Text of MD HB 1019 (2025)

Human Relations - Protection of the Free Exercise of Religion

Back to the bill page

Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.

Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)

As introduced

7,281 characters

Open the printed bill (PDF)

EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW. [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. *hb1019* HOUSE BILL 1019 D5 5lr2898 By: Delegate Schmidt Introduced and read first time: February 3, 2025 Assigned to: Health and Government Operations A BILL ENTITLED AN ACT concerning 1 Human Relations – Protection of the Free Exercise of Religion 2 FOR the purpose of prohibiting a governmental authority, under certain circumstances, 3 from burdening a person’s exercise of religion; authorizing a person aggrieved by a 4 violation of this Act to obtain certain relief in a civil action; and generally relating to 5 the protection of religious freedom. 6 BY adding to 7 Article – State Government 8 Section 20–1301 through 20–1305 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 13. 9 Religious Freedom” 10 Annotated Code of Maryland 11 (2021 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 12 Preamble 13 WHEREAS, The framers of the U.S. Constitution and the people of this State, 14 recognizing free exercise of religion as an inalienable right, secured its protection in the 15 First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and in Article 36 of the Declaration of Rights of 16 the Maryland Constitution, respectively; and 17 WHEREAS, In City of Boerne v. Flores, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the 18 compelling interest test provided for in the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act to 19 protect the inalienable constitutional right of free exercise of religion must be adopted by a 20 state through legislative act or court decision in order to apply to state or local government 21 action; and 22 WHEREAS, The Senate of Maryland and the House of Delegates of Maryland have 23 determined that the same compelling interest test provided for in the federal Religious 24 Freedom Restoration Act applies to the State and local governments in Maryland; now, 25 therefore, 26 2 HOUSE BILL 1019 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 1 That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 2 Article – State Government 3 SUBTITLE 13. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. 4 20–1301. 5 (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 6 INDICATED. 7 (B) “COMPELLING GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST” MEANS AN INTEREST 8 ARISING FROM A SUBSTANTIAL THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, PEACE, 9 ORDER, OR GENERAL WELFARE. 10 (C) “EXERCISE OF RELIGION” MEANS THE PRACTICE OR OBSERVANCE OF 11 RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, WHETHER OR NOT COMPELLED BY OR CENTRAL TO A SYSTEM 12 OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF, INCLUDING OBSERVANCE UNDER ARTICLE 36 OF THE 13 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OF THE MARYLAND CONSTITUTION OR THE FREE 14 EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. 15 (D) “GOVERNMENTAL ACTION” MEANS A LAW, A REGULATION, AN 16 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, A DECISION, A PRACTICE, OR ANY OTHER EXERCISE OF 17 GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. 18 (E) “GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY” INCLUDES: 19 (1) THE STATE, A COUNTY, OR A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OR ANY 20 SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE, A COUNTY, OR A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; AND 21 (2) ANY OFFICIAL OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE 22 OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT BY ANY ENTITY DESCRIBED IN ITEM (1) OF THIS 23 SUBSECTION. 24 (F) “PERSON” INCLUDES: 25 (1) AN INDIVIDUAL; AND 26 (2) A RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION, ASSOCIATION, OR CORPORATION. 27 20–1302. 28 HOUSE BILL 1019 3 THIS SUBTITLE APPLIES TO A GOVERNMENTAL ACTION TAKEN BY A 1 GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2025, INCLUDING A 2 GOVERNMENTAL ACTION TAKEN PURSUANT TO A LAW, REGULATION, POLICY, 3 GUIDELINE, OR OTHER AUTHORITY THAT WAS IN EFFECT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2025, 4 UNLESS STATE LAW EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES THAT GOVERNMENTAL ACTION FROM 5 COVERAGE UNDER THIS SUBTITLE. 6 20–1303. 7 (A) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION, A 8 GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY MAY NOT SUBSTANTIALLY BURDEN A PERSON’S 9 EXERCISE OF RELIGION EVEN IF THE BURDEN RESULTS FROM A RULE OF GENERAL 10 APPLICABILITY. 11 (B) A GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY MAY SUBSTANTIALLY BURDEN A 12 PERSON’S EXERCISE OF RELIGION ONLY IF IT DEMONSTRATES THAT APPLICATION 13 OF THE BURDEN TO THE PERSON IS: 14 (1) IN FURTHERANCE OF A COMPELLING GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST; 15 AND 16 (2) THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE MEANS OF FURTHERING THAT 17 COMPELLING GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST. 18 20–1304. 19 (A) A PERSON AGGRIEVED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE MAY OBTAIN 20 APPROPRIATE RELIEF IN A CIVIL ACTION IN A COURT OF COMPETENT 21 JURISDICTION. 22 (B) SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION, APPROPRIATE RELIEF 23 UNDER THIS SUBTITLE MAY INCLUDE: 24 (1) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; AND 25 (2) COMPENSATORY DAMAGES INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S 26 FEES. 27 (C) A PERSON AGGRIEVED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE BY AN 28 OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE OF AN ENTITY DESCRIBED IN § 20–1301(E)(1) OF THIS 29 SUBTITLE MAY SEEK: 30 4 HOUSE BILL 1019 (1) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST THE OFFICIAL, EMPLOYEE, OR THE 1 ENTITY BY WHICH THE OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE IS EMPLOYED; 2 (2) COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AGAINST THE ENTITY BY WHICH THE 3 OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE IS EMPLOYED; AND 4 (3) IF THE OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE WAS ACTING CLEARLY OUTSIDE 5 THE SCOPE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT, COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AGAINST THE 6 OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE. 7 (D) THE RIGHTS ESTABLISHED UNDER THIS SUBTITLE MAY BE RAISED BY A 8 PLAINTIFF IN AN ACTION FOR RELIEF UNDER THIS SECTION OR AS A DEFENSE TO AN 9 ACTION. 10 (E) A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES BROUGHT UNDER THIS SUBTITLE IS SUBJECT 11 TO: 12 (1) THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIMS ACT UNDER TITLE 5, 13 SUBTITLE 3 OF THE COURTS ARTICLE; OR 14 (2) THE MARYLAND TORT CLAIMS ACT UNDER TITLE 12, SUBTITLE 1 15 OF THIS ARTICLE. 16 20–1305. 17 (A) (1) IN THIS SUBSECTION, “PROVIDING” DOES NOT INCLUDE THE 18 DENIAL OF FUNDING, BENEFITS, OR EXEMPTIONS. 19 (2) THIS SUBTITLE MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO PROHIBIT ANY 20 GOVERNMENTAL ACTION PROVIDING FUNDING, BENEFITS, OR EXEMPTIONS TO THE 21 EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OR THE 22 MARYLAND CONSTITUTION. 23 (B) THIS SUBTITLE MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO AFFECT, INTERPRET, OR 24 ADDRESS IN ANY WAY THE SUBSTANCE OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF 25 RIGHTS OR THE MARYLAND CONSTITUTION. 26 (C) THE PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PROVIDED UNDER THIS 27 SUBTITLE IS IN ADDITION TO, AND DOES NOT REDUCE, THE PROTECTIONS PROVIDED 28 UNDER THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OR THE MARYLAND 29 CONSTITUTION. 30 SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 31 1, 2025. 32