Text of OH HCR 17 (2024)
Express opposition to the reinterpretation of Title IX
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
4,596 characters
As Introduced
135th General Assembly
Regular Session
H. C. R. No. 17
2023-2024
Representative Bird
A C O N C U R R E N T R E S O L U T I O N
To express the General Assembly's opposition to the
United States Department of Education's
reinterpretation of Title IX, and to express support
for the Attorney General's legal challenge to the
Department's reinterpretation.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF
OHIO (THE SENATE CONCURRING):
WHEREAS, Congress enacted Title IX in 1972 to rectify a
history of sex discrimination against women in educational
institutions by prohibiting disparate treatment based on sex and
providing women with equal education and athletic opportunities;
and
WHEREAS, For forty years following Title IX's enactment,
the term "sex" was consistently used and interpreted by the
United States Department of Education and reviewing courts to
mean a binary classification of people, biologically either male
or female; and
WHEREAS, In 2021, President Biden issued a sweeping
Executive Order, Executive Order 13988, declaring the United
States Supreme Court's holding in Bostock v. Clayton County, 590
U.S. 644, regarding employment law anti-discrimination
protections under Title VII changed the meaning of all federal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
H. C. R. No. 17
Page 2
As Introduced
laws governing and prohibiting sex discrimination, and
furthermore, directed all federal agencies to review existing
regulations for compliance with Bostock's holding unless a law
contains sufficient indications to the contrary; and
WHEREAS, The Executive Order represents a vast
overstatement of the holding in Bostock, and directs the
executive branch to rewrite federal law by executive fiat; and
WHEREAS, Despite the usurpation of Congress's Article I
legislative power, various federal agencies, including the U.S.
Department of Education, began to adopt and attempt to
promulgate rules imposing a new definition of "sex" not found
anywhere in existing law; and
WHEREAS, The U.S. Department of Education's
reinterpretation of Title IX preempts Ohio law governing
athletics and compels the State to choose between enforcing
existing state law or adhering to a new interpretation of Title
IX, thus requiring the State and universities to incur costs
related to reviewing and updating policies to ensure compliance
with the current Administration's reinterpretation, and credibly
threatening the loss of federal funding and the imposition of
substantial penalties through private suit if the new
interpretation is not applied in full; and
WHEREAS, The Department's redefinition of "sex" conflicts
with the plain meaning of Title IX and its operative
regulations, and accordingly, the reinterpretation is not
entitled to deference and exceeded the agency's legal authority
to implement; and
WHEREAS, Redefining "sex" for purposes of Title IX
undermines the fundamental protections established by Title IX
that safeguard equal education and athletic opportunities for
women in Ohio and across the country; and
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
H. C. R. No. 17
Page 3
As Introduced
WHEREAS, On April 30, 2024, Ohio Attorney General Dave
Yost, joined by the attorneys general from four other states,
brought suit against the U.S. Department of Education for its
unlawful reinterpretation of Title IX; now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That we, the members of the 135th General
Assembly of the State of Ohio, express our fervent opposition to
the U.S. Department of Education's unlawful reinterpretation of
Title IX and redefinition of the word "sex"; and be it further
RESOLVED, That we, the members of the 135th General
Assembly of the State of Ohio, support and commend Ohio Attorney
General Dave Yost for bringing suit against the Biden
Administration's U.S. Department of Education for its unlawful
reinterpretation of Title IX; and be it further
RESOLVED, That we, the members of the 135th General
Assembly of the State of Ohio, express our unwavering support
for equal education and athletic opportunities protections for
women assured by Title IX; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives
transmit duly authenticated copies of this resolution to the
news media of Ohio.
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71