Text of IN SB 505 (2005)
Bias crimes. Makes commission of a crime because of the color, creed, disability, national origin, race, religion, sexual orientation, or sex of the victim an aggravating circumst…
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: The state legislature's website. Bill text as published on the state legislature's website (see the bill's official link). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
22,659 characters
C
o
p
y
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
Introduced Version
SENATE BILL No. 505
_____
DIGEST OF INTRODUCED BILL
Citations Affected: IC 35-38-1-7.1; IC 35-46-2-2; IC 35-50-2-9.
Synopsis: Bias crimes. Makes commission of a crime because of the
color, creed, disability, national origin, race, religion, sexual
orientation, or sex of the victim an aggravating circumstance: (1) that
may be considered by a judge when the judge imposes a sentence for
the crime; and (2) that, in a murder case, may provide the grounds on
which the state seeks the death penalty. Makes it discrimination in jury
selection, a Class A misdemeanor, for a public servant having the duty
to select or summon persons for grand jury or trial jury service to
knowingly or intentionally fail to select or summon a person because
of the person's sexual orientation.
Effective: July 1, 2005.
Broden
January 18, 2005, read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary.
C
o
p
y
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
Introduced
First Regular Session 114th General Assembly (2005)
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana
Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type,
additions will appear in this style type, and deletions will appear in this style type.
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional
provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in this style type. Also, the
word NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds
a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in this style type or this style type reconciles conflicts
between statutes enacted by the 2004 Regular Session of the General Assembly.
SENATE BILL No. 505
A BILL FOR AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning
criminal law and procedure.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:
1
SECTION 1. IC 35-38-1-7.1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
2
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2005]: Sec. 7.1. (a) In determining
3
what sentence to impose for a crime, the court shall consider:
4
(1) the risk that the person will commit another crime;
5
(2) the nature and circumstances of the crime committed;
6
(3) the person's:
7
(A) prior criminal record;
8
(B) character; and
9
(C) condition;
10
(4) whether the victim of the crime was less than twelve (12)
11
years of age or at least sixty-five (65) years of age;
12
(5) whether the person committed the offense in the presence or
13
within hearing of a person who is less than eighteen (18) years of
14
age who was not the victim of the offense;
15
(6) whether the person violated a protective order issued against
16
the person under IC 34-26-5 (or IC 31-1-11.5, IC 34-26-2, or
17
IC 34-4-5.1 before their repeal), a workplace violence restraining
C
o
p
y
2
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
order issued against the person under IC 34-26-6, or a no contact
2
order issued against the person; and
3
(7) any oral or written statement made by a victim of the crime.
4
(b) The court may consider the following factors as aggravating
5
circumstances or as favoring imposing consecutive terms of
6
imprisonment:
7
(1) The person has recently violated the conditions of any
8
probation, parole, or pardon granted to the person.
9
(2) The person has a history of criminal or delinquent activity.
10
(3) The person is in need of correctional or rehabilitative
11
treatment that can best be provided by commitment of the person
12
to a penal facility.
13
(4) Imposition of a reduced sentence or suspension of the
14
sentence and imposition of probation would depreciate the
15
seriousness of the crime.
16
(5) The victim of the crime was less than twelve (12) years of age
17
or at least sixty-five (65) years of age.
18
(6) The victim of the crime was mentally or physically infirm.
19
(7) The person committed a forcible felony while wearing a
20
garment designed to resist the penetration of a bullet.
21
(8) The person committed a sex crime listed in subsection (e) and:
22
(A) the crime created an epidemiologically demonstrated risk
23
of transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
24
and involved the sex organ of one (1) person and the mouth,
25
anus, or sex organ of another person;
26
(B) the person had knowledge that the person was a carrier of
27
HIV; and
28
(C) the person had received risk counseling as described in
29
subsection (g).
30
(9) The person committed an offense related to controlled
31
substances listed in subsection (f) if:
32
(A) the offense involved:
33
(i) the delivery by any person to another person; or
34
(ii) the use by any person on another person;
35
of a contaminated sharp (as defined in IC 16-41-16-2) or other
36
paraphernalia that creates an epidemiologically demonstrated
37
risk of transmission of HIV by involving percutaneous contact;
38
(B) the person had knowledge that the person was a carrier of
39
the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); and
40
(C) the person had received risk counseling as described in
41
subsection (g).
42
(10) The person committed the offense in an area of a
C
o
p
y
3
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
consolidated or second class city that is designated as a public
2
safety improvement area by the Indiana criminal justice institute
3
under IC 36-8-19.5.
4
(11) The injury to or death of the victim of the crime was the
5
result of shaken baby syndrome (as defined in IC 16-41-40-2).
