Text of KS HB 2320 (2020)
Enacting the marriage and constitution restoration act.
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
25,674 characters
Session of 2019
HOUSE BILL No. 2320
By Representatives Garber, Donohoe, French, Helmer, Highland, Huebert and
Rhiley
2-13
AN ACT concerning marriage; enacting the marriage and constitution
restoration act.
WHEREAS, Civilizations for millennia have defined marriage as a
union between a man and a woman; and
WHEREAS, The United States is a constitutional republic that the state
of Kansas is a part of; and
WHEREAS, The doctrine of preemption prohibits the state of Kansas
from making or enforcing policies that violate the constitution of the
United States; and
WHEREAS, All state senators and representatives and all executive
and judicial officers are bound by oath or affirmation pursuant to article VI
of the constitution of the United States to not enforce, respect, favor or
endorse policies that violate the free exercise clause or the establishment
clause of the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States,
regardless of what political party they are affiliated with; and
WHEREAS, The 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States
applies to the state of Kansas though the 14th amendment of the
constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, The constitution of the United States is not silent as to
how the states must legally define marriage, as acknowledged by the
United States supreme court; and
WHEREAS, The establishment clause of the 1st amendment of the
constitution of the United States, balanced with the free exercise clause of
the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States, has exclusive
jurisdiction in informing the state of Kansas how to respond to marriage
requests of all kinds that do not involve a man and a woman and how the
state must react to all self-asserted, sex-based identity narratives that are
questionably real, moral and have a tendency to erode community
standards of decency; and
WHEREAS, All religion amounts to is a set of unproven answers to the
greater questions like "Why are we here?" and "What should we be doing
as humans?"; and
WHEREAS, The establishment clause of the 1st amendment of the
constitution of the United States was never solely designed to prohibit the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
HB 2320
2
government from only respecting and recognizing the doctrines of
institutionalized religions, but of non-institutionalized religions, like
secular humanism, as well; and
WHEREAS, The sworn testimonies of ex-gays, medical experts,
persecuted Christians and licensed ministers demonstrate that there is no
real proof that a gay gene exists, that the idea that sexual orientation is
predicated on immutability is not proven and that sexual orientation is a
mythology, dogma, doctrine or orthodoxy that is inseparably linked to the
religion of secular humanism; and
WHEREAS, The United States supreme court found that secular
humanism is a religion for the purpose of the establishment clause of the
1st amendment of the constitution of the United States in Torcaso v.
Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), stating "among religions in this country
which do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the
existence of God are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular
Humanism and others"; and
WHEREAS, Most of the federal courts of appeals have acknowledged
that secular humanism is a religion in cases such as Malnak v. Yogi, 592
F.2d 197, 200-15 (3d Cir.1979), Theriault v. Silber, 547 F.2d 1279, 1281
(5th Cir.1977), Thomas v. Review Bd., 450 U.S. 707, 714, 101 S.Ct. 1425,
67 L.Ed.2d 624 (1981), Lindell v. McCallum, 352 F.3d 1107, 1110 (7th
Cir.2003), Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Sec'y of Dep't of Health and Human
Servs., 150 F.Supp.3d 419 (3d Cir. Aug. 4, 2017), and Wells v. City and
County of Denver, 257 F.3d 1132, 1148 (10th Cir. 2001); and
WHEREAS, Secular humanism is also commonly referred to as
postmodern western individualistic moral relativism, expressive
individualism, and by other names and is centered on the unproven idea
that there are no moral absolutes; and
WHEREAS, The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning
(LGBTQ) community is organized, full and has a daily code by which
members may guide their daily lives, which makes it a denominational
sect that is inseparably part of the religion of secular humanism; and
WHEREAS, Instead of having a cross, the ten commandments icon, or
star and crescent, the LGBTQ secular humanist community has the gay
pride rainbow colored flag to symbolize its faith-based worldview; and
WHEREAS, The ideas that "a person is born homosexual," or that "a
person can be born in the wrong body," or that "a person can come out of
an invisible closet and be baptized gay," or that "to disagree with
homosexual orthodoxy premises makes you a bigot" are a series of
unproven faith-based assumptions and naked assertions that are implicitly
religious and inseparably linked to the religion of secular humanism; and
WHEREAS, The government's endorsement of LGBTQ ideology has
amounted to the greatest sham since the inception of American
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
3
jurisprudence; and
WHEREAS, In the wake of the government's endorsement of LGBTQ
ideology, the government's endorsement of LGBTQ secular humanism has
not been about "tolerance," but "dominance"; and
WHEREAS, In the wake of the government's endorsement of LGBTQ
ideology, many citizens who object to the government's endorsement of
LGBTQ secular humanism is not based on "bigotry," but on "biology"; and
WHEREAS, In the wake of the government's endorsement of LGBTQ
ideology, when a secular humanist says that "love is love," what they
really mean is that they are amenable to government assets being used to
oppress and marginalize anyone who disagrees with their beliefs, which is
