Joslin v. U.S. Department of the Interior

Court
E.D. Cal.
Docket number
1:26-cv-02029
Filed
Last filing
Assigned judge
Jennifer L. Thurston
Referred judge
Frank J. Singer
Nature of suit
440 Civil Rights: Other
Cause
05:552 Right to Privacy Act
Jurisdiction
U.S. Government Defendant
Jury demand
None
Case
Joslin v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Source
Docket on CourtListener(opens another site)

The 39 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.

Docket entries

The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.

Clear
Docket entries
No.DateDescriptionDocument
51OPPOSITION by Shannon SJ Joslin to 50 Motion to Dismiss,. (Wydman, Margaret) (Entered: 08/31/2026)Open(opens another site)
52REPLY by Pam Bondi, Jessica Bowron, Doug Burgum, Eric Grant, National Park Service, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of the Interior to RESPONSE to 50 Motion to Dismiss,. (Davidson, Rachel) (Entered: 09/14/2026)Open(opens another site)
53MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) Pursuant to Local Rule 302, the filed motion to dismiss 50 will be heard and decided by the undersigned. As set forth in the Court's standing order, no hearing will be calendared, and the matter will be decided on the papers. As a result of the ongoing judicial resource emergency in this District, approximately 100 regular civil motions remain under submission before the undersigned. As a result, it is likely to be six or more months until the motion(s) in this matter is resolved. The Court reiterates that magistrate judge consent can alleviate the delay caused by the resource emergency. The parties SHALL reconsider magistrate judge consent for all purposes or only for this pending motion. In addition, the parties are reminded of their ongoing obligation to inform the Court of any changed circumstances that have rendered all or part of any pending motion moot. Finally, the parties are informed that the undersigned generally requires a formal settlement conference take place before any civil case proceeds to trial. Should the parties jointly wish to schedule a settlement conference, they are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Irma Munoz at [email address removed] signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on September 22, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 09/22/2026)Open(opens another site)
54ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer on 10/15/2026. Because the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 50 ) remains pending with the assigned district judge, the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE currently set for November 18, 2026, is continued to January 25, 2027, at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (FJS) before Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer. The parties shall file a Joint Scheduling Report seven (7) days prior to the conference. The parties shall appear at the conference remotely by telephone. The parties will be provided with the telephonic conference information by the Courtroom Deputy prior to the conference. The conference number and password are confidential and are not to be shared. (Deputy Clerk CLA)Open(opens another site)
Case Assigned to Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan. (zmtm) [Transferred from dcd on 3/13/2026.]
MINUTE ORDER: The Plaintiff has filed a 1 Complaint and 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction but it does not yet appear that the Defendants have been served. The Court therefore ORDERS that within 48 hours of the Plaintiff effecting service, the Parties must meet and confer and file a joint status report addressing the following issues: (1) a proposed briefing schedule on the motion; (2) a statement addressing whether a hearing on the motion is necessary, and if so, three proposed dates and times for such a hearing; and (3) a statement addressing whether the Parties anticipate factual disputes between the declarants, and if so, whether the Parties believe an evidentiary hearing will be necessary to resolve the disputes and a proposal for proceeding with such a hearing, see LCvR 65.1(d). The Parties may also address any other issues that they believe will be helpful to the Court. Any disagreements should be noted in the Joint Status Report. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 2/23/2026. (lcal) [Transferred from dcd on 3/13/2026.]
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the 7 Joint Status Report, the Court ORDERS the Defendants to file their motion to transfer by March 2, 2026. The Plaintiff must file their opposition to the Defendants' Motion by March 5, 2026. The Defendants must file any reply in support of their motion by March 9, 2026. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 2/25/2026. (lcal) [Transferred from dcd on 3/13/2026.]
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description