Text of US HB 2796 (2017)
Civil Rights Uniformity Act of 2017
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
8,880 characters
I
115TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 2796
To repeal executive overreach, to clarify that the proper constitutional
authority for social transformation belongs to the legislative branch.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 7, 2017
Mr. OLSON (for himself, Mr. BABIN, Mr. ABRAHAM, and Mrs. HARTZLER) in-
troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
A BILL
To repeal executive overreach, to clarify that the proper
constitutional authority for social transformation belongs
to the legislative branch.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Uni-
4
formity Act of 2017’’.
5
SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF
6
PURPOSE.
7
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
8
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2
•HR 2796 IH
(1) Over the past half century, Congress has
1
passed numerous civil rights laws prohibiting dis-
2
crimination on the basis of ‘‘sex’’, a designation long
3
understood to be grounded in objective biology up to
4
the present day. There is no evidence that Congress
5
or the American people ever understood the word sex
6
or gender in civil rights laws to include subjective
7
self-identification.
8
(2) For years, advocates have pressed Congress
9
to include a person’s subjective self-declared ‘‘gender
10
identity’’ in Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
11
sex discrimination. Congress has declined to do so
12
except for the Shepard-Byrd Act of 2009 and the
13
Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of
14
2013 where gender identity is defined as ‘‘actual or
15
perceived gender-related characteristics’’ with ‘‘gen-
16
der’’, there referring to characteristics associated
17
with biological males and females.
18
(3) This demonstrates that when Congress
19
wants to protect sex, it does so explicitly; when it
20
wants to also elevate gender identity it does so ex-
21
plicitly; and when it does not want to elevate gender
22
identity, it can do so either explicitly or by simply
23
not disturbing the status quo.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3
•HR 2796 IH
(4) Despite the complete clarity of this point,
1
President Barack Obama’s administration has at-
2
tempted to effectively replace the word ‘‘sex’’ with
3
the phrase ‘‘gender identity’’ for purposes of Federal
4
antidiscrimination law and policy through a series of
5
unilateral executive actions.
6
(5) For example, on December 15, 2014, Attor-
7
ney General Eric Holder announced that the De-
8
partment of Justice would reinterpret the ban on
9
‘‘sex’’ discrimination under title VII of the Civil
10
Rights Act of 1964 to encompass ‘‘gender identity’’.
11
This was followed on March 27, 2015, by an Equal
12
Employment Opportunity Commission decision hold-
13
ing that declining to use a female pronoun to ad-
14
dress a male who identifies as female constituted
15
‘‘sex’’ discrimination under title VII.
16
(6) On May 9, 2016, the Obama administration
17
sued the State of North Carolina and threatened it
18
with fines and loss of Federal funding if it did not
19
adopt the administration’s incorrect readings of title
20
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and title IX of
21
the Education Amendments of 1972.
22
(7) On May 13, 2016, the Departments of Jus-
23
tice and Education issued a ‘‘significant guidance’’
24
letter stating that under title IX of the Education
25
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
4
•HR 2796 IH
Amendments of 1972 ‘‘when a school provides sex-
1
segregated activities and facilities, transgender stu-
2
dents must be allowed to participate in such activi-
3
ties and access such facilities consistent with their
4
gender identity.’’ The guidance further states that
5
schools ‘‘must treat a student’s gender identity as
6
the student’s sex’’ including in the context of ‘‘sex-
7
segregated restrooms, locker rooms, shower facilities,
8
housing, and athletic teams, as well as single-sex
9
classes.’’ In other words, the Departments consider
10
it a title IX violation if a person of the male sex who
11
self-identifies as a female is not granted unfettered
12
access to women’s or girls’ dorms, showers, locker
13
rooms, and bathrooms. This, despite assurance that
14
such a thing would never happen from the likes of
15
Ruth Bader Ginsburg who wrote in 1975 that ‘‘sep-
16
arate places to disrobe, sleep, perform personal bod-
17
ily functions are permitted, in some situations re-
18
quired, by regard for individual privacy.’’ This posi-
19
tion was codified in Federal regulations, 34 CFR
20
106.33, which state that recipients of Federal funds
21
‘‘may provide separate toilet, locker room, and show-
22
er facilities on the basis of sex,’’ with sex obviously
23
referring to biology.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
5
•HR 2796 IH
(8) Also on May 13, 2016, the Department of
1
Health and Human Services finalized regulations
2
that redefined the Affordable Care Act’s prohibition
3
on ‘‘sex’’ discrimination in federally funded health
4
programs and activities to cover ‘‘gender identity’’,
5
thereby opening health care professionals and insur-
6
ers to extensive liability if they decline to participate
7
in or pay for ‘‘gender transition’’ treatments or ‘‘sex
8
change’’ operations.
9
(9) The Obama administration’s actions are an
10
affront to the rule of law, the separation of powers,
11
the will of the people, language, history, safety, pri-
12
vacy, and biological realities.
13
(b) PURPOSE.—The purposes of this Act are—
14
(1) to prevent the executive branch from unilat-
15
erally rewriting Federal civil rights laws by enacting
16
or implementing any policy or undertaking any en-
17
forcement action that is based on construing the
18
term ‘‘sex’’ or ‘‘gender’’ to mean ‘‘gender identity’’;
19
and
20
(2) to ensure that gender identity is not treated
21
as a protected class in Federal law or policy without
22
the affirmative approval of the people’s representa-
23
tives in Congress.
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
6
•HR 2796 IH
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF POLICIES REDEFINING SEX TO
1
MEAN GENDER IDENTITY.
2
(a) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—In determining the
3
meaning of any Federal civil rights law, and of any related
4
ruling, regulation, guidance, or interpretation of the var-
5
ious administrative bureaus and agencies of the United
6
States, the words ‘‘sex’’ and ‘‘gender’’ and their equiva-
7
lents shall not be interpreted to mean ‘‘gender identity’’
8
or its equivalent, and the words ‘‘man’’ and ‘‘woman’’ and
9
their equivalents shall refer exclusively to a person’s ge-
10
netic sex.
11
(b) RULE OF INTERPRETATION.—No Federal civil
12
rights law shall be interpreted to treat gender identity or
13
transgender status as a protected class, unless such law
14
expressly designates ‘‘gender identity’’ or ‘‘transgender
15
status’’ as a protected class.
16
(c) DEFINITION
OF
‘‘FEDERAL
CIVIL
RIGHTS
17
LAW’’.—For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘Federal civil
18
rights law’’ means any Federal law prohibiting discrimina-
19
tion on the basis of sex or gender, including title IX of
20
the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et
21
seq.), the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000a et
22
seq.), the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), the
23
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law
24
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
7
•HR 2796 IH
111–148), and any other Federal law or provision thereof
1
prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex or gender.
2
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
04:57 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 069000
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\H2796.IH
H2796
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS