Documents in City of Chicago v. Department of Justice
Court documents in the archive for this case, each with the description the archive holds and a link to the original where there is one. Documents are listed by docket entry; an attachment sits under its entry, marked with the entry number and its own number (12-3 is the third attachment to entry 12). 28 documents.
| Entry | Date | Document | Pages | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COMPLAINT filed by City of Chicago; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24334685.(Metcalf, Chelsey) (Entered: 11/12/2025)complaint | 50 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 3 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff City of Chicago by Rebecca Alfert Hirsch (Hirsch, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/12/2025)attorney appearance | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 6 | MOTION by Plaintiffs City of Chicago, City of Saint Paul for order Entering Agreed Schedule, Relieving the Action from Amended General Order 25-0024, and Granting Leave to File Excess Pages (Metcalf, Chelsey) (Entered: 11/13/2025)motion for order | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 11 | MOTION by Plaintiff City of Chicago for preliminary injunction (Hirsch, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/17/2025)motion for preliminary injunction | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 12 | MEMORANDUM by City of Chicago in support of motion for preliminary injunction 11 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Stephen Kane, # 2 Declaration Tomas Maulawin, # 3 Declaration Lindsay Bacher)(Hirsch, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/17/2025)memorandum in support of motion | 32 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 12-1 | MEMORANDUM by City of Chicago in support of motion for preliminary injunction 11 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Stephen Kane, # 2 Declaration Tomas Maulawin, # 3 Declaration Lindsay Bacher)(Hirsch, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/17/2025)Declaration Stephen Kane | 34 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 12-2 | MEMORANDUM by City of Chicago in support of motion for preliminary injunction 11 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Stephen Kane, # 2 Declaration Tomas Maulawin, # 3 Declaration Lindsay Bacher)(Hirsch, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/17/2025)Declaration Tomas Maulawin | 59 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 12-3 | MEMORANDUM by City of Chicago in support of motion for preliminary injunction 11 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Stephen Kane, # 2 Declaration Tomas Maulawin, # 3 Declaration Lindsay Bacher)(Hirsch, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/17/2025)Declaration Lindsay Bacher | 93 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 16 | STATUS Report (joint) by Department of Justice (Johnson, Patrick) (Entered: 12/01/2025)status report | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 17 | RESPONSE by Department of Justicein Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff City of Chicago for preliminary injunction 11 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1.A, # 3 Exhibit 1.B, # 4 Exhibit 1.C, # 5 Exhibit 1.D, # 6 Exhibit 1.E, # 7 Exhibit 1.F, # 8 Exhibit 1.G, # 9 Exhibit 1.H)(Johnson, Patrick) (Entered: 12/10/2025)response in opposition to motion | 32 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 19-1 | MOTION by Movant Federation for American Immigration Reform for leave to file Amicus Brief (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Amicus Brief)(Hauenschild, Jonathon) (Entered: 12/12/2025)Exhibit Proposed Amicus Brief | 19 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 22 | BRIEF filed by Federation for American Immigration Reform by Jonathon P. Hauenschild. (Hauenschild, Jonathon) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 12/16/2025 (aee, ). (Entered: 12/16/2025)brief | 20 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 23 | REPLY by City of Chicago, City of Saint Paul to MOTION by Plaintiff City of Chicago for preliminary injunction 11, response in opposition to motion, 17 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Scott Hvizdos)(Metcalf, Chelsey) (Entered: 12/17/2025)reply to response to motion | 17 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 23-1 | REPLY by City of Chicago, City of Saint Paul to MOTION by Plaintiff City of Chicago for preliminary injunction 11, response in opposition to motion, 17 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Scott Hvizdos)(Metcalf, Chelsey) (Entered: 12/17/2025)Declaration Scott Hvizdos | 29 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 28 | MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs' motion 11 for preliminary injunction and stay of agency action is granted. The Court will separately enter a preliminary injunction order. By 1/21/26, Plaintiffs' counsel shall provide a Word version of a draft preliminary injunction order to the undersigned judge's proposed order inbox after discussing the form of the order with Defendants' counsel. In addition, the parties shall file a joint status report by 1/21/26 setting forth proposed next steps for this case. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/15/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) (Entered: 01/15/2026)order on motion for preliminary injunction | 21 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 29 | STATUS Report Joint Status Report by City of Chicago (Geary, Laura) (Entered: 01/21/2026)status report | 3 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 31 | ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Stay Of Agency Action. