Text of CO HB 1058 (2025)
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity Defense
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
79,826 characters
First Regular Session
Seventy-fifth General Assembly
STATE OF COLORADO
INTRODUCED
LLS NO. 25-0114.01 Shelby Ross x4510
HOUSE BILL 25-1058
House Committees
Senate Committees
Judiciary
A BILL FOR AN ACT
CONCERNING MODIFICATIONS TO THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NOT
101
GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY.
102
Bill Summary
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does
not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill
passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that
applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at
http://leg.colorado.gov/.)
Legislative Oversight Committee Concerning the Treatment
of Persons with Behavioral Health Disorders in the Criminal and
Juvenile Justice Systems. When a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity
is accepted by a court, the bill requires the court, in consultation with the
department of human services (CDHS) and the parties, to determine
whether a sanity examination requires the defendant to stay overnight for
HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
Bradfield, English
SENATE SPONSORSHIP
Michaelson Jenet, Cutter
Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.
Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
an extended examination and the number of days of the extended
examination. If the defendant is in custody, the bill authorizes the sanity
examination to be conducted at the jail or place of confinement or at a
facility operated by or under contract with CDHS. If the defendant is at
liberty on summons or on bond, the bill prohibits the court from ordering
the defendant into custody in order to conduct the sanity examination
(section 11).
If a sanity examination is recorded, the bill prohibits a defendant
from being dressed in prison or jail clothing and prohibits restraints on the
defendant from being visible on the recording (section 12).
Current law authorizes psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and
other personnel conducting a sanity examination to conduct a
narcoanalytic interview of the defendant with drugs that are medically
appropriate, to subject the defendant to a polygraph examination, and to
testify to the results of the procedures, statements, and reactions of the
defendant. The bill repeals this provision (section 12).
The bill makes conforming amendments and technical corrections.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
1
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-101 as
2
follows:
3
16-8-101. Insanity defined - offenses committed before July 1,
4
1995. (1) The applicable test of insanity shall be IS, and the COURT SHALL
5
INSTRUCT THE jury: shall be so instructed: "A person who is so diseased
6
or defective in mind at the time of the commission of the act as to be
7
incapable of distinguishing right from wrong with respect to that act is
8
not accountable". But care should be taken not to confuse such mental
9
disease or defect with moral obliquity, mental depravity, or passion
10
growing out of anger, revenge, hatred, or other motives, and kindred evil
11
conditions, for when the act is induced by any of these causes the person
12
is accountable to the law.".
13
(2) The term "diseased or defective in mind", as used in
14
subsection (1) of this section, does not refer to an abnormality manifested
15
only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.
16
HB25-1058
-2-
(3) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed before
1
July 1, 1995.
2
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-101.5
3
as follows:
4
16-8-101.5. Insanity defined - offenses committed on or after
5
July 1, 1995. (1) The applicable test of insanity shall be IS:
6
(a) A person who is so diseased or defective in mind at the time
7
of the commission of the act as to be incapable of distinguishing right
8
from wrong with respect to that act is not accountable; except that care
9
should be taken not to confuse such mental disease or defect with moral
10
obliquity, mental depravity, or passion growing out of anger, revenge,
11
hatred, or other motives and kindred evil conditions, for, when the act is
12
induced by any of these causes, the person is accountable to the law; or
13
(b) A person who suffered from a condition of mind caused by
14
mental disease or defect that prevented the person from forming a
15
culpable mental state that is an essential element of a crime charged. but
16
care should be taken not to confuse such mental disease or defect with
17
moral obliquity, mental depravity, or passion growing out of anger,
18
revenge, hatred, or other motives and kindred evil conditions because,
19
when the act is induced by any of these causes, the person is accountable
20
to the law.
21
(2) As used in this section:
22
(a) "Diseased or defective in mind" does not refer to an
23
abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial
24
conduct. Evidence of knowledge or awareness of the victim's actual or
25
perceived gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual
26
orientation shall not constitute inability to distinguish right from wrong.
27
HB25-1058
-3-
(b) "Gender identity" and "gender expression" have the same
1
meaning as in section 18-1-901 (3)(h.5).
2
(c) "Mental disease or defect" includes only those severely
3
abnormal mental conditions that grossly and demonstrably impair a
4
person's perception or understanding of reality and that are not
5
attributable to the voluntary ingestion of alcohol or any other
6
psychoactive substance but does not include an abnormality manifested
7
only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.
8
(d) "Sexual orientation" has the same meaning as in section
9
18-9-121 (5)(b).
10
(3) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or
11
after July 1, 1995.
12
SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-102 as
13
follows:
14
16-8-102. Definitions. As used in this article ARTICLE 8, unless
15
the context otherwise requires:
16
(1) and (2) Repealed.
17
(1) "DISEASED OR DEFECTIVE IN MIND" DOES NOT REFER TO AN
18
ABNORMALITY MANIFESTED ONLY BY REPEATED CRIMINAL OR OTHERWISE
19
ANTISOCIAL CONDUCT. EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE OR AWARENESS OF THE
20
VICTIM'S ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED GENDER, GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER
21
EXPRESSION, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN
22
INABILITY TO DISTINGUISH RIGHT FROM WRONG.
23
(2.5) (2) "Forensic psychologist" means a licensed psychologist
24
who is board certified in forensic psychology by the American board of
25
professional psychology or who has completed a fellowship in forensic
26
psychology meeting criteria established by the American board of
27
HB25-1058
-4-
forensic psychology.
1
(3) "GENDER IDENTITY" AND "GENDER EXPRESSION" HAVE THE
2
SAME MEANING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-1-901.
3
(2.7) (4) (a) "Impaired mental condition" means a condition of
4
mind, caused by mental disease or defect that prevents the person from
5
forming the culpable mental state that is an essential element of any crime
6
charged. For the purposes of this subsection (2.7), "mental disease or
7
defect" includes only those severely abnormal mental conditions which
8
grossly and demonstrably impair a person's perception or understanding
9
of reality and which are not attributable to the voluntary ingestion of
10
alcohol or any other psychoactive substance; except that it does not
11
include an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise
12
antisocial conduct.
13
(b) This subsection (2.7) shall apply only SUBSECTION (4) APPLIES
14
to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
15
(3) Repealed.
16
(4) (5) "Ineligible for release" means the defendant is suffering
17
from a mental disease or defect which is likely to cause him THE
18
DEFENDANT to be dangerous to himself THE DEFENDANT'S SELF, to others,
19
or to the community, in the reasonably foreseeable future, if he THE
20
DEFENDANT is permitted to remain at liberty.
21
(4.5) (6) "Ineligible to remain on conditional release" means the
22
defendant has violated one or more conditions in his THE DEFENDANT'S
23
release, or the defendant is suffering from a mental disease or defect
24
which is likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to be dangerous to himself
25
THE DEFENDANT'S SELF, to others, or to the community in the reasonably
26
foreseeable future, if he THE DEFENDANT is permitted to remain on
27
HB25-1058
-5-
conditional release.
1
(4.7) (7) "Mental disease or defect" means only those severely
2
abnormal mental conditions that grossly and demonstrably impair a
3
person's perception or understanding of reality and that are not
4
attributable to the voluntary ingestion of alcohol or any other
5
psychoactive substance; except that it does not include an abnormality
6
manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.
7
(5) (8) "Release examination" means a court-ordered examination
8
of a defendant directed to developing evidence relevant to determining
9
whether he THE DEFENDANT is eligible for release.
10
(6) (9) "Release hearing" means a hearing for the purpose of
11
determining whether a defendant previously committed to the department
12
of human services, following a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity,
13
has become eligible for release.
14
(7) Repealed.
15
(8) (10) "Sanity examination" means a court-ordered examination
16
of a defendant who has entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity,
17
directed to developing information relevant to determining the sanity or
18
insanity of the defendant at the time of the commission of the act with
19
which he THE DEFENDANT is charged and also his THE DEFENDANT'S
20
competency to proceed.
21
(11) "SEXUAL ORIENTATION" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS SET
22
FORTH IN SECTION 18-9-121.
23
SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103 as
24
follows:
25
16-8-103. Pleading insanity as a defense. (1) (a) The defense of
26
insanity may only be raised by a specific plea entered at the time of
27
HB25-1058
-6-
arraignment; except that the court, for good cause shown, may permit the
1
plea to be entered at any time prior to trial. The form of the plea shall be
2
IS: "Not guilty by reason of insanity"; and it must be pleaded orally either
3
by the defendant or by the defendant's counsel. A defendant who does not
4
raise the defense as provided in this section shall IS not be permitted to
5
rely upon insanity as a defense to the crime charged but, when charged
6
with a crime requiring a specific intent as an element thereof, may
7
introduce evidence of the defendant's mental condition as bearing upon
8
his or her THE DEFENDANT'S capacity to form the required specific intent.
9
The plea of not guilty by reason of insanity includes the plea of not guilty.
10
(b) This subsection (1) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
11
committed before July 1, 1995.
12
(1.5) (a) The defense of insanity may only be raised by a specific
13
plea entered at the time of arraignment; except that the court, for good
14
cause shown, may permit the plea to be entered at any time prior to trial.
15
The form of the plea shall be IS: "Not guilty by reason of insanity"; and
16
it must be pleaded orally either by the defendant or by the defendant's
17
counsel. The plea of not guilty by reason of insanity includes the plea of
18
not guilty.
19
(b) This subsection (1.5) shall apply APPLIES to offenses
20
committed on or after July 1, 1995.
21
(2) If counsel for the defendant believes that a plea of not guilty
22
by reason of insanity should be entered on behalf of the defendant but the
23
defendant refuses to permit the entry of the plea, counsel may so inform
24
the court. The court shall then conduct such AN investigation as it deems
25
proper, which may include the appointment of psychiatrists or forensic
26
psychologists to assist in examining the defendant and advising the court.
27
HB25-1058
-7-
After its investigation, the court shall conduct a hearing to determine
1
whether the plea should be entered. If the court finds that the entry of a
2
plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is necessary for a just
3
determination of the charge against the defendant, it THE COURT shall
4
enter the plea on behalf of the defendant, and the plea so entered shall
5
have HAS the same effect as though it had been voluntarily entered by the
6
defendant. himself or herself.
7
(3) If there has been no A grand jury indictment or preliminary
8
hearing HAS NOT BEEN HELD prior to the entry of the plea of not guilty by
9
reason of insanity, the court shall hold a preliminary hearing prior to the
10
trial of the insanity issue. If probable cause is not established, the case
11
shall MUST be dismissed, but the court may order the district attorney to
12
institute civil proceedings pursuant to article 65 of title 27 C.R.S., if it
13
appears that the protection of the public or the accused requires it A CIVIL
14
PROCEEDING.
15
(4) Before accepting a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, the
16
court shall advise the defendant of the effect and consequences of the
17
plea.
18
SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103.5
19
as follows:
20
16-8-103.5. Impaired mental condition - when raised -
21
procedure - legislative intent. (1) If the defendant intends to assert the
22
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition, he THE DEFENDANT
23
shall indicate that intention to the court and to the prosecution at the time
24
of arraignment; except that the court, for good cause shown, shall permit
25
the defendant to inform the court and the prosecution of his THE
26
DEFENDANT'S intention to assert the affirmative defense of impaired
27
HB25-1058
-8-
mental condition at any time prior to trial.
1
(2) If counsel for the defendant believes that an assertion of the
2
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition should be entered on
3
behalf of the defendant but the defendant refuses to permit counsel to
4
offer such evidence, counsel may so inform the court. The court shall then
5
conduct such AN investigation as it deems proper, which may include the
6
appointment of psychiatrists or forensic psychologists to assist in
7
examining the defendant and advising the court. After its investigation,
8
the court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether evidence of
9
impaired mental condition should be offered at trial. If the court finds that
10
such a THE defense OF IMPAIRED MENTAL CONDITION is necessary for a
11
just determination of the charge against the defendant, it THE COURT shall
12
inform the prosecution that such THE defense shall MUST be asserted at
13
trial by the defendant and shall order the defendant's counsel to present
14
evidence at trial on the defense of impaired mental condition.
15
(3) At the time at which WHEN the defendant announces his THE
16
DEFENDANT'S intention to assert the affirmative defense of impaired
17
mental condition, the court shall advise the defendant of the effect and
18
consequences of asserting the defense.
19
(4) When the defendant indicates his THE DEFENDANT'S intention
20
to assert the defense of impaired mental condition, the court shall order
21
an examination of the defendant pursuant to section 16-8-106. The court
22
shall order both the prosecutor and the defendant to exchange the names,
23
addresses, reports, and statements of persons, other than medical experts
24
subject to the provisions of section 16-8-103.6, whom the parties intend
25
to call as witnesses with regard to the affirmative defense of impaired
26
mental condition.
27
HB25-1058
-9-
(5) If the trier of fact finds the defendant not guilty by reason of
1
impaired mental condition, pursuant to section 18-1-803 (3), C.R.S., the
2
court shall commit the defendant to the custody of the department of
3
human services until such time as he THE DEFENDANT is found eligible for
4
release, pursuant to the standards set forth in sections 16-8-115 and
5
16-8-120. The executive director of the department of human services
6
shall designate the state facility at which WHERE the defendant shall be
7
held for care and psychiatric treatment and may transfer the defendant
8
from one institution to another if, in the opinion of the EXECUTIVE
9
director, it TRANSFERRING THE DEFENDANT is desirable to do so in the
10
interest of the DEFENDANT'S proper care, custody, and treatment of the
11
defendant or the protection of the public or the personnel of the facilities
12
in question.
13
(6) It is the intent of the general assembly that the assertion of the
14
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition not be made in such a
15
fashion A MANNER that it is used to circumvent the requirements of
16
disclosure specified in rule 16 of the Colorado rules of criminal
17
procedure.
18
(7) A defendant may raise impaired mental condition only through
19
an assertion of affirmative defense.
20
(8) This section shall apply only APPLIES to offenses committed
21
before July 1, 1995.
22
SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103.6
23
as follows:
24
16-8-103.6. Waiver of privilege. (1) (a) A defendant who places
25
his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition at issue by pleading not
26
guilty by reason of insanity pursuant to section 16-8-103, or asserting the
27
HB25-1058
-10-
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition pursuant to section
1
16-8-103.5, or disclosing witnesses who may provide evidence
2
concerning the defendant's mental condition during a sentencing hearing
3
held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July
4
1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302 for an offense charged prior
5
to July 1, 2020, waives any claim of confidentiality or privilege as to
6
communications made by the defendant to a physician or psychologist in
7
the course of an examination or treatment for the mental condition for the
8
purpose of any trial or hearing on the issue of the mental condition, or
9
sentencing hearing conducted pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an
10
offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302
11
for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020. The court shall order both the
12
prosecutor and the defendant to exchange the names, addresses, reports,
13
and statements of any physician or psychologist who has examined or
14
treated the defendant for the mental condition.
