Documents in K.C. v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board
Court documents in the archive for this case, each with the description the archive holds and a link to the original where there is one. Documents are listed by docket entry; an attachment sits under its entry, marked with the entry number and its own number (12-3 is the third attachment to entry 12). 120 documents.
119 of 120 documents match.
| Entry | Date | Document | Pages | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135 | APPEARANCE & CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT | 24 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 136 | RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION | 25 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 137 | Filed Plaintiffs Reply In Support of Motion for Reconsideration En Banc As To Sua Sponte Stay of Preliminary Injunction by Appellees Beth Clawson, Nathaniel Clawson, K.C., M.W. and Ryan Welch. [137][7376076] [23-2366] (JAD) [Entered: 04/15/2024 10:18 AM] | 14 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 138 | MOTION TO STRIKE | 7 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 139 | ORDER re: Motion to strike. [138] The motion is DENIED. SCR [139] [7377480] [23-2366] (CG) [Entered: 04/19/2024 12:12 PM] | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 140 | ORDER: A motion requesting en banc reconsideration (DE 135) of this court’s orders (DE 124 & 130) was filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees on March 29, 2024. The motion was considered by all judges in regular active service, using the procedure for petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge in regular active service requested a vote on the motion. A majority of the judges in regular active service voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Rovner, Judge Jackson-Akiwumi, Judge Lee, and Judge Pryor voted to grant rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the motion requesting en banc reconsideration is DENIED. [135] [140] [7377508] [23-2366] (CG) [Entered: 04/19/2024 12:39 PM] | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 141 | Filed Appellees K.C., Beth Clawson, Nathaniel Clawson, M.W. and Ryan Welch Citation of Additional Authority, per Circuit Rule 28(e). [141] [7380633] [23-2366] (Falk, Kenneth) [Entered: 05/06/2024 01:25 PM] | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 142 | Filed Appellees K.C., Nathaniel Clawson, Beth Clawson, M.W. and Ryan Welch Citation of Additional Authority, per Circuit Rule 28(e). [142] [7380886] [23-2366] (Falk, Kenneth) [Entered: 05/07/2024 11:01 AM] | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 143 | CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE | 3 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 144 | Filed opinion of the court by Judge Brennan. REVERSED, VACATED, and REMANDED. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge; Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge and Candace Jackson-Akiwumi, Circuit Judge, dissenting. [144] [7417603] [23-2366] (CG) [Entered: 11/13/2024 02:40 PM] | 86 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 145 | FINAL JUDGMENT | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 146-1 | Motion (all other motions not listed below) | 3 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 146-2 | Declaration of Kenneth J. Falk | 3 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 147 | ORDER re: Motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing en banc. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc, if any, is due on or before December 27, 2024. [146] MDF [147] [7419051] [23-2366] (AP) [Entered: 11/20/2024 02:04 PM] | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 149 | PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | 26 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 151 | REQUEST TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 155 | UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL | 3 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 158 | PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | 20 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 160 | ORDER: On consideration of the petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees on December 23, 2024, the majority of judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Judge Jackson-Akiwumi voted to grant panel rehearing. No judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. [160] [7441087] [23-2366] (HTP) [Entered: 03/18/2025 02:06 PM] | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external |