Text of NJ A 4130 (2011)
Enacts the "Freedom of Religion and Equality in Civil Marriage Act."
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
15,420 characters
ASSEMBLY, No. 4130
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
214th LEGISLATURE
INTRODUCED JUNE 16, 2011
Sponsored by:
Assemblyman REED GUSCIORA
District 15 (Mercer)
Assemblywoman CONNIE WAGNER
District 38 (Bergen)
SYNOPSIS
Enacts the "Freedom of Religion and Equality in Civil
Marriage Act."
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT
As introduced.
An Act concerning marriage, revising various parts of
the statutory law and supplementing Title 37 of the Revised Statutes, and
repealing section 94 of P.L.2006, c.103.
Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
1. (New section) This act
shall be known and may be cited as the "Freedom of Religion and Equality in
Civil Marriage Act."
2. (New section) The
Legislature finds and declares that:
a. Civil marriage is a
legal institution recognized by the State in order to promote stable
relationships and to protect individuals who are in those relationships. The
institution of marriage also provides important protections for the families of
those who are married, including not only children or other dependents, but
members of their extended families.
b. In Lewis v. Harris,
188 N.J. 415 (2006), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that denying
rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to
their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of
Article I, paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution. The court held that to
comply with this constitutional mandate, the Legislature must either amend the
marriage statutes to include those couples or create a parallel statutory
structure which will provide, on equal terms, the rights and benefits enjoyed
and burdens and obligations borne by married couples. The Legislature
responded to the Lewis v. Harris decision by enacting P.L.2006,
c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.), which established civil unions in this State.
c. Although same-sex
couples may enter into civil unions, nonetheless New Jersey's discriminatory
exclusion of these couples from marriage further harms same-sex couples and
their families by denying them unique public recognition and affirmation.
d. The Legislature has an
interest in encouraging stable relationships.
e. It is the intent of the
Legislature in enacting this bill to end the pernicious practice of marriage
discrimination in New Jersey.
3. (New section)
"Marriage" means the legally recognized union of two consenting persons in a
committed relationship. Whenever the term "marriage" occurs or the term "man,"
"woman," "husband" or "wife" occurs in the context of marriage or any reference
is made thereto in any law, statute, rule, regulation or order, the same shall
be deemed to mean or refer to the union of two persons pursuant to this
amendatory and supplementary act.
4. (New section) It is the
intent of the Legislature that this amendatory and supplementary act be
interpreted consistently with the guarantees of the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution and of Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey
Constitution.
5. (New section) a. No
member of the clergy of any religion authorized to solemnize marriage and no
religious society, institution or organization in this State shall be required
to solemnize any marriage in violation of the free exercise of religion
guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or by
Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey Constitution.
b. No religious society,
institution or organization in this State serving a particular faith or denomination
shall be compelled to provide space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges
related to the solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage if such
solemnization, celebration or promotion of marriage is in violation of the
beliefs of such religious society, institution or organization.
c. No civil claim or cause
of action against any religious society, institution or organization, or any
employee thereof, shall arise out of any refusal to provide space, services,
advantages, goods, or privileges pursuant to this section. No State action to
penalize or withhold benefits from any such religious society, institution or
organization, or any employee thereof, shall result from any refusal to provide
space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges pursuant to this section.
d. Nothing in this act
shall be construed to limit the effect of section 2 of P.L.1979, c.428
(C.18A:35-4.7).
6. (New section) On and
after the effective date of this amendatory and supplementary act, no civil
unions shall be established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.).
7. (New section) On and
after the effective date of this amendatory and supplementary act:
a. All partners in civil
unions previously established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) who have
not moved for dissolution of their civil union pursuant to section 64 of
P.L.2006, c.103 (C.2A:34-2.1) shall be deemed married; all civil union licenses
previously issued on their behalf shall be deemed to be marriage licenses; and
all certificates of civil union shall be deemed to be certificates of marriage;
b. All partners in civil
unions previously established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) may
apply for a marriage license in accordance with the provisions of R.S.37:1-4,
section 10 of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before
the Legislature as this bill) and all other applicable provisions of law.
c. Partners in civil
unions previously established under P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) may
solemnize their marriage at any time, but partners who do not undergo the
solemnization of their marriage will nonetheless be deemed married pursuant to
this act.
8. R.S.37:1-4 is amended to
read as follows:
37:1-4. Issuance of marriage
or civil union license, emergencies, validity.
a. Except as provided
in R.S.37:1-6 and subsection b. of this section, the marriage [or
civil union] license shall not be issued by a licensing officer sooner
than 72 hours after the application therefor has been made; provided, however,
that the Superior Court may, by order, waive all or any part of said 72-hour
period in cases of emergency, upon satisfactory proof being shown to it. Said
order shall be filed with the licensing officer and attached to the application
for the license.
b. The licensing officer
shall issue a marriage license immediately to partners in a civil union
established pursuant to P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-28 et al.) who apply for such
license.
c. A marriage [or
civil union] license, when properly issued as provided in this article,
shall be good and valid only for 30 days after the date of the issuance
thereof.
(cf: P.L.2006, c.103, s.9)
9. R.S.37:1-13 is amended
to read as follows:
37:1-13. Authorization to
solemnize marriages and civil unions.
Each judge of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, each judge of a federal district
court, United States magistrate, judge of a municipal court, judge of the
Superior Court, judge of a tax court, retired judge of the Superior Court or
Tax Court, or judge of the Superior Court or Tax Court, the former County
Court, the former County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, or the former
County District Court who has resigned in good standing, surrogate of any
county, county clerk and any mayor or the deputy mayor when authorized by the mayor,
or chairman of any township committee or village president of this State, and
every [minister] member of the clergy of every religion,
are hereby authorized to solemnize marriages [or civil unions]
between such persons as may lawfully enter into the matrimonial relation [or
civil union]; and every religious society, institution or organization
in this State may join together in marriage [or civil union] such
persons according to the rules and customs of the society, institution or
organization.