15
(b) This subsection (1) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
16
committed before July 1, 1995.
17
(2) (a) A defendant who places his or her THE DEFENDANT'S
18
mental condition at issue by pleading not guilty by reason of insanity
19
pursuant to section 16-8-103 or disclosing witnesses who may provide
20
evidence concerning the defendant's mental condition during a sentencing
21
hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior
22
to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102; or, for offenses
23
committed on or after July 1, 1999, by seeking to introduce evidence
24
concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition pursuant to
25
section 16-8-107 (3) waives any claim of confidentiality or privilege as
26
to communications made by the defendant to a physician or psychologist
27
HB25-1058
-11-
in the course of an examination or treatment for the mental condition for
1
the purpose of any trial or hearing on the issue of the mental condition,
2
or sentencing hearing conducted pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an
3
offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102.
4
The court shall order both the prosecutor and the defendant to exchange
5
the names, addresses, reports, and statements of any physician or
6
psychologist who has examined or treated the defendant for the mental
7
condition.
8
(b) This subsection (2) shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed
9
on or after July 1, 1995.
10
SECTION 7. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103.7
11
as follows:
12
16-8-103.7. Examination after entry of defenses of insanity
13
and impaired mental condition. (1) (a) When, at the time of
14
arraignment, the defense of insanity is raised pursuant to section
15
16-8-103, and the defendant asserts his or her THE DEFENDANT'S intention
16
to raise the affirmative defense of impaired mental condition pursuant to
17
section 16-8-103.5, the court shall order one examination of the defendant
18
with regard to both defenses pursuant to section 16-8-106.
19
(b) This subsection (1) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
20
committed before July 1, 1995.
21
(2) (a) When, at the time of arraignment, the defense of insanity
22
is raised pursuant to section 16-8-103, the court shall order an
23
examination of the defendant with regard to the insanity defense pursuant
24
to section 16-8-106.
25
(b) This subsection (2) shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed
26
on or after July 1, 1995.
27
HB25-1058
-12-
(3) (a) When the defendant gives notice pursuant to section
1
16-8-107 (3) that he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to introduce evidence
2
in the nature of expert opinion concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S
3
mental condition, the court shall order an examination of the defendant
4
pursuant to section 16-8-106.
5
(b) The provisions of This subsection (3) shall apply APPLIES to
6
offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999.
7
SECTION 8. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-104 as
8
follows:
9
16-8-104. Separate trial of issues. The issues raised by the plea
10
of not guilty by reason of insanity shall MUST be tried separately to
11
different juries, and the sanity of the defendant shall MUST be tried first.
12
This section shall apply only APPLIES to offenses committed before July
13
1, 1995.
14
SECTION 9. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-104.5
15
as follows:
16
16-8-104.5. Single trial of issues. (1) The issues raised by the
17
plea of not guilty by reason of insanity shall MUST be treated as an
18
affirmative defense and shall MUST be tried at the same proceeding and
19
before the same trier of fact as the charges to which not guilty by reason
20
of insanity is offered as a defense.
21
(2) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or
22
after July 1, 1995.
23
SECTION 10. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-105, amend
24
(1), (4), and (5) as follows:
25
16-8-105. Procedure after plea for offenses committed before
26
July 1, 1995. (1) When a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is
27
HB25-1058
-13-
accepted, the court shall forthwith commit ORDER the defendant for TO
1
UNDERGO a sanity examination, specifying the place and period of
2
commitment WHERE THE EXAMINATION MUST BE CONDUCTED.
3
(4) If the trier of fact finds the defendant not guilty by reason of
4
insanity, the court shall commit the defendant to the custody of the
5
department of human services until such time as he THE DEFENDANT is
6
found eligible for release. The executive director of the department of
7
human services shall designate the state facility at which the defendant
8
shall be held for care and psychiatric treatment and may transfer the
9
defendant from one institution to another if, in the opinion of the
10
EXECUTIVE director, it is desirable to do so in the interest of the
11
DEFENDANT'S proper care, custody, and treatment of the defendant or the
12
protection of the public or the personnel of the facilities in question.
13
(5) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed before
14
July 1, 1995.
15
SECTION 11. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-105.5, amend
16
(1), (2), and (3) as follows:
17
16-8-105.5. Procedure after plea for offenses committed on or
18
after July 1, 1995. (1) (a) When a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity
19
is accepted, the court shall forthwith commit ORDER the defendant for TO
20
UNDERGO a sanity examination, specifying the place and period of
21
commitment WHERE THE EXAMINATION MUST BE CONDUCTED. THE
22
COURT, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
23
AND THE PARTIES, SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THE EXAMINATION
24
REQUIRES THE DEFENDANT TO STAY OVERNIGHT FOR AN EXTENDED
25
EXAMINATION AND THE NUMBER OF DAYS OF THE EXTENDED
26
EXAMINATION.
27
HB25-1058
-14-
(b) (I) IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN CUSTODY, THE EXAMINATION MAY
1
BE CONDUCTED AT THE JAIL OR PLACE OF CONFINEMENT OR AT A FACILITY
2
OPERATED BY OR UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
3
SERVICES. IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN CUSTODY AND THE COURT DETERMINES
4
THE EXAMINATION MUST BE CONDUCTED AT A FACILITY OPERATED BY OR
5
UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, THE
6
COURT SHALL ORDER THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES TO TAKE
7
CUSTODY OF THE DEFENDANT TO CONDUCT THE EXAMINATION AND
8
RETURN THE DEFENDANT TO THE ORIGINAL PLACE OF CUSTODY AFTER THE
9
EXAMINATION IS COMPLETE.
10
(II) IF THE DEFENDANT IS AT LIBERTY ON SUMMONS OR ON BOND,
11
THE EXAMINATION MAY BE CONDUCTED AT A FACILITY OPERATED BY OR
12
CONTRACTED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OR AT A
13
LOCATION THAT THE COURT AND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
14
DETERMINE IS APPROPRIATE; EXCEPT THAT THE COURT SHALL NOT ORDER
15
A DEFENDANT INTO CUSTODY IN ORDER TO CONDUCT THE EXAMINATION
16
IF THE DEFENDANT IS AT LIBERTY ON SUMMONS OR ON BOND.
17
(2) Upon receiving the report of the sanity examination, the court
18
shall immediately set the case for trial. Every person is presumed to be
19
sane; but, once any evidence of insanity is introduced, the people have
20
PROSECUTION HAS the burden of proving sanity beyond a reasonable
21
doubt.
22
(3) When the affirmative defense of not guilty by reason of
23
insanity has been raised, the jury shall MUST be given special verdict
24
forms containing interrogatories. The trier of fact shall decide first the
25
question of guilt as to felony charges that are before the court. If the trier
26
of fact concludes that guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt as
27
HB25-1058
-15-
to one or more of the felony charges submitted for consideration, the
1
special interrogatories shall MUST not be answered. Upon completion of
2
its deliberations on the felony charges as previously set forth in this
3
subsection (3), the trier of fact shall consider any other charges before the
4
court in a similar manner; except that it THE TRIER OF FACT shall not
5
answer the special interrogatories regarding such THE charges if it THE
6
TRIER OF FACT has previously found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt with
7
respect to one or more felony charges. The interrogatories shall MUST
8
provide for specific findings of the jury with respect to the affirmative
9
defense of not guilty by reason of insanity. When the court sits as the trier
10
of fact, it THE COURT shall enter appropriate specific findings with respect
11
to the affirmative defense of not guilty by reason of insanity.
12
SECTION 12. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-106, amend
13
(1)(a), (1)(b), (2)(a), (2)(b), (3), and (7) introductory portion as follows:
14
16-8-106. Examinations and report. (1) (a) All examinations
15
ordered by the court in criminal cases shall MUST be accomplished by the
16
entry of an order of the court specifying the place where such THE
17
examination is to be conducted and the period of time allocated for such
18
THE examination. The defendant may be committed for such THE
19
examination to the Colorado psychiatric hospital in Denver, the Colorado
20
mental health institute at Pueblo A STATE-RUN MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL,
21
the place where he or she THE DEFENDANT is in custody, or such ANY
22
other public institution designated by the court. In determining the place
23
where such THE examination is to be conducted, the court shall give
24
priority to the place where the defendant is in custody, unless the nature
25
and circumstances of the examination require designation of a different
26
facility. ONE OR MORE PSYCHIATRISTS OR FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGISTS
27
HB25-1058
-16-
SHALL OBSERVE the defendant shall be observed and examined by one or
1
more psychiatrists or forensic psychologists during such A period as the
2
court directs. For good cause shown, upon motion of the prosecution or
3
defendant, or upon the court's own motion, the court may order such ANY
4
further or other examination as is advisable under the circumstances.
5
Nothing in This section shall DOES NOT abridge the right of the defendant
6
to procure an examination as provided in section 16-8-108.
7
(b) (I) An interview conducted PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION in any
8
case that includes a class 1 or class 2 felony charge or a felony sex
9
offense charge described in section 18-3-402, 18-3-404, 18-3-405, or
10
18-3-405.5 C.R.S., pursuant to this section must be video and audio
11
recorded and preserved, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (1)(c) OF
12
THIS SECTION. The court shall advise the defendant that any examination
13
with a psychiatrist or forensic psychologist may be video and audio
14
recorded. A copy of the recording must be provided to all parties and the
15
court with the examination report. Any jail or other facility where the
16
court orders the examination to take place must SHALL permit the
17
recording to occur and must SHALL provide the space and equipment
18
necessary for such THE recording. If space and equipment are not
19
available, the sheriff or facility director shall attempt to coordinate a
20
location and the availability of equipment with the court, which AND THE
21
COURT may consult with the district attorney and defense counsel for an
22
agreed-upon location. If no AN agreement is NOT reached, and upon the
23
request of either the defense counsel or district attorney, the court shall
24
order the location of the examination, which may include the Colorado
25
mental health institute at Pueblo A STATE-RUN MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL.
26
(II) IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, IF
27
HB25-1058
-17-
THE EXAMINATION IS RECORDED, THE DEFENDANT MUST NOT BE DRESSED
1
IN PRISON OR JAIL CLOTHING. THIS SUBSECTION (1)(b)(II) DOES NOT
2
REQUIRE OR PROHIBIT THE USE OF RESTRAINTS, AND THE EXAMINATION
3
MAY BE STOPPED OR PAUSED IN ORDER TO APPLY RESTRAINTS ON THE
4
DEFENDANT TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE EVALUATOR, THE DEFENDANT,
5
OR OTHERS, AS LONG AS THE RESTRAINTS ARE NOT VISIBLE ON THE
6
RECORDING.
7
(2) (a) The defendant shall have HAS a privilege against
8
self-incrimination during the course of an examination under CONDUCTED
9
PURSUANT TO this section. The fact of the defendant's noncooperation
10
with psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting
11
the examination may be admissible in the defendant's trial on the issue of
12
insanity or impaired mental condition and in any sentencing hearing held
13
pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 or 18-1.3-1302. C.R.S. This paragraph
14
(a) shall apply only SUBSECTION (2)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed
15
before July 1, 1995.
16
(b) The defendant shall have HAS a privilege against
17
self-incrimination during the course of an examination under CONDUCTED
18
PURSUANT TO this section. The fact of the defendant's noncooperation
19
with psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting
20
the examination may be admissible in the defendant's trial on the issue of
21
insanity and in any sentencing hearing held pursuant to section
22
18-1.3-1201 or 18-1.4-102. C.R.S. This paragraph (b) shall apply
23
SUBSECTION (2)(b) APPLIES to offenses committed on or after July 1,
24
1995, but prior to July 1, 1999.
25
(3) (a) To aid in forming an opinion as to REGARDING the
26
DEFENDANT'S mental condition, of the defendant, it is permissible in the
27
HB25-1058
-18-
course of an examination under CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO this section to
1
use THE DEFENDANT'S confessions and admissions of the defendant and
2
any other evidence of the circumstances surrounding the commission of
3
the offense, as well as the DEFENDANT'S medical and social history of the
4
defendant, in questioning the defendant. When the defendant is
5
noncooperative with psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other
6
personnel conducting the examination, an opinion of the DEFENDANT'S
7
mental condition of the defendant may be rendered by such THE
8
psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, or other personnel based upon such
9
THE DEFENDANT'S confessions AND admissions and any other evidence of
10
the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense, as well as
11
the DEFENDANT'S known medical and social history, of the defendant, and
12
such THE opinion may be admissible into evidence at trial and in any
13
sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 or 18-1.3-1302.
14
C.R.S. It shall also be permissible to conduct a narcoanalytic interview of
15
the defendant with such drugs as are medically appropriate and to subject
16
the defendant to polygraph examination. In any trial or hearing on the
17
issue of the defendant's sanity, eligibility for release, or impaired mental
18
condition, and in any sentencing hearing held pursuant to section
19
18-1.3-1201 or 18-1.3-1302, C.R.S., the physicians and other personnel
20
conducting the examination may testify to the results of any such
21
procedures and the statements and reactions of the defendant insofar as
22
the same entered into the formation of their opinions as to the mental
23
condition of the defendant both at the time of the commission of the
24
alleged offense and at the present time. This paragraph (a) shall apply
25
only THIS SUBSECTION (3)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed before July
26
1, 1995.
27
HB25-1058
-19-
(b) To aid in forming an opinion as to REGARDING the
1
DEFENDANT'S mental condition, of the defendant, it is permissible in the
2
course of an examination under CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO this section to
3
use THE DEFENDANT'S confessions and admissions of the defendant and
4
any other evidence of the circumstances surrounding the commission of
5
the offense, as well as the DEFENDANT'S medical and social history of the
6
defendant, in questioning the defendant. When the defendant is
7
noncooperative with psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other
8
personnel conducting the examination, an opinion of the DEFENDANT'S
9
mental condition of the defendant may be rendered by such THE
10
psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, or other personnel based upon such
11
THE DEFENDANT'S confessions AND admissions and any other evidence of
12
the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense, as well as
13
the DEFENDANT'S known medical and social history, of the defendant, and
14
such THE opinion may be admissible into evidence at trial and in any
15
sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense
16
charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102. It shall
17
also be permissible to conduct a narcoanalytic interview of the defendant
18
with such drugs as are medically appropriate and to subject the defendant
19
to polygraph examination. In any trial or hearing on the issue of the
20
defendant's sanity or eligibility for release, and in any sentencing hearing
21
held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July
22
1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102, the physicians and other
23
personnel conducting the examination may testify to the results of any
24
such procedures and the statements and reactions of the defendant insofar
25
as the same entered into the formation of their opinions as to the mental
26
condition of the defendant both at the time of the commission of the
27
HB25-1058
-20-
alleged offense and at the present time. This subsection (3)(b) applies to
1
offenses committed on or after July 1, 1995.
