Text of MD HB 757 (2022)
Education – Interscholastic and Intramural Teams and Sports – Designation Based on Biological Sex (Save Women’s Sports Act)
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
13,150 characters
EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW.
[Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
*hb0757*
HOUSE BILL 757
F1, D5
2lr1981
By: Delegates Szeliga, Arikan, Boteler, Chisholm, M. Fisher, Grammer, Kittleman,
Krebs, Mangione, McComas, Morgan, Parrott, Reilly, Rose, Shoemaker,
Thiam, and Wivell
Introduced and read first time: February 3, 2022
Assigned to: Ways and Means
A BILL ENTITLED
AN ACT concerning
1
Education – Interscholastic and Intramural Teams and Sports – Designation
2
Based on Biological Sex
3
(Save Women’s Sports Act)
4
FOR the purpose of requiring certain interscholastic and intramural athletic teams or
5
sports sponsored by certain schools to be expressly designated based on biological
6
sex; prohibiting certain entities from taking certain adverse actions against a school
7
or county board of education for maintaining separate interscholastic and intramural
8
athletic teams and sports for students of the female sex; providing that certain
9
individuals have the right to bring a civil action under certain circumstances; and
10
generally relating to interscholastic and intramural teams and sports of public and
11
nonpublic schools.
12
BY adding to
13
Article – Education
14
Section 7–129
15
Annotated Code of Maryland
16
(2018 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement)
17
Preamble
18
WHEREAS, The General Assembly finds that there are two biological sexes, female
19
and male, and that a person’s sex is objectively determined by genetics and anatomy
20
existing at the time of birth; and
21
WHEREAS, There are “[i]nherent differences between men and women,” and that
22
these differences “remain cause for celebration, but not for denigration of the members of
23
either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual’s opportunity.” United States v.
24
Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 533 (1996); and
25
2
HOUSE BILL 757
WHEREAS, The “inherent differences” between men and women range from
1
chromosomal and hormonal differences to physiological differences; and
2
WHEREAS, Men generally have “denser, stronger bones, tendons, and ligaments”
3
and “larger hearts, greater lung volume per body mass, a higher red blood cell count, and
4
higher hemoglobin.” Neel Burton, The Battle of the Sexes, PSYCHOL. TODAY (July 2,
5
2012), https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hide–andseek/201207/the–battle–the–sexes;
6
and
7
WHEREAS, Men also have higher natural levels of testosterone, which affects traits
8
such as hemoglobin levels, body fat content, the storage and use of carbohydrates, and the
9
development of Type 2 muscle fibers, all of which result in men being able to generate
10
higher speed and power during physical activity. Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Sex in Sport,
11
80 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 63, 74 (2017) (quoting Gina Kolata, Men,
12
Women and Speed. 2 Words: Got Testosterone?, N.Y. TIMES (Aug. 21, 2008)); and
13
WHEREAS, The biological differences between females and males, especially as they
14
relate to natural levels of testosterone, “explain the male and female secondary sex
15
characteristics which develop during puberty and have lifelong effects, including those most
16
important for success in sport: categorically different strength, speed, and endurance.”
17
Doriane Lambelet Coleman and Wickliffe Shreve, “Comparing Athletic Performances: The
18
Best Elite Women to Boys and Men,” Duke Law Center for Sports Law and Policy,
19
https://web.law.duke.edu/sports/sex–sport/comparative–athletic–performance/; and
20
WHEREAS, While classifications based on sex are generally disfavored, the Supreme
21
Court has recognized that “sex classifications may be used to compensate women for
22
particular economic disabilities [they have] suffered, to promote equal employment
23
opportunity, [and] to advance full development of the talent and capacities of our Nation’s
24
people.” United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 533 (1996) (internal citations and
25
quotation marks omitted); and
26
WHEREAS, One place where sex classifications allow for the “full development of
27
the talent and capacities of our Nation’s people” is in the context of sports and athletics;
28
and
29
WHEREAS, Courts have recognized that the inherent, physiological differences
30
between males and females result in different athletic capabilities. See, e.g., Kleczek v.