(cf: P.L.2006, c.103, s.17)
10. Section 94 of P.L.2006,
c.103 (C.37:1-36) is repealed.
11. (New section) The
Commissioner of Health and Senior Services, pursuant to the "Administrative
Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1) shall adopt rules and regulations
to effectuate the purposes of this amendatory and supplementary act.
12. This act shall take
effect on the 60th day following enactment, except that the Commissioner of
Health and Senior Services may take such anticipatory administrative action in
advance as shall be necessary for the implementation of this act.
STATEMENT
This bill, titled the "Freedom
of Religion and Equality in Civil Marriage Act," would authorize same-sex
marriage in the State. The bill defines "marriage" as the legally recognized
union of two consenting persons in a committed relationship.
In Lewis v. Harris,
188 N.J. 415 (2006), the New Jersey Supreme Court mandated marriage
equality to all consenting couples in the State. The court held that denying
rights and benefits to same-sex couples that are statutorily given to their
heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of Article I,
paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution. The court held that to comply with
this constitutional mandate, the Legislature must either amend the marriage
statutes to include same-sex couples or create a parallel statutory structure
which would provide, on equal terms, the rights and benefits enjoyed and
burdens and obligations borne by married couples. The Legislature first
responded to Lewis v. Harris by enacting P.L.2006, c.103
(C.37:1-28 et al.), which established same-sex civil unions.
The bill's findings and
declarations provide that civil marriage is a legal institution recognized by
the State in order to promote stable relationships and to protect individuals
who are in those relationships. The institution of marriage also provides
important protections for the families of those who are married, including not
only children or other dependents, but also members of their extended families.
In addition, the bill's
findings and declarations provide that the Legislature has an interest in
encouraging stable relationships, and that it is the intent of the Legislature
in enacting the bill to end the pernicious practice of marriage discrimination
in New Jersey.
Under the bill, "marriage"
would be defined as the legally recognized union of two consenting persons in a
committed relationship. The bill provides that whenever the term "marriage"
occurs or the term "man," "woman," "husband" or "wife" occurs in the context of
marriage or any reference is made thereto in any law, statute, rule, regulation
or order, the same shall be deemed to mean or refer to the union of two persons
pursuant to the bill.
The bill provides that it is
the intent of the Legislature that the bill be interpreted consistently with
the guarantees of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and of
Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey Constitution.
The bill specifically provides
that no member of the clergy of any religion authorized to solemnize marriage
and no religious society, institution or organization in this State would be
required to solemnize any marriage in violation of the free exercise of
religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or
by Article I, paragraph 4 of the New Jersey Constitution. The bill also
provides that no religious society, institution or organization in this State
serving a particular faith or denomination shall be compelled to provide space,
services, advantages, goods, or privileges related to the solemnization,
celebration or promotion of marriage if such solemnization, celebration or
promotion of marriage is in violation of the beliefs of such religious society,
institution or organization.
In addition, the bill provides
that no civil claim or cause of action against any religious society,
institution or organization, or any employee thereof, would arise out of any
refusal to provide space, services, advantages, goods, or privileges pursuant
to the bill. Under the bill no State action to penalize or withhold benefits
from any such religious society, institution or organization, or any employee
thereof, would result from any refusal to provide space, services, advantages,
goods, or privileges.
The bill also provides that nothing
in the act would be construed to limit the effect of section 2 of P.L.1979,
c.428 (C.18A:35-4.7). This section provides that any child whose parent or
guardian presents to the school principal a signed statement that any part of
the instructions in health, family life education or sex education is in
conflict with his conscience, or sincerely held moral or religious beliefs
shall be excused from that portion of the course where such instruction is being
given and no penalties as to credit or graduation shall result therefrom.
In addition, the bill updates
language in current law concerning the authority to solemnize marriages, set
out in R.S.37:1-13. Currently, this section of law authorizes "every minister
of every religion" to solemnize marriages. The bill would change this phrase
to "every member of the clergy of every religion."
The bill also provides that on
and after its effective date, no civil unions could be established. The bill
takes effect on the 60th day following enactment.
In addition, the bill repeals
section 94 of P.L.2006, c.103 (C.37:1-36), which had established the New Jersey
Civil Union Review Commission. The function of the commission is to evaluate
the operation and effectiveness of the enactment establishing civil unions,
including the effect on same-sex couples, their children and other family
members of being provided civil unions rather than marriage. With the enactment
of this bill, the commission's function would be obviated.
Under the bill, partners who
have previously established a civil union may apply for a marriage license and
would receive the license immediately, without the usual 72-hour waiting period
between application for, and issuance of, the license. The usual fees for a
marriage license would apply to same sex couples.
The bill provides that civil
union partners would have 60 days following enactment to move to dissolve their
civil union pursuant to applicable law (set out in section 64 of P.L.2006, c.103
(C.2A:34-2.1)). If they do not do so within the 60-day period, the bill
provides that these civil union partners would be deemed married, and that all
civil union licenses and certificates of civil union issued on their behalf
would be deemed to be marriage licenses and certificates of marriage.
The bill also provides that
civil union partners may apply for a marriage license and solemnize their
marriage at any time, without a waiting period for the license. However, civil
union partners who choose not to solemnize their marriages would nonetheless be
deemed married as of the effective date of the act unless their civil union has
been dissolved within the 60-day period set out in the bill.