2
(c) For offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999, when a
3
defendant undergoes an examination pursuant to the provisions of
4
paragraph (b) of this subsection (3) SUBSECTION (3)(b) OF THIS SECTION
5
because the defendant has given notice pursuant to section 16-8-107 (3)
6
that he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to introduce expert opinion
7
evidence concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition, the
8
physicians, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting the
9
examination may testify to the results of any such procedures and the
10
DEFENDANT'S statements and reactions of the defendant insofar as such
11
IF THE statements and reactions entered into the formation of their THE
12
EXPERTS' opinions as to REGARDING the DEFENDANT'S mental condition.
13
of the defendant.
14
(7) With respect to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999,
15
when a defendant has undergone an examination pursuant to the
16
provisions of this section because the defendant has given notice pursuant
17
to section 16-8-107 (3) that he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to
18
introduce expert opinion evidence concerning his or her THE
19
DEFENDANT'S mental condition, the report of shall examination REPORT
20
MUST include, but is not limited to, the items described in subsections
21
(5)(a), (5)(b), and (5)(c) of this section, and:
22
SECTION 13. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-107, amend
23
(1)(a), (1)(c), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(c), (3)(b), and (3)(c) as follows:
24
16-8-107. Evidence. (1) (a) Except as provided in this subsection
25
(1), no evidence acquired directly or indirectly for the first time from a
26
communication derived from the defendant's mental processes during the
27
HB25-1058
-21-
course of a court-ordered examination under PURSUANT TO section
1
16-8-106 or acquired pursuant to section 16-8-103.6 is NOT admissible
2
against the defendant on the issues raised by a plea of not guilty, if the
3
defendant is put to trial on those issues, except to rebut evidence of his or
4
her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition introduced by the defendant to
5
show incapacity to form a culpable mental state; and, in such case, that
6
evidence may be considered by the trier of fact only as bearing upon the
7
question of capacity to form a culpable mental state, and the jury, at the
8
request of either party, shall MUST be so instructed.
9
(c) If the defendant testifies in his or her ON THE DEFENDANT'S
10
own behalf upon the trial of the issues raised by the plea of not guilty, or
11
at a sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an
12
offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302
13
for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section
14
18-1.4-102, the provisions of this section shall DOES not bar any evidence
15
used to impeach or rebut the defendant's testimony.
16
(1.5) (a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (1.5),
17
evidence acquired directly or indirectly for the first time from a
18
communication derived from the defendant's mental processes during the
19
course of a court-ordered examination pursuant to section 16-8-106 or
20
acquired pursuant to section 16-8-103.6 is admissible only as to the issues
21
raised by the defendant's plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, and the
22
jury, at the request of either party, shall MUST be so instructed; except
23
that, for offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999, such THE evidence
24
shall IS also be admissible as to the defendant's mental condition if the
25
defendant undergoes the examination because the defendant has given
26
notice pursuant to subsection (3) of this section that he or she THE
27
HB25-1058
-22-
DEFENDANT intends to introduce expert opinion evidence concerning his
1
or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition.
2
(c) If the defendant testifies in his or her ON THE DEFENDANT'S
3
own behalf, the provisions of this section shall DOES not bar any evidence
4
used to impeach or rebut the defendant's testimony. This subsection (1.5)
5
shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1995.
6
(3) (b) Regardless of whether a defendant enters a plea of not
7
guilty by reason of insanity pursuant to section 16-8-103, the defendant
8
shall not be IS NOT permitted to introduce evidence in the nature of expert
9
opinion concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition without
10
having first given notice to the court and the prosecution of his or her THE
11
DEFENDANT'S intent to introduce such THE evidence and without having
12
undergone a court-ordered examination pursuant to section 16-8-106. A
13
defendant who places his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition at
14
issue by giving such notice waives any claim of confidentiality or
15
privilege as provided in section 16-8-103.6. Such THE notice shall MUST
16
be given at the time of arraignment; except that the court, for good cause
17
shown, shall permit the defendant to inform the court and prosecution of
18
the intent to introduce such evidence at any time prior to trial. Any period
19
of delay caused by the examination and report provided for in section
20
16-8-106 shall MUST be excluded, as provided in section 18-1-405 (6)(a),
21
C.R.S., from the time within which the defendant must be brought to trial.
22
(c) The provisions of This subsection (3) shall apply APPLIES to
23
offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999.
24
SECTION 14. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-108, amend
25
(1)(a) as follows:
26
16-8-108. Examination at instance of defendant. (1) (a) If the
27
HB25-1058
-23-
defendant wishes to be examined by a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other
1
expert of his THE DEFENDANT'S own choice in connection with any
2
proceeding under this article ARTICLE 8, the court, upon timely motion,
3
shall order that the examiner chosen by the defendant be given reasonable
4
opportunity to conduct the examination. An interview conducted pursuant
5
to a court order under this section must be video and audio recorded and
6
preserved, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (1)(b) OF THIS SECTION.
7
The court shall advise the defendant that any examination with a
8
psychiatrist or forensic psychologist may be audio and video recorded. A
9
copy of the recording must be provided to the prosecution with the
10
examination report. Any jail or other facility where the court orders the
11
examination to take place must SHALL permit the recording to occur and
12
must SHALL provide the space and equipment necessary for such THE
13
recording, if available. If space and equipment are not available, the
14
sheriff or facility director shall attempt to coordinate a location and the
15
availability of equipment with the court, which AND THE COURT may
16
consult with the district attorney and defense counsel for an agreed-upon
17
location. If no AN agreement is NOT reached, and upon the request of
18
either the defense counsel or district attorney, the court shall order the
19
location of the examination, which may include the Colorado mental
20
health institute at Pueblo A STATE-RUN MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL.
21
SECTION 15. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-109 as
22
follows:
23
16-8-109. Testimony of lay witnesses. In any trial or hearing in
24
which THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition of the defendant is an issue,
25
witnesses A WITNESS not specially trained in psychiatry or psychology
26
may testify as to their THE WITNESS'S observation of the defendant's
27
HB25-1058
-24-
actions and conduct, and as to conversations which they have THAT THE
1
WITNESS HAS had with him THE DEFENDANT bearing upon his THE
2
DEFENDANT'S mental condition, and they shall THE WITNESS MUST be
3
permitted to give their opinions or conclusions concerning THE
4
DEFENDANT'S mental condition. of the defendant.
5
SECTION 16. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-114, amend
6
(3) as follows:
7
16-8-114. Evidence concerning competency - inadmissibility.
8
(3) (a) Evidence of any determination as to the defendant's competency
9
or incompetency is not admissible on the issues raised by the pleas of not
10
guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity or the affirmative defense of
11
impaired mental condition. This paragraph (a) shall apply only
12
SUBSECTION (3)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
13
(b) Evidence of any determination as to the defendant's
14
competency or incompetency is not admissible on the issues raised by the
15
pleas of not guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. This paragraph (b)
16
shall apply SUBSECTION (3)(b) APPLIES to offenses committed on or after
17
July 1, 1995.
18
SECTION 17. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-115, amend
19
(1)(b), (1)(c), (1.5), (2), (3)(b), (3)(c), (4)(a.5), (4)(f), (4)(g)(XXI), and
20
(4)(i)(I) as follows:
21
16-8-115. Release from commitment after verdict of not guilty
22
by reason of insanity or not guilty by reason of impaired mental
23
condition - definitions. (1) (b) Following the initial release hearing
24
pursuant to subsection (1)(a) of this section, the court may order a release
25
hearing at any time on its own motion, on motion of the prosecuting
26
attorney, or on motion of the defendant. The court shall order a release
27
HB25-1058
-25-
hearing upon receipt of the report of the chief officer of the institution in
1
which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant is committed, OR THE CHIEF
2
OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, that the defendant no longer requires hospitalization,
3
as provided in section 16-8-116. Except for the initial release hearing,
4
unless the court for good cause shown permits, the defendant is not
5
entitled to a hearing within one year subsequent to a previous hearing.
6
(c) Beginning September 1, 2022, the chief officer of the
7
institution in which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant is committed, OR THE
8
CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, shall annually submit a release examination
9
report to the court certifying whether the defendant continues to meet the
10
criteria for ongoing inpatient hospitalization or meets the applicable test
11
for release pursuant to section 16-8-120. The report must be submitted
12
each year by the date on which the defendant was initially committed for
13
inpatient hospitalization unless another release examination is ordered
14
within the twelve months preceding such THE date. The release
15
examination report must include the information required for a release
16
examination pursuant to subsection (2.5) of this section. The institution
17
HOSPITAL shall provide a copy of the report to the defendant, the
18
prosecuting attorney, and any other attorney of record. Upon receipt and
19
after review of the report, the court may order a release hearing on its
20
own motion, on motion of the prosecuting attorney, or on motion of the
21
defendant.
22
(1.5) (a) Any victim of any crime or any member of such THE
23
victim's immediate family, if the victim has died or is a minor, the
24
perpetrator of which has been found not guilty by reason of insanity or
25
not guilty by reason of impaired mental condition, shall be notified by the
26
court in a timely manner prior to any hearing for release of the perpetrator
27
HB25-1058
-26-
held pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, if such THE victim or
1
family member can reasonably be located. This paragraph (a) shall apply
2
only SUBSECTION (1.5)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed before July 1,
3
1995.
4
(b) Any victim of any crime or any member of such THE victim's
5
immediate family, if the victim has died or is a minor, the perpetrator of
6
which has been found not guilty by reason of insanity, shall be notified by
7
the court in a timely manner prior to any hearing for release of the
8
perpetrator held pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, if such THE
9
victim or family member can reasonably be located. This paragraph (b)
10
shall apply SUBSECTION (1.5)(b) APPLIES to offenses committed on or
11
after July 1, 1995.
12
(2) (a) The court shall order a release examination of the
13
defendant when a current one has not already been furnished or when
14
either the prosecution or defense moves for an examination of the
15
defendant at a different institution HOSPITAL or by different experts. The
16
court may order any additional or supplemental examination,
17
investigation, or study that it THE COURT deems necessary to a proper
18
consideration and determination of the question of eligibility for release.
19
The court shall set the matter for release hearing after it THE COURT has
20
received all of the reports that it THE COURT has ordered under PURSUANT
21
TO this section. When none of said THE reports indicates that the
22
defendant is eligible for release, the defendant's request for A release
23
hearing shall be denied by the court if the defendant is unable to show by
24
way of an offer of proof any evidence by a medical expert in mental
25
disorders that would indicate that the defendant is eligible for release. For
26
the purposes of this subsection (2), "medical expert in mental disorders"
27
HB25-1058
-27-
means a physician licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO article
1
240 of title 12, a psychologist licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT
2
TO article 245 of title 12, a psychiatric technician licensed under the
3
provisions of PURSUANT TO article 295 of title 12, a registered
4
professional nurse, as defined in section 12-255-104 (11), who by reason
5
of postgraduate education and additional nursing preparation has gained
6
knowledge, judgment, and skill in psychiatric or mental health nursing,
7
or a social worker licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO part 4
8
of article 245 of title 12. The release hearing shall be to the court or, on
9
demand by the defendant, to a jury of not to exceed COMPOSED OF NOT
10
MORE THAN six persons. At the release hearing, if any evidence of
11
insanity is introduced, the defendant has the burden of proving restoration
12
of sanity by a preponderance of the evidence; if any evidence of
13
ineligibility for release by reason of impaired mental condition is
14
introduced, the defendant has the burden of proving, by a preponderance
15
of the evidence, that the defendant is eligible for release by no longer
16
having an impaired mental condition. This subsection (2)(a) shall apply
17
only APPLIES to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
18
(b) The court shall order a release examination of the defendant
19
when a current one has not already been furnished or when either the
20
prosecution or defense moves for an examination of the defendant at a
21
different institution HOSPITAL or by different experts. The court may order
22
any additional or supplemental examination, investigation, or study that
23
it THE COURT deems necessary to a proper consideration and
24
determination of the question of eligibility for release. The court shall set
25
the matter for release hearing after it THE COURT has received all of the
26
reports that it has THE COURT ordered under PURSUANT TO this section.
27
HB25-1058
-28-
When none of the reports indicates that the defendant is eligible for
1
release, THE COURT SHALL DENY the defendant's request for A release
2
hearing shall be denied by the court if the defendant is unable to show by
3
way of an offer of proof any evidence by a medical expert in mental
4
disorders that would indicate that the defendant is eligible for release. For
5
the purposes of this subsection (2), "medical expert in mental disorders"
6
means a physician licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO article
7
240 of title 12, a psychologist licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT
8
TO article 245 of title 12, a psychiatric technician licensed under the
9
provisions of PURSUANT TO article 295 of title 12, a registered
10
professional nurse as, defined in section 12-255-104 (11), who by reason
11
of postgraduate education and additional nursing preparation has gained
12
knowledge, judgment, and skill in psychiatric or mental health nursing,
13
or a social worker licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO part 4
14
of article 245 of title 12. The release hearing shall be to the court or, on
15
demand by the defendant, to a jury composed of not more than six
16
persons. At the release hearing, if any evidence that the defendant does
17
not meet the release criteria is introduced, the defendant has the burden
18
of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has no
19
DOES NOT HAVE AN abnormal mental condition that would be likely to
20
cause the defendant to be dangerous either to himself or herself THE
21
DEFENDANT'S SELF or to others or to the community in the reasonably
22
foreseeable future. This subsection (2)(b) shall apply APPLIES to offenses
23
committed on or after July 1, 1995.
24
(3) (b) When a defendant is conditionally released, the chief
25
officer of the institution in which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant is
26
committed, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, shall forthwith give written
27
HB25-1058
-29-
notice of the terms and conditions of such THE release to the executive
1
director of the department of human services and to the director of any
2
behavioral health safety net provider that may be charged with THE
3
DEFENDANT'S continued treatment. of the defendant. The director of such
4
THE behavioral health safety net provider shall make written reports every
5
three months to the executive director of the department of human
6
services and to the district attorney for the judicial district where the
7
defendant was committed and to the district attorney for any judicial
8
district where the defendant may be required to receive treatment
9
concerning the DEFENDANT'S treatment and status. of the defendant. Such
10
THE reports shall MUST include all known violations of the terms and
11
conditions of the defendant's release and any changes in the defendant's
12
mental status that would indicate that the defendant has become ineligible
13
to remain on conditional release. as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5).
