City of Shoreline v. United States Department of Transportation
- Court
- W.D. Wash.
- Docket number
- 2:26-cv-01311
- Filed
- Last filing
- Assigned judge
- Barbara J. Rothstein
- Nature of suit
- 899 Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
- Cause
- 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act
- Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Defendant
- Jury demand
- None
The 10 court documents filed in this docket, as listed for its case.
Docket entries
The entries the archive holds for this docket. For the full docket, use the link above.
| No. | Date | Description | Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-01435; 2:25-cv-00814, by Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/16/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 2 | COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants filed by City of Shoreline. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(King, Margaret) (Prepayment Waived) Modified on 4/17/2026 to add receipt # AWAWDC-9619672 (MIH). (Entered: 04/17/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 3 | Notice of Filing Deficiency re 2 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MIH)(cc attorney Julie Ainsworth-Taylor via Ad Hoc) (Entered: 04/17/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 4 | Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to all Defendants (MIH) (Entered: 04/17/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 5 | MINUTE ORDER made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly hereby TRANSFERS the above captioned case as related to 2:25cv00814BJR and 2:25cv01435BJR to the Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein. All future pleadings shall bear the cause number 2:26cv01311BJR.(CJS) (Entered: 04/22/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 6 | STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. (NAW) (Entered: 04/23/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 7 | NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Julie K. Ainsworth-Taylor on behalf of Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (Ainsworth-Taylor, Julie) (Entered: 04/27/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 8 | AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to Defendants on 4/20/2026, filed by Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 9 | APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kunyu Ching FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Shoreline (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9653394 (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 10 | APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gary DiBianco FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Shoreline (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9653435 (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 11 | APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Amy Powell FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Shoreline (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9653448 (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 12 | ORDER re 9 10 11 Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorneys Kunyu Ching, Gary DiBianco, Amy Powell for City of Shoreline, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/30/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 13 | NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah Louise Bishop on behalf of Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 05/29/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 14 | Stipulated MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE, filed by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 05/29/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 15 | ORDER granting the Parties' 14 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 16 | Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Plaintiffs in 2:25-cv-01435-BJR, City of Seattle v. Trump et al.The Clerk placed on this docket pursuant to 15 ORDER re the Parties' 14 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The parties are directed to file the remaining briefs in both cases. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(CJS) Modified on 6/10/2026 to reflect "second" per chambers request (CJS). (Entered: 06/02/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 17 | RESPONSE, by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation to 16 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction.The Clerk placed on this docket pursuant to 15 ORDER re the Parties' 14 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The parties are directed to file the remaining briefs in both cases. (CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 18 | REPLY, filed by All Plaintiffs, TO RESPONSE to 16 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Tricia Juhnke and Exhibits 1-5, # 2 Proposed Order)(Ching, Kunyu) Modified by Clerk on 6/10/2026 to properly reflect document and regenerated NEF (CJS). (Entered: 06/08/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 19 | SURREPLY filed by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation re 16 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 06/12/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 20 | ORDER GRANTING THE CITY OF SHORELINE'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Shoreline's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Shoreline Dkt. 18 ) is GRANTED. By the end of the third court day after issuance of this Order, Defendants shall file on this Court's electronic docket and serve upon Plaintiffs a Status Report documenting the actions they have taken to comply with this Order, including a copy of the notice and an explanation as to whom the notice was sent. This Order shall remain in effect pending further orders from this Court. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (APH) (Entered: 06/29/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 21 | ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 7/28/2026, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 8/4/2026, Joint Status Report due by 8/11/2026. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (NAW) (Entered: 06/30/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 22 | Stipulated MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER, filed by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 07/01/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 23 | ORDER granting the Parties' 22 Stipulated MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (APH) (Entered: 07/02/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 24 | DECLARATION of Sarah Louise Bishop re 20 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction,, by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 07/08/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 25 | STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CASE PLAN by parties (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CASE PLAN)(Ching, Kunyu) (Entered: 08/11/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 26 | STIPULATION AND ORDER re Parties' 25 Stipulation JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CASE PLAN. The remaining initial deadlines in this case shall be vacated. By 10 court days after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issues a ruling in Martin Luther King, Jr. Cnty. et al. v. Trump et al., Case No. 25-3664 (King County), the parties shall meet and confer regarding their claims and defenses and potential for settlement, and file a joint status report and proposed schedule with the Court. In the unlikely event that the Ninth Circuit does not issue a decision in King County by 11/1/2026, the parties shall meet and confer and file a status report on 11/5/2026. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (CJS) (Entered: 08/12/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 27 | NOTICE OF APPEAL to Ninth Circuit (26-5552) re 20 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. No fee required- US Government Party (cc: USCA) (Bishop, Sarah) Modified on 8/31/2026 to add CCA#. (RE). (Entered: 08/27/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 28 | TIME SCHEDULE ORDER/USCA CASE NUMBER (26-5552) as to 27 Notice of Appeal, filed by Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. (RE) (Entered: 08/31/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 29 | JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 09/08/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 30 | ORDER re 29 Joint Status Report. Defendants shall file a certified administrative record on or before 10/30/2026. The remaining deadlines in this case shall continue to be held in abeyance for now. The parties shall file a joint status report and further proposed case schedule within fifteen court days from when the earliest of the following events occurs in King County: (1) the mandate issues; (2) the government moves for reconsideration, rehearing en banc, or a stay pending further review; or (3) the government files a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (APH) (Entered: 09/10/2026) | Open(opens another site) | |
| 31 | No description | Open(opens another site) | |
| No description | |||
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (MIH) | |||
| No description | |||
| No description | |||
| Set Motion and R&R Deadlines re 16 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Plaintiff's consolidated Reply due by 6/5/2026. DOT Defendants' Surreply responding only to the City of Shoreline's additional arguments due by 6/12/2026. Set per 15 Order. (CJS) | |||
| No description | |||
| ***Motion terminated: 18 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by City of Shoreline. This is not a motion. The Clerk has modified the entry. (CJS) |
38 entries