Text of NJ A 199 (2014)
Enacts the "Marriage Equality and Religious Exemption Act."
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
23,678 characters
ASSEMBLY, No. 199
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
216th LEGISLATURE
PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2014 SESSION
Sponsored by:
Assemblyman REED GUSCIORA
District 15 (Hunterdon and Mercer)
Assemblywoman SHEILA Y. OLIVER
District 34 (Essex and Passaic)
Assemblywoman MILA M. JASEY
District 27 (Essex and Morris)
Assemblyman JOHN F. MCKEON
District 27 (Essex and Morris)
Assemblywoman VALERIE VAINIERI HUTTLE
District 37 (Bergen)
Assemblyman JASON O'DONNELL
District 31 (Hudson)
Assemblyman JOHN S. WISNIEWSKI
District 19 (Middlesex)
Assemblyman TIMOTHY J. EUSTACE
District 38 (Bergen and Passaic)
Co-Sponsored by:
Assemblyman Diegnan, Assemblywoman Lampitt, Assemblymen
Singleton, Burzichelli and Assemblywoman Spencer
SYNOPSIS
Enacts the "Marriage Equality and Religious Exemption
Act."
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT
Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative
Counsel
An Act concerning marriage, revising various parts of
the statutory law and supplementing Title 37 of the Revised Statutes, and
repealing section 94 of P.L.2006, c.103.
Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
1. (New section) This act
shall be known and may be cited as the "Marriage Equality and Religious
Exemption Act."
2. (New section) The
Legislature finds and declares that:
a. Six states and the District of Columbia, together comprising 35 million Americans, allow same-sex couples to
marry.
b. In Lewis v. Harris,
188 N.J. 415 (2006), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that denying
rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to
their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of
Article I, paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution. The court held that to
comply with this constitutional mandate, the Legislature must either amend the
marriage statutes to include those couples or create a parallel statutory
structure to attempt to provide the rights and benefits enjoyed by, and burdens
and obligations borne by, married couples.
c. The Legislature and the
Governor responded to the Lewis v. Harris decision by enacting P.L.2006,
c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.), which established civil unions in this State.
d. In P.L.2006, c.103 the
Legislature created the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission to investigate
whether "provid[ing] civil unions rather than marriage" to same-sex couples
affords them equality, and empowered the Commission to present findings and
make recommendations to the Legislature. In accordance with P.L.2006, c.103,
the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the General
Assembly appointed members to the Commission.
e. Through testimony and
overwhelming evidence, the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission found that
numerous employers in New Jersey have denied equal benefits to civil union
partners because of the deprivation of marriage equality, and that numerous
hospitals in New Jersey have denied visitation and medical decision rights to
civil union partners because of the deprivation of marriage equality.
f. The New Jersey Civil
Union Review Commission unanimously concluded that instead of ending
discrimination against same-sex couples, P.L.2006, c.103 actually "invites and
encourages unequal treatment" of same-sex couples.
g. The findings of the New
Jersey Civil Union Review Commission were confirmed by testimony before the
Senate Judiciary Committee in 2009, in which civil union couples described
their difficulty in getting employers and hospitals in New Jersey to accept
their civil unions as equal to marriage, thus perpetuating inequality and
hardship.
h. Both the New Jersey
Civil Union Review Commission and the Senate Judiciary Committee heard
overwhelming evidence that the separate and inferior label of civil union
stigmatizes children and parents in civil unions, at school and in other
settings, and causes psychological harm.
i. The civil union
enactment invades the privacy of same-sex couples and invites discrimination
against them when they are forced to disclose in job interviews, on forms, and
in other settings a civil union status available only to same-sex couples.
j. New Jersey enacted the
strongest possible civil union law in order to comply with Lewis v. Harris,
and therefore cannot strengthen the civil union law as an alternative to
marriage equality in order to provide equality to same-sex couples.
k. Civil marriage is a
legal institution recognized by the State in order to encourage stable
relationships and to protect individuals from discrimination, and the State has
an interest in encouraging stable relationships and protecting individuals from
discrimination.
l. It is the intent of the
Legislature in enacting this bill to end the pernicious practice of
discrimination in civil marriage in New Jersey.
m. It is the intent of the
Legislature in enacting this bill to leave decisions about religious marriage
to religions, and to uphold the free exercise of religion guaranteed by the
First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, paragraph 4
of the New Jersey Constitution.
