Litigation
Court cases in the project's archive about laws and policies that affect transgender and other LGBTQ+ people. Each case page links its dockets, its court documents, its opinions and any oral arguments, with the originals on CourtListener. Charts show the cases by issue, year, court and place.
Also: a finding aid to experts who testified for the side defending the laws.
12 of 664 cases match.
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doe v. McConn | S.D. Tex. | District | 5th Cir. | 1980 | Drag & expressionalso Gender-affirming care, Policing & criminal law | Favorable | 1 |
| Friends of George's, Inc. v. Steven MulroyNo. 23-5611 | 6th Cir. | Circuit | 6th Cir. | 2023 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | 54 | |
| Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender Pride/Twin Cities v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board | D. Minn. | District | 8th Cir. | 2010 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | Adverse | 1 |
| HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. DeSantis | M.D. Fla. | District | 11th Cir. | 2023 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | Favorable | 87 |
| HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Business and Profe | 11th Cir. | Circuit | 11th Cir. | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | 1 | ||
| HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Business and Professional RegulationNo. 23-12160 | 11th Cir. | Circuit | 11th Cir. | 2026 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | Favorable | 37 |
| Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen | 9th Cir. | Circuit | 9th Cir. | 2026 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | Favorable | 113 |
| Naples Pride v. City of NaplesNo. 25-11756 | 11th Cir. | Circuit | 11th Cir. | 2025 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | 3 | |
| Southern Utah Drag Stars v. City of St. George | D. Utah | District | 10th Cir. | 2023 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | Favorable | 30 |
| Spectrum WT v. WendlerNo. 23-10994 | 5th Cir. | Circuit | 5th Cir. | 2023 | Drag & expressionalso Schools & education, Speech & religious objections | Favorable | 175 |
| Texas A&M Queer Empowerment v. MahomesNo. 25-20108 | 5th Cir. | Circuit | 5th Cir. | 2025 | Drag & expressionalso Schools & education, Speech & religious objections | 13 | |
| Woodlands Pride v. PaxtonNo. 23-20480 | 5th Cir. | Circuit | 5th Cir. | 2025 | Drag & expressionalso Speech & religious objections | 42 |
12 cases
Each case has one main issue and may raise others (shown as “also”); the Issue filter finds a case by either. Choose a column heading to sort by it, and again to reverse the order. A blank cell means the archive has no entry for that case yet.
The outcome is this project's own coding of how a case turned out, made from the court's record; it is not the court's finding. How it is coded, and how to ask for a correction, is on the About page.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.