a position that is categorically "unloving"; and
WHEREAS, In the wake of the government's endorsement of LGBTQ
ideology, we have learned that people who are "intolerant" of "intolerant
people" are "intolerant," people who are "judgmental" against "judgmental
people" are "judgmental," and people who are "dogmatic" about not "being
dogmatic" are "dogmatic"; and
WHEREAS, In the wake of the government's entanglement with
LGBTQ secular humanism, there has not been a land rush on gay
marriage, but there has been a land rush by many secular humanists to
persecute many non-observers of the religion of secular humanism; and
WHEREAS, In the wake of the government's endorsement of LGBTQ
secular humanism, there has not been a land rush on gay marriage but
there has been a land rush by many secular humanists to infiltrate public
schools and public libraries with the intent to indoctrinate and proselytize
minors to their religious worldview on faith, morality, sex and marriage
with the government's stamp of approval; and
WHEREAS, There are no ex-blacks but there are thousands of ex-gays;
and
WHEREAS, Skin-tone is genetic and sexual orientation is faith-based;
and
WHEREAS, Those who seek to end the government's unconstitutional
entanglement with the LGBTQ secular humanist religion are defending the
integrity of the civil rights movement lead by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
from an emotional ploy and an unprincipled misapplication of the 14th
amendment of the constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, For any person to suggest that the homosexual civil rights
movement, which is not based on immutability or genetics, is equal to the
race-based civil rights movement, which was actually based on
immutability and genetics, has engaged in an act of fraud and racial
animus in-kind that is intellectually, emotionally, sexually and racially
exploitative; and
WHEREAS, People of color at one point in this country had to ride on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
4
the back of the bus, walk to school and drink from colored water fountains,
and for anyone to equate the race-based civil rights plight to the goal of
many secular humanists to entangle the government with their religion is a
per se act of racial animus that is deeply offensive to many people in the
state of Kansas; and
WHEREAS, Parody marriages have never been a part of American
tradition and heritage and have nothing to do with the substantive due
process clause of the 14th amendment of the constitution of the United
States; and
WHEREAS, It is a long-standing government principle that emotional
appeals or sincerity of belief do not allow the state of Kansas to usurp the
establishment clause of the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United
States or for devout secular humanists to entangle our government with
LGBTQ secular humanism; and
WHEREAS, The history of parody marriages is that most forms were
illegal until recently or they remain illegal today, and they continue to
erode community standards of decency; and
WHEREAS, All forms of parody marriage equally erode community
standards of decency; and
WHEREAS, The state of Kansas has a compelling interest to uphold
community standards of decency as set forth under the constitution of the
state of Kansas and in accordance with the findings of the United States
supreme court; and
WHEREAS, Community standards of decency do not evolve, but
people can become desensitized; and
WHEREAS, The enforcement of marriage policies between a man and
a woman do not erode community standards of decency and fulfill a series
of compelling state interest; and
WHEREAS, Individuals who legally marry in the state of Kansas are
entitled to a constellation of benefits funded by the taxpayers; and
WHEREAS, There are many taxpayers in the state of Kansas who
sincerely believe that all forms of marriage that do not involve a man and a
woman are immoral and that for their tax dollars to be appropriated to
enable immorality is itself an act of immorality that causes them to violate
their conscience by the simple act of paying taxes; and
WHEREAS, Marriage between a man and a woman arose out of the
nature of things, and marriage between a man and a woman is natural,
neutral and non-controversial, unlike parody forms of marriage that do not
involve a man and a woman; and
WHEREAS, Marriage policies that endorse marriage between a man
and a woman are secular in nature for purposes of the establishment clause
of the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States, insofar as the
policies accomplish their purpose, fulfill a compelling state interest and do
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
5
not put religion over non-religion in their making and in their enforcement,
unlike parody marriage policies; and
WHEREAS, The legislative branch may sever as a check on the
judicial and executive branches; and
WHEREAS, The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584
(2015) was called an "egotistic judicial putsch" that causes secular
humanists in office to constitute "a threat to American Democracy" by
dissenting supreme court justices; and
WHEREAS, Stare decisis does not keep Obergefell v. Hodges,135 S.Ct.
2584 (2015) from being overruled, because stare decisis is at its weakest
when the court is asked to interpret the constitution of the United States,
and because questions which merely lurk in the record, neither brought to
attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered as having
been so decided as to constitute precedents; and
WHEREAS, The question whether the establishment clause of the 1st
amendment of the constitution of the United States has exclusive
jurisdiction over informing the states as to which marriages they can
legally recognize was lurking in the shadows but was undecided upon by
the court in Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015).