n. Therefore, this bill
includes a religious exemption stating that no member of the clergy of any
religion authorized to solemnize marriage and no religious society, institution
or organization in this State shall be required to solemnize any marriage in
violation of the free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to
the United States Constitution or by Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey
Constitution.
o. This bill includes
another religious exemption stating that no religious society, institution or
organization in this State serving a particular faith or denomination shall be
compelled to provide space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges related
to the solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage if such
solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage is in violation of the
beliefs of such religious society, institution or organization.
p. In addition, this bill
includes a religious exemption stating that no civil claim or cause of action
against any religious society, institution or organization, or any employee
thereof, shall arise out of any refusal to provide space, services, advantages,
goods, or privileges. No State action to penalize or withhold benefits from
any such religious society, institution or organization, or any employee
thereof, shall result from any refusal to provide space, services, advantages,
goods, or privileges pursuant to this exemption.
3. (New section)
"Marriage" means the legally recognized union of two consenting persons in a
committed relationship. Whenever the term "marriage" occurs or the term "man,"
"woman," "husband" or "wife" occurs in the context of marriage or any reference
is made thereto in any law, statute, rule, regulation or order, the same shall
be deemed to mean or refer to the union of two persons pursuant to this
amendatory and supplementary act.
4. (New section) It is the
intent of the Legislature that this amendatory and supplementary act be
interpreted consistently with the guarantees of the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution and of Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey
Constitution.
5. (New section) a. No
member of the clergy of any religion authorized to solemnize marriage and no
religious society, institution or organization in this State shall be required
to solemnize any marriage in violation of the free exercise of religion
guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or by
Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey Constitution.
b. No religious society,
institution or organization in this State serving a particular faith or denomination
shall be compelled to provide space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges
related to the solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage if such
solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage is in violation of the
beliefs of such religious society, institution or organization.
c. No civil claim or cause
of action against any religious society, institution or organization, or any
employee thereof, shall arise out of any refusal to provide space, services,
advantages, goods, or privileges pursuant to this section. No State action to
penalize or withhold benefits from any such religious society, institution or
organization, or any employee thereof, shall result from any refusal to provide
space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges pursuant to this section.
d. Nothing in this act
shall be construed to limit the effect of section 2 of P.L.1979, c.428
(C.18A:35-4.7).
6. (New section) On and
after the effective date of this amendatory and supplementary act, no civil
unions shall be established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.).
7. (New section) On and
after the effective date of this amendatory and supplementary act:
a. All partners in civil
unions previously established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) who have
not moved for dissolution of their civil union pursuant to section 64 of
P.L.2006, c.103 (C.2A:34-2.1) shall be deemed married; all civil union licenses
previously issued on their behalf shall be deemed to be marriage licenses; and
all certificates of civil union shall be deemed to be certificates of marriage;
b. All partners in civil
unions previously established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) may
apply for a marriage license in accordance with the provisions of R.S.37:1-4
and all other applicable provisions of law.
c. Partners in civil unions
previously established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) may solemnize
their marriage at any time, but partners who do not undergo the solemnization
of their marriage will nonetheless be deemed married pursuant to this act.
8. R.S.37:1-4 is amended to
read as follows:
37:1-4. Issuance of marriage
or civil union license, emergencies, validity.
a. Except as
provided in R.S.37:1-6 and subsection b. of this section, the marriage [or civil union] license shall not be
issued by a licensing officer sooner than 72 hours after the application
therefor has been made; provided, however, that the Superior Court may, by
order, waive all or any part of said 72-hour period in cases of emergency, upon
satisfactory proof being shown to it. Said order shall be filed with the
licensing officer and attached to the application for the license.
b. The licensing officer
shall issue a marriage license immediately to partners in a civil union
established pursuant to P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) who apply for such
license.
c. A marriage [or civil union] license, when properly
issued as provided in this article, shall be good and valid only for 30 days
after the date of the issuance thereof.
(cf: P.L.2006, c.103, s.9)
9. R.S.37:1-13 is amended
to read as follows:
37:1-13. Authorization to
solemnize marriages and civil unions.
