County of Santa Clara v. Noem

Court
N.D. Cal.
Docket number
3:25-cv-08330
Filed
Last filing
Assigned judge
William H. Orrick
Referred judge
Virginia K. Demarchi
Nature of suit
890 Other Statutory Actions
Cause
05:551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jurisdiction
U.S. Government Defendant
Jury demand
None
Case
County of Santa Clara v. Noem
Source
Docket on CourtListener(opens another site)

The 181 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.

Docket entries

The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.

Clear
Docket entries
No.DateDescriptionDocument
51NOTICE of Appearance filed by Kate Stanford on behalf of County of Marin (Stanford, Kate) (Filed on 10/7/2025) (Entered: 10/07/2025)Open(opens another site)
52NOTICE of Appearance filed by Edward F. Sears on behalf of County of Marin (Sears, Edward) (Filed on 10/7/2025) (Entered: 10/07/2025)Open(opens another site)
53ORDER Granting 50 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to Jonathan Salamas. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/7/2025. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2025) (Entered: 10/07/2025)Open(opens another site)
54Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting 21 Motion to Shorten Time. Responses due by 10/14/2025 12:00 p.m. Replies due by 10/17/2025 5:00 p.m. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 10/22/2025 02:00 PM.(wholc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2025) (Entered: 10/07/2025)Open(opens another site)
55ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Judge Edward J. Davila and Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2025) Modified on 10/8/2025 (smc, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 10/08/2025)Open(opens another site)
56NOTICE of Appearance filed by Elisa Tanya Tolentino on behalf of City Of San Jose (Tolentino, Elisa) (Filed on 10/9/2025) (Entered: 10/09/2025)Open(opens another site)
57NOTICE of Appearance filed by Katrina Leigh Eiland on behalf of City of Berkeley (Eiland, Katrina) (Filed on 10/9/2025) (Entered: 10/09/2025)Open(opens another site)
58NOTICE of Appearance filed by Brian Patrick Eggleston on behalf of City Of San Jose (Eggleston, Brian) (Filed on 10/9/2025) (Entered: 10/09/2025)Open(opens another site)
59NOTICE of Appearance filed by Stephen A. Hylas on behalf of City of Berkeley (Hylas, Stephen) (Filed on 10/9/2025) (Entered: 10/09/2025)Open(opens another site)
60NOTICE of Appearance filed by Farimah Faiz Brown on behalf of City of Berkeley (Brown, Farimah) (Filed on 10/9/2025) (Entered: 10/09/2025)Open(opens another site)
61STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 54 Order on Motion to Shorten Time, filed by Kristi Noem, United States Department of Homeland Security, David Richardson, Federal Emergency Management Agency. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Tagert, John) (Filed on 10/10/2025) (Entered: 10/10/2025)Open(opens another site)
62ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY by Judge William H. Orrick denying 35 Administrative Motion stay. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2025) (Entered: 10/10/2025)Open(opens another site)
63ORDER GRANTING 61 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING AND HEARING, EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO GRANT AWARDS, AND SET DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. Deadlines reset as to 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 10/24/2025. Replies due by 11/4/2025. Motion Hearing reset for 11/19/2025 10:00 AM via Videoconference before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/10/2025. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2025) (Entered: 10/10/2025)Open(opens another site)
64NOTICE of Appearance filed by H. Luke Edwards on behalf of City Of Oakland (Edwards, H.) (Filed on 10/15/2025) (Entered: 10/15/2025)Open(opens another site)
65NOTICE of Appearance filed by Divya Musinipally on behalf of City Of Oakland (Musinipally, Divya) (Filed on 10/15/2025) (Entered: 10/15/2025)Open(opens another site)
66OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) filed byKristi Noem, United States Department of Homeland Security, David Richardson, Federal Emergency Management Agency. (Tagert, John) (Filed on 10/24/2025) (Entered: 10/24/2025)Open(opens another site)
67MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21281536.) filed by Martin Luther King, Jr. County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Washington State Supreme Court Certificate of Good Standing)(Holcomb, Alison) (Filed on 10/27/2025) (Entered: 10/27/2025)Open(opens another site)
68Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting 67 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Alison Holcomb. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2025) (Entered: 10/28/2025)Open(opens another site)
69REPLY (re 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) filed byCity and County of San Francisco. (Attachments: # 1 Supp. Decl. of David Louk ISO MPI, # 2 Exhibit 10 to Decl. David Louk, # 3 Exhibit 11 to Decl. David Louk, # 4 Exhibit 12 to Decl. David Louk)(Mills, Steven) (Filed on 11/4/2025) (Entered: 11/04/2025)Open(opens another site)
70Request for Judicial Notice re 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice ISO Plaintiffs' MPI filed byCity and County of San Francisco. (Attachments: # 1 Ex. 13 to Supp. RJN ISO MPI, # 2 Ex. 14 to Supp. RJN ISO MPI, # 3 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) 19 ) (Mills, Steven) (Filed on 11/4/2025) (Entered: 11/04/2025)Open(opens another site)
71STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byCity and County of San Francisco. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) 19 ) (Mills, Steven) (Filed on 11/17/2025) (Entered: 11/17/2025)Open(opens another site)