Now, therefore:
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas:
Section 1. The provisions of sections 1 through 6, and amendments
thereto, shall be known and may be cited as the marriage and constitution
restoration act.
Sec. 2. As used in this act:
(a) "Community standards of decency" means a standard based on the
reasonable observer's perspective that, if offended by appeals to the
prurient interest or the patently offensive, would harm the general decency,
safety, health and welfare of the community.
(b) "Conversion therapy" means a therapeutic practice in which a
licensed mental health expert, acting under authorized consent, assists
clients in the goal of realigning such client's sexual preference to prefer
members of the opposite sex who have corresponding reproductive
anatomy.
(c) "Marriage" means a legal union that represents an intended
lifelong commitment between one person who was born male and one
person who was born female as husband and wife, who are of equal but
opposite genders, who become spouses of the opposite sex, and who have
corresponding sexual anatomy that, if coalesced, have the actual or
symbolic potential to create an offspring whom likely has the input of the
two spouses with whom the same genetic code and ancestral chain is
shared.
(d) "Non-secular sham" means a policy, a course or principle of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
6
action adopted or proposed by a state actor that endorses, respects or
favors the beliefs of a particular religion where the preeminent and
primary force driving the state's action is not genuine, but is a sham that
ultimately has a primary religious objective. The term "non-secular sham"
refers to a type of policy that is predicated on a series of unproven faith-
based assumptions and naked assertions that are implicitly religious.
(e) "Parody marriage" means any form of alleged marriage that does
not involve a man and a woman. The term "parody marriage" refers to a
variety of so-called marriages that do not involve a man and a woman that
amount to doctrines that are inseparably linked to the religion of secular
humanism. The term "parody marriage" refers to so-called marriages
between more than two people, persons of the same sex, a person and an
animal, or a person and an object.
(f) "Religion" means a set of unproven answers to the greater
questions like "Why are we here?" and "What should we be doing as
humans?" that are predicated on an institutionalized or non-
institutionalized faith-based worldview flowing out of a community that is
full, organized and has a daily code by which its members may guide their
daily lives.
(g) "Secular humanism" means a faith-based worldview that is also
referred to as postmodern western individualistic moral relativism and
expressive individualism. A belief system that is protected by the free
exercise clause of the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United
States and the constitution of the state of Kansas, and centered on the
unproven assumption that there are no moral absolutes and that on one
moral doctrine should be used as the superior basis for law and policy. The
term "secular humanism" includes a series of unproven faith-based
assumptions and naked assertions that suggest that morality and truth are
man-made conventions and that at the heart of liberty is man's ability to
define man's own meaning of the universe. The term "secular humanism"
refers to a religion that does not fulfill any compelling state interest, but
instead, tends to erode community standards of decency. The term "secular
humanism" refers to homosexuality, sexual orientation, polygamy,
transgenderism, zoophilia and objectophilia, which are self-asserted, sex-
based identity narratives, doctrines, dogmas and mythologies that flow
directly out of and are inseparably linked to the religion. The term "secular
humanism" refers to the belief that man is merely a bundle of chemicals,
animated pieces of meat or accidental particles and that nature is all there
is. The term "secular humanism" refers to the unproven faith-based
assumption that nature is all that there is, but that mankind should still love
each other.
(h) "Secular policy" means a course or principle of action adopted or
proposed by a state actor that is natural, neutral, and non-controversial that
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
7
is based on self-evident morality and objective truth from the reasonable
observer perspective. The term includes procedure that generally
accomplishes its goals and does not tend to put religion over non-religion
or one religion over another. The term includes a course of governmental
action where the preeminent and primary force driving the policy is
genuine, not a sham, and not merely secondary to a religious objective.
(i) "Sexual orientation" means a mythology, dogma, doctrine or
ideology that is inseparably linked to the religion of secular humanism.
The term includes self-asserted, sex-based identity narrative that are often
predicated on a series of unproven faith-based assumptions and naked
assertions that are implicitly religious and have a tendency to erode
community standards of decency.
Sec. 3. (a) The 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States
applies to the state of Kansas though the 14th amendment of the
constitution of the United States.
(b) All members of the legislature and all executive and judicial
officers are bound by oath or affirmation pursuant to article VI of the
constitution of the United States to not enforce, respect, recognize or
endorse policies that violate the free exercise clause or establishment
clause of the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States
regardless of the members' or officers' party affiliation.
Sec. 4. (a) Pursuant to the free exercise clause of the 1st amendment
of the constitution of the United States, any person within the jurisdiction
of this state has the fundamental, existing and individual right to freely
cultivate any self-asserted, sex-based identity narrative or self-asserted
sexual orientation based on a personal, autonomous choice and to practice
secular humanism.