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/3/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) (Entered: 02/03/2026)preliminary injunction | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 34 | MOTION by Plaintiffs City of Chicago, City of Saint Paul for leave to file First Amended Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - First Amended Complaint)(Kauffman, John) (Entered: 03/09/2026)motion for leave to file | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 39 | First AMENDED complaint by City of Saint Paul, City of Chicago, City of Santa Monica against All Defendants (Kauffman, John) (Entered: 03/10/2026)amended complaint | 53 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 42 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: At 39, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding the City of Santa Monica as a Plaintiff. Plaintiffs now move 40 for a second preliminary injunction. They contend that the City of Santa Monica is similarly situated to the City of Saint Paul and the City of Chicago and that the same preliminary injunction issued with respect to Saint Paul and Chicago should be extended to Santa Monica. The Court agrees that Santa Monica is similarly situated, and Plaintiffs' motion 40 is granted. The Court will separately enter a preliminary injunction order. By 3/25/26, Plaintiffs' counsel shall provide a Word version of a draft preliminary injunction order to the undersigned judge's proposed order inbox after discussing the form of the order with Defendants' counsel. Presentment of motion set for 3/24/26 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) (Entered: 03/19/2026)order on motion for preliminary injunction | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 43 | ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Second Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Stay Of Agency Action. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 3/25/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) (Entered: 03/25/2026) | 4 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 48 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The Court grants the joint motion 46 for a 28-day extension of the summary judgment briefing deadlines as follows: a. The parties shall file cross-motions for summary judgment by May 22, 2026; b. The parties shall file responses by June 22, 2026; and c. The parties shall file replies by July 6, 2026. Presentment hearing of 4/23/26 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) (Entered: 04/17/2026)Order on Motion for Extension of Time | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 51 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Unopposed motion by Defendant to modify scheduling order regarding summary judgment briefing 50 is granted. Mailed notice. (jn,) (Entered: 05/22/2026)Order on Motion to Amend/Correct | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 54 | MOTION by Defendant Department of Justice for summary judgment (Johnson, Patrick) (Entered: 06/05/2026)Summary Judgment | 31 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 58-1 | MOTION by Plaintiffs City of Chicago, City of Santa Monica, City of Saint Paul for summary judgment (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Declaration Bacher, # 3 Declaration Charles, # 4 Declaration Cline, # 5 Declaration Jacob, # 6 Declaration Kane, # 7 Declaration Kapustianyk, # 8 Declaration Maulawin, # 9 Declaration Milstein)(Kauffman, John) (Entered: 07/20/2026)Memorandum in Support | 43 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 67 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Defendant's unopposed motion 65 to extend time is granted. Defendants shall reply in support of their motion for summary judgment and respond to Plaintiffs' cross-motion by 9/8/26. Plaintiffs shall reply by 9/29/26. Presentment of motion set for 8/13/26 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) (Entered: 08/11/2026)Order on Motion for Extension of Time | 1 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 72 | ORDER : The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by its attorney, ANDREW S. BOUTROS, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, having filed its Omnibus Motion to Withdraw Designations of Former Assistant United States Attorneys, and having shown good cause in support of its motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the government is granted leave to withdraw the designation of the attorneys identified in its motion as counsel for the United States in the matters identified in Exhibit A to this Order and those counsel shall be removed from the electronic notification list for those matters. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/7/2026: Mailed notice. (tg, ) (Entered: 10/09/2026)Order | 15 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external | |
| 73 | ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motion 54 for summary judgment is denied and Plaintiffs' motion 58 for summary judgment is granted. The Court will separately enter an order that effectuates this ruling. By 11/13/26, Plaintiffs' counsel shall provide a Word version of an order that effectuates this ruling to the undersigned judge's proposed order inbox after discussing the form of the order with Defendants' counsel. In addition, the parties shall file a joint status report by 11/13/26 setting forth proposed next steps for this case. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 10/30/2026. Mailed notice (ags) (Entered: 10/30/2026)Order AND Order on Motion for Summary Judgment AND Order on Motion for Summary Judgment AND ~Util - Set Deadlines | 2 | View here · Original(opens another site)PDF, external |
28 documents