Text of NC HB 65 (2019)

Same sex marriage is a secular humanist plot

Back to the bill page

Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.

Source: An official source. Bill text from an official source (GovInfo, the state legislature or Open States), checked to be the bill's own text. Source page(opens another site)

As introduced

8,570 characters

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO REAFFIRM THE VOTE OF THE PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO ADOPT ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KNOWN AS THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, TO STATE WHY THE AMENDMENT SHOULD BE UPHELD, TO DECLARE NULL AND VOID FOR THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA THE OBERGEFELL V. HODGES DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND TO CALL ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TO OVERTURN THE OBERGEFELL V. HODGES DECISION. Whereas, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the establishment of any one religion as the one all Americans are required to espouse, and at the same time, declares that all are free to exercise whatever religion they espouse; and Whereas, the sovereign People of the State of North Carolina, in May 2012, approved the Marriage Amendment to the Constitution of the State of North Carolina by a vote of 61% to 39%, and this amendment became Article XIV, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of North Carolina and remains so; and Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has found that Secular Humanism is a religion for the purpose of the First Amendment Establishment Clause in Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961); and Whereas, the only model for marriage that simply follows the scientifically obvious biology of human beings is the ancient model of marriage between a man and a woman, and therefore, marriage policies that endorse marriage as being between a man and a woman are thus secular in nature as relates to the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution; and Whereas, marriage between a man and a woman arose out of the nature of the human species, and marriage between a man and a woman is natural, uncontrived, and noncontroversial, unlike forms of marriage that do not involve a man and a woman and thus may be defined as "parody marriages" for the purposes of this Act; and Whereas, marriage policies that endorse a marriage between a man and a woman are based on self-evident neutral morality and do not put religion over nonreligion upon their enforcement, while all forms of "parody marriages" are equally nonsecular in nature; and Whereas, all forms of marriage that do not involve a man and a woman and all self-asserted sex-based identity narratives and sexual orientations that do not follow the scientifically obvious biology of the human species are inseparably part of the religion of Secular Humanism; and Whereas, the decision of the United States Supreme Court known as Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) in effect has imposed the views of Secular Humanism on the People and the States of these United States in the matter of marriage law, which authority is not given to the federal government in the United States Constitution, and is, therefore, an unconstitutional establishment of religion and also an unconstitutional usurpation by the United States Supreme Court of powers reserved to the People or to the States; and Whereas, the State of North Carolina, while obligated to uphold the United States Constitution, is therefore also obligated to hold any law or court opinion that is contrary to the United States Constitution to be null and void and unenforceable; and Whereas, the Internal Revenue Service has from its inception conceded that marital status for all federal tax returns is determined according to state law; and Whereas, in the wake of the Obergefell opinion, there have been increased efforts by the proponents of Secular Humanism to persecute nonobservers of the religion of Secular Humanism and to infiltrate public schools with the intent to indoctrinate minors to the Secular Humanist worldview, against the wishes of many of their parents, and to inculcate them with the Secular Humanist view on faith, morality, sex, and marriage; and Whereas, it is an unsettled matter of opinion whether sexual orientation is immutable or genetic, and therefore, for a person to suggest that he/she was born homosexual or the wrong gender or that to disagree with their beliefs makes the dissenter a bigot, is nothing more than a series of unproven faith-based assumptions and naked assertions that are implicitly religious and may not be enforced by government upon anyone; and Whereas, "parody marriages" have historically never been a part of American tradition and heritage and have nothing to do with the Substantive Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and Whereas, the history of "parody marriages" is that most forms were illegal until recently or they remain illegal today; and Whereas, there are hundreds of thousands of taxpayers living in the State of North Carolina who sincerely believe that all forms of marriage that do not involve one man and one woman are immoral and that for their tax dollars to enable immorality and the erosion of community standards of decency is itself an act of immorality that is a violation of their conscience; and Whereas, it is unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution for tax dollars of nonobservers of the religion of Secular Humanism to be appropriated by the government to finance the distribution of a constellation of benefits to individuals who enter a form of marriage based solely on their self-asserted sex-based identity narrative, when there are hundreds of thousands of taxpayers who believe that "parody marriages" are immoral, nonsecular, subversive to human flourishing, and go against community standards of decency; and Whereas, "stare decisis" does not render Obergefell v. Hodges incapable of being overturned because of the overriding principle that Constitutional questions which merely lurk in the record, neither brought to the attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered as having been so decided as to constitute precedents; and Whereas, the question whether the Establishment Clause has exclusive jurisdiction over informing the States as to which marriages they can legally recognize was lurking in the shadows but was undecided by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges; and Whereas, the decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was a nonsecular sham based on an unprincipled ploy and the misapplication of the Fourteenth Amendment that has had the effect of excessively entangling the government of these United States with the religion of Secular Humanism and eroding the fundamental rights of nonbelievers of the religion of Secular Humanism; and Whereas, the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause and the First Amendment Establishment Clause have exclusive jurisdiction over how the State of North Carolina may respond to marriage requests of all types, and the power to interfere with those policies which are the province of each State does not appear anywhere in the listed powers of the federal government in the United States Constitution; Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: SECTION 1. G.S. 51-1.2 reads as rewritten: "§ 51-1.2. Marriages between persons of the same gender not valid. (a) The North Carolina General Assembly hereby reaffirms the vote of the people of the State of North Carolina by a margin of sixty-one percent (61%) to thirty-nine percent (39%) to amend the Constitution of the State of North Carolina by adding Article XIV, Section 6, known as the Marriage Amendment, to the Constitution of the State of North Carolina. The North Carolina General Assembly hereby declares that it will uphold the United States Constitution, as well as the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, which includes considering null and void and unenforceable the Obergefell v. Hodges opinion of the United States Supreme Court, as should be the response to any law or court decision which violates either or both Constitutions. Thus, the State of North Carolina shall enforce the Marriage Amendment, Article XIV, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, and the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina calls upon the United States Supreme Court to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges decision and respect the rights of each State and its People to decide matters over which the United States Constitution has not given jurisdiction specifically to the federal government. (b) Marriages, whether created by common law, contracted, or performed outside of North Carolina, between individuals of the same gender are not valid in North Carolina." SECTION 2. This act is effective when it becomes law.