14
(c) A defendant who has been conditionally released remains
15
under the supervision of the department of human services until the
16
committing court enters a final order of unconditional release. When a
17
defendant fails to comply with any conditions of his THE DEFENDANT'S
18
release requiring him THE DEFENDANT to establish, maintain, and reside
19
at a specific residence and his THE DEFENDANT'S whereabouts have
20
therefore become unknown to the authorities charged with his THE
21
DEFENDANT'S supervision or when the defendant leaves the state of
22
Colorado without the consent of the committing court, the defendant's
23
absence from supervision shall constitute CONSTITUTES unauthorized
24
absence, as defined in section 18-8-208.2. Such offense occurs in the
25
county in which the defendant is authorized to reside.
26
(4) (a.5) In addition to any terms and conditions of release
27
HB25-1058
-30-
imposed pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, a court may order a
1
defendant, as a condition of release, to register with the local law
2
enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in which the defendant resides if
3
the court finds that the chief officer of the institution in which HOSPITAL
4
WHERE the defendant has been committed, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S
5
DESIGNEE, recommends registration based on information obtained from
6
the defendant during the course of treatment that indicates the defendant
7
has committed an offense involving unlawful sexual behavior.
8
(f) The local law enforcement agency shall transmit any
9
registrations received pursuant to paragraph (e) of this subsection (4)
10
SUBSECTION (4)(e) OF THIS SECTION to the Colorado bureau of
11
investigation within three business days following receipt OF THE
12
REGISTRATION. The Colorado bureau of investigation shall include any
13
registration information received pursuant to this section in the central
14
registry established pursuant to section 16-22-110 and shall specify that
15
the information applies to a defendant required to register as a condition
16
of release pursuant to this section. The forms completed by defendants A
17
DEFENDANT required to register as a condition of release pursuant to this
18
subsection (4) shall be ARE confidential and shall MUST not be open to
19
inspection except as provided in paragraph (e) of subsection (3)
20
SUBSECTION (3)(e) of this section and except as provided for release of
21
information to the public pursuant to sections 16-22-110 (6) and
22
16-22-112.
23
(g) As used in this subsection (4), "an offense involving unlawful
24
sexual behavior" means any of the following offenses:
25
(XXI) Criminal attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit any
26
of the offenses specified in this paragraph (g) SUBSECTION (4)(g).
27
HB25-1058
-31-
(i) (I) Any defendant required to register as a condition of release
1
pursuant to this subsection (4), upon completion of a period of not less
2
than twenty years from the date the defendant is placed on conditional
3
release, may petition the district court for an order that discontinues the
4
requirement for such registration and removes the defendant's name from
5
the central registry established pursuant to section 16-22-110. The court
6
may issue such AN order only if the court makes written findings of fact
7
that the defendant has neither been convicted nor found not guilty by
8
reason of insanity of an offense involving unlawful sexual behavior
9
subsequent to his or her THE DEFENDANT'S conditional release and that the
10
defendant would not pose an undue threat to the community if allowed to
11
live in the community without registration.
12
SECTION 18. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-115.5, amend
13
(3), (4), (5), (6)(a), (6)(b), and (8) as follows:
14
16-8-115.5. Enforcement and revocation of conditional release
15
from commitment. (3) Whenever the superintendent of the Colorado
16
mental health institute at Pueblo DIRECTOR OF FORENSIC SERVICES IN THE
17
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, has
18
probable cause to believe that such THE defendant has become ineligible
19
to remain on conditional release, as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5), said
20
superintendent THE DIRECTOR, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, shall notify
21
the district attorney for the judicial district where the defendant was
22
committed. The superintendent DIRECTOR, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE,
23
or the district attorney shall apply for a warrant to be directed to the
24
sheriff or a peace officer in the jurisdiction in which WHERE the defendant
25
resides or may be found, commanding such THE sheriff or peace officer
26
to take custody of the defendant. The application shall MUST include the
27
HB25-1058
-32-
order conditionally releasing the defendant pursuant to section 16-8-115
1
(3) and supporting documentation showing that THE defendant has
2
become ineligible to remain on conditional release. as defined in section
3
16-8-102 (4.5). The committing court and the district court for the tenth
4
judicial district are authorized to issue such a warrant pursuant to the
5
provisions of section 16-1-106. The superintendent DIRECTOR, OR THE
6
DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, shall mail a copy of the application to the
7
committing court and the district attorney in the committing jurisdiction.
8
(4) The sheriff or peace officer to whom the warrant is directed
9
pursuant to subsection (3) of this section shall take all necessary legal
10
action to take custody of the defendant. A sheriff shall deliver the
11
defendant immediately to the Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo,
12
which HOSPITAL WHERE THE DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED, AND THE
13
HOSPITAL shall provide care and security for the defendant. If any other
14
peace officer takes custody of the defendant, such THE peace officer shall
15
deliver the defendant to the custody of the sheriff of the jurisdiction in
16
which WHERE the defendant was found, and such THE sheriff shall comply
17
with the provisions of this subsection (4).
18
(5) The Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo HOSPITAL
19
WHERE THE DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED shall examine the defendant to
20
evaluate the defendant's ability to remain on conditional release. The
21
examination shall MUST be consistent with the procedure provided in
22
section 16-8-106. If the defendant refuses to submit to and cooperate with
23
the examination, the committing court shall revoke the conditional
24
release. The examination shall MUST be completed within twenty-one
25
days after the defendant has been delivered to the institute HOSPITAL as
26
a result of the defendant's arrest. The institute HOSPITAL shall mail or
27
HB25-1058
-33-
deliver a written report of the examination to the committing court and
1
the district attorney in the committing jurisdiction promptly after the
2
examination is completed. The defendant may request an examination as
3
provided in section 16-8-108.
4
(6) (a) The district attorney for the judicial district where the
5
defendant was committed may file in the committing court a petition for
6
the revocation of the defendant's conditional release. The petition shall
7
MUST set forth the name of the defendant, an allegation that the defendant
8
has become ineligible to remain on conditional release, as defined in
9
section 16-8-102 (4.5), and the substance of the evidence sustaining the
10
allegation.
11
(b) If the district attorney for the committing judicial district does
12
not file a petition for revocation, as provided in paragraph (a) of this
13
subsection (6) SUBSECTION (6)(a) OF THIS SECTION, within ten days after
14
the defendant is delivered to the Colorado mental health institute at
15
Pueblo HOSPITAL WHERE THE DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED, the defendant
16
shall MUST be immediately released from custody; except that, upon a
17
showing of good cause by the district attorney, the court may grant a
18
reasonable extension of time to file the petition for revocation.
19
(8) Within thirty-five days after the defendant is delivered to the
20
Colorado mental health institute in Pueblo HOSPITAL WHERE THE
21
DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED pursuant to subsection (4) of this section,
22
and if the defendant is not released from custody pursuant to paragraph
23
(b) of subsection (6) SUBSECTION (6)(b) of this section, the committing
24
court shall hold a hearing on the petition for revocation of conditional
25
release. At such THE hearing, any evidence having probative value shall
26
be IS admissible, but the defendant shall be IS permitted to offer testimony
27
HB25-1058
-34-
and to call, confront, and cross-examine witnesses. If the court finds by
1
a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has become ineligible
2
to remain on conditional release, as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5), it
3
shall THE COURT MUST enter an order revoking the defendant's conditional
4
release and recommitting the defendant. At any time thereafter, the
5
defendant may be afforded a release hearing as provided in section
6
16-8-115. If the court does not find by a preponderance of the evidence
7
that the defendant has become ineligible to remain on conditional release,
8
as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5), it THE COURT shall dismiss the
9
petition and reinstate or modify the original order of conditional release.
10
SECTION 19. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-116 as
11
follows:
12
16-8-116. Release by department of human services authority.
13
(1) AFTER A FINDING OF NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY, when the
14
chief officer of the institution in which HOSPITAL WHERE a defendant has
15
been committed, after a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity OR THE
16
CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, OR THE DIRECTOR OF FORENSIC SERVICES IN
17
THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE,
18
WHO HAS BEEN SUPERVISING THE DEFENDANT'S CONDITIONAL RELEASE,
19
determines that the defendant no longer requires hospitalization OR
20
SUPERVISION because he THE DEFENDANT no longer suffers from a mental
21
disease or defect which THAT is likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to be
22
dangerous to himself A DANGER TO THE DEFENDANT'S SELF, to others, or
23
to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future, such THE chief
24
officer OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, OR THE DIRECTOR OR THE
25
DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, shall report this THE determination to the court that
26
committed the defendant and the prosecuting attorney, including in the
27
HB25-1058
-35-
report a report of examination equivalent to a release examination. The
1
clerk of the court shall forthwith furnish a copy of the report to counsel
2
for the defendant.
3
(2) Within thirty-five days after receiving the report of the chief
4
officer of the institution having custody of the defendant OR THE CHIEF
5
OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, OR THE DIRECTOR OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, the
6
court shall set a hearing on the discharge of the defendant in accordance
7
with section 16-8-115, whether or not such THE report is contested.
8
(3) Repealed.
9
SECTION 20. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-117 as
10
follows:
11
16-8-117. Advisement on matters to be determined. When a
12
determination is to be made as to a defendant's eligibility for release, the
13
court shall explain to the defendant the nature and consequences of the
14
proceeding and the rights of the defendant under PURSUANT TO this
15
section, including his or her THE DEFENDANT'S right to a jury trial upon
16
the question of eligibility for release. The defendant, if he or she THE
17
DEFENDANT wishes to contest the question, may request a hearing which
18
shall then THAT MUST be granted as a matter of right. At the hearing, the
19
defendant and the prosecuting attorney are entitled to be present in
20
person, to examine any reports of examination or other matter to be
21
considered by the court as bearing upon the determination, to introduce
22
evidence, summon witnesses, cross-examine witnesses for the other side
23
or the court, and to make opening and closing statements and argument.
24
The court may examine or cross-examine any witness called by the
25
defendant or prosecuting attorney and may summon and examine
26
witnesses on its own motion.
27
HB25-1058
-36-
SECTION 21. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-118, amend
1
(1), (1.5), (2)(a.5), and (2)(b) as follows:
2
16-8-118.
Temporary
removal
for
treatment
and
3
rehabilitation. (1) The chief officer of the institution in which WHERE
4
a defendant has been committed under this article ARTICLE 8 or article 8.5
5
of this title TITLE 16, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, may authorize
6
treatment and rehabilitation activities involving temporary physical
7
removal of such person THE DEFENDANT from the institution in which
8
WHERE the defendant has been placed, if prior to such THE authorization
9
the following procedures are carried out:
10
(a) Such THE chief officer, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE,
11
shall give written notice by certified mail, with return receipt requested,
12
to the committing court and the district attorney that on or after thirty-five
13
days from the date of mailing such THE notice, he or she THE CHIEF
14
OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, will authorize treatment and
15
rehabilitation activities involving temporary physical removal of the
16
defendant from the institution, unless written objections to such THE
17
authorization are received by him or her THE CHIEF OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF
18
OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, within thirty-five days from the date of mailing such
19
THE notice.
20
(b) The clerk of the committing court shall deliver a copy of the
21
notice mentioned in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) DESCRIBED IN
22
SUBSECTION (1)(a) OF THIS SECTION to the attorney of record for the
23
defendant. The district attorney or the attorney of record for the defendant
24
may file objections with the clerk of the committing court to the proposed
25
action of the chief officer of the institution in which such WHERE THE
26
defendant is held, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE. THE PARTY MAKING
27
HB25-1058
-37-
THE OBJECTIONS SHALL DELIVER a copy of any such THE objections, shall
1
be delivered by the party making such objections, either by mail or by
2
personal service, to such THE chief officer, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S
3
DESIGNEE, prior to the expiration of thirty-five days from the mailing of
4
the notice by the chief officer of the institution, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S
5
DESIGNEE.
6
(c) In the event that objections are filed and served as provided in
7
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection (1) SUBSECTIONS (1)(a) AND
8
(1)(b) OF THIS SECTION, the committing court shall fix a time for a hearing
9
upon the objections, and no removal of the defendant from the institution
10
in which he WHERE THE DEFENDANT is held shall be IS authorized unless
11
and until approval thereof is given by the committing court following
12
such THE hearing.
13
(1.5) The chief officer of the institution, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S
14
DESIGNEE, is authorized to allow a defendant, without court authorization
15
as set forth DESCRIBED in subsection (1) of this section, to leave the
16
physical premises of the treatment or habilitation facility for needed
17
medical treatment at a hospital, clinic, or other health-care facility, so
18
long as the defendant is accompanied by staff from the facility.
19
(2) (a.5) A court may order any defendant who receives treatment
20
and rehabilitation activities involving temporary physical removal of the
21
defendant from the institution to register with the local law enforcement
22
agency of the jurisdiction in which WHERE the defendant resides if the
23
court finds that the chief officer of the institution in which WHERE the
24
defendant has been committed, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE,
25
recommends registration based on information obtained from the
26
defendant during the course of treatment that indicates the defendant has
27
HB25-1058
-38-
committed an offense involving unlawful sexual behavior.
1
(b) Prior to temporary physical removal from the institution of any
2
defendant who is required to register pursuant to this subsection (2), the
3
department of human services shall obtain from the defendant the address
4
at which WHERE the defendant plans to reside and THE DEPARTMENT shall
5
notify the local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in which
6
WHERE the defendant plans to reside and the Colorado bureau of
7
investigation as provided in section 16-8-115 (4)(c).
8
SECTION 22. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-119 as
9
follows:
10
16-8-119. Counsel and physicians for indigent defendants. In
11
all proceedings under this article BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 8,
12
upon motion of the defendant and proof that he THE DEFENDANT is
13
indigent and without funds to employ physicians, psychologists, or
14
attorneys to which he THE DEFENDANT is entitled under this article
15
ARTICLE 8, the court shall appoint such THE physicians, psychologists, or
16
attorneys for him THE DEFENDANT at state expense.
17
SECTION 23. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-120 as
18
follows:
19
16-8-120. Applicable tests for release. (1) As to any person
20
charged with any crime allegedly committed on or after June 2, 1965, the
21
test for determination of a defendant's sanity for release from
22
commitment, or his THE DEFENDANT'S eligibility for conditional release,
23
shall be IS: "That the defendant has no abnormal mental condition which
24
would be likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to be dangerous either to
25
himself THE DEFENDANT'S SELF or to others or to the community in the
26
reasonably foreseeable future".
27
HB25-1058
-39-
(2) As to any person charged with any crime allegedly committed
1
prior to June 2, 1965, the test for determination of a defendant's sanity for
2
release from commitment, or his THE DEFENDANT'S eligibility for
3
conditional release, shall be IS the test provided by law at the time of the
4
alleged crime to determine the sanity or insanity of such THE defendant.
5
(3) As to any person charged with any crime allegedly committed
6
on or after July 1, 1983, the test for determination of a defendant's sanity
7
for release from commitment, or his THE DEFENDANT'S eligibility for
8
conditional release, shall be IS: "That the defendant has no abnormal
9
mental condition which THAT would be likely to cause him THE
10
DEFENDANT to be dangerous either to himself THE DEFENDANT'S SELF or
11
others or to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future, and is
12
capable of distinguishing right from wrong and has substantial capacity
13
to conform his THE DEFENDANT'S conduct to requirements of law".