31
Rhode Island Interscholastic League, Inc., 612 A.2d 734, 738 (R.I. 1992) (“Because of innate
32
physiological differences, boys and girls are not similarly situated as they enter athletic
33
competition.”); Petrie v. Ill. High Sch. Ass’n, 394 N.E.2d 855, 861 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979) (noting
34
that “high school boys [generally possess physiological advantages over] their girl
35
counterparts” and that those advantages give them an unfair lead over girls in some sports
36
like “high school track”); and
37
WHEREAS, A recent study of female and male Olympic performances since 1983
38
found that, although athletes from both sexes improved over the time span, the “gender
39
HOUSE BILL 757
3
gap” between female and male performances remained stable. “These suggest that women’s
1
performances at the high level will never match those of men.” Valerie Thibault, et al.,
2
Women and men in sport performance: The gender gap has not evolved since 1983, 9
3
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 214, 219 (2010); and
4
WHEREAS, As Duke Law professor and All–American track athlete Doriane
5
Coleman, tennis champion Martina Navratilova, and Olympic track gold medalist Sanya
6
Richards–Ross recently wrote: “The evidence is unequivocal that starting in puberty, in
7
every sport except sailing, shooting and riding, there will always be significant numbers of
8
boys and men who would beat the best girls and women in head–to–head competition.
9
Claims to the contrary are simply a denial of science.” Doriane Coleman, Martina
10
Navratilova, et al., Pass the Equality Act, But Don’t Abandon Title IX, WASHINGTON
11
POST (Apr. 29, 2019), https://wapo.st/2VKlNN1; and
12
WHEREAS, The benefits that natural testosterone provides to male athletes are not
13
diminished through the use of puberty blockers and cross–sex hormones. A recent study on
14
the impact of such treatments found that policies like those of the International Olympic
15
Committee that require biological males to undergo at least one year of testosterone
16
suppression before competing in women’s sports do not create a level playing field. “[T]he
17
reduction in testosterone levels required by many sports federation transgender policies is
18
insufficient to remove or reduce the male advantage by any meaningful degree.” For
19
example, “the muscle mass advantage males possess over females, and potentially the
20
performance implications thereof, are not removed by 12 months of testosterone
21
suppression.” Instead, the study concluded that “The data presented here demonstrates
22
that the male physical performance advantage over females, attributed to superior
23
anthropometric and muscle mass/strength parameters achieved at puberty, is not removed
24
by the current regimen of testosterone suppression permitting participation of transgender
25
women in female sports categories. Rather, it appears that the male performance
26
advantage is largely retained by transgender women and thus remains substantial.”
27
Hilton, E.N.; Lundberg, T.R. Transgender Women in The Female Category of Sport: Is the
28
Male Performance Advantage Removed by Testosterone Suppression?. Preprints 2020,
29
2020050226 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202005.0226.v1); and
30
WHEREAS, Having separate sex–specific teams furthers efforts to promote sex
31
equality. Sex–specific teams accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes
32
to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with
33
opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous
34
other long–term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors; now, therefore,
35
SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND,
36
That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:
37
Article – Education
38
7–129.
39
4
HOUSE BILL 757
(A)
(1)
IN THIS SECTION THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS
1
INDICATED.
2
(2)
“STUDENT OF THE FEMALE SEX” MEANS A STUDENT WHOSE
3
BIOLOGICAL SEX IS FEMALE.
4
(3)
“STUDENT OF THE MALE SEX” MEANS A STUDENT WHOSE
5
BIOLOGICAL SEX IS MALE.
6
(B)
THIS SECTION APPLIES TO:
7
(1)
PUBLIC SCHOOLS; AND
8
(2)
NONPUBLIC SCHOOLS WHOSE STUDENT ATHLETES OR ATHLETIC
9
TEAMS COMPETE AGAINST STUDENT ATHLETES OR ATHLETIC TEAMS FROM PUBLIC
10
SCHOOLS IN THE STATE.