Each judge of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, each judge of a federal district court,
United States magistrate, judge of a municipal court, judge of the Superior
Court, judge of a tax court, retired judge of the Superior Court or Tax Court,
or judge of the Superior Court or Tax Court, the former County Court, the
former County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, or the former County
District Court who has resigned in good standing, surrogate of any county,
county clerk and any mayor or the deputy mayor when authorized by the mayor, or
chairman of any township committee or village president of this State, and
every [minister] member of the clergy
of every religion, are hereby authorized to solemnize marriages [or civil unions] between such persons as
may lawfully enter into the matrimonial relation [or civil union]; and every religious society, institution
or organization in this State may join together in marriage [or civil union] such persons according
to the rules and customs of the society, institution or organization.
(cf: P.L.2006, c.103, s.17)
10. Section 94 of P.L.2006,
c.103 (C.37:1-36) is repealed.
11. (New section) The
Commissioner of Health and Senior Services, pursuant to the "Administrative
Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1) shall adopt rules and regulations
to effectuate the purposes of this amendatory and supplementary act.
12. This act shall take
effect on the 60th day following enactment, except that the Commissioner of
Health and Senior Services may take such anticipatory administrative action in
advance as shall be necessary for the implementation of this act.
STATEMENT
This bill, titled the "Marriage
Equality and Religious Exemption Act," would authorize same-sex marriage in the
State. The bill defines "marriage" as the legally recognized union of two
consenting persons in a committed relationship.
Findings and Declarations
The bill's findings and
declarations provide that:
a. Six states and the District of Columbia, together comprising 35 million Americans, allow same-sex couples to
marry.
b. In Lewis v. Harris,
188 N.J. 415 (2006), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that denying
rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to
their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of
Article I, paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution. The court held that to
comply with this constitutional mandate, the Legislature must either amend the
marriage statutes to include those couples or create a parallel statutory
structure to attempt to provide the rights and benefits enjoyed by, and burdens
and obligations borne by, married couples.
c. The Legislature and the
Governor responded to the Lewis v. Harris decision by enacting P.L.2006,
c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.), which established civil unions in this State.
d. In P.L.2006, c.103 the
Legislature created the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission to investigate
whether "provid[ing] civil unions rather than marriage" to same-sex couples
affords them equality, and empowered the Commission to present findings and
make recommendations to the Legislature. In accordance with P.L.2006, c.103,
the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the General
Assembly appointed members to the Commission.
e. Through testimony and overwhelming
evidence, the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission found that numerous
employers in New Jersey have denied equal benefits to civil union partners
because of the deprivation of marriage equality, and that numerous hospitals in
New Jersey have denied visitation and medical decision rights to civil union
partners because of the deprivation of marriage equality.
f. The New Jersey Civil
Union Review Commission unanimously concluded that instead of ending
discrimination against same-sex couples, P.L.2006, c.103 actually "invites and
encourages unequal treatment" of same-sex couples.
g. The findings of the New
Jersey Civil Union Review Commission were confirmed by testimony before the
Senate Judiciary Committee in 2009, in which civil union couples described
their difficulty in getting employers and hospitals in New Jersey to accept
their civil unions as equal to marriage, thus perpetuating inequality and
hardship.
h. Both the New Jersey
Civil Union Review Commission and the Senate Judiciary Committee heard
overwhelming evidence that the separate and inferior label of civil union
stigmatizes children and parents in civil unions, at school and in other
settings, and causes psychological harm.
i. The civil union
enactment invades the privacy of same-sex couples and invites discrimination
against them when they are forced to disclose in job interviews, on forms, and
in other settings a civil union status available only to same-sex couples.
j. New Jersey enacted the
strongest possible civil union law in order to comply with Lewis v. Harris,
and therefore cannot strengthen the civil union law as an alternative to
marriage equality in order to provide equality to same-sex couples.
k. Civil marriage is a
legal institution recognized by the State in order to encourage stable
relationships and to protect individuals from discrimination, and the State has
an interest in encouraging stable relationships and protecting individuals from
discrimination.
l. It is the intent of the
Legislature in enacting this bill to end the pernicious practice of
discrimination in civil marriage in New Jersey.
m. It is the intent of the
Legislature in enacting this bill to leave decisions about religious marriage
to religions, and to uphold the free exercise of religion guaranteed by the
First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, paragraph 4
of the New Jersey Constitution.