14
(4) As to any person charged with any crime allegedly committed
15
on or after July 1, 1983, but before July 1, 1995, resulting in commitment
16
by reason of impaired mental condition, the test for determination of a
17
defendant's mental condition for release from commitment, or a
18
defendant's eligibility for conditional release, shall be IS: "That the
19
defendant has no abnormal mental condition which THAT would be likely
20
to cause the defendant to be dangerous either to himself or herself THE
21
DEFENDANT'S SELF or to others or to the community in the reasonably
22
foreseeable future".
23
SECTION 24. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-121 as
24
follows:
25
16-8-121. Escape - return to institution. (1) If any defendant,
26
confined in an institution for the care and treatment of persons with
27
HB25-1058
-40-
behavioral or mental health disorders or intellectual and developmental
1
disabilities under the supervision of the executive director of the
2
department of human services, escapes from such THE institution, it is the
3
duty of the chief officer to apply forthwith to the district court for the
4
county in which the hospital or institution is located for a warrant of
5
arrest directed to the sheriff of the county, commanding him or her THE
6
SHERIFF forthwith to take all necessary legal action to effect the arrest of
7
the defendant and to return him or her THE DEFENDANT promptly to the
8
institution. The fact of an escape becomes a part of the official record of
9
a defendant and must be certified to the committing court as part of the
10
record in any proceeding to determine whether the defendant is eligible
11
for release from commitment or eligible for conditional release.
12
(2) If any defendant committed to the custody of the executive
13
director of the department of human services and placed in an institution
14
under his or her THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S supervision has escaped from
15
an institution for the care and treatment of persons with behavioral,
16
mental health, or substance use disorders in another state, the chief officer
17
is authorized to return the defendant to the institution from which he or
18
she THE DEFENDANT escaped. The chief officer is further authorized to
19
effect the return at the expense of the state of Colorado and under such
20
terms and conditions as the chief officer deems suitable.
21
SECTION 25. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-1-803, amend
22
(1) as follows:
23
18-1-803. Impaired mental condition. (1) Evidence of an
24
impaired mental condition, as defined in section 16-8-102 (2.7), C.R.S.
25
(4), though not legal insanity may be offered in a proper case as bearing
26
upon the capacity of the accused to form the culpable mental state which
27
HB25-1058
-41-
is an element of the offense charged.
1
SECTION 26. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 25.5-10-237,
2
amend (1) as follows:
3
25.5-10-237. Terminology. (1) Whenever the terms "insane",
4
"insanity", "mentally or mental incompetent", "mental incompetency", or
5
"of unsound mind" are used in the laws of the state of Colorado, they
6
shall be deemed to refer to the insane, as defined in section 16-8-101,
7
C.R.S. SECTIONS 16-8-101 AND 16-8-101.5, or to a person with an
8
intellectual and developmental disability, as defined in section
9
25.5-10-202, as the context of the particular law requires.
10
SECTION 27. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 27-65-127, amend
11
(1)(a) as follows:
12
27-65-127. Imposition of legal disability - deprivation of legal
13
right - restoration - repeal. (1) (a) When an interested person wishes to
14
obtain a determination as to the imposition of a legal disability or the
15
deprivation of a legal right for a person who has a mental health disorder
16
and who is a danger to the person's self or others, is gravely disabled, or
17
is insane, as defined in section 16-8-101 SECTIONS 16-8-101 AND
18
16-8-101.5, and who is not then subject to proceedings pursuant to this
19
article 65 or part 3 or part 4 of article 14 of title 15, the interested person
20
may petition the court for a specific finding as to the legal disability or
21
deprivation of a legal right. Actions commenced pursuant to this
22
subsection (1) may include but are not limited to actions to determine
23
contractual rights and rights with regard to the operation of motor
24
vehicles.
25
SECTION 28. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act
26
takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the
27
HB25-1058
-42-
ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except
1
that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V
2
of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this
3
act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take
4
effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in
5
November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the
6
official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
7
HB25-1058
-43-
As enrolled or final
72,943 characters
HOUSE BILL 25-1058
BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Bradfield and English, Brown, Clifford,
Duran, Joseph, Mabrey, Rydin, Zokaie, McCluskie;
also SENATOR(S) Michaelson Jenet and Amabile, Cutter, Ball,
Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kipp, Marchman, Rodriguez, Weissman, Coleman.
CONCERNING MODIFICATIONS TO THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NOT GUILTY
BY REASON OF INSANITY.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-101, amend (3);
and repeal (2) as follows:
16-8-101. Insanity defined - offenses committed before July 1,
1995. (2) The term "diseased or defective in mind", as used in subsection
(1) of this section, does not refer to an abnormality manifested only by
repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.
(3) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed before
July 1, 1995.
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-101.5, amend (3);
NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative
officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill
or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative
history, or the Session Laws.
________
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
the act.
and repeal (2) as follows:
16-8-101.5. Insanity defined - offenses committed on and after
July 1, 1995. (2) As used in this section:
(a) "Diseased or defective in mind" does not refer to an abnormality
manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.
Evidence of knowledge or awareness of the victim's actual or perceived
gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation shall not
constitute inability to distinguish right from wrong.
(b) "Gender identity" and "gender expression" have the same
meaning as in section 18-1-901 (3)(h.5).
(c) "Mental disease or defect" includes only those severely abnormal
mental conditions that grossly and demonstrably impair a person's
perception or understanding of reality and that are not attributable to the
voluntary ingestion of alcohol or any other psychoactive substance but does
not include an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or
otherwise antisocial conduct.
(d) "Sexual orientation" has the same meaning as in section
18-9-121 (5)(b).
(3) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or
after July 1, 1995.
SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-102 as
follows:
16-8-102. Definitions. As used in this article ARTICLE 8, unless the
context otherwise requires:
(1) and (2) Repealed.
(1) "DISEASED OR DEFECTIVE IN MIND" DOES NOT REFER TO AN
ABNORMALITY MANIFESTED ONLY BY REPEATED CRIMINAL OR OTHERWISE
ANTISOCIAL CONDUCT. EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE OR AWARENESS OF THE
VICTIM'S ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED GENDER, GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER
EXPRESSION, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN INABILITY
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
TO DISTINGUISH RIGHT FROM WRONG.
(2.5) (2) "Forensic psychologist" means a licensed psychologist who
is board certified in forensic psychology by the American board of
professional psychology or who has completed a fellowship in forensic
psychology meeting criteria established by the American board of forensic
psychology.
(3) "GENDER IDENTITY" AND "GENDER EXPRESSION" HAVE THE SAME
MEANING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-1-901.
(2.7) (4) (a) "Impaired mental condition" means a condition of mind,
caused by mental disease or defect that prevents the person from forming
the culpable mental state that is an essential element of any crime charged.
For the purposes of this subsection (2.7), "mental disease or defect"
includes only those severely abnormal mental conditions which grossly and
demonstrably impair a person's perception or understanding of reality and
which are not attributable to the voluntary ingestion of alcohol or any other
psychoactive substance; except that it does not include an abnormality
manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.
(b) This subsection (2.7) shall apply only SUBSECTION (4) APPLIES
to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
(3) Repealed.
(4) (5) "Ineligible for release" means the defendant is suffering from
a mental disease or defect which is likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to
be dangerous to himself THE DEFENDANT'S SELF, to others, or to the
community, in the reasonably foreseeable future, if he THE DEFENDANT is
permitted to remain at liberty.
(4.5) (6) "Ineligible to remain on conditional release" means the
defendant has violated one or more conditions in his THE DEFENDANT'S
release, or the defendant is suffering from a mental disease or defect which
is likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to be dangerous to himself THE
DEFENDANT'S SELF, to others, or to the community in the reasonably
foreseeable future, if he THE DEFENDANT is permitted to remain on
conditional release.
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(4.7) (7) "Mental disease or defect" means only those severely
abnormal mental conditions that grossly and demonstrably impair a person's
perception or understanding of reality and that are not attributable to the
voluntary ingestion of alcohol or any other psychoactive substance; except
that it does not include an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal
or otherwise antisocial conduct.
(5) (8) "Release examination" means a court-ordered examination
of a defendant directed to developing evidence relevant to determining
whether he THE DEFENDANT is eligible for release.
(6) (9) "Release hearing" means a hearing for the purpose of
determining whether a defendant previously committed to the department
of human services, following a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity,
has become eligible for release.
(7) Repealed.
(8) (10) "Sanity examination" means a court-ordered examination
of a defendant who has entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity,
directed to developing information relevant to determining the sanity or
insanity of the defendant at the time of the commission of the act with
which he THE DEFENDANT is charged and also his THE DEFENDANT'S
competency to proceed.
(11) "SEXUAL ORIENTATION" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS SET FORTH
IN SECTION 18-9-121.
SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103 as
follows:
16-8-103. Pleading insanity as a defense. (1) (a) The defense of
insanity may only be raised by a specific plea entered at the time of
arraignment; except that the court, for good cause shown, may permit the
plea to be entered at any time prior to trial. The form of the plea shall be IS:
"Not guilty by reason of insanity"; and it must be pleaded orally either by
the defendant or by the defendant's counsel. A defendant who does not raise
the defense as provided in this section shall IS not be permitted to rely upon
insanity as a defense to the crime charged but, when charged with a crime
requiring a specific intent as an element thereof, may introduce evidence of
PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
the defendant's mental condition as bearing upon his or her THE
DEFENDANT'S capacity to form the required specific intent. The plea of not
guilty by reason of insanity includes the plea of not guilty.
(b) This subsection (1) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
committed before July 1, 1995.
(1.5) (a) The defense of insanity may only be raised by a specific
plea entered at the time of arraignment; except that the court, for good cause
shown, may permit the plea to be entered at any time prior to trial. The form
of the plea shall be IS: "Not guilty by reason of insanity"; and it must be
pleaded orally either by the defendant or by the defendant's counsel. The
plea of not guilty by reason of insanity includes the plea of not guilty.
(b) This subsection (1.5) shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed
on or after July 1, 1995.
(2) If counsel for the defendant believes that a plea of not guilty by
reason of insanity should be entered on behalf of the defendant but the
defendant refuses to permit the entry of the plea, counsel may so inform the
court. The court shall then conduct such AN investigation as it deems
proper, which may include the appointment of psychiatrists or forensic
psychologists to assist in examining the defendant and advising the court.
After its investigation, the court shall conduct a hearing to determine
whether the plea should be entered. If the court finds that the entry of a plea
of not guilty by reason of insanity is necessary for a just determination of
the charge against the defendant, it THE COURT shall enter the plea on behalf
of the defendant, and the plea so entered shall have HAS the same effect as
though it had been voluntarily entered by the defendant. himself or herself.
(3) If there has been no A grand jury indictment or preliminary
hearing HAS NOT BEEN HELD prior to the entry of the plea of not guilty by
reason of insanity, the court shall hold a preliminary hearing prior to the
trial of the insanity issue. If probable cause is not established, the case shall
MUST be dismissed, but the court may order the district attorney to institute
civil proceedings pursuant to article 65 of title 27 C.R.S., if it appears that
the protection of the public or the accused requires it A CIVIL PROCEEDING.
(4) Before accepting a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, the
court shall advise the defendant of the effect and consequences of the plea.
PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103.5 as
follows:
16-8-103.5. Impaired mental condition - when raised - procedure
- legislative intent. (1) If the defendant intends to assert the affirmative
defense of impaired mental condition, he THE DEFENDANT shall indicate that
intention to the court and to the prosecution at the time of arraignment;
except that the court, for good cause shown, shall permit the defendant to
inform the court and the prosecution of his THE DEFENDANT'S intention to
assert the affirmative defense of impaired mental condition at any time prior
to trial.
(2) If counsel for the defendant believes that an assertion of the
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition should be entered on
behalf of the defendant but the defendant refuses to permit counsel to offer
such evidence, counsel may so inform the court. The court shall then
conduct such AN investigation as it deems proper, which may include the
appointment of psychiatrists or forensic psychologists to assist in examining
the defendant and advising the court. After its investigation, the court shall
conduct a hearing to determine whether evidence of impaired mental
condition should be offered at trial. If the court finds that such a THE
defense OF IMPAIRED MENTAL CONDITION is necessary for a just
determination of the charge against the defendant, it THE COURT shall
inform the prosecution that such THE defense shall MUST be asserted at trial
by the defendant and shall order the defendant's counsel to present evidence
at trial on the defense of impaired mental condition.
(3) At the time at which WHEN the defendant announces his THE
DEFENDANT'S intention to assert the affirmative defense of impaired mental
condition, the court shall advise the defendant of the effect and
consequences of asserting the defense.
(4) When the defendant indicates his THE DEFENDANT'S intention to
assert the defense of impaired mental condition, the court shall order an
examination of the defendant pursuant to section 16-8-106. The court shall
order both the prosecutor and the defendant to exchange the names,
addresses, reports, and statements of persons, other than medical experts
subject to the provisions of section 16-8-103.6, whom the parties intend to
call as witnesses with regard to the affirmative defense of impaired mental
condition.
PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(5) If the trier of fact finds the defendant not guilty by reason of
impaired mental condition, pursuant to section 18-1-803 (3), C.R.S., the
court shall commit the defendant to the custody of the department of human
services until such time as he THE DEFENDANT is found eligible for release,
pursuant to the standards set forth in sections 16-8-115 and 16-8-120. The
executive director of the department of human services shall designate the
state facility at which WHERE the defendant shall be held for care and
psychiatric treatment and may transfer the defendant from one institution to
another if, in the opinion of the EXECUTIVE director, it TRANSFERRING THE
DEFENDANT is desirable to do so in the interest of the DEFENDANT'S proper
care, custody, and treatment of the defendant or the protection of the public
or the personnel of the facilities in question.
(6) It is the intent of the general assembly that the assertion of the
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition not be made in such a
fashion A MANNER that it is used to circumvent the requirements of
disclosure specified in rule 16 of the Colorado rules of criminal procedure.
(7) A defendant may raise impaired mental condition only through
an assertion of affirmative defense.
(8) This section shall apply only APPLIES to offenses committed
before July 1, 1995.
SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103.6 as
follows:
16-8-103.6. Waiver of privilege. (1) (a) A defendant who places
his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition at issue by pleading not guilty
by reason of insanity pursuant to section 16-8-103, or asserting the
affirmative defense of impaired mental condition pursuant to section
16-8-103.5, or disclosing witnesses who may provide evidence concerning
the defendant's mental condition during a sentencing hearing held pursuant
to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or
pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020,
waives any claim of confidentiality or privilege as to communications made
by the defendant to a physician or psychologist in the course of an
examination or treatment for the mental condition for the purpose of any
trial or hearing on the issue of the mental condition, or sentencing hearing
conducted pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to
PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302 for an offense charged
prior to July 1, 2020. The court shall order both the prosecutor and the
defendant to exchange the names, addresses, reports, and statements of any
physician or psychologist who has examined or treated the defendant for the
mental condition.
