Text of US HR 1437 (2026)
Recognizing that equity, diversity, and inclusion in federally funded health research is necessary to enhance scientific excellence, and ensure equitable outcomes for patients in the United States.
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
9,443 characters
IV
119TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. RES. 1437
Recognizing that equity, diversity, and inclusion in federally funded health
research is necessary to enhance scientific excellence, and ensure equi-
table outcomes for patients in the United States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 16, 2026
Mrs. DINGELL (for herself, Mr. COHEN, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the fol-
lowing resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce
RESOLUTION
Recognizing that equity, diversity, and inclusion in federally
funded health research is necessary to enhance scientific
excellence, and ensure equitable outcomes for patients
in the United States.
Whereas, on May 29, 2026, the White House Office of Man-
agement and Budget published a proposed rule that
would expand their authority in policymaking for Federal
agencies and allow the Office of Management and Budget
to circumvent congressional authority;
Whereas the proposed rule builds off an Executive Order
signed by President Donald J. Trump in August 2025,
which directed Federal agencies to give political ap-
pointees oversight of grants to ensure that they ‘‘advance
the President’s policy priorities’’;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:10 Jul 16, 2026
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1437.IH
HR1437
kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2
•HRES 1437 IH
Whereas the proposed rule would expand the authority of the
Office of Management and Budget, politicize control of
Federal grants, de-emphasize peer review, place more re-
strictions on meeting attendance for grant holders, limit
collaborations between federally funded United States sci-
entists and overseas colleagues, and restrict Federal fi-
nancial support for the publication of results by United
States scientists in scientific journals;
Whereas more than 230 research universities and affiliated
academic medical centers and research institutes, said
that ‘‘the proposed changes would effectively dismantle a
framework that has supported basic and applied research
in the United States and add unnecessary restrictions,
requirements, and substantial burden that will hamper
United States leadership and competitiveness’’;
Whereas the proposed rule would, for all Federal agencies,
prohibit Federal funds for bilateral or multilateral col-
laborations, agreements, programs, or activities with cer-
tain foreign countries or entities;
Whereas the proposal would disallow researchers from using
Federal grants to cover costs associated with publication,
‘‘including article-processing charges, fees that many
journals charge authors to make articles freely available’’;
Whereas existing policy requires all federally funded research
to be made free to read as soon as it is published;
Whereas, historically, United States research grants have
been managed by career civil servants, many of them sci-
entists, who conducted peer reviews alongside expert sci-
entists from recognized organizations including acad-
emies, scientific and professional societies, and academic
institutions;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:10 Jul 16, 2026
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1437.IH
HR1437
kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3
•HRES 1437 IH
Whereas, according to the American Society for Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, the peer-review system is a rig-
orous process intended to ensure that applications for
funding are based on scientific merit and innovation;
Whereas the proposed rule would require senior political ap-
pointees to review every discretionary grant before it is
awarded, and would forbid political appointees from rou-
tinely deferring to peer review recommendations by pan-
els;
Whereas the proposed rule would codify and expand the au-
thority of Federal agencies to terminate active grants
mid-award if they are deemed ‘‘inconsistent with program
goals or agency priorities’’;
Whereas agencies would not be required to provide a process
for researchers to appeal a termination;
Whereas the proposed rule would prohibit the use of Federal
funding for research on diversity, equity, and inclusion,
as well as gender, disproportionately impacting funding
for projects that focus on underserved and underrep-
resented communities and for scientists from these back-
grounds;
Whereas the Trump administration’s fiscal year 2026 budget
request proposed eliminating has indicated its intention
to remove the National Institute on Minority Health and
Health Disparities, which focuses on groups that tend to
have poorer health outcomes;
Whereas, according to data from the United States Census
Bureau, women make up approximately 50.5 percent to
51.1 percent of the population of the United States;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:10 Jul 16, 2026
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1437.IH
HR1437
kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4
•HRES 1437 IH
Whereas, until the 1990s, nearly all health research was con-
ducted on men, as women were excluded from most clin-
ical trials;
Whereas researchers had previously assumed that they could
apply the results of their male-only study to females,
which overlooked fundamental differences between women
and men, such as the vast majority of studies on aging
that fail to account for the impact of menopause on age-
related conditions;
Whereas cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death
among women, yet women have historically been under-
represented in cardiovascular research and are more like-
ly to experience delayed or missed diagnoses because di-
agnostic criteria, symptom recognition, and treatment ap-
proaches were largely developed based on male popu-
lations;
Whereas people of color have historically been underrep-
resented in clinical trials and other medical development
research;
Whereas individuals with lighter skin have historically been
the default baseline for assessing medical devices and
treatments, as evidenced by multiple studies that found
pulse oximeters, which help guide essential care decisions,
overestimated oxygen saturation to a greater degree in
Black patients than in White patients;
Whereas disparities in access to medical advancements can
lead to disparities in health outcomes and life expectancy;
Whereas the National Institutes of Health Policy and Guide-
lines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Sub-
jects in Clinical Research requires racial and ethnic cat-
egories to be used when reporting population data;
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:10 Jul 16, 2026
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6300
E:\BILLS\HR1437.IH
HR1437
kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
5
•HRES 1437 IH
Whereas health disparities have economic costs for the entire
Nation, and a 2018 study found that racial health dis-
parities
alone
cost
$421,000,000,000
to
$451,000,000,000 in excess medical care expenses, lower
labor force productivity, and premature death;
Whereas Black, LGBTQ, and women patients routinely expe-
rience discrimination from health care providers;
Whereas more representation in the health care workforce
may contribute to the research and training of health
professionals who contribute to the overall health of the
United States, and restricting federally funded research
related to diversity is likely to reshape the health of all
Americans;
Whereas high-quality research on communities most impacted
by health disparities is necessary to close gaps in health
outcomes for these communities; and
Whereas the purpose of clinical research is to understand how
the human body works, and in order for research to be
useful it should reflect all of the populations it intends
to help, regardless of their background, gender, religion,
ethnicity, sexuality, disability, or socioeconomic status,
has access to opportunities to contribute: Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
1
(1) recognizes that equity, diversity, and inclu-
2
sion in federally funded health research is—
3
(A) necessary to enhance scientific excel-
4
lence, and ensure equitable outcomes for pa-
5
tients in the United States; and
6
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:10 Jul 16, 2026
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\HR1437.IH
HR1437
kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
6
•HRES 1437 IH
(B) essential to address the full range of
1
health challenges we face in the United States;
2
(2) recognizes and is committed to addressing
3
systemic barriers in federally funded research
4
projects for underserved and underrepresented com-
5
munities such as bias in funding, publication, and
6
representation;
7
(3) opposes arbitrary and politically motivated
8
efforts to impede the science-based, meritorious re-
9
view process of federally funded research projects
10
that has made the United States the leader in health
11
innovation for decades; and
12
(4) urges the administration to maintain the
13
longstanding, apolitical, science-backed peer review
14
process.
15
Æ
VerDate Sep 11 2014
21:10 Jul 16, 2026
Jkt 069200
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6301
E:\BILLS\HR1437.IH
HR1437
kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB