Text of FL H 991 (2023)
Defamation, False Light, and Unauthorized Publication of Name or Likenesses
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
18,663 characters
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 1 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
A bill to be entitled
1
An act relating to defamation, false light, and
2
unauthorized publication of name or likenesses;
3
amending s. 90.5015, F.S.; providing that provisions
4
concerning journalist's privilege do not apply to
5
defamation claims when the defendant is a professional
6
journalist or media entity; amending s. 770.05, F.S.;
7
defining the term "defamation or privacy tort";
8
revising provisions concerning venue for certain
9
actions; amending s. 770.08, F.S.; revising provisions
10
limiting the choice of venue in specified actions;
11
creating s. 770.09, F.S.; exempting certain claims
12
from specified provisions concerning offers of
13
judgment and demands for judgment in civil actions;
14
providing for award of attorney fees and costs to
15
prevailing plaintiffs in such actions; creating s.
16
770.105, F.S.; specifying that certain persons may not
17
be considered public figures for purposes of certain
18
actions; creating s. 770.11, F.S.; specifying that a
19
fact finder may infer actual malice in certain
20
circumstances; providing that certain allegations are
21
defamatory per se; providing statutory damages to
22
prevailing plaintiffs who are the subject of such
23
allegations; creating s. 770.12, F.S.; creating a
24
presumption that a statement by an anonymous source is
25
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 2 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
presumptively false for purposes of a defamation
26
action; providing requirements if a defendant in a
27
defamation action refuses to identify an anonymous
28
source; creating s. 770.13, F.S.; providing that a
29
public figure does not need to show actual malice to
30
prevail in a defamation action in certain
31
circumstances; creating s. 770.15, F.S.; providing
32
that a person who gives publicity to a matter
33
concerning a natural person that places that person
34
before the public in a false light may be liable for
35
damages in certain circumstances; amending s. 720.304,
36
F.S.; revising a provision on award of attorney fees
37
in certain actions by property owners; amending s.
38
768.295, F.S.; revising a provision on award of
39
attorney fees in strategic lawsuits against public
40
participation; providing for severability; providing
41
an effective date.
42
43
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
44
45
Section 1. Subsection (9) is added to section 90.5015,
46
Florida Statutes, to read:
47
90.5015 Journalist's privilege.—
48
(9) This section does not apply to defamation claims
49
brought under chapter 770 when the defendant is a professional
50
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 3 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
journalist or media entity.
51
Section 2. Section 770.05, Florida Statutes, is amended to
52
read:
53
770.05 Limitation of choice of venue.—
54
(1) As used in this chapter, the term "defamation or
55
privacy tort" refers to libel, slander, false light, invasion of
56
privacy, or any other tort founded upon any single publication,
57
exhibition, or utterance, such as any one edition of a
58
newspaper, book, or magazine, any one presentation to an
59
audience, any one broadcast over radio or television, any one
60
exhibition of a motion picture, or any one publication,
61
exhibition, or utterance on the Internet. Editing any form of
62
media so that it attributes something false or leads a
63
reasonable viewer to believe something false about a plaintiff
64
may give rise to a defamation claim or privacy tort.
65
(2) A No person may not shall have more than one choice of
66
venue for damages for any defamation or privacy tort libel or
67
slander, invasion of privacy, or any other tort founded upon any
68
single publication, exhibition, or utterance, such as any one
69
edition of a newspaper, book, or magazine, any one presentation
70
to an audience, any one broadcast over radio or television, or
71
any one exhibition of a motion picture. Recovery in any action
72
shall include all damages for any such tort suffered by the
73
plaintiff in all jurisdictions.
74
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,
75
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 4 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
or any other statute providing for venue, when:
76
(a) Damages for defamation are based on material published
77
through the radio or television, venue is proper in any county
78
where the material was accessed.
79
(b) Damages for defamation are based on material published
80
through the Internet, venue is proper in any county in the
81
state.
82
Section 3. Section 770.08, Florida Statutes, is amended to
83
read:
84
770.08 Limitation on venue recovery of damages.—Except as
85
provided in s. 770.05(3)(a), a No person may not shall have more
86
than one choice of venue for any defamation or privacy tort
87
damages for libel founded upon a single publication or
88
exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05., and Upon
89
his or her election in any one of his or her choices of venue,
90
then the person shall be bound to recover there all damages
91
allowed him or her.