6
(12) Before the commission of the crime, the person administered
7
to the victim of the crime, without the victim's knowledge, a
8
sedating drug or a drug that had a hypnotic effect on the victim,
9
or the person had knowledge that such a drug had been
10
administered to the victim without the victim's knowledge.
11
(13) The person:
12
(A) committed trafficking with an inmate under IC 35-44-3-9;
13
and
14
(B) is an employee of the penal facility.
15
(14) The person committed the offense in the presence or within
16
hearing of a person who is less than eighteen (18) years of age
17
who was not the victim of the offense.
18
(15) The person who committed the offense knowingly or
19
intentionally:
20
(A) selected another individual who was injured; or
21
(B) damaged or otherwise affected property;
22
in the commission of the offense because of the color, creed,
23
disability, national origin, race, religion, sexual orientation, or
24
sex of the injured individual or of the owner or occupant of
25
the affected property.
26
(c) The court may consider the following factors as mitigating
27
circumstances or as favoring suspending the sentence and imposing
28
probation:
29
(1) The crime neither caused nor threatened serious harm to
30
persons or property, or the person did not contemplate that it
31
would do so.
32
(2) The crime was the result of circumstances unlikely to recur.
33
(3) The victim of the crime induced or facilitated the offense.
34
(4) There are substantial grounds tending to excuse or justify the
35
crime, though failing to establish a defense.
36
(5) The person acted under strong provocation.
37
(6) The person has no history of delinquency or criminal activity,
38
or the person has led a law-abiding life for a substantial period
39
before commission of the crime.
40
(7) The person is likely to respond affirmatively to probation or
41
short term imprisonment.
42
(8) The character and attitudes of the person indicate that the
C
o
p
y
4
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
person is unlikely to commit another crime.
2
(9) The person has made or will make restitution to the victim of
3
the crime for the injury, damage, or loss sustained.
4
(10) Imprisonment of the person will result in undue hardship to
5
the person or the dependents of the person.
6
(11) The person was convicted of a crime involving the use of
7
force against a person who had repeatedly inflicted physical or
8
sexual abuse upon the convicted person and evidence shows that
9
the convicted person suffered from the effects of battery as a
10
result of the past course of conduct of the individual who is the
11
victim of the crime for which the person was convicted.
12
(d) The criteria listed in subsections (b) and (c) do not limit the
13
matters that the court may consider in determining the sentence.
14
(e) For the purposes of this article, the following crimes are
15
considered sex crimes:
16
(1) Rape (IC 35-42-4-1).
17
(2) Criminal deviate conduct (IC 35-42-4-2).
18
(3) Child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3).
19
(4) Child seduction (IC 35-42-4-7).
20
(5) Prostitution (IC 35-45-4-2).
21
(6) Patronizing a prostitute (IC 35-45-4-3).
22
(7) Incest (IC 35-46-1-3).
23
(8) Sexual misconduct with a minor under IC 35-42-4-9(a).
24
(f) For the purposes of this article, the following crimes are
25
considered offenses related to controlled substances:
26
(1) Dealing in or manufacturing cocaine, a narcotic drug, or
27
methamphetamine (IC 35-48-4-1).
28
(2) Dealing in a schedule I, II, or III controlled substance
29
(IC 35-48-4-2).
30
(3) Dealing in a schedule IV controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-3).
31
(4) Dealing in a schedule V controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-4).
32
(5) Possession of cocaine, a narcotic drug, or methamphetamine
33
(IC 35-48-4-6).
34
(6) Possession of a controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-7).
35
(7) Dealing in paraphernalia (IC 35-48-4-8.5).
36
(8) Possession of paraphernalia (IC 35-48-4-8.3).
37
(9) Offenses relating to registration (IC 35-48-4-14).
38
(g) For the purposes of this section, a person received risk
39
counseling if the person had been:
40
(1) notified in person or in writing that tests have confirmed the
41
presence of antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus
42
(HIV) in the person's blood; and
C
o
p
y
5
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
(2) warned of the behavior that can transmit HIV.
2
SECTION 2. IC 35-46-2-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
3
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2005]: Sec. 2. A public servant
4
having the duty to select or summon persons for grand jury or trial jury
5
service who knowingly or intentionally fails to select or summon a
6
person because of color, creed, disability, national origin, race, religion,
7
sexual orientation, or sex commits discrimination in jury selection, a
8
Class A misdemeanor.
9
SECTION 3. IC 35-50-2-9 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
10
FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2005]: Sec. 9. (a) The state may
11
seek either a death sentence or a sentence of life imprisonment without
12
parole for murder by alleging, on a page separate from the rest of the
13
charging instrument, the existence of at least one (1) of the aggravating
14
circumstances listed in subsection (b). In the sentencing hearing after
15
a person is convicted of murder, the state must prove beyond a
16
reasonable doubt the existence of at least one (1) of the aggravating
17
circumstances alleged. However, the state may not proceed against a
18
defendant under this section if a court determines at a pretrial hearing
19
under IC 35-36-9 that the defendant is a mentally retarded individual.
