Text of HI SB 778 (2010)
Abstinence-Only Funding; Title V; Comprehensive Sex Education
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
4,135 characters
Report Title:
Abstinence-Only Funding; Title V; Comprehensive Sex
Education
Description:
Requires the State to reject all Title V federal funding
for mandated abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
H.B. NO.
778
TWENTY-FIFTH LEGISLATURE, 2009
STATE OF HAWAII
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to Health.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that as of
November 2008, twenty-five states, including California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Massachusetts, Maine, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island,
Wisconsin, Arizona, and Iowa, have saved millions of dollars by rejecting Title
V federal dollars that require State matching funds. Title V federal dollars
are required to be used for abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education
programs, which have been found to be ineffective, inaccurate, and
gender-biased.
Abstinence-only education teaches our youth
only about abstinence from sexual activity, without teaching basic facts about
contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, and human immunodeficiency virus.
States that continue to take the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage federal
funds are prohibited by law from providing information about the health
benefits of condoms and birth control in protecting young people from unwanted
pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, and human immunodeficiency virus.
In April 2007, a longitudinal study of two thousand
children commissioned by Congress found that teaching abstinence does not keep
teenagers from having sex nor does it increase the likelihood that they will
use contraception if they do. The results essentially gutted the fundamental
premise behind the abstinence-only movement. The study concludes that, "Abstinence-only
[education] was an experiment that failed", an experiment that is putting
our children's health at risk.
In December 2004, a report titled "The
Content of Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Education Programs" was
released that evaluated "the content of the most popular abstinence-only
curricula used by grantees of the largest federal abstinence initiative, Special Programs of Regional and National Significance
Community-Based Abstinence Education (SPRANS)." The report
concluded that "over eighty per cent of the abstinence-only curricula,
used by over two-thirds of the SPRANS grantees in 2003, contain false,
misleading, or distorted information about reproductive health."
The legislature finds that it is the policy of
this State to provide Hawaii's youth with reliable information regarding
contraception and protection from sexually transmitted diseases as well as to
provide our youth with comprehensive sexuality education that empowers them to
act responsibly and in their best self-interest. The legislature further finds
that the federal abstinence-only-until-marriage education program is not
compatible with this goal.
The purpose of this Act is to assure
comprehensive sex education for Hawaii's youth and to reject programs and
funding for abstinence-only-until-marriage education programs.
SECTION 2. Chapter 302A, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended
by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§302A- Comprehensive sex
education. The State shall reject all Title V federal funding for
mandated abstinence-only-until-marriage programs."
SECTION 3. Chapter 321, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended
by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows:
"§321- Comprehensive sex
education. The State shall reject all Title V federal funding for
mandated abstinence-only-until-marriage programs."
SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its
approval.
INTRODUCED BY:
_____________________________