Text of MS SB 2093 (2016)
MRFRA; clarify that religious leaders are not required to perform certain marriages inconsistent with their religious beliefs.
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
5,525 characters
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE
2016 Regular Session
To: Judiciary, Division A
By: Senator(s) Younger
Senate Bill 2093
AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 11-61-1, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972,
TO CLARIFY THAT RELIGIOUS LEADERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PERFORM SAME-SEX
MARRIAGES; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI:
SECTION 1. Section
11-61-1, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:
11-61-1. (1) This section
shall be known and may be cited as the Mississippi Religious Freedom
Restoration Act.
(2) The Mississippi
Legislature finds the following:
(a) The framers of the
Constitution, recognizing free exercise of religion as an unalienable right,
secured its protection in the First Amendment to the Constitution;
(b) Laws
"neutral" toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as
laws intended to interfere with religious exercise;
(c) Government should
not substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification;
(d) In Employment
Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), the United States Supreme Court
virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on
religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion; and
(e) The compelling
interest test as set forth in prior federal court rulings is a workable test
for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and competing prior
governmental interests.
(3) The purposes of this
section are as follows:
(a) To restore the
compelling interest test as set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S.
398 (1963), and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), and to
guarantee its application in all cases where free exercise of religion is
substantially burdened; and
(b) To provide a claim
or defense to persons whose religious exercise is substantially burdened by
government.
(4) As used in this
section, the following words shall have the following meanings:
(a)
"Government" means any branch, department, agency, instrumentality or
political subdivision of the State of Mississippi and any official or other
person acting under color of law of the State of Mississippi.
(b)
"Demonstrates" means to meet the burdens of going forward with the
evidence and of persuasion.
(c) "Exercise of
religion" means the exercise of religion under the First Amendment to the
Constitution.
(d) "Religious
leader" means an individual who is associated with and is acting on behalf
of a religious organization, including a member of clergy, a minister, a
pastor, a priest, a rabbi, an imam or a spiritual advisor.
(5) (a) Except as
provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, government shall not
substantially burden:
(i) A
person's exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general
applicability * * *, except
as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection.;
(ii) A
religious leader's exercise of religion by requiring him to perform or
solemnize any marriage inconsistent with a sincerely held religious belief that
marriage is the union of one man and one woman.
(b) Government may
substantially burden a person's or religious leader's exercise of
religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person:
(i) Is in
furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and
(ii) Is the least
restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
(6) A person whose
religious exercise has been burdened in violation of this section may assert
that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain
appropriate relief against the government, as defined by subsection (4) of this
section. Standing to assert a claim or defense under this section shall be the
same as the general rules of standing under Article III of the United States
Constitution.
(7) (a) This section
applies to all state laws, rules, regulations and any municipal or county
ordinances, rules or regulations and the implementation of those laws, whether
statutory or otherwise, and whether adopted before or after July 1, 2014.
(b) Any such law,
rule, regulation or ordinances adopted after July 1, 2014, shall be subject to
this section unless such law explicitly excludes such application by reference
to this section.
(8) Nothing in this section
shall be construed to authorize any government to burden any religious belief.
(9) Nothing in this section
shall be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address that portion of
the First Amendment prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion.
Granting government funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible
under the Establishment Clause, shall not constitute a violation of this
section. As used in this subsection, the term "granting," used with
respect to government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the
denial of government funding, benefits, or exemptions.
(10) Nothing in this
section shall create any rights by an employee against an employer if the
employer is not the government.
(11) Nothing in this
section shall be construed to suggest that any state law adopted before July 1,
2016, requires a religious leader to perform or solemnize any marriage inconsistent
with a religious belief that marriage is the union of one man and one woman.
SECTION 2. This act
shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2016.