold case in abeyance [until the United States Supreme Court decides Little v.Hecox, No. 24-38 (July 3, 2025) and West Virginia v. B.P.J., No. 24-43 (July 3,2025)]. (de) | |||
| No description | |||
| ENDORSED ORDER. Text of Order: The stay is lifted. Parties shall submit a new joint proposed scheduling order within 14 days. Given that the Supreme Court's opinion in B.P.J has significantly impacted the legal landscape applicable to plaintiffs' claims, the court finds it appropriate to deny the pending motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 128 & 129) without prejudice to refiling within thirty days. Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 47 (2016) ("[D]istrict courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets...with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases."). So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de) | |||
| No description | |||
| No description |
20 entries