Documents in K.C. v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board

Court documents in the archive for this case, each with the description the archive holds and a link to the original where there is one. Documents are listed by docket entry; an attachment sits under its entry, marked with the entry number and its own number (12-3 is the third attachment to entry 12). 120 documents.

Clear

119 of 120 documents match.

Court documents
EntryDateDocumentPagesOpen
60-4Helstrom DS5View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
64BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND 19 OTHER STATES46View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
65BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE 81 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS56
66Amicus brief filed by Amici Curiae Lisa Ikemoto, Glenn Cohen, David Cohen, Khiara Bridges and Aziza Ahmed by consent. Paper copies due on 10/04/2023 [66] [7338469] [23-2366] (LJ) [Entered: 09/27/2023 02:37 PM]60View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
71ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellants' reply brief. [58] Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/18/2023 for Appellants Lindsay Hyer, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, Todd Rokita and Daniel Rusyniak. CDH [71] [7338516] [23-2366] (PS) [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:21 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
72BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF39View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
73-1APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTDisclosure Statement/Appearance1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
73-2APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTDisclosure Statement of CJ Morrison1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
74APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
77APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
78-1APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTZelbo Appearance3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
78-2APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTCollavecchio Appearance3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
78-3APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTGariboldi Appearance3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
78-4APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTReynolds Appearance3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
78-5APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTArkles Appearance3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
78-6APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTDuncan Appearance3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
81APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
83APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
84Added Attorney Tovah R. Calderon for Amicus Curiae USA, in case 23-2366 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorneys Jonathan L. Backer and Tovah R. Calderon for Amicus Curiae United States. [84] [7338557] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-2366]--[Edited 09/28/2023 by MAN to reflect the addition of counsel] (Backer, Jonathan) [Entered: 09/28/2023 08:16 AM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
85BRIEF OF FOREIGN NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ADVOCATING FOR THE RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES AND AFFIRMANCE40View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
87BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE GOOD TROUBLE COALITION INDIANA, INC. IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES AND AFFIRMANCE43View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
88BRIEF OF ELLIOT PAGE AND FIFTY-FIVE OTHER INDIVIDUALS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES56View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
90BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE GLBTQ ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS, NATIONAL29View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
91BRIEF FOR CONSERVATIVE LEGISLATORS, FORMER LEGISLATORS, AND ACTIVISTS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING25View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
93APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
101APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
105REPLY FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS35View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
107NOTICE: Attorney James A. Barta for Appellants Lindsay Hyer, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, Todd Rokita and Daniel Rusyniak will not be available for oral argument December 6, 2023, and January 16-17, 2024. Counsel also respectfully requests that the Court avoid scheduling argument in this appeal on the same day as argument in Smiley v. Jenner, No. 23-2543, which is also pending before this Court.. [107] [7343654] [23-2366] (Barta, James) [Entered: 10/24/2023 03:05 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
108NOTICE: Attorney Mr. Kenneth J. Falk for Appellees Beth Clawson, Nathaniel Clawson, K.C., M.W. and Ryan Welch will not be available for oral argument 2023: November 3, 6-8, 14-15; December 4-18, 13; 2024: January 8-11, 22; February 5, 12; March 25-27. [108] [7343731] [23-2366] (Falk, Kenneth) [Entered: 10/24/2023 07:52 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
109NOTICE: Attorney James A. Barta for Appellants Lindsay Hyer, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, Todd Rokita and Daniel Rusyniak will not be available for oral argument December 6, 2023, January 8-9, 11-12, 16-17, 2024 and February 7-8, 2024. Counsel also respectfully requests that the Court avoid scheduling argument in this appeal on the same day as argument in Smiley v. Jenner, No. 23-2543, pending before this Court.. [109] [7347515] [23-2366] (Barta, James) [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:13 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
110NOTICE: Attorney James A. Barta for Appellants Lindsay Hyer, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, Todd Rokita and Daniel Rusyniak will not be available for oral argument January 11-12, 16-17, and 23, 2024; February 8, 2024; and May 28-31, 2024. [110] [7351146] [23-2366] (Barta, James) [Entered: 12/01/2023 03:22 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
