Text of NC HB 65 (2019)
Same sex marriage is a secular humanist plot
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: An official source. Bill text from an official source (GovInfo, the state legislature or Open States), checked to be the bill's own text. Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
8,570 characters
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT TO REAFFIRM THE VOTE OF THE PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO ADOPT
ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA, KNOWN AS THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, TO STATE WHY THE
AMENDMENT SHOULD BE UPHELD, TO DECLARE NULL AND VOID FOR THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA THE OBERGEFELL V. HODGES DECISION OF THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND TO CALL ON THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT TO OVERTURN THE OBERGEFELL V. HODGES DECISION.
Whereas, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the
establishment of any one religion as the one all Americans are required to espouse, and at the
same time, declares that all are free to exercise whatever religion they espouse; and
Whereas, the sovereign People of the State of North Carolina, in May 2012, approved
the Marriage Amendment to the Constitution of the State of North Carolina by a vote of 61% to
39%, and this amendment became Article XIV, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of North
Carolina and remains so; and
Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has found that Secular Humanism is a
religion for the purpose of the First Amendment Establishment Clause in Torcaso v. Watkins,
367 U.S. 488 (1961); and
Whereas, the only model for marriage that simply follows the scientifically obvious
biology of human beings is the ancient model of marriage between a man and a woman, and
therefore, marriage policies that endorse marriage as being between a man and a woman are thus
secular in nature as relates to the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment to the United
States Constitution; and
Whereas, marriage between a man and a woman arose out of the nature of the human
species, and marriage between a man and a woman is natural, uncontrived, and noncontroversial,
unlike forms of marriage that do not involve a man and a woman and thus may be defined as
"parody marriages" for the purposes of this Act; and
Whereas, marriage policies that endorse a marriage between a man and a woman are
based on self-evident neutral morality and do not put religion over nonreligion upon their
enforcement, while all forms of "parody marriages" are equally nonsecular in nature; and
Whereas, all forms of marriage that do not involve a man and a woman and all
self-asserted sex-based identity narratives and sexual orientations that do not follow the
scientifically obvious biology of the human species are inseparably part of the religion of Secular
Humanism; and
Whereas, the decision of the United States Supreme Court known as Obergefell v.
Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) in effect has imposed the views of Secular Humanism on the
People and the States of these United States in the matter of marriage law, which authority is not
given to the federal government in the United States Constitution, and is, therefore, an
unconstitutional establishment of religion and also an unconstitutional usurpation by the United
States Supreme Court of powers reserved to the People or to the States; and
Whereas, the State of North Carolina, while obligated to uphold the United States
Constitution, is therefore also obligated to hold any law or court opinion that is contrary to the
United States Constitution to be null and void and unenforceable; and
Whereas, the Internal Revenue Service has from its inception conceded that marital
status for all federal tax returns is determined according to state law; and
Whereas, in the wake of the Obergefell opinion, there have been increased efforts by
the proponents of Secular Humanism to persecute nonobservers of the religion of Secular
Humanism and to infiltrate public schools with the intent to indoctrinate minors to the Secular
Humanist worldview, against the wishes of many of their parents, and to inculcate them with the
Secular Humanist view on faith, morality, sex, and marriage; and
Whereas, it is an unsettled matter of opinion whether sexual orientation is immutable
or genetic, and therefore, for a person to suggest that he/she was born homosexual or the wrong
gender or that to disagree with their beliefs makes the dissenter a bigot, is nothing more than a
series of unproven faith-based assumptions and naked assertions that are implicitly religious and
may not be enforced by government upon anyone; and
Whereas, "parody marriages" have historically never been a part of American
tradition and heritage and have nothing to do with the Substantive Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and
Whereas, the history of "parody marriages" is that most forms were illegal until
recently or they remain illegal today; and
Whereas, there are hundreds of thousands of taxpayers living in the State of North
Carolina who sincerely believe that all forms of marriage that do not involve one man and one
woman are immoral and that for their tax dollars to enable immorality and the erosion of
community standards of decency is itself an act of immorality that is a violation of their
conscience; and
Whereas, it is unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause in the First
Amendment to the United States Constitution for tax dollars of nonobservers of the religion of
Secular Humanism to be appropriated by the government to finance the distribution of a
constellation of benefits to individuals who enter a form of marriage based solely on their
self-asserted sex-based identity narrative, when there are hundreds of thousands of taxpayers who
believe that "parody marriages" are immoral, nonsecular, subversive to human flourishing, and
go against community standards of decency; and
Whereas, "stare decisis" does not render Obergefell v. Hodges incapable of being
overturned because of the overriding principle that Constitutional questions which merely lurk
in the record, neither brought to the attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered
as having been so decided as to constitute precedents; and
Whereas, the question whether the Establishment Clause has exclusive jurisdiction
over informing the States as to which marriages they can legally recognize was lurking in the
shadows but was undecided by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges; and
Whereas, the decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was a nonsecular sham based on an
unprincipled ploy and the misapplication of the Fourteenth Amendment that has had the effect
of excessively entangling the government of these United States with the religion of Secular
Humanism and eroding the fundamental rights of nonbelievers of the religion of Secular
Humanism; and
Whereas, the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause and the First Amendment
Establishment Clause have exclusive jurisdiction over how the State of North Carolina may
respond to marriage requests of all types, and the power to interfere with those policies which
are the province of each State does not appear anywhere in the listed powers of the federal
government in the United States Constitution; Now, therefore,
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 51-1.2 reads as rewritten:
"§ 51-1.2. Marriages between persons of the same gender not valid.
(a) The North Carolina General Assembly hereby reaffirms the vote of the people of the
State of North Carolina by a margin of sixty-one percent (61%) to thirty-nine percent (39%) to
amend the Constitution of the State of North Carolina by adding Article XIV, Section 6, known
as the Marriage Amendment, to the Constitution of the State of North Carolina. The North
Carolina General Assembly hereby declares that it will uphold the United States Constitution, as
well as the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, which includes considering null and void
and unenforceable the Obergefell v. Hodges opinion of the United States Supreme Court, as
should be the response to any law or court decision which violates either or both Constitutions.
Thus, the State of North Carolina shall enforce the Marriage Amendment, Article XIV, Section
6 of the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, and the General Assembly of the State of
North Carolina calls upon the United States Supreme Court to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges
decision and respect the rights of each State and its People to decide matters over which the
United States Constitution has not given jurisdiction specifically to the federal government.
(b) Marriages, whether created by common law, contracted, or performed outside of
North Carolina, between individuals of the same gender are not valid in North Carolina."
SECTION 2. This act is effective when it becomes law.