11
(C)
(1)
AN INTERSCHOLASTIC OR INTRAMURAL ATHLETIC TEAM OR
12
SPORT THAT IS SPONSORED BY A PUBLIC OR NONPUBLIC SCHOOL SHALL BE
13
EXPRESSLY DESIGNATED AS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BASED ON BIOLOGICAL SEX:
14
(I)
A BOYS, MALE, OR MEN’S TEAM OR SPORT;
15
(II)
A GIRLS, FEMALE, OR WOMEN’S TEAM OR SPORT; OR
16
(III) A COEDUCATIONAL OR MIXED TEAM OR SPORT.
17
(2)
AN INTERSCHOLASTIC OR INTRAMURAL ATHLETIC TEAM OR
18
SPORT DESIGNATED FOR GIRLS, FEMALES, OR WOMEN MAY NOT INCLUDE STUDENTS
19
OF THE MALE SEX.
20
(D)
A
GOVERNMENTAL
ENTITY,
A
LICENSING
OR
ACCREDITING
21
ORGANIZATION, OR AN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OR ORGANIZATION MAY NOT ACCEPT
22
A COMPLAINT, CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION, OR TAKE ANY OTHER ADVERSE ACTION
23
AGAINST
A
SCHOOL
OR
COUNTY
BOARD
FOR
MAINTAINING
SEPARATE
24
INTERSCHOLASTIC OR INTRAMURAL ATHLETIC TEAMS OR SPORTS FOR STUDENTS
25
OF THE FEMALE SEX.
26
(E)
(1)
(I)
A
STUDENT
WHO
IS
DEPRIVED
OF
AN
ATHLETIC
27
OPPORTUNITY OR SUFFERS ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT HARM AS A RESULT OF A
28
VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST THE SCHOOL THE
29
STUDENT ATTENDS.
30
HOUSE BILL 757
5
(II)
A STUDENT WHO IS SUBJECT TO RETALIATION OR OTHER
1
ADVERSE ACTION BY A SCHOOL OR AN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OR ORGANIZATION
2
AS A RESULT OF REPORTING A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION TO AN EMPLOYEE OR
3
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SCHOOL, ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OR ORGANIZATION, OR
4
ANY STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY WITH OVERSIGHT OF SCHOOLS IN THE STATE MAY
5
BRING A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST THE SCHOOL OR ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OR
6
ORGANIZATION.
7
(III) A SCHOOL THAT SUFFERS ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT HARM
8
FROM A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, A LICENSING OR ACCREDITING ORGANIZATION,
9
OR AN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OR ORGANIZATION AS A RESULT OF A VIOLATION OF
10
THIS SECTION MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY,
11
LICENSING OR ACCREDITING ORGANIZATION, OR ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OR
12
ORGANIZATION.
13
(2)
A CIVIL ACTION INITIATED UNDER THIS SECTION MUST BE
14
INITIATED WITHIN 2 YEARS AFTER THE HARM OCCURRED.
15
(3)
AN INDIVIDUAL WHO PREVAILS IN A CIVIL ACTION UNDER THIS
16
SECTION MAY RECOVER:
17
(I)
MONETARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR ANY
18
PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMOTIONAL, AND PHYSICAL HARM SUFFERED;
19
(II)
REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS; AND
20
(III) ANY OTHER RELIEF, INCLUDING AN INJUNCTION, AS THE
21
COURT MAY DETERMINE APPROPRIATE.
22
(F)
THIS SECTION MAY BE KNOWN AND CITED AS THE SAVE WOMEN’S
23
SPORTS ACT OR SELINA’S LAW.
24
SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, if any provision of this Act or
25
the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid for any reason in a
26
court of competent jurisdiction, the provision shall be construed to give the provision the
27
maximum effect permitted by law unless the provision is held to be absolutely invalid.
28
SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, if any provision of this Act or
29
the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid for any reason in a
30
court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or any other
31
application of this Act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application,
32
and for this purpose the provisions of this Act are declared severable.
33
6
HOUSE BILL 757
SECTION 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July
1
1, 2022.
2