111NOTICE: Attorney Mr. Kenneth J. Falk for Appellees Beth Clawson, Nathaniel Clawson, K.C., M.W. and Ryan Welch will not be available for oral argument 2023: December 5-8, 13 2024: January 8-11, 17, 22-23, 30; February 5, 12-13; March 25-27; May 28-31. [111] [7351397] [23-2366] (Falk, Kenneth) [Entered: 12/04/2023 03:14 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
112-1NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENTNotice of Oral Argument2View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
112-2Current Covid-19 Courtroom Procedures1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
112-3SPECIAL NOTICE TO COUNSEL WHO WILL PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENTSpecial Note to Counsel Presenting Argum2View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
113UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE4View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
114ORDER issued GRANTING Unopposed Motion for the United States as Amicus Curiae to Participate in Oral Argument. [113] Amicus curiae the United States may participate in oral argument on behalf the plaintiffs-appellees. Pursuant to the plaintiffs-appellees’ agreement, the amicus curiae is allocated five minutes of the plaintiffs-appellees’ oral argument time. The clerk of this court shall distribute a copy of this order to the assigned merits panel. LCE [114] [7355187] [23-2366] (AD) [Entered: 12/21/2023 02:23 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
117Filed Appellees Beth Clawson, Nathaniel Clawson, K.C., M.W. and Ryan Welch Citation of Additional Authority, per Circuit Rule 28(e). Argument set for: 02/16/2024. [117] [7360462] [23-2366] (Rose, Gavin) [Entered: 01/24/2024 11:43 AM]19View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
119Filed Appellees K.C., M.W., Beth Clawson, Nathaniel Clawson and Ryan Welch Citation of Additional Authority, per Circuit Rule 28(e). Argument set for: 02/16/2024. [119] [7362560] [23-2366] (Falk, Kenneth) [Entered: 02/05/2024 12:06 PM]2View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
124ORDER: This is an appeal from the district court’s preliminary injunction. This court has reviewed the submissions in this case as well as heard oral argument on February 16, 2024. The order and injunction entered by the district court in this case on June 16, 2023, Docket Entry 67 (Order) and Docket Entry 68 (Injunction), are hereby STAYED. An opinion from this court will follow. A judgment in this case will issue with that opinion. [124] [7367014] [23-2366] (FP) [Entered: 02/27/2024 03:49 PM]2View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
125APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT24View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
126ORDER: On February 28, 2024, the court received an emergency petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc from the appellees. Because this court has not entered a final judgment, the court is treating the document as a motion to reconsider and request for en banc consideration. SCR [126] [7367251] [23-2366] (FP) [Entered: 02/28/2024 04:49 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
127ORDER: On February 28, 2024, appellees filed a motion to reconsider and request en banc consideration of this court’s February 27, 2024 order staying the district court’s preliminary injunction and order dated June 16, 2023. Counsel for appellants is requested to file a response to that motion by March 5, 2024, at 12:00 pm CST. As part of its response, counsel is requested to address IND. CODE § 25-1-22-13(d), including: 1. whether a “grace period” similar to that referenced in IND. CODE § 25-1-22- 13(d) should be built into this court’s stay; and 2. whether another approach would accomplish the end of IND. CODE § 25-1-22- 13(d). Judge Jackson-Akiwumi records here her dissent from the court’s February 27, 2024 order staying the preliminary injunction entered by the district court on June 16, 2023. Judge Jackson-Akiwumi further dissents from the court’s order above because it does not request full briefing from both parties on whether a stay should issue. [127] [7367531] [23-2366] (CG) [Entered: 03/01/2024 09:51 AM]2View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
128RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES’ MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND REQUEST FOR EN BANC CONSIDERATION26View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
129-1Response14View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
129-2Exhibit A: Bast Declaration6View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
130ORDER: This court has received Appellees’ motion to reconsider and request for en banc consideration of this court’s February 27, 2024, order staying the district court’s preliminary injunction and order dated June 16, 2023 (DE 125 and DE 126), as well as the State’s response (DE 128) and Appellees’ reply (DE 129) to this motion. After review and consideration, the court denies Appellees’ motion, and denies the alternative relief of delaying this court’s stay. Judge Jackson-Akiwumi dissents from the denial of Plaintiff-Appellees’ motion for reconsideration. (See order for further details) [125] [130] [7371558] [23-2366] (AD) [Entered: 03/21/2024 04:07 PM]7View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
132MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE3View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
133ORDER re: Motion for leave to withdraw appearance. [132] The motion is GRANTED. Attorney Melinda R. Holmes may withdraw from further representation of appellants Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, Lindsay Hyer, Todd Rokita, Daniel Rusyniak, and Indiana Family and Social Services Administration in this matter. Attorney James A. Barta will continue to serve as counsel of record for the appellants. CDH [133] [7372240] [23-2366] (CG) [Entered: 03/26/2024 10:52 AM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external
134ORDER: On 03/25/2024, this court received a “Petition for Rehearing En Banc as to Sua Sponte Stay of Preliminary Injunction” from appellees. Because this court has not entered judgment in this appeal, the court construes the document as a motion requesting en banc reconsideration. 7th Cir. Op. P. 1(a)(2). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of this court shall file INSTANTER the motion, so construed, and DISTRIBUTE the motion, along with a copy of this order, to all judges entitled to vote on whether this court’s 02/27/2024, order staying the preliminary injunction should be reconsidered en banc. JXK [134] [7373173] [23-2366] (MAN) [Entered: 03/29/2024 03:26 PM]1View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external