20
(b) The aggravating circumstances are as follows:
21
(1) The defendant committed the murder by intentionally killing
22
the victim while committing or attempting to commit any of the
23
following:
24
(A) Arson (IC 35-43-1-1).
25
(B) Burglary (IC 35-43-2-1).
26
(C) Child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3).
27
(D) Criminal deviate conduct (IC 35-42-4-2).
28
(E) Kidnapping (IC 35-42-3-2).
29
(F) Rape (IC 35-42-4-1).
30
(G) Robbery (IC 35-42-5-1).
31
(H) Carjacking (IC 35-42-5-2).
32
(I) Criminal gang activity (IC 35-45-9-3).
33
(J) Dealing in cocaine or a narcotic drug (IC 35-48-4-1).
34
(2) The defendant committed the murder by the unlawful
35
detonation of an explosive with intent to injure a person or
36
damage property.
37
(3) The defendant committed the murder by lying in wait.
38
(4) The defendant who committed the murder was hired to kill.
39
(5) The defendant committed the murder by hiring another person
40
to kill.
41
(6) The victim of the murder was a corrections employee,
42
probation officer, parole officer, community corrections worker,
C
o
p
y
6
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
home detention officer, fireman, judge, or law enforcement
2
officer, and either:
3
(A) the victim was acting in the course of duty; or
4
(B) the murder was motivated by an act the victim performed
5
while acting in the course of duty.
6
(7) The defendant has been convicted of another murder.
7
(8) The defendant has committed another murder, at any time,
8
regardless of whether the defendant has been convicted of that
9
other murder.
10
(9) The defendant was:
11
(A) under the custody of the department of correction;
12
(B) under the custody of a county sheriff;
13
(C) on probation after receiving a sentence for the commission
14
of a felony; or
15
(D) on parole;
16
at the time the murder was committed.
17
(10) The defendant dismembered the victim.
18
(11) The defendant burned, mutilated, or tortured the victim while
19
the victim was alive.
20
(12) The victim of the murder was less than twelve (12) years of
21
age.
22
(13) The victim was a victim of any of the following offenses for
23
which the defendant was convicted:
24
(A) Battery as a Class D felony or as a Class C felony under
25
IC 35-42-2-1.
26
(B) Kidnapping (IC 35-42-3-2).
27
(C) Criminal confinement (IC 35-42-3-3).
28
(D) A sex crime under IC 35-42-4.
29
(14) The victim of the murder was listed by the state or known by
30
the defendant to be a witness against the defendant and the
31
defendant committed the murder with the intent to prevent the
32
person from testifying.
33
(15) The defendant committed the murder by intentionally
34
discharging a firearm (as defined in IC 35-47-1-5):
35
(A) into an inhabited dwelling; or
36
(B) from a vehicle.
37
(16) The victim of the murder was pregnant and the murder
38
resulted in the intentional killing of a fetus that has attained
39
viability (as defined in IC 16-18-2-365).
40
(17) The defendant committed the murder by knowingly or
41
intentionally selecting the victim of the murder because of the
42
color, creed, disability, national origin, race, religion, sexual
C
o
p
y
7
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
orientation, or sex of the victim.
2
(c) The mitigating circumstances that may be considered under this
3
section are as follows:
4
(1) The defendant has no significant history of prior criminal
5
conduct.
6
(2) The defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or
7
emotional disturbance when the murder was committed.
8
(3) The victim was a participant in or consented to the defendant's
9
conduct.
10
(4) The defendant was an accomplice in a murder committed by
11
another person, and the defendant's participation was relatively
12
minor.
13
(5) The defendant acted under the substantial domination of
14
another person.
15
(6) The defendant's capacity to appreciate the criminality of the
16
defendant's conduct or to conform that conduct to the
17
requirements of law was substantially impaired as a result of
18
mental disease or defect or of intoxication.
19
(7) The defendant was less than eighteen (18) years of age at the
20
time the murder was committed.
21
(8) Any other circumstances appropriate for consideration.
22
(d) If the defendant was convicted of murder in a jury trial, the jury
23
shall reconvene for the sentencing hearing. If the trial was to the court,
24
or the judgment was entered on a guilty plea, the court alone shall
25
conduct the sentencing hearing. The jury or the court may consider all
26
the evidence introduced at the trial stage of the proceedings, together
27
with new evidence presented at the sentencing hearing. The court shall
28
instruct the jury concerning the statutory penalties for murder and any
29
other offenses for which the defendant was convicted, the potential for
30
consecutive or concurrent sentencing, and the availability of good time
31
credit and clemency. The court shall instruct the jury that, in order for
32
the jury to recommend to the court that the death penalty or life
33
imprisonment without parole should be imposed, the jury must find at
34
least one (1) aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt as
35
described in subsection (k) (l) and shall provide a special verdict form
36
for each aggravating circumstance alleged. The defendant may present
37
any additional evidence relevant to:
38
(1) the aggravating circumstances alleged; or
39
(2) any of the mitigating circumstances listed in subsection (c).