(b) A person has the free-exercise right to conduct a marriage
ceremony that does not involve a man and a woman and other rituals that
are in accord with such person's self-asserted, sexual orientation and to
live as married people do, free from governmental interference, as long as
the ceremonies and lifestyle practices do not conflict with other state and
federal law.
Sec. 5. (a) The state has a compelling interest to uphold community
standards of decency and a duty to not make or enforce policies that put
the religion of secular humanism over non-religion and to not make and
enforce policies that are preempted by the establishment clause of the 1st
amendment of the constitution of the United States. The unproven truth
claims flowing out of the religion of secular humanism tend to erode
community standards of decency and cannot be respected, endorsed,
favored or recognized for the purposes of this section or the establishment
clause of the 1st amendment of the constitution of the United States.
(b) Under this section, the establishment clause of the 1st amendment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
8
of the constitution of the United States, and the state's compelling interests
to uphold community standards of decency, the state is prohibited from
enforcing, endorsing, respecting or favoring the following policies for
being non-secular shams that cultivate indefensible legal weapons against
non-observers of the religion of secular humanism and for having the
effect of excessively entangling the government with the religion of
secular humanism, while eroding community standards of decency:
(1) Policies that permit legally recognized or respected marriage of
any form of parody marriage that does not involve a man and a woman;
(2) policies that authorize the state to appropriate benefits to
individuals who entered into a parody marriage of any kind that does not
involve a man and a woman;
(3) policies that permit counties to issue marriage licenses to
individuals who seek legal recognition and respect of a marriage that does
not involve a man and a woman;
(4) policies that treat sexual orientation as a suspect class or as a basis
of prohibited discrimination under the assumption that sexual orientation is
predicated on immutability or genetics;
(5) policies that treat sexual orientation as a suspect class or as a basis
of prohibited discrimination under the assumption that parody marriage
that does not involve a man and a woman are a part of American history or
heritage;
(6) policies that respect a person's unproven belief that they were
born the gender that does not accord with the anatomy with which the
individual was born;
(7) policies that permit the state to appropriate tax dollars to pay for
sex change operations;
(8) policies that ban conversion therapy;
(9) policies that permit public libraries and public schools in the state
to partner with nonsecular organizations to promote, sponsor, host, favor,
or endorse the drag queen storytime or other similar, related secular
humanist programming that target children with apprehension that the
government approves;
(10) policies that mandate pronoun changes to respect the plausibility
of secular humanist ideology;
(11) policies that respect, condone, ratify or affirm homosexual,
transgender, zoophilia, objectophilia, polygamy, orthodoxy and sexual
orientation as if the doctrines were plausible, moral or decent and not a
political ploy or an imperialistic power play; and
(12) policies that permit a person or parent to change the sex on a
birth certificate that does not accord with the anatomy that the person was
born with.
(c) The state shall no longer be in the parody marriage funding and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
HB 2320
9
endorsement business and shall disentangle itself from the lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) secular humanist church
pursuant to this section and the establishment clause of the 1st amendment
of the constitution of the United States. The state shall not, through any
government action create, enforce or respect any LGBTQ or any other
secular humanist policy whether directly or symbolically. The state shall
maintain the separation of church and state, which includes separating
itself from the non-institutionalized religions such as secular humanism,
expressive individualism and postmodern western individualistic moral
relativism.
Sec. 6. (a) Policies that respect and endorse a marriage between a
man and a woman shall continue to be enforced because the policies are
natural, neutral, non-controversial and secular in nature. The state will
continue to enforce, respect, endorse and recognize marriage policies
between a man and a woman because such marriage policies have a
primary secular purpose, accomplishing non-religious objectives and do
not put religion over non-religion, unlike policies that respect the various
forms of parody marriage, which do not involve a man and a woman. The
state will only issue marriage licenses to a man and a woman who meet the
requirements by the governing state agency, because such state action is
secular and does not excessively entangle the government with any
religion nor does the recognition endorse a religion.
(b) Policies that respect and endorse a marriage between a man and a
woman fulfill a compelling state interest by upholding community
standards of decency and such policies are not a critic on religion.
(c) The state shall continue to enforce and recognize that marriage
policies that respect a legal union that represents an intended lifelong
commitment between one person who was born male and one person who
was born female as husband and wife, who are of equal but opposite
genders, who become spouses of the opposite sex, and who have
corresponding sexual anatomy that, if coalesced, have the actual or
symbolic potential to create an offspring whom likely has the input of the
two spouses with whom the same genetic code and ancestral chain is
shared.
Sec. 7. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its
publication in the statute book.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36