92
Section 4. Section 770.09, Florida Statutes, is created to
93
read:
94
770.09 Application of costs and attorney fees in
95
defamation cases.—The fee-shifting provisions of s. 768.79 do
96
not apply to defamation or privacy tort claims. Notwithstanding
97
any other provision of law, a prevailing plaintiff on a
98
defamation or privacy tort claim is entitled to an award of
99
reasonable costs and attorney fees.
100
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 5 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
Section 5. Section 770.105, Florida Statutes, is created
101
to read:
102
770.105 Limitations on judicial determination of a public
103
figure.—A person may not be considered a public figure for
104
purposes of establishing a defamation or privacy tort claim if
105
his or her fame or notoriety arises solely from one or more of
106
the following:
107
(1) Defending him or herself publicly against accusations.
108
(2) Granting an interview on a specific topic.
109
(3) Public employment other than elected office or
110
appointment by an elected official.
111
(4) A video, image, or statement uploaded on the Internet
112
that has reached a broad audience.
113
Section 6. Section 770.11, Florida Statutes, is created to
114
read:
115
770.11 Clarifying defamation standards.—
116
(1) A fact finder shall infer actual malice for purposes
117
of a defamation action when:
118
(a) The defamatory allegation is fabricated by the
119
defendant, is the product of his or her imagination, or is based
120
wholly on an unverified anonymous report;
121
(b) An allegation is so inherently implausible that only a
122
reckless person would have put it into circulation; or
123
(c) There are obvious reasons to doubt the veracity of the
124
defamatory allegation or the accuracy of an informant's reports.
125
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 6 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
There are obvious reasons to doubt the veracity of a report
126
when:
127
1. There is sufficient contrary evidence that was known to
128
or should have been known to the defendant after a reasonable
129
investigation; or
130
2. The report is inherently improbable or implausible on
131
its face; or
132
(d) The defendant willfully failed to validate,
133
corroborate, or otherwise verify the defamatory allegation.
134
(2) An allegation that the plaintiff has discriminated
135
against another person or group because of their race, sex,
136
sexual orientation, or gender identity constitutes defamation
137
per se.
138
(a) A defendant cannot prove the truth of an allegation of
139
discrimination with respect to sexual orientation or gender
140
identity by citing a plaintiff's constitutionally protected
141
religious expression or beliefs.
142
(b) A defendant cannot prove the truth of an allegation of
143
discrimination with respect to sexual orientation or gender
144
identity by citing a plaintiff's scientific beliefs.
145
(c) A prevailing plaintiff for allegations under this
146
subsection is, in addition to all other damages, entitled to
147
statutory damages of at least $35,000.
148
Section 7. Section 770.12, Florida Statutes, is created to
149
read:
150
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 7 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
770.12 Presumption regarding anonymous sources.—
151
(1) A statement by an anonymous source is presumptively
152
false for purposes of a defamation action.
153
(2) In a case where a defendant in a defamation action
154
refuses to identify the source of a defamatory statement, the
155
plaintiff need only prove that the defendant acted negligently
156
in making the defamatory statement.
157
Section 8. Section 770.13, Florida Statutes, is created to
158
read:
159
770.13 Actual malice for public figures in defamation
160
cases.-A public figure does not need to show actual malice to
161
prevail in a defamation cause of action when the allegation does
162
not relate to the reason for his or her public status.
163
Section 9. Section 770.15, Florida Statutes, is created to
164
read:
165
770.15 Invasion of privacy; place person before public in
166
false light.—
167
(1) Any person who gives publicity to a matter concerning
168
a natural person that places that person before the public in a
169
false light is subject to liability if:
170
(a) The false light in which the person was placed would
171
be highly offensive to a reasonable person; and
172
(b) The defendant had knowledge of or acted in reckless
173
disregard as to the false implications of the publicized matter.
174
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 8 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
(2) This section incorporates the standards set forth
175
under chapter 770 for defamation causes of action to whatever
176
extent necessary.
177
(3) Editing any form of media so that it attributes
178
something false or leads a reasonable viewer to believe
179
something false about a plaintiff may give rise to a defamation
180
claim for false light.
