Text of MS SC 542 (2025)
Call upon Supreme Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell relating to marriage.
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
4,729 characters
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE
2025 Regular Session
To: Rules
By: Senator(s) Chism
Senate Concurrent Resolution 542
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION CALLING UPON THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES TO OVERTURN THE OBERGEFELL V. HODGES DECISION, AND TO
RESTORE THE RIGHTS OF THE STATE TO PRESCRIBE THE CONDITIONS FOR MARRIAGE AND
THE DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE.
WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of
the United States in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at
odds with the Constitution of the United States and the principles upon which
the United States is established; and
WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from
governmental action, not as a right to a particular governmental entitlement;
and
WHEREAS, Obergefell invokes a definition of
"liberty" that the Framers would not have recognized, rejecting the
idea memorialized in the Declaration of Independence that human dignity is
innate; and
WHEREAS, when the Framers proclaimed in the Declaration of
Independence that "all men are created equal" and "endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights," they referred to a vision
of mankind in which all humans are created in the image of God and are,
therefore, of inherent worth; and
WHEREAS, Obergefell undermines this vision by declaring
that citizens must seek their identity and self-worth from the government and
positive law pronouncements; and
WHEREAS, Obergefell
relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as a font of substantive rights, a
doctrine that strays from the proper meaning of the Constitution and exalts judges
at the expense of the people from whom judges derive their authority; and
WHEREAS, Obergefell's inversion of the original meaning of
liberty causes collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order
that protect liberty, including religious liberty; and
WHEREAS, the
Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Windsor, 57031 U.S. 744
(2013), that the definition of marriage is "an area that has long been
regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the states," meaning that
the State of Mississippi, and not the Supreme Court, has the right to regulate
marriage for its citizens; and
WHEREAS, Obergefell requires states to issue marriage
licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages in complete
contravention of their own state constitutions and the will of their voters,
thus undermining the civil liberties and democratic institutions of those
states' residents and voters; and
WHEREAS, marriage as an institution has been recognized as
the union of one man and one woman for more than 2,000 years, and within common
law, the basis of the United States' Anglo-American legal tradition, for more
than 800 years; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of Mississippi defined
marriage as the exclusive union of one man and one woman in a 2004 statewide
initiative that passed with the support of 86% of voters; and
WHEREAS, Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly
rejected this Biblical, ancient and common law definition of marriage in favor
of a novel, flawed and inaccurate interpretation of the Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the Obergefell decision was illegitimate
because two of the justices in the majority ruling, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg
and Elena Kagan, had previously officiated same-sex weddings, and thus were not
impartial triers of fact, and therefore should have recused themselves
according to 28 U.S. Code § 455; and
WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only
Legislatures elected by the people may pass laws, Obergefell is an
illegitimate overreach:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES CONCURRING THEREIN, That the Legislature rejects the Obergefell
decision.
BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Senate, the House of Representatives concurring
therein, calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse the Obergefell
decision, to restore the natural and common law definition of marriage, a union
of one man and one woman.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, That the Senate, the House of Representatives concurring therein,
insists on restoring the issue of marriage and enforcement of all laws
pertaining to marriage to the several states and to the people.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That
the Secretary of the Senate is hereby authorized and directed to forward a
certified copy of this resolution to the Supreme Court of the United States.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That
this resolution be furnished to the Capitol Press Corps.