City of Huntington Beach, et al. v. Newsom, et al.

Court
9th Cir.
Docket number
25-3826
Filed
Last filing
Case
City of Huntington Beach, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
Cite
City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom, No. 25-3826 (9th Cir. filed June 18, 2025)
Source
Docket on CourtListener(opens another site)

The 18 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.

Docket entries

The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.

Docket entries
No.DateDescriptionDocument
48MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Parent. [Entered: 11/13/2025 07:19 AM]Open(opens another site)
49MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Parent. [Entered: 11/13/2025 07:22 AM]Open(opens another site)
50RESPONSE to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 49) filed by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond. [Entered: 11/18/2025 10:19 PM]Open(opens another site)
51REPLY to Response to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 50) filed by Appellant Parent. [Entered: 11/25/2025 08:03 AM]Open(opens another site)
52CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant Parent. [Entered: 12/29/2025 10:14 AM]Open(opens another site)
53ORDER FILED. Daniel P. COLLINS, Kenneth K. LEE, Lucy H. KOH Before the court is Plaintiffs-Appellants’ “Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, Only as to Parent 7A” (Dkt. 49), and their accompanying motion for judicial notice (Dkt. 48). On September 12, 2025, we denied Plaintiffs-Appellants’ previous motion for an injunction pending appeal, concluding that they had failed to make a sufficient showing of Article III standing. See Dkt. 42. Specifically, we held that Plaintiffs-Appellants had failed to adequately show that their asserted “future injuries are fairly traceable to AB 1955 and would be redressed by a decision invalidating AB 1955 in whole or in part.” Id. at 5. In the instant motion, Plaintiff-Appellant 7A, whose child attends high school in an unspecified school district in Orange County, asserts that she has now “fill[ed] th[e] gap” identified in our prior order. We disagree and deny the motion... Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs-Appellants’ renewed motion for preliminary injunction pending appeal (Dkt. 49) and their accompanying motion for judicial notice (Dkt. 48). (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 02/19/2026 03:54 PM]Open(opens another site)
54ORDER FILED. Daniel P. COLLINS, Kenneth K. LEE, Lucy H. KOH The parties are hereby directed to file simultaneous supplemental briefs addressing the impact, if any, of the Supreme Court’s order in Mirabelli v. Bonta, No. 25A810, 607 U.S. ___ (2026), 2026 WL 575049 (U.S. Mar. 2, 2026), on the issues presented in this case. Each side shall file its respective supplemental brief by March 13, 2026. Each supplemental brief shall conform to the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(1)–(6) and shall not exceed 2,500 words, excluding the items listed in Fed. R. App. P. 32(f). [Entered: 03/03/2026 01:59 PM]Open(opens another site)
55SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 3/13/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 03/13/2026 01:34 PM] [Edited: 03/13/2026 04:08 PM]Open(opens another site)
56CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 55 by Appellees is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/13/2026 04:09 PM]Open(opens another site)
57SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant Parent. [Entered: 03/13/2026 07:00 PM]Open(opens another site)
58MOTION to Reconsider Nondispositive Order filed by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant Parent. [Entered: 03/13/2026 07:18 PM]Open(opens another site)
59CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 57 by Appellants is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:10 AM]Open(opens another site)
60RESPONSE to Motion to Reconsider Nondispositive Order (DE 58) filed by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond. [Entered: 03/16/2026 06:16 PM]Open(opens another site)
61ORDER FILED. Daniel P. COLLINS, Kenneth K. LEE, Lucy H. KOH Before the court is “Motion for Reconsideration of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal” (Dkt. 58), filed on behalf of Plaintiffs-Appellants 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A, and 10A (“Movants”).1 We have twice denied motions for preliminary injunctions pending appeal, concluding that the relevant Plaintiffs-Appellants had failed to make a sufficient showing of Article III standing. Dkts. 42, 53. In the instant motion, Movants assert that, in light of Mirabelli v. Bonta, 607 U.S. 492 (2026), we should reconsider our denial of a preliminary injunction pending appeal. We agree, grant the motion, and grant a preliminary injunction as described below. . . . Accordingly, we grant Movants’ motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 58).3 Pending the disposition of this appeal and the issuance of our mandate, we enjoin Defendants-Appellees from taking any action to enforce Sections 5 and 6 of AB 1955 (codified as California Education Code §§ 220.3(a), 220.5(a)) as to Parents 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A, and 10A with respect to information about their respective children exhibiting symptoms of gender dysphoria. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 06/18/2026 04:25 PM]Open(opens another site)
62CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 29 by American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 06/18/2026 04:50 PM]Open(opens another site)
63REQUEST for Publication filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants in Chino Valley Unified School District v. Newsom, No. 25-3686. [Entered: 06/24/2026 12:46 PM]Open(opens another site)
64Response to Request for Publication filed by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond. [COURT UPDATE: Fixed docket text to show parties.] [Entered: 07/08/2026 10:17 AM] [Edited: 07/08/2026 12:40 PM]Open(opens another site)
65CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond. [Entered: 07/08/2026 10:29 AM]Open(opens another site)
66ORDER FILED. Daniel P. COLLINS, Kenneth K. LEE, Lucy H. KOH The pending request of certain non-parties for publication of the Court’s June 18, 2026 order granting reconsideration (Dkt. No. 63) is DENIED. [Entered: 07/09/2026 09:08 AM]Open(opens another site)
67CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant Parent. [Entered: 07/09/2026 02:51 PM]Open(opens another site)

20 entries