181
Section 10. Paragraph (c) of subsection (4) of section
182
720.304, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
183
720.304 Right of owners to peaceably assemble; display of
184
flag; SLAPP suits prohibited.—
185
(4) It is the intent of the Legislature to protect the
186
right of parcel owners to exercise their rights to instruct
187
their representatives and petition for redress of grievances
188
before the various governmental entities of this state as
189
protected by the First Amendment to the United States
190
Constitution and s. 5, Art. I of the State Constitution. The
191
Legislature recognizes that "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public
192
Participation" or "SLAPP" suits, as they are typically called,
193
have occurred when members are sued by individuals, business
194
entities, or governmental entities arising out of a parcel
195
owner's appearance and presentation before a governmental entity
196
on matters related to the homeowners' association. However, it
197
is the public policy of this state that government entities,
198
business organizations, and individuals not engage in SLAPP
199
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 9 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
suits because such actions are inconsistent with the right of
200
parcel owners to participate in the state's institutions of
201
government. Therefore, the Legislature finds and declares that
202
prohibiting such lawsuits by governmental entities, business
203
entities, and individuals against parcel owners who address
204
matters concerning their homeowners' association will preserve
205
this fundamental state policy, preserve the constitutional
206
rights of parcel owners, and assure the continuation of
207
representative government in this state. It is the intent of the
208
Legislature that such lawsuits be expeditiously disposed of by
209
the courts.
210
(c) A parcel owner sued by a governmental entity, business
211
organization, or individual in violation of this section has a
212
right to an expeditious resolution of a claim that the suit is
213
in violation of this section. A parcel owner may petition the
214
court for an order dismissing the action or granting final
215
judgment in favor of that parcel owner. The petitioner may file
216
a motion for summary judgment, together with supplemental
217
affidavits, seeking a determination that the governmental
218
entity's, business organization's, or individual's lawsuit has
219
been brought in violation of this section. The governmental
220
entity, business organization, or individual shall thereafter
221
file its response and any supplemental affidavits. As soon as
222
practicable, the court shall set a hearing on the petitioner's
223
motion, which shall be held at the earliest possible time after
224
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 10 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
the filing of the governmental entity's, business organization's
225
or individual's response. The court may award the parcel owner
226
sued by the governmental entity, business organization, or
227
individual actual damages arising from the governmental
228
entity's, individual's, or business organization's violation of
229
this section. A court may treble the damages awarded to a
230
prevailing parcel owner and shall state the basis for the treble
231
damages award in its judgment. The court shall award the
232
nonmoving prevailing party reasonable attorney attorney's fees
233
and costs incurred in connection with a claim that an action was
234
filed in violation of this section if the nonmoving party
235
prevails on a motion filed under this section.
236
Section 11. Subsection (4) of section 768.295, Florida
237
Statutes, is amended to read:
238
768.295 Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation
239
(SLAPP) prohibited.—
240
(4) A person or entity sued by a governmental entity or
241
another person in violation of this section has a right to an
242
expeditious resolution of a claim that the suit is in violation
243
of this section. A person or entity may move the court for an
244
order dismissing the action or granting final judgment in favor
245
of that person or entity. The person or entity may file a motion
246
for summary judgment, together with supplemental affidavits,
247
seeking a determination that the claimant's or governmental
248
entity's lawsuit has been brought in violation of this section.
249
HB 991
2023
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
hb0991-00
Page 11 of 11
F
L
O
R
I
D
A
H
O
U
S
E
O
F
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
S
The claimant or governmental entity shall thereafter file a
250
response and any supplemental affidavits. As soon as
251
practicable, the court shall set a hearing on the motion, which
252
shall be held at the earliest possible time after the filing of
253
the claimant's or governmental entity's response. The court may
254
award, subject to the limitations in s. 768.28, the party sued
255
by a governmental entity actual damages arising from a
256
governmental entity's violation of this section. The court shall
257
award the nonmoving prevailing party reasonable attorney fees
258
and costs incurred in connection with a claim that an action was
259
filed in violation of this section if the nonmoving party
260
prevails on a motion filed under this section.
261
Section 12. If any provision of this act or the
262
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
263
invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or
264
applications of this act which can be given effect without the
265
invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions
266
of this act are severable.
267
Section 13. This act shall take effect July 1, 2023.
268