Text of MO HCR 49 (2026)
Rejects the Obergefell v. Hodges decision and calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
4,786 characters
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE CONCURRENT
RESOLUTION NO. 49
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE TITUS.
7239H.01I
JOSEPH ENGLER, Chief Clerk
WHEREAS, the Obergefell v. Hodges decision by the Supreme Court of the United
2
States is at odds with the Constitution of the United States, 576 U.S. 644 (2015)(hereafter
3
Obergefell), and the principles of the United States; and
4
5
WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from
6
governmental action, not as a right to a particular governmental entitlement; and
7
8
WHEREAS, the Obergefell decision ignores the Declaration of Independence's
9
proclamation that human dignity is innate and that "all men are created equal" and "endowed
10
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"; instead, such decision sees dignity coming
11
from the government; and
12
13
WHEREAS, Obergefell denies the framers' understanding that liberty flows from our
14
innate dignity, causing collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that
15
protects liberty, including religious liberty; and
16
17
WHEREAS, Obergefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due Process
18
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as a font of
19
substantive rights, a doctrine that strays from the full meaning of the Constitution of the
20
United States and exalts judges at the expense of the people from whom they derive their
21
authority; and
22
23
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States recognized in United States v.
24
Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), that the definition of marriage is "an area that has long been
25
regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States". Therefore, the state of Missouri, not
26
the Supreme Court of the United States, has the right to regulate marriage for its residents;
27
and
28
29
WHEREAS, Obergefell requires states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples
30
and to recognize same-sex marriages in contravention of the states' constitutions and the
31
expressed will of their voters, thus undermining the civil liberties of those states' residents and
32
voters; and
33
34
WHEREAS, marriage as an institution has been recognized as the union of one man
35
and one woman for more than two thousand years, and within common law, the basis of the
36
United States' Anglo-American legal tradition, for more than eight hundred years; and
37
38
WHEREAS, the Obergefell decision arbitrarily and unjustly rejects the definition of
39
marriage in favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key clauses within the Constitution of
40
the United States and our nation's legal and cultural precedents; and
41
42
WHEREAS, the Obergefell decision was illegitimate because two of the Justices on
43
the Supreme Court of the United States in the majority ruling, specifically Justices Ruth
44
Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, had previously officiated same-sex weddings and thus
45
were not impartial triers of fact. Therefore, those Justices should have recused themselves
46
according to 28 U.S.C. Section 455; and
47
48
WHEREAS, Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis was persecuted for her faith in
49
refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses, and the Supreme Court of the United States
50
declined to uphold and defend her First Amendment rights on account of the Obergefell
51
decision; and
52
53
WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only legislatures elected by the
54
people may pass laws, Obergefell is an illegitimate overreach; and
55
56
WHEREAS, the people of the state of Missouri voted to define marriage as between
57
one man and one woman in Amendment 2 in 2004, by a vote of nearly seventy-one percent to
58
twenty-nine percent:
59
60
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the members of the House of
61
Representatives of the One Hundred Third General Assembly, Second Regular Session, the
62
Senate concurring therein, hereby reject the Obergefell decision and call upon the Supreme
63
Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell and restore the natural law definition of
64
marriage, a union of one man and one woman, as was recognized at the founding; and
HCR 49
2
65
66
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Missouri General Assembly insists on
67
restoring the issue of marriage and enforcement of all laws pertaining to marriage back to the
68
several states and the people; and
69
70
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Clerk of the Missouri House of
71
Representatives be instructed to prepare a properly inscribed copy of this resolution for the
72
Supreme Court of the United States.
Bill Body End
HCR 49
3