(b) This subsection (1) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
committed before July 1, 1995.
(2) (a) A defendant who places his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental
condition at issue by pleading not guilty by reason of insanity pursuant to
section 16-8-103 or disclosing witnesses who may provide evidence
concerning the defendant's mental condition during a sentencing hearing
held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July 1,
2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102; or, for offenses committed on or
after July 1, 1999, by seeking to introduce evidence concerning his or her
THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition pursuant to section 16-8-107 (3) waives
any claim of confidentiality or privilege as to communications made by the
defendant to a physician or psychologist in the course of an examination or
treatment for the mental condition for the purpose of any trial or hearing on
the issue of the mental condition, or sentencing hearing conducted pursuant
to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or
pursuant to section 18-1.4-102. The court shall order both the prosecutor
and the defendant to exchange the names, addresses, reports, and statements
of any physician or psychologist who has examined or treated the defendant
for the mental condition.
(b) This subsection (2) shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed
on or after July 1, 1995.
SECTION 7. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-103.7 as
follows:
16-8-103.7. Examination after entry of defenses of insanity and
impaired mental condition. (1) (a) When, at the time of arraignment, the
defense of insanity is raised pursuant to section 16-8-103, and the defendant
asserts his or her THE DEFENDANT'S intention to raise the affirmative defense
of impaired mental condition pursuant to section 16-8-103.5, the court shall
order one examination of the defendant with regard to both defenses
pursuant to section 16-8-106.
PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(b) This subsection (1) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
committed before July 1, 1995.
(2) (a) When, at the time of arraignment, the defense of insanity is
raised pursuant to section 16-8-103, the court shall order an examination of
the defendant with regard to the insanity defense pursuant to section
16-8-106.
(b) This subsection (2) shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed
on or after July 1, 1995.
(3) (a) When the defendant gives notice pursuant to section
16-8-107 (3) that he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to introduce evidence
in the nature of expert opinion concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S
mental condition, the court shall order an examination of the defendant
pursuant to section 16-8-106.
(b) The provisions of This subsection (3) shall apply APPLIES to
offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999.
SECTION 8. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-104 as
follows:
16-8-104. Separate trial of issues. The issues raised by the plea of
not guilty by reason of insanity shall MUST be tried separately to different
juries, and the sanity of the defendant shall MUST be tried first. This section
shall apply only APPLIES to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
SECTION 9. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-104.5 as
follows:
16-8-104.5. Single trial of issues. (1) The issues raised by the plea
of not guilty by reason of insanity shall MUST be treated as an affirmative
defense and shall MUST be tried at the same proceeding and before the same
trier of fact as the charges to which not guilty by reason of insanity is
offered as a defense.
(2) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or
after July 1, 1995.
PAGE 9-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
SECTION 10. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-105, amend (1),
(4), and (5) as follows:
16-8-105. Procedure after plea for offenses committed before
July 1, 1995. (1) When a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is
accepted, the court shall forthwith commit ORDER the defendant for TO
UNDERGO a sanity examination, specifying the place and period of
commitment WHERE THE EXAMINATION MUST BE CONDUCTED.
(4) If the trier of fact finds the defendant not guilty by reason of
insanity, the court shall commit the defendant to the custody of the
department of human services until such time as he THE DEFENDANT is
found eligible for release. The executive director of the department of
human services shall designate the state facility at which the defendant shall
be held for care and psychiatric treatment and may transfer the defendant
from one institution to another if, in the opinion of the EXECUTIVE director,
it is desirable to do so in the interest of the DEFENDANT'S proper care,
custody, and treatment of the defendant or the protection of the public or the
personnel of the facilities in question.
(5) This section shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed before
July 1, 1995.
SECTION 11. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-105.5, amend
(1), (2), and (3) as follows:
16-8-105.5. Procedure after plea for offenses committed on or
after July 1, 1995. (1) (a) When a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity
is accepted, the court shall forthwith commit ORDER the defendant for TO
UNDERGO a sanity examination, specifying the place and period of
commitment WHERE THE EXAMINATION MUST BE CONDUCTED. THE COURT,
IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND THE
PARTIES, SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THE EXAMINATION REQUIRES THE
DEFENDANT TO STAY OVERNIGHT FOR AN EXTENDED EXAMINATION AND THE
NUMBER OF DAYS OF THE EXTENDED EXAMINATION.
(b) (I) IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN CUSTODY, THE EXAMINATION MAY BE
CONDUCTED AT THE JAIL OR PLACE OF CONFINEMENT OR AT A FACILITY
OPERATED BY OR UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES. IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN CUSTODY AND THE COURT DETERMINES
PAGE 10-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
THE EXAMINATION MUST BE CONDUCTED AT A FACILITY OPERATED BY OR
UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, THE COURT
SHALL ORDER THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES TO TAKE CUSTODY OF
THE DEFENDANT TO CONDUCT THE EXAMINATION AND RETURN THE
DEFENDANT TO THE ORIGINAL PLACE OF CUSTODY AFTER THE EXAMINATION
IS COMPLETE.
(II) IF THE DEFENDANT IS AT LIBERTY ON SUMMONS OR ON BOND, THE
EXAMINATION MAY BE CONDUCTED AT A FACILITY OPERATED BY OR
CONTRACTED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OR AT AN
OUT-OF-CUSTODY LOCATION THAT THE COURT AND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES DETERMINE IS APPROPRIATE.
(2) Upon receiving the report of the sanity examination, the court
shall immediately set the case for trial. Every person is presumed to be sane;
but, once any evidence of insanity is introduced, the people have
PROSECUTION HAS the burden of proving sanity beyond a reasonable doubt.
(3) When the affirmative defense of not guilty by reason of insanity
has been raised, the jury shall MUST be given special verdict forms
containing interrogatories. The trier of fact shall decide first the question of
guilt as to felony charges that are before the court. If the trier of fact
concludes that guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt as to one
or more of the felony charges submitted for consideration, the special
interrogatories shall MUST not be answered. Upon completion of its
deliberations on the felony charges as previously set forth in this subsection
(3), the trier of fact shall consider any other charges before the court in a
similar manner; except that it THE TRIER OF FACT shall not answer the
special interrogatories regarding such THE charges if it THE TRIER OF FACT
has previously found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt with respect to one
or more felony charges. The interrogatories shall MUST provide for specific
findings of the jury with respect to the affirmative defense of not guilty by
reason of insanity. When the court sits as the trier of fact, it THE COURT shall
enter appropriate specific findings with respect to the affirmative defense
of not guilty by reason of insanity.
SECTION 12. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-106, amend
(1)(a), (1)(b), (2)(a), (2)(b), (3), and (7) introductory portion as follows:
16-8-106. Examinations and report. (1) (a) All examinations
PAGE 11-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
ordered by the court in criminal cases shall MUST be accomplished by the
entry of an order of the court specifying the place where such THE
examination is to be conducted and the period of time allocated for such
THE examination. The defendant may be committed for such THE
examination to the Colorado psychiatric hospital in Denver, the Colorado
mental health institute at Pueblo A STATE-RUN MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL,
the place where he or she THE DEFENDANT is in custody, or such ANY other
public institution designated by the court. In determining the place where
such THE examination is to be conducted, the court shall give priority to the
place where the defendant is in custody, unless the nature and circumstances
of the examination require designation of a different facility. ONE OR MORE
PSYCHIATRISTS OR FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGISTS SHALL OBSERVE the defendant
shall be observed and examined by one or more psychiatrists or forensic
psychologists during such A period as the court directs. For good cause
shown, upon motion of the prosecution or defendant, or upon the court's
own motion, the court may order such ANY further or other examination as
is advisable under the circumstances. Nothing in This section shall DOES
NOT abridge the right of the defendant to procure an examination as
provided in section 16-8-108.
(b) (I) An interview conducted PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION in any
case that includes a class 1 or class 2 felony charge or a felony sex offense
charge described in section 18-3-402, 18-3-404, 18-3-405, or 18-3-405.5
C.R.S., pursuant to this section must be video and audio recorded and
preserved, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (1)(c) OF THIS SECTION. The
court shall advise the defendant that any examination with a psychiatrist or
forensic psychologist may be video and audio recorded. A copy of the
recording must be provided to all parties and the court with the examination
report. Any jail or other facility where the court orders the examination to
take place must SHALL permit the recording to occur and must SHALL
provide the space and equipment necessary for such THE recording. If space
and equipment are not available, the sheriff or facility director shall attempt
to coordinate a location and the availability of equipment with the court,
which AND THE COURT may consult with the district attorney and defense
counsel for an agreed-upon location. If no AN agreement is NOT reached,
and upon the request of either the defense counsel or district attorney, the
court shall order the location of the examination, which may include the
Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo A STATE-RUN MENTAL HEALTH
HOSPITAL.
PAGE 12-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(II) IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, IF THE
EXAMINATION IS RECORDED, THE DEFENDANT MUST NOT BE DRESSED IN
PRISON OR JAIL CLOTHING. THIS SUBSECTION (1)(b)(II) DOES NOT REQUIRE
OR PROHIBIT THE USE OF RESTRAINTS, AND THE EXAMINATION MAY BE
STOPPED OR PAUSED IN ORDER TO APPLY RESTRAINTS ON THE DEFENDANT TO
ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE EVALUATOR, THE DEFENDANT, OR OTHERS, AS
LONG AS THE RESTRAINTS ARE NOT VISIBLE ON THE RECORDING.
(2) (a) The defendant shall have HAS a privilege against
self-incrimination during the course of an examination under CONDUCTED
PURSUANT TO this section. The fact of the defendant's noncooperation with
psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting the
examination may be admissible in the defendant's trial on the issue of
insanity or impaired mental condition and in any sentencing hearing held
pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 or 18-1.3-1302. C.R.S. This paragraph (a)
shall apply only SUBSECTION (2)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed before
July 1, 1995.
(b) The defendant shall have HAS a privilege against
self-incrimination during the course of an examination under CONDUCTED
PURSUANT TO this section. The fact of the defendant's noncooperation with
psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting the
examination may be admissible in the defendant's trial on the issue of
insanity and in any sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201
or 18-1.4-102. C.R.S. This paragraph (b) shall apply SUBSECTION (2)(b)
APPLIES to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1995, but prior to July 1,
1999.
(3) (a) To aid in forming an opinion as to REGARDING the
DEFENDANT'S mental condition, of the defendant, it is permissible in the
course of an examination under CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO this section to
use THE DEFENDANT'S confessions and admissions of the defendant and any
other evidence of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the
offense, as well as the DEFENDANT'S medical and social history of the
defendant, in questioning the defendant. When the defendant is
noncooperative with psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other
personnel conducting the examination, an opinion of the DEFENDANT'S
mental condition of the defendant may be rendered by such THE
psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, or other personnel based upon such
THE DEFENDANT'S confessions AND admissions and any other evidence of
PAGE 13-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense, as well as the
DEFENDANT'S known medical and social history, of the defendant, and such
THE opinion may be admissible into evidence at trial and in any sentencing
hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 or 18-1.3-1302. C.R.S. It shall
also be permissible to conduct a narcoanalytic interview of the defendant
with such drugs as are medically appropriate and to subject the defendant
to polygraph examination. In any trial or hearing on the issue of the
defendant's sanity, eligibility for release, or impaired mental condition, and
in any sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 or
18-1.3-1302, C.R.S., the physicians and other personnel conducting the
examination may testify to the results of any such procedures and the
statements and reactions of the defendant insofar as the same entered into
the formation of their opinions as to the mental condition of the defendant
both at the time of the commission of the alleged offense and at the present
time. This paragraph (a) shall apply only THIS SUBSECTION (3)(a) APPLIES
to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
(b) To aid in forming an opinion as to REGARDING the DEFENDANT'S
mental condition, of the defendant, it is permissible in the course of an
examination under CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO this section to use THE
DEFENDANT'S confessions and admissions of the defendant and any other
evidence of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense,
as well as the DEFENDANT'S medical and social history of the defendant, in
questioning the defendant. When the defendant is noncooperative with
psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting the
examination, an opinion of the DEFENDANT'S mental condition of the
defendant may be rendered by such THE psychiatrists, forensic
psychologists, or other personnel based upon such THE DEFENDANT'S
confessions AND admissions and any other evidence of the circumstances
surrounding the commission of the offense, as well as the DEFENDANT'S
known medical and social history, of the defendant, and such THE opinion
may be admissible into evidence at trial and in any sentencing hearing held
pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020,
or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102. It shall also be permissible to conduct a
narcoanalytic interview of the defendant with such drugs as are medically
appropriate and to subject the defendant to polygraph examination. In any
trial or hearing on the issue of the defendant's sanity or eligibility for
release, and in any sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201
for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section
18-1.4-102, the physicians and other personnel conducting the examination
PAGE 14-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
may testify to the results of any such procedures and the statements and
reactions of the defendant insofar as the same entered into the formation of
their opinions as to the mental condition of the defendant both at the time
of the commission of the alleged offense and at the present time. This
subsection (3)(b) applies to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1995.
(c) For offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999, when a
defendant undergoes an examination pursuant to the provisions of
paragraph (b) of this subsection (3) SUBSECTION (3)(b) OF THIS SECTION
because the defendant has given notice pursuant to section 16-8-107 (3) that
he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to introduce expert opinion evidence
concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition, the physicians,
forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting the examination may
testify to the results of any such procedures and the DEFENDANT'S
statements and reactions of the defendant insofar as such IF THE statements
and reactions entered into the formation of their THE EXPERTS' opinions as
to REGARDING the DEFENDANT'S mental condition. of the defendant.
(7) With respect to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999,
when a defendant has undergone an examination pursuant to the provisions
of this section because the defendant has given notice pursuant to section
16-8-107 (3) that he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to introduce expert
opinion evidence concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition,
the report of examination shall REPORT MUST include, but is not limited to,
the items described in subsections (5)(a), (5)(b), and (5)(c) of this section,
and:
SECTION 13. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-107, amend
(1)(a), (1)(c), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(c), (3)(b), and (3)(c) as follows:
16-8-107. Evidence. (1) (a) Except as provided in this subsection
(1), no evidence acquired directly or indirectly for the first time from a
communication derived from the defendant's mental processes during the
course of a court-ordered examination under PURSUANT TO section 16-8-106
or acquired pursuant to section 16-8-103.6 is NOT admissible against the
defendant on the issues raised by a plea of not guilty, if the defendant is put
to trial on those issues, except to rebut evidence of his or her THE
DEFENDANT'S mental condition introduced by the defendant to show
incapacity to form a culpable mental state; and, in such case, that evidence
may be considered by the trier of fact only as bearing upon the question of
PAGE 15-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
capacity to form a culpable mental state, and the jury, at the request of
either party, shall MUST be so instructed.
