Olympus Spa, et al. v. Armstrong, et al.

Court
9th Cir.
Docket number
23-4031
Filed
Last filing
Case
Olympus Spa v. Armstrong
Cite
Olympus Spa v. Armstrong, No. 23-4031 (9th Cir. filed Dec. 8, 2023)
Source
Docket on CourtListener(opens another site)

The 14 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.

Docket entries

The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.

Clear
Docket entries
No.DateDescriptionDocument
51CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellee Andreta Armstrong, Appellee Madison Imiola. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:17 PM]Open(opens another site)
52OPINION (M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE) AFFIRMED. Opinion by Judge McKeown; Dissent by Judge Lee. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:27 AM]Open(opens another site)
53MOTION to Extend Time to File Petition for Rehearing filed by Appellant Myoon Woon Lee, Appellant Sun Lee, Appellant Jane Does. [Entered: 05/30/2025 03:27 PM]Open(opens another site)
54TEXT CLERK ORDER. The motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing (DE 53) is granted. [Entered: 06/02/2025 01:32 PM]Open(opens another site)
55STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Olympus Spa, Appellant Myoon Woon Lee, Appellant Sun Lee, Appellant Jane Doe, Appellant Jane Does. [Entered: 06/23/2025 03:31 PM]Open(opens another site)
56PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Appellant Olympus Spa, Appellant Myoon Woon Lee, Appellant Sun Lee, Appellant Jane Doe, Appellant Jane Does. [Entered: 06/25/2025 01:42 PM]Open(opens another site)
57AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Women's Declaration International USA.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 6/30/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 06/27/2025 10:01 AM] [Edited: 06/30/2025 11:14 AM]Open(opens another site)
58ORDER FILED. M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE  Appellees are directed to file a response to the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc within 21 days of the date of this order. The response shall not exceed 15 pages in length unless it complies with the alternative length limitation of 4,200 words. 9th Cir. R. 40-1. [Entered: 07/16/2025 03:03 PM]Open(opens another site)
59TEXT CLERK ORDER. The motion for leave to file amicus brief (DE 57) is granted. [Entered: 07/16/2025 03:05 PM]Open(opens another site)
60CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 57 by Women's Declaration International USA is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/16/2025 03:21 PM]Open(opens another site)
61MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Petition For Rehearing (DE 53.1) filed by Appellee Andreta Armstrong, Appellee Madison Imiola. [Entered: 07/25/2025 04:22 PM]Open(opens another site)
62ORDER FILED. M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE Appellees Armstrong and Imiola’s (collectively, “Washington”) motion for a 14-day extension of time to file a response to Olympus Spa’s combined petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. No. 61, is granted. Washington will file its response by August 20, 2025. [Entered: 07/28/2025 04:29 PM]Open(opens another site)
63DEFECTIVE --- PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Appellee Andreta Armstrong, Appellee Madison Imiola. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 64] [Entered: 08/20/2025 07:27 PM] [Edited: 08/21/2025 09:00 AM]Open(opens another site)
64RESPONSE to Petition for Panel Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc (DE 56) filed by Appellee Andreta Armstrong, Appellee Madison Imiola. [Court entered filing to correct DE 63] [Entered: 08/21/2025 08:59 AM]Open(opens another site)
65ORDER and AMENDED OPINION (M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE) The opinion filed May 29, 2025, and reported at 138 F.4th 1204 is hereby amended. The dissent is unchanged. The amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. Judge McKeown and Judge Gould voted to deny appellants’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Lee voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Gould and Judge Lee vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge McKeown so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40. Accordingly, the petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. No. 56, are DENIED. AFFIRMED. Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN; Dissent by Judge LEE; Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN; Additional Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN; Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge OWENS; Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge VANDYKE; Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge TUNG; Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge COLLINS. [COURT UPDATE (3/12/26): due to technical issues, the court is unable to attach PDFs to the docket; court will manually email PDFs to parties and district court; docket will be updated as soon as technically issues are resolved] [COURT UPDATE: Order and Amended Opinion Attached]. [Entered: 03/12/2026 07:34 PM] [Edited: 03/12/2026 08:01 PM]Open(opens another site)
66UPDATED ORDER FOR PUBLICATION FILED. (M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE) Attached reformatted order and webcite.  [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:06 AM]Open(opens another site)
67MANDATE ISSUED M. Margaret McKEOWN, Ronald M. GOULD, Kenneth K. LEE.  The judgment of this Court, entered 5/29/2025 and amended 3/12/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 03/20/2026 09:01 AM]Open(opens another site)
68Supreme Court Letter Received. [Entered: 04/14/2026 01:43 PM]Open(opens another site)
69Supreme Court Letter Received. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:02 PM]Open(opens another site)
70Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed.  [Entered: 09/04/2026 11:31 AM]Open(opens another site)