72CLERKS NOTICE RE ZOOM HEARING - The Hearing on 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction will be held via Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/who Civ LR 77-3(d). Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2025) (Entered: 11/18/2025)Open(opens another site)
73Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William H. Orrick: Motion Hearing held on 11/19/2025 re 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion taken under submission; written order to follow. Total Time in Court: 39 minutes. Court Reporter: Kendra Steppler. Plaintiff Attorneys: Steven Mills, Sharanya Mohan, and Raphael Rajendra. Defendant Attorney: John Stephen Tagert. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/19/2025) (Entered: 11/19/2025)Open(opens another site)
74ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge William H. Orrick re: 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2025) (Entered: 11/21/2025)Open(opens another site)
75STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Submission of Joint Status Report and Deadline to Respond to the Complaint filed by Federal Emergency Management Agency, Kristi Noem, David Richardson, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Tagert, John) (Filed on 11/28/2025) (Entered: 11/28/2025)Open(opens another site)
76ORDER GRANTING 75 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/1/2025. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2025) (Entered: 12/01/2025)Open(opens another site)
77STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Joint Status Report with Stipulated Proposed Order Addressing Further Proceedings re 76 Order filed by Federal Emergency Management Agency, Kristi Noem, David Richardson, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Order)(Tagert, John) (Filed on 12/12/2025) JOINT STATUS REPORT ADDRESSING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS (Entered: 12/12/2025)Open(opens another site)
78NOTICE of Appearance filed by Jennifer Marie Martin on behalf of City of San Diego (Martin, Jennifer) (Filed on 12/16/2025) (Entered: 12/16/2025)Open(opens another site)
79ORDER GRANTING 77 STIPULATED REQUEST WITHIN THE JOINT STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIES by Judge William H. Orrick. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2025) (Entered: 12/16/2025)Open(opens another site)
80***DOCKETED IN INCORRECT CASE; PLEASE DISREGARD***FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 1/20/2026 02:00 PM via videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 1/13/2026. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/18/2025. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2025) Modified on 12/19/2025 (jmd, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 12/18/2025)Open(opens another site)
81CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING - Case Management Conference set for 1/20/2026 02:00 PM (Joint case management statement due 1/13/2026). This proceeding will be held via Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/who Civ LR 77-3(d). Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2025) (Entered: 12/19/2025)Open(opens another site)
82ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2025) (Entered: 12/31/2025)Open(opens another site)
83ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Bellingham (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
84ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Tucson (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
85ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Alameda (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
86ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of San Diego (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
87ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options County of LA and Fire Protection District (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
88ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options County of Marin (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
89ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Oakland (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
90ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Pasadena (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
91ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Pierce County (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
92ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Sacramento (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
93ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of San Jose (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
94ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Santa Rosa (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
95ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Snohomish County (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
96ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Sonoma County Plaintiffs (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
97ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options County of Santa Clara (Godbey, Hannah) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
98ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options County of San Mateo (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
99ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Martin Luther King, Jr. County (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)
100ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options City of Petaluma (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 1/5/2026) (Entered: 01/05/2026)Open(opens another site)