Text of MI HR 264 (2016)
A resolution to urge the State Board of Education to reject the recently proposed Statement and Guidance on Safe and Supportive Learning Environments for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ) Students.
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
4,704 characters
Rep.
Nesbitt offered the following resolution:
House
Resolution No. 264.
A resolution to
urge the State Board of Education to reject the recently proposed Statement and
Guidance on Safe and Supportive Learning Environments for Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ) Students.
Whereas, Article
VIII, Section 1 of the Michigan Constitution, which can be traced back to
parallel language in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, proclaims the vital
nature of traditional education in Michigan: "Religion, morality and
knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind,
schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged"; and
Whereas, Article
VIII, Section 3 of the Michigan Constitution states, "Leadership and general
supervision over all public education, including adult education and
instructional programs in state institutions, except as to institutions of
higher education granting baccalaureate degrees, is vested in a state board of
education. It shall serve as the general planning and coordinating body for all
public education, including higher education, and shall advise the legislature
as to the financial requirements in connection therewith"; and
Whereas, The
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states, in part, "No State
shall…deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law"; and
Whereas, The
United States Supreme Court has long recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment
protects the fundamental liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and
education of their children. As stated by the Court in Troxel v Granville,
530 US 57 (2000), "[t]he liberty interest…of parents in the care,
custody, and control of their children—is perhaps the oldest of the
fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme] Court"; and
Whereas, The
United States Supreme Court recognized, in Parham v J.R., 442 US 574
(1979), that "our constitutional system['s]…concept of the family
rests on a presumption that parents possess what a child lacks in maturity,
experience, and capacity for judgment required for making life’s
difficult decisions. More important, historically it has recognized that
natural bonds of affection lead parents to act in the best interests of their
children"; and
Whereas, The
United States Supreme Court recognized in Pierce v Society of the Sister of
the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, 268 US 510 (1925), that "[t]he child
is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his
destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare
him for additional obligations." Consequently, the state cannot
"unreasonably interfere with the liberty of parents and guardians to
direct the upbringing and education of children under their control"; and
Whereas, On
February 23, 2016, State Superintendent Brian Whiston proposed, at the State
Board of Education’s request, a Statement and Guidance on Safe and
Supportive Learning Environments for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and
Questioning (LGBTQ) Students; and
Whereas, The
Statement and Guidance directs schools to allow children, without parental
knowledge or consent, to identify with a gender other than that which is
recognized by their parents; and
Whereas, The
Statement and Guidance directs school staff to address and treat students by
the name and gender they choose, while recommending a confidentiality policy
that directs schools to purposefully deceive parents. More specifically, it
recommends that a school, when talking to a transgender child’s parent,
"use the student’s legal name and the pronoun corresponding to the
student’s assigned sex at birth, unless the student or parent/guardian
has specified otherwise"; and
Whereas, The
State Board of Education extended the public comment period on the Statement
and Guidance due to several thousand comments submitted from concerned parents
and educators who opposed the plan; and
Whereas, The
Statement and Guidance would significantly interfere with the fundamental
rights of parents to determine the upbringing of their children and direct
their education; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the
House of Representatives, That we urge the State Board of Education to heed the
concerns of thousands of Michigan parents and reject the proposed Statement and
Guidance on Safe and Supportive Learning Environments for Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ) Students; and be it further
Resolved, That
copies of this resolution be transmitted to the member of the State Board of
Education.