Documents in City of Huntington Beach, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
Court documents in the archive for this case, each with the description the archive holds and a link to the original where there is one. Documents are listed by docket entry; an attachment sits under its entry, marked with the entry number and its own number (12-3 is the third attachment to entry 12). 18 documents.
| Entry | Date | Document | Pages | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | filing | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 10 | filing | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 14 | filing | 104 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 14 | OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant ParentBrief | 104 | ||
| 20 | filing | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 26 | filing | 73 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 32 | filing | 37 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 38 | filing | 45 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 42 | filing | 8 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 49 | MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Parent. [Entered: 11/13/2025 07:22 AM] | 18 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 51 | REPLY to Response to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 50) filed by Appellant Parent. [Entered: 11/25/2025 08:03 AM] | 15 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 53 | ORDER FILED. Daniel P. COLLINS, Kenneth K. LEE, Lucy H. KOH Before the court is Plaintiffs-Appellants’ “Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal, Only as to Parent 7A” (Dkt. 49), and their accompanying motion for judicial notice (Dkt. 48). On September 12, 2025, we denied Plaintiffs-Appellants’ previous motion for an injunction pending appeal, concluding that they had failed to make a sufficient showing of Article III standing. See Dkt. 42. Specifically, we held that Plaintiffs-Appellants had failed to adequately show that their asserted “future injuries are fairly traceable to AB 1955 and would be redressed by a decision invalidating AB 1955 in whole or in part.” Id. at 5. In the instant motion, Plaintiff-Appellant 7A, whose child attends high school in an unspecified school district in Orange County, asserts that she has now “fill[ed] th[e] gap” identified in our prior order. We disagree and deny the motion... Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs-Appellants’ renewed motion for preliminary injunction pending appeal (Dkt. 49) and their accompanying motion for judicial notice (Dkt. 48). (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 02/19/2026 03:54 PM] | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 55 | SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 3/13/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 03/13/2026 01:34 PM] [Edited: 03/13/2026 04:08 PM] | 14 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 57 | SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant Parent. [Entered: 03/13/2026 07:00 PM] | 20 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 60 | RESPONSE to Motion to Reconsider Nondispositive Order (DE 58) filed by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond. [Entered: 03/16/2026 06:16 PM] | 5 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 61 | ORDER FILED. Daniel P. COLLINS, Kenneth K. LEE, Lucy H. KOH Before the court is “Motion for Reconsideration of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal” (Dkt. 58), filed on behalf of Plaintiffs-Appellants 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A, and 10A (“Movants”).1 We have twice denied motions for preliminary injunctions pending appeal, concluding that the relevant Plaintiffs-Appellants had failed to make a sufficient showing of Article III standing. Dkts. 42, 53. In the instant motion, Movants assert that, in light of Mirabelli v. Bonta, 607 U.S. 492 (2026), we should reconsider our denial of a preliminary injunction pending appeal. We agree, grant the motion, and grant a preliminary injunction as described below. . . . Accordingly, we grant Movants’ motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 58).3 Pending the disposition of this appeal and the issuance of our mandate, we enjoin Defendants-Appellees from taking any action to enforce Sections 5 and 6 of AB 1955 (codified as California Education Code §§ 220.3(a), 220.5(a)) as to Parents 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A, and 10A with respect to information about their respective children exhibiting symptoms of gender dysphoria. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 06/18/2026 04:25 PM] | 10 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 65 | CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellee Gavin Newsom, Appellee Rob Bonta, Appellee Tony Thurmond. [Entered: 07/08/2026 10:29 AM] | 7 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 67 | CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant City of Huntington Beach, Appellant Parent. [Entered: 07/09/2026 02:51 PM] | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external |
18 documents