Text of MO SB 1192 (2026)
Prohibits higher education accrediting agencies from considering diversity, equity, and inclusion practices
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
5,565 characters
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
SENATE BILL NO. 1192
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR BROWN (26).
4636S.02I
KRISTINA MARTIN, Secretary
AN ACT
To amend chapter 173, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to diversity, equity, and
inclusion practices at higher education accrediting agencies, with penalty provisions.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 173, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto
1
one new section, to be known as section 173.1570, to read as
2
follows:
3
173.1570. 1. As used in this section, the following
1
terms mean:
2
(1) "Accreditation", the status of public recognition
3
that an accrediting agency grants to an educational
4
institution, program, or both that meets the agency's
5
standards and requirements;
6
(2) "Accrediting agency", a person or governmental
7
entity that conducts accrediting activities and makes
8
decisions concerning the accreditation or pre-accreditation
9
status of institutions, programs, or both. The term
10
includes any national, regional, or programmatic accrediting
11
agency;
12
(3) "Diversity, equity, and inclusion", any
13
differential treatment of, or assignment of any fault or
14
blame to, an individual or group at an institution of higher
15
education based on race; color; ethnicity; national origin,
16
other than as it relates to immigration status under United
17
SB 1192
2
States law; sex, other than as it relates to sex-segregated
18
facilities, such as dormitories and bathrooms, or to
19
athletic programs; sexual orientation; or gender identity;
20
(4) "Diversity, equity, and inclusion practice or
21
procedure", any initiative, policy, program, mandate,
22
requirement, standard, metric, statistic, or other practice
23
or procedure related to diversity, equity, and inclusion;
24
(5) "Institution of higher education", a public
25
postsecondary educational institution in this state,
26
including all of the institution's programs, departments,
27
divisions, offices, centers, colleges, and schools, and any
28
person acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.
29
2. When taking any action involving the accreditation
30
or renewal of accreditation of an institution of higher
31
education, an accrediting agency shall not:
32
(1) Base its accrediting decision in any way on a
33
review or consideration of any diversity, equity, and
34
inclusion practice or procedure;
35
(2) Collect information related to any diversity,
36
equity, and inclusion practice or procedure; or
37
(3) Include any requirement related to any diversity,
38
equity, and inclusion practice or procedure.
39
3. An accrediting agency shall implement policies to
40
ensure that a person who has any decision-making or
41
recommendation authority related to the accreditation or
42
renewal of accreditation of an institution of higher
43
education does not collect and is not presented with any
44
information regarding any diversity, equity, and inclusion
45
practice or procedure.
46
4. Any current or former student or employee of an
47
institution of higher education may bring a civil action
48
against an accrediting agency that conducts accrediting
49
SB 1192
3
activities and makes decisions concerning the accreditation
50
of such institution for any violation of subsection 2 or 3
51
of this section that occurred while such person was a
52
student or employee of such institution and that involves
53
such agency's accreditation of such institution. Such
54
action shall be brought in the county where the violation
55
occurred. If the court finds that the accrediting agency
56
violated subsection 2 or 3 of this section, in addition to
57
any other legal or equitable remedies which in the judgment
58
of the court shall be appropriate, the accrediting agency
59
shall pay:
60
(1) The prevailing party's reasonable attorney's fees
61
and court costs;
62
(2) Damages to the prevailing party in an amount equal
63
to three times the amount of money paid by the institution
64
of higher education to the accrediting agency during the
65
applicable time period, which shall be defined as the
66
duration of the accrediting agency's violation, as well as
67
the five years prior to the violation, including dues, fees,
68
and any other payments; and
69
(3) Civil penalties of either:
70
(a) Up to one thousand dollars per student who
71
attended the institution of higher education at the time
72
when the violation occurred; or
73
(b) If no students attended the institution of higher
74
education at the time when the violation occurred, up to one
75
thousand dollars per student who attended the institution
76
during the semester immediately preceding the time when the
77
violation occurred.
78
5. Any violation of subsection 2 or 3 of this section
79
shall constitute an unlawful discriminatory practice, as
80
defined in section 213.010, and an unfair and unlawful
81
SB 1192
4
practice, as provided in subsection 1 of section 407.020.
82
The attorney general may investigate and seek appropriate
83
remedies for any violation of subsection 2 or 3 of this
84
section to the full extent provided by law.
85
✓