40
(e) For a defendant sentenced after June 30, 2002, except as
41
provided by IC 35-36-9, if the hearing is by jury, the jury shall
42
recommend to the court whether the death penalty or life imprisonment
C
o
p
y
8
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
without parole, or neither, should be imposed. The jury may
2
recommend:
3
(1) the death penalty; or
4
(2) life imprisonment without parole;
5
only if it makes the findings described in subsection (l). If the jury
6
reaches a sentencing recommendation, the court shall sentence the
7
defendant accordingly. After a court pronounces sentence, a
8
representative of the victim's family and friends may present a
9
statement regarding the impact of the crime on family and friends. The
10
impact statement may be submitted in writing or given orally by the
11
representative. The statement shall be given in the presence of the
12
defendant.
13
(f) If a jury is unable to agree on a sentence recommendation after
14
reasonable deliberations, the court shall discharge the jury and proceed
15
as if the hearing had been to the court alone.
16
(g) If the hearing is to the court alone, except as provided by
17
IC 35-36-9, the court shall:
18
(1) sentence the defendant to death; or
19
(2) impose a term of life imprisonment without parole;
20
only if it makes the findings described in subsection (l).
21
(h) If a court sentences a defendant to death, the court shall order
22
the defendant's execution to be carried out not later than one (1) year
23
and one (1) day after the date the defendant was convicted. The
24
supreme court has exclusive jurisdiction to stay the execution of a
25
death sentence. If the supreme court stays the execution of a death
26
sentence, the supreme court shall order a new date for the defendant's
27
execution.
28
(i) If a person sentenced to death by a court files a petition for
29
post-conviction relief, the court, not later than ninety (90) days after the
30
date the petition is filed, shall set a date to hold a hearing to consider
31
the petition. If a court does not, within the ninety (90) day period, set
32
the date to hold the hearing to consider the petition, the court's failure
33
to set the hearing date is not a basis for additional post-conviction
34
relief. The attorney general shall answer the petition for post-conviction
35
relief on behalf of the state. At the request of the attorney general, a
36
prosecuting attorney shall assist the attorney general. The court shall
37
enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the
38
petition not later than ninety (90) days after the date the hearing
39
concludes. However, if the court determines that the petition is without
40
merit, the court may dismiss the petition within ninety (90) days
41
without conducting a hearing under this subsection.
42
(j) A death sentence is subject to automatic review by the supreme
C
o
p
y
9
2005
IN 505—LS 7758/DI 107+
1
court. The review, which shall be heard under rules adopted by the
2
supreme court, shall be given priority over all other cases. The supreme
3
court's review must take into consideration all claims that the:
4
(1) conviction or sentence was in violation of the:
5
(A) Constitution of the State of Indiana; or
6
(B) Constitution of the United States;
7
(2) sentencing court was without jurisdiction to impose a
8
sentence; and
9
(3) sentence:
10
(A) exceeds the maximum sentence authorized by law; or
11
(B) is otherwise erroneous.
12
If the supreme court cannot complete its review by the date set by the
13
sentencing court for the defendant's execution under subsection (h), the
14
supreme court shall stay the execution of the death sentence and set a
15
new date to carry out the defendant's execution.
16
(k) A person who has been sentenced to death and who has
17
completed state post-conviction review proceedings may file a written
18
petition with the supreme court seeking to present new evidence
19
challenging the person's guilt or the appropriateness of the death
20
sentence if the person serves notice on the attorney general. The
21
supreme court shall determine, with or without a hearing, whether the
22
person has presented previously undiscovered evidence that
23
undermines confidence in the conviction or the death sentence. If
24
necessary, the supreme court may remand the case to the trial court for
25
an evidentiary hearing to consider the new evidence and its effect on
26
the person's conviction and death sentence. The supreme court may not
27
make a determination in the person's favor nor make a decision to
28
remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing without
29
first providing the attorney general with an opportunity to be heard on
30
the matter.
31
(l) Before a sentence may be imposed under this section, the jury,
32
in a proceeding under subsection (e), or the court, in a proceeding
33
under subsection (g), must find that:
34
(1) the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that at least
35
one (1) of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection (b)
36
exists; and
37
(2) any mitigating circumstances that exist are outweighed by the
38
aggravating circumstance or circumstances.
39
SECTION 4. [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2005] IC 35-38-1-7.1,
40
IC 35-46-2-2, and IC 35-50-2-9, all as amended by this act, apply
41
only to offenses committed after June 30, 2005.