(c) If the defendant testifies in his or her ON THE DEFENDANT'S own
behalf upon the trial of the issues raised by the plea of not guilty, or at a
sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense
charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302 for an
offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102, the
provisions of this section shall DOES not bar any evidence used to impeach
or rebut the defendant's testimony.
(1.5) (a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (1.5),
evidence acquired directly or indirectly for the first time from a
communication derived from the defendant's mental processes during the
course of a court-ordered examination pursuant to section 16-8-106 or
acquired pursuant to section 16-8-103.6 is admissible only as to the issues
raised by the defendant's plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, and the
jury, at the request of either party, shall MUST be so instructed; except that,
for offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999, such THE evidence shall IS
also be admissible as to the defendant's mental condition if the defendant
undergoes the examination because the defendant has given notice pursuant
to subsection (3) of this section that he or she THE DEFENDANT intends to
introduce expert opinion evidence concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S
mental condition.
(c) If the defendant testifies in his or her ON THE DEFENDANT'S own
behalf, the provisions of this section shall DOES not bar any evidence used
to impeach or rebut the defendant's testimony. This subsection (1.5) shall
apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1995.
(3) (b) Regardless of whether a defendant enters a plea of not guilty
by reason of insanity pursuant to section 16-8-103, the defendant shall not
be IS NOT permitted to introduce evidence in the nature of expert opinion
concerning his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition without having
first given notice to the court and the prosecution of his or her THE
DEFENDANT'S intent to introduce such THE evidence and without having
undergone a court-ordered examination pursuant to section 16-8-106. A
defendant who places his or her THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition at issue
by giving such notice waives any claim of confidentiality or privilege as
provided in section 16-8-103.6. Such THE notice shall MUST be given at the
PAGE 16-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
time of arraignment; except that the court, for good cause shown, shall
permit the defendant to inform the court and prosecution of the intent to
introduce such evidence at any time prior to trial. Any period of delay
caused by the examination and report provided for in section 16-8-106 shall
MUST be excluded, as provided in section 18-1-405 (6)(a), C.R.S., from the
time within which the defendant must be brought to trial.
(c) The provisions of This subsection (3) shall apply APPLIES to
offenses committed on or after July 1, 1999.
SECTION 14. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-108, amend
(1)(a) as follows:
16-8-108. Examination at instance of defendant. (1) (a) If the
defendant wishes to be examined by a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other
expert of his THE DEFENDANT'S own choice in connection with any
proceeding under this article ARTICLE 8, the court, upon timely motion, shall
order that the examiner chosen by the defendant be given reasonable
opportunity to conduct the examination. An interview conducted pursuant
to a court order under this section must be video and audio recorded and
preserved, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (1)(b) OF THIS SECTION. The
court shall advise the defendant that any examination with a psychiatrist or
forensic psychologist may be audio and video recorded. A copy of the
recording must be provided to the prosecution with the examination report.
Any jail or other facility where the court orders the examination to take
place must SHALL permit the recording to occur and must SHALL provide the
space and equipment necessary for such THE recording, if available. If space
and equipment are not available, the sheriff or facility director shall attempt
to coordinate a location and the availability of equipment with the court,
which AND THE COURT may consult with the district attorney and defense
counsel for an agreed-upon location. If no AN agreement is NOT reached,
and upon the request of either the defense counsel or district attorney, the
court shall order the location of the examination, which may include the
Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo A STATE-RUN MENTAL HEALTH
HOSPITAL.
SECTION 15. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-109 as
follows:
16-8-109. Testimony of lay witnesses. In any trial or hearing in
PAGE 17-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
which THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition of the defendant is an issue,
witnesses A WITNESS not specially trained in psychiatry or psychology may
testify as to their THE WITNESS'S observation of the defendant's actions and
conduct, and as to conversations which they have THAT THE WITNESS HAS
had with him THE DEFENDANT bearing upon his THE DEFENDANT'S mental
condition, and they shall THE WITNESS MUST be permitted to give their
opinions or conclusions concerning THE DEFENDANT'S mental condition. of
the defendant.
SECTION 16. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-114, amend (3)
as follows:
16-8-114. Evidence concerning competency - inadmissibility.
(3) (a) Evidence of any determination as to the defendant's competency or
incompetency is not admissible on the issues raised by the pleas of not
guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity or the affirmative defense of
impaired mental condition. This paragraph (a) shall apply only SUBSECTION
(3)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
(b) Evidence of any determination as to the defendant's competency
or incompetency is not admissible on the issues raised by the pleas of not
guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. This paragraph (b) shall apply
SUBSECTION (3)(b) APPLIES to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1995.
SECTION 17. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-115, amend
(1)(b), (1)(c), (1.5), (2), (3)(b), (3)(c), (4)(a.5), (4)(f), (4)(g)(XXI), and
(4)(i)(I) as follows:
16-8-115. Release from commitment after verdict of not guilty
by reason of insanity or not guilty by reason of impaired mental
condition - definitions. (1) (b) Following the initial release hearing
pursuant to subsection (1)(a) of this section, the court may order a release
hearing at any time on its own motion, on motion of the prosecuting
attorney, or on motion of the defendant. The court shall order a release
hearing upon receipt of the report of the chief officer of the institution in
which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant is committed, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S
DESIGNEE, that the defendant no longer requires hospitalization, as provided
in section 16-8-116. Except for the initial release hearing, unless the court
for good cause shown permits, the defendant is not entitled to a hearing
within one year subsequent to a previous hearing.
PAGE 18-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(c) Beginning September 1, 2022, the chief officer of the institution
in which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant is committed, OR THE CHIEF
OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, shall annually submit a release examination report to
the court certifying whether the defendant continues to meet the criteria for
ongoing inpatient hospitalization or meets the applicable test for release
pursuant to section 16-8-120. The report must be submitted each year by the
date on which the defendant was initially committed for inpatient
hospitalization unless another release examination is ordered within the
twelve months preceding such THE date. The release examination report
must include the information required for a release examination pursuant to
subsection (2.5) of this section. The institution HOSPITAL shall provide a
copy of the report to the defendant, the prosecuting attorney, and any other
attorney of record. Upon receipt and after review of the report, the court
may order a release hearing on its own motion, on motion of the prosecuting
attorney, or on motion of the defendant.
(1.5) (a) Any victim of any crime or any member of such THE
victim's immediate family, if the victim has died or is a minor, the
perpetrator of which has been found not guilty by reason of insanity or not
guilty by reason of impaired mental condition, shall be notified by the court
in a timely manner prior to any hearing for release of the perpetrator held
pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, if such THE victim or family
member can reasonably be located. This paragraph (a) shall apply only
SUBSECTION (1.5)(a) APPLIES to offenses committed before July 1, 1995.
(b) Any victim of any crime or any member of such THE victim's
immediate family, if the victim has died or is a minor, the perpetrator of
which has been found not guilty by reason of insanity, shall be notified by
the court in a timely manner prior to any hearing for release of the
perpetrator held pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, if such THE
victim or family member can reasonably be located. This paragraph (b) shall
apply SUBSECTION (1.5)(b) APPLIES to offenses committed on or after July
1, 1995.
(2) (a) The court shall order a release examination of the defendant
when a current one has not already been furnished or when either the
prosecution or defense moves for an examination of the defendant at a
different institution HOSPITAL or by different experts. The court may order
any additional or supplemental examination, investigation, or study that it
THE COURT deems necessary to a proper consideration and determination of
PAGE 19-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
the question of eligibility for release. The court shall set the matter for
release hearing after it THE COURT has received all of the reports that it THE
COURT has ordered under PURSUANT TO this section. When none of said THE
reports indicates that the defendant is eligible for release, the defendant's
request for A release hearing shall be denied by the court if the defendant
is unable to show by way of an offer of proof any evidence by a medical
expert in mental disorders that would indicate that the defendant is eligible
for release. For the purposes of this subsection (2), "medical expert in
mental disorders" means a physician licensed under the provisions of
PURSUANT TO article 240 of title 12, a psychologist licensed under the
provisions of PURSUANT TO article 245 of title 12, a psychiatric technician
licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO article 295 of title 12, a
registered professional nurse, as defined in section 12-255-104 (11), who
by reason of postgraduate education and additional nursing preparation has
gained knowledge, judgment, and skill in psychiatric or mental health
nursing, or a social worker licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO
part 4 of article 245 of title 12. The release hearing shall be to the court or,
on demand by the defendant, to a jury of not to exceed COMPOSED OF NOT
MORE THAN six persons. At the release hearing, if any evidence of insanity
is introduced, the defendant has the burden of proving restoration of sanity
by a preponderance of the evidence; if any evidence of ineligibility for
release by reason of impaired mental condition is introduced, the defendant
has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the
defendant is eligible for release by no longer having an impaired mental
condition. This subsection (2)(a) shall apply only APPLIES to offenses
committed before July 1, 1995.
(b) The court shall order a release examination of the defendant
when a current one has not already been furnished or when either the
prosecution or defense moves for an examination of the defendant at a
different institution HOSPITAL or by different experts. The court may order
any additional or supplemental examination, investigation, or study that it
THE COURT deems necessary to a proper consideration and determination of
the question of eligibility for release. The court shall set the matter for
release hearing after it THE COURT has received all of the reports that it has
THE COURT ordered under PURSUANT TO this section. When none of the
reports indicates that the defendant is eligible for release, THE COURT SHALL
DENY the defendant's request for A release hearing shall be denied by the
court if the defendant is unable to show by way of an offer of proof any
evidence by a medical expert in mental disorders that would indicate that
PAGE 20-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
the defendant is eligible for release. For the purposes of this subsection (2),
"medical expert in mental disorders" means a physician licensed under the
provisions of PURSUANT TO article 240 of title 12, a psychologist licensed
under the provisions of PURSUANT TO article 245 of title 12, a psychiatric
technician licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO article 295 of title
12, a registered professional nurse as, defined in section 12-255-104 (11),
who by reason of postgraduate education and additional nursing preparation
has gained knowledge, judgment, and skill in psychiatric or mental health
nursing, or a social worker licensed under the provisions of PURSUANT TO
part 4 of article 245 of title 12. The release hearing shall be to the court or,
on demand by the defendant, to a jury composed of not more than six
persons. At the release hearing, if any evidence that the defendant does not
meet the release criteria is introduced, the defendant has the burden of
proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has no DOES
NOT HAVE AN abnormal mental condition that would be likely to cause the
defendant to be dangerous either to himself or herself THE DEFENDANT'S
SELF or to others or to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future.
This subsection (2)(b) shall apply APPLIES to offenses committed on or after
July 1, 1995.
(3) (b) When a defendant is conditionally released, the chief officer
of the institution in which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant is committed, OR
THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, shall forthwith give written notice of the
terms and conditions of such THE release to the executive director of the
department of human services and to the director of any behavioral health
safety net provider that may be charged with THE DEFENDANT'S continued
treatment. of the defendant. The director of such THE behavioral health
safety net provider shall make written reports every three months to the
executive director of the department of human services and to the district
attorney for the judicial district where the defendant was committed and to
the district attorney for any judicial district where the defendant may be
required to receive treatment concerning the DEFENDANT'S treatment and
status. of the defendant. Such THE reports shall MUST include all known
violations of the terms and conditions of the defendant's release and any
changes in the defendant's mental status that would indicate that the
defendant has become ineligible to remain on conditional release. as defined
in section 16-8-102 (4.5).
(c) A defendant who has been conditionally released remains under
the supervision of the department of human services until the committing
PAGE 21-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
court enters a final order of unconditional release. When a defendant fails
to comply with any conditions of his THE DEFENDANT'S release requiring
him THE DEFENDANT to establish, maintain, and reside at a specific
residence and his THE DEFENDANT'S whereabouts have therefore become
unknown to the authorities charged with his THE DEFENDANT'S supervision
or when the defendant leaves the state of Colorado without the consent of
the committing court, the defendant's absence from supervision shall
constitute CONSTITUTES unauthorized absence, as defined in section
18-8-208.2. Such offense occurs in the county in which the defendant is
authorized to reside.
(4) (a.5) In addition to any terms and conditions of release imposed
pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, a court may order a defendant, as
a condition of release, to register with the local law enforcement agency of
the jurisdiction in which the defendant resides if the court finds that the
chief officer of the institution in which HOSPITAL WHERE the defendant has
been committed, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, recommends
registration based on information obtained from the defendant during the
course of treatment that indicates the defendant has committed an offense
involving unlawful sexual behavior.
(f) The local law enforcement agency shall transmit any registrations
received pursuant to paragraph (e) of this subsection (4) SUBSECTION (4)(e)
OF THIS SECTION to the Colorado bureau of investigation within three
business days following receipt OF THE REGISTRATION. The Colorado bureau
of investigation shall include any registration information received pursuant
to this section in the central registry established pursuant to section
16-22-110 and shall specify that the information applies to a defendant
required to register as a condition of release pursuant to this section. The
forms completed by defendants A DEFENDANT required to register as a
condition of release pursuant to this subsection (4) shall be ARE confidential
and shall MUST not be open to inspection except as provided in paragraph
(e) of subsection (3) SUBSECTION (3)(e) of this section and except as
provided for release of information to the public pursuant to sections
16-22-110 (6) and 16-22-112.
(g) As used in this subsection (4), "an offense involving unlawful
sexual behavior" means any of the following offenses:
(XXI) Criminal attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit any
PAGE 22-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
of the offenses specified in this paragraph (g) SUBSECTION (4)(g).
(i) (I) Any defendant required to register as a condition of release
pursuant to this subsection (4), upon completion of a period of not less than
twenty years from the date the defendant is placed on conditional release,
may petition the district court for an order that discontinues the requirement
for such registration and removes the defendant's name from the central
registry established pursuant to section 16-22-110. The court may issue such
AN order only if the court makes written findings of fact that the defendant
has neither been convicted nor found not guilty by reason of insanity of an
offense involving unlawful sexual behavior subsequent to his or her THE
DEFENDANT'S conditional release and that the defendant would not pose an
undue threat to the community if allowed to live in the community without
registration.
SECTION 18. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-115.5, amend
(3), (4), (5), (6)(a), (6)(b), and (8) as follows:
16-8-115.5. Enforcement and revocation of conditional release
from commitment. (3) Whenever the superintendent of the Colorado
mental health institute at Pueblo DIRECTOR OF FORENSIC SERVICES IN THE
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, has
probable cause to believe that such THE defendant has become ineligible to
remain on conditional release, as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5), said
superintendent THE DIRECTOR, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, shall notify the
district attorney for the judicial district where the defendant was committed.