n. Therefore, this bill
includes a religious exemption stating that no member of the clergy of any
religion authorized to solemnize marriage and no religious society, institution
or organization in this State shall be required to solemnize any marriage in
violation of the free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to
the United States Constitution or by Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey
Constitution.
o. This bill includes
another religious exemption stating that no religious society, institution or
organization in this State serving a particular faith or denomination shall be
compelled to provide space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges related
to the solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage if such
solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage is in violation of the
beliefs of such religious society, institution or organization.
p. In addition, this bill
includes a religious exemption stating that no civil claim or cause of action
against any religious society, institution or organization, or any employee
thereof, shall arise out of any refusal to provide space, services, advantages,
goods, or privileges. No State action to penalize or withhold benefits from
any such religious society, institution or organization, or any employee
thereof, shall result from any refusal to provide space, services, advantages,
goods, or privileges pursuant to this exemption.
Marriage
Under the bill, "marriage"
would be defined as the legally recognized union of two consenting persons in a
committed relationship. The bill provides that whenever the term "marriage"
occurs or the term "man," "woman," "husband" or "wife" occurs in the context of
marriage or any reference is made thereto in any law, statute, rule, regulation
or order, the same shall be deemed to mean or refer to the union of two persons
pursuant to the bill.
Religious Exemptions
The bill provides that it is
the intent of the Legislature that the bill be interpreted consistently with
the guarantees of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and of
Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey Constitution.
The bill specifically provides
that no member of the clergy of any religion authorized to solemnize marriage
and no religious society, institution or organization in this State would be
required to solemnize any marriage in violation of the free exercise of
religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or
by Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey Constitution. The bill also
provides that no religious society, institution or organization in this State
serving a particular faith or denomination shall be compelled to provide space,
services, advantages, goods, or privileges related to the solemnization,
celebration or promotion of marriage if such solemnization, celebration or
promotion of marriage is in violation of the beliefs of such religious society,
institution or organization.
In addition, the bill provides
that no civil claim or cause of action against any religious society,
institution or organization, or any employee thereof, would arise out of any
refusal to provide space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges pursuant
to the bill. Under the bill no State action to penalize or withhold benefits
from any such religious society, institution or organization, or any employee
thereof, would result from any refusal to provide space, services, advantages,
goods, or privileges.
The bill also provides that nothing
in the act would be construed to limit the effect of section 2 of P.L.1979,
c.428 (C.18A:35-4.7). This section provides that any child whose parent or
guardian presents to the school principal a signed statement that any part of
the instructions in health, family life education or sex education is in
conflict with his conscience, or sincerely held moral or religious beliefs
shall be excused from that portion of the course where such instruction is
being given and no penalties as to credit or graduation shall result
therefrom.
"Member of the Clergy" Language
In addition, the bill updates
language in current law concerning the authority to solemnize marriages, set
out in R.S.37:1-13. Currently, this section of law authorizes "every minister
of every religion" to solemnize marriages. The bill would change this phrase
to "every member of the clergy of every religion."
Civil Unions
The bill also provides that on
and after its effective date, no civil unions could be established. The bill
takes effect on the 60th day following enactment.
In addition, the bill repeals
section 94 of P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-36), which had established the New Jersey
Civil Union Review Commission. The function of the commission is to evaluate
the operation and effectiveness of the enactment establishing civil unions,
including the effect on same-sex couples, their children and other family
members of being provided civil unions rather than marriage. With the enactment
of this bill, the commission's function would be obviated.
Under the bill, partners who
have previously established a civil union may apply for a marriage license and
would receive the license immediately, without the usual 72-hour waiting period
between application for, and issuance of, the license. The usual fees for a
marriage license would apply to same sex couples.
The delayed effective date
provided by the bill allows civil union partners 60 days following enactment to
move to dissolve their civil union pursuant to applicable law (set out in
section 64 of P.L.2006, c.103 (C.2A:34-2.1)). If they do not do so within the
60-day period, the bill provides that these civil union partners would be
deemed married, and that all civil union licenses and certificates of civil
union issued on their behalf would be deemed to be marriage licenses and
certificates of marriage.
The bill also provides that
civil union partners may apply for a marriage license and solemnize their
marriage at any time, without a waiting period for the license. However, civil
union partners who choose not to solemnize their marriages would nonetheless be
deemed married as of the effective date of the act unless their civil union has
been dissolved within the 60-day period set out in the bill.