The superintendent DIRECTOR, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, or the district
attorney shall apply for a warrant to be directed to the sheriff or a peace
officer in the jurisdiction in which WHERE the defendant resides or may be
found, commanding such THE sheriff or peace officer to take custody of the
defendant. The application shall MUST include the order conditionally
releasing the defendant pursuant to section 16-8-115 (3) and supporting
documentation showing that THE defendant has become ineligible to remain
on conditional release. as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5). The committing
court and the district court for the tenth judicial district are authorized to
issue such a warrant pursuant to the provisions of section 16-1-106. The
superintendent DIRECTOR, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, shall mail a copy
of the application to the committing court and the district attorney in the
committing jurisdiction.
PAGE 23-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(4) The sheriff or peace officer to whom the warrant is directed
pursuant to subsection (3) of this section shall take all necessary legal action
to take custody of the defendant. A sheriff shall deliver the defendant
immediately to the Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo, which
HOSPITAL WHERE THE DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED, AND THE HOSPITAL
shall provide care and security for the defendant. If any other peace officer
takes custody of the defendant, such THE peace officer shall deliver the
defendant to the custody of the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which WHERE
the defendant was found, and such THE sheriff shall comply with the
provisions of this subsection (4).
(5) The Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo HOSPITAL WHERE
THE DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED shall examine the defendant to evaluate
the defendant's ability to remain on conditional release. The examination
shall MUST be consistent with the procedure provided in section 16-8-106.
If the defendant refuses to submit to and cooperate with the examination,
the committing court shall revoke the conditional release. The examination
shall MUST be completed within twenty-one days after the defendant has
been delivered to the institute HOSPITAL as a result of the defendant's arrest.
The institute HOSPITAL shall mail or deliver a written report of the
examination to the committing court and the district attorney in the
committing jurisdiction promptly after the examination is completed. The
defendant may request an examination as provided in section 16-8-108.
(6) (a) The district attorney for the judicial district where the
defendant was committed may file in the committing court a petition for the
revocation of the defendant's conditional release. The petition shall MUST
set forth the name of the defendant, an allegation that the defendant has
become ineligible to remain on conditional release, as defined in section
16-8-102 (4.5), and the substance of the evidence sustaining the allegation.
(b) If the district attorney for the committing judicial district does
not file a petition for revocation, as provided in paragraph (a) of this
subsection (6) SUBSECTION (6)(a) OF THIS SECTION, within ten days after the
defendant is delivered to the Colorado mental health institute at Pueblo
HOSPITAL WHERE THE DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED, the defendant shall
MUST be immediately released from custody; except that, upon a showing
of good cause by the district attorney, the court may grant a reasonable
extension of time to file the petition for revocation.
PAGE 24-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(8) Within thirty-five days after the defendant is delivered to the
Colorado mental health institute in Pueblo HOSPITAL WHERE THE
DEFENDANT WAS COMMITTED pursuant to subsection (4) of this section, and
if the defendant is not released from custody pursuant to paragraph (b) of
subsection (6) SUBSECTION (6)(b) of this section, the committing court shall
hold a hearing on the petition for revocation of conditional release. At such
THE hearing, any evidence having probative value shall be IS admissible, but
the defendant shall be IS permitted to offer testimony and to call, confront,
and cross-examine witnesses. If the court finds by a preponderance of the
evidence that the defendant has become ineligible to remain on conditional
release, as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5), it shall THE COURT MUST enter
an order revoking the defendant's conditional release and recommitting the
defendant. At any time thereafter, the defendant may be afforded a release
hearing as provided in section 16-8-115. If the court does not find by a
preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has become ineligible to
remain on conditional release, as defined in section 16-8-102 (4.5), it THE
COURT shall dismiss the petition and reinstate or modify the original order
of conditional release.
SECTION 19. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-116 as
follows:
16-8-116. Release by department of human services authority.
(1) AFTER A FINDING OF NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY, when the
chief officer of the institution in which HOSPITAL WHERE a defendant has
been committed, after a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity OR THE
CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, OR THE DIRECTOR OF FORENSIC SERVICES IN THE
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, WHO HAS
BEEN SUPERVISING THE DEFENDANT'S CONDITIONAL RELEASE, determines
that the defendant no longer requires hospitalization OR SUPERVISION
because he THE DEFENDANT no longer suffers from a mental disease or
defect which THAT is likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to be dangerous
to himself A DANGER TO THE DEFENDANT'S SELF, to others, or to the
community in the reasonably foreseeable future, such THE chief officer OR
THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, OR THE DIRECTOR OR THE DIRECTOR'S
DESIGNEE, shall report this THE determination to the court that committed
the defendant and the prosecuting attorney, including in the report a report
of examination equivalent to a release examination. The clerk of the court
shall forthwith furnish a copy of the report to counsel for the defendant.
PAGE 25-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(2) Within thirty-five days after receiving the report of the chief
officer of the institution having custody of the defendant OR THE CHIEF
OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, OR THE DIRECTOR OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, the
court shall set a hearing on the discharge of the defendant in accordance
with section 16-8-115, whether or not such THE report is contested.
(3) Repealed.
SECTION 20. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-117 as
follows:
16-8-117. Advisement on matters to be determined. When a
determination is to be made as to a defendant's eligibility for release, the
court shall explain to the defendant the nature and consequences of the
proceeding and the rights of the defendant under PURSUANT TO this section,
including his or her THE DEFENDANT'S right to a jury trial upon the question
of eligibility for release. The defendant, if he or she THE DEFENDANT wishes
to contest the question, may request a hearing which shall then THAT MUST
be granted as a matter of right. At the hearing, the defendant and the
prosecuting attorney are entitled to be present in person, to examine any
reports of examination or other matter to be considered by the court as
bearing upon the determination, to introduce evidence, summon witnesses,
cross-examine witnesses for the other side or the court, and to make
opening and closing statements and argument. The court may examine or
cross-examine any witness called by the defendant or prosecuting attorney
and may summon and examine witnesses on its own motion.
SECTION 21. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-118, amend (1),
(1.5), (2)(a.5), and (2)(b) as follows:
16-8-118. Temporary removal for treatment and rehabilitation.
(1) The chief officer of the institution in which WHERE a defendant has
been committed under this article ARTICLE 8 or article 8.5 of this title TITLE
16, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, may authorize treatment and
rehabilitation activities involving temporary physical removal of such
person THE DEFENDANT from the institution in which WHERE the defendant
has been placed, if prior to such THE authorization the following procedures
are carried out:
(a) Such THE chief officer, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, shall
PAGE 26-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
give written notice by certified mail, with return receipt requested, to the
committing court and the district attorney that on or after thirty-five days
from the date of mailing such THE notice, he or she THE CHIEF OFFICER, OR
THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, will authorize treatment and rehabilitation
activities involving temporary physical removal of the defendant from the
institution, unless written objections to such THE authorization are received
by him or her THE CHIEF OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, within
thirty-five days from the date of mailing such THE notice.
(b) The clerk of the committing court shall deliver a copy of the
notice mentioned in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) DESCRIBED IN
SUBSECTION (1)(a) OF THIS SECTION to the attorney of record for the
defendant. The district attorney or the attorney of record for the defendant
may file objections with the clerk of the committing court to the proposed
action of the chief officer of the institution in which such WHERE THE
defendant is held, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE. THE PARTY MAKING
THE OBJECTIONS SHALL DELIVER a copy of any such THE objections, shall be
delivered by the party making such objections, either by mail or by personal
service, to such THE chief officer, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, prior
to the expiration of thirty-five days from the mailing of the notice by the
chief officer of the institution, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE.
(c) In the event that objections are filed and served as provided in
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection (1) SUBSECTIONS (1)(a) AND (1)(b)
OF THIS SECTION, the committing court shall fix a time for a hearing upon
the objections, and no removal of the defendant from the institution in
which he WHERE THE DEFENDANT is held shall be IS authorized unless and
until approval thereof is given by the committing court following such THE
hearing.
(1.5) The chief officer of the institution, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S
DESIGNEE, is authorized to allow a defendant, without court authorization
as set forth DESCRIBED in subsection (1) of this section, to leave the physical
premises of the treatment or habilitation facility for needed medical
treatment at a hospital, clinic, or other health-care facility, so long as the
defendant is accompanied by staff from the facility.
(2) (a.5) A court may order any defendant who receives treatment
and rehabilitation activities involving temporary physical removal of the
defendant from the institution to register with the local law enforcement
PAGE 27-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
agency of the jurisdiction in which WHERE the defendant resides if the court
finds that the chief officer of the institution in which WHERE the defendant
has been committed, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S DESIGNEE, recommends
registration based on information obtained from the defendant during the
course of treatment that indicates the defendant has committed an offense
involving unlawful sexual behavior.
(b) Prior to temporary physical removal from the institution of any
defendant who is required to register pursuant to this subsection (2), the
department of human services shall obtain from the defendant the address
at which WHERE the defendant plans to reside and THE DEPARTMENT shall
notify the local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in which WHERE
the defendant plans to reside and the Colorado bureau of investigation as
provided in section 16-8-115 (4)(c).
SECTION 22. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-119 as
follows:
16-8-119. Counsel and physicians for indigent defendants. In all
proceedings under this article BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 8, upon
motion of the defendant and proof that he THE DEFENDANT is indigent and
without funds to employ physicians, psychologists, or attorneys to which he
THE DEFENDANT is entitled under this article ARTICLE 8, the court shall
appoint such THE physicians, psychologists, or attorneys for him THE
DEFENDANT at state expense.
SECTION 23. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-120 as
follows:
16-8-120. Applicable tests for release. (1) As to any person
charged with any crime allegedly committed on or after June 2, 1965, the
test for determination of a defendant's sanity for release from commitment,
or his THE DEFENDANT'S eligibility for conditional release, shall be IS: "That
the defendant has no abnormal mental condition which would be likely to
cause him THE DEFENDANT to be dangerous either to himself THE
DEFENDANT'S SELF or to others or to the community in the reasonably
foreseeable future".
(2) As to any person charged with any crime allegedly committed
prior to June 2, 1965, the test for determination of a defendant's sanity for
PAGE 28-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
release from commitment, or his THE DEFENDANT'S eligibility for
conditional release, shall be IS the test provided by law at the time of the
alleged crime to determine the sanity or insanity of such THE defendant.
(3) As to any person charged with any crime allegedly committed on
or after July 1, 1983, the test for determination of a defendant's sanity for
release from commitment, or his THE DEFENDANT'S eligibility for
conditional release, shall be IS: "That the defendant has no abnormal mental
condition which THAT would be likely to cause him THE DEFENDANT to be
dangerous either to himself THE DEFENDANT'S SELF or others or to the
community in the reasonably foreseeable future, and is capable of
distinguishing right from wrong and has substantial capacity to conform his
THE DEFENDANT'S conduct to requirements of law".
(4) As to any person charged with any crime allegedly committed on
or after July 1, 1983, but before July 1, 1995, resulting in commitment by
reason of impaired mental condition, the test for determination of a
defendant's mental condition for release from commitment, or a defendant's
eligibility for conditional release, shall be IS: "That the defendant has no
abnormal mental condition which THAT would be likely to cause the
defendant to be dangerous either to himself or herself THE DEFENDANT'S
SELF or to others or to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future".
SECTION 24. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 16-8-121 as
follows:
16-8-121. Escape - return to institution. (1) If any defendant,
confined in an institution for the care and treatment of persons with
behavioral or mental health disorders or intellectual and developmental
disabilities under the supervision of the executive director of the department
of human services, escapes from such THE institution, it is the duty of the
chief officer to apply forthwith to the district court for the county in which
the hospital or institution is located for a warrant of arrest directed to the
sheriff of the county, commanding him or her THE SHERIFF forthwith to take
all necessary legal action to effect the arrest of the defendant and to return
him or her THE DEFENDANT promptly to the institution. The fact of an
escape becomes a part of the official record of a defendant and must be
certified to the committing court as part of the record in any proceeding to
determine whether the defendant is eligible for release from commitment
or eligible for conditional release.
PAGE 29-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
(2) If any defendant committed to the custody of the executive
director of the department of human services and placed in an institution
under his or her THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S supervision has escaped from
an institution for the care and treatment of persons with behavioral, mental
health, or substance use disorders in another state, the chief officer is
authorized to return the defendant to the institution from which he or she
THE DEFENDANT escaped. The chief officer is further authorized to effect
the return at the expense of the state of Colorado and under such terms and
conditions as the chief officer deems suitable.
SECTION 25. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-1-803, amend (1)
as follows:
18-1-803. Impaired mental condition. (1) Evidence of an impaired
mental condition, as defined in section 16-8-102 (2.7), C.R.S. (4), though
not legal insanity may be offered in a proper case as bearing upon the
capacity of the accused to form the culpable mental state which is an
element of the offense charged.
SECTION 26. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 25.5-10-237, amend
(1) as follows:
25.5-10-237. Terminology. (1) Whenever the terms "insane",
"insanity", "mentally or mental incompetent", "mental incompetency", or
"of unsound mind" are used in the laws of the state of Colorado, they shall
be deemed to refer to the insane, as defined in section 16-8-101, C.R.S.
SECTIONS 16-8-101 AND 16-8-101.5, or to a person with an intellectual and
developmental disability, as defined in section 25.5-10-202, as the context
of the particular law requires.
SECTION 27. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 27-65-127, amend
(1)(a) as follows:
27-65-127. Imposition of legal disability - deprivation of legal
right - restoration - repeal. (1) (a) When an interested person wishes to
obtain a determination as to the imposition of a legal disability or the
deprivation of a legal right for a person who has a mental health disorder
and who is a danger to the person's self or others, is gravely disabled, or is
insane, as defined in section 16-8-101 SECTIONS 16-8-101 AND 16-8-101.5,
and who is not then subject to proceedings pursuant to this article 65 or part
PAGE 30-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
3 or part 4 of article 14 of title 15, the interested person may petition the
court for a specific finding as to the legal disability or deprivation of a legal
right. Actions commenced pursuant to this subsection (1) may include but
are not limited to actions to determine contractual rights and rights with
regard to the operation of motor vehicles.
SECTION 28. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act
takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the
ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except
that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V
of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act
within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect
PAGE 31-HOUSE BILL 25-1058
unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in
November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official
declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________
____________________________
Julie McCluskie
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
PRESIDENT OF
OF REPRESENTATIVES
THE SENATE
____________________________
____________________________
Vanessa Reilly
Esther van Mourik
CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
SECRETARY OF
OF REPRESENTATIVES
THE SENATE
APPROVED________________________________________
(Date and Time)
_________________________________________
Jared S. Polis
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
PAGE 32-HOUSE BILL 25-1058