Text of US SB 2024 (2014)
State Marriage Defense Act of 2014
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
4,605 characters
II
Calendar No. 308
113TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
S. 2024
To amend chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, with regard to the
definition of ‘‘marriage’’ and ‘‘spouse’’ for Federal purposes and to
ensure respect for State regulation of marriage.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
FEBRUARY 12, 2014
Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced
the following bill; which was read the first time
FEBRUARY 24, 2014
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
A BILL
To amend chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, with
regard to the definition of ‘‘marriage’’ and ‘‘spouse’’
for Federal purposes and to ensure respect for State
regulation of marriage.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
1
tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
3
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Marriage De-
4
fense Act of 2014’’.
5
VerDate Mar 15 2010
22:38 Feb 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2024.PCS
S2024
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2
•S 2024 PCS
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
1
Congress finds the following:
2
(1) Congress affirms the States’ legitimate and
3
proper public policy interests in regulating domestic
4
relations and in defining marriage for the residents
5
of their States.
6
(2) Despite striking down section 3 of the De-
7
fense of Marriage Act, the Supreme Court ruling in
8
United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013)
9
did not institute a new Federal definition of mar-
10
riage that includes same sex marriage. Instead,
11
United States v. Windsor specifically required the
12
Federal Government to defer to ‘‘state sovereign
13
choices about who may be married’’ in determining
14
marital status for Federal purposes.
15
(3) United States v. Windsor reaffirmed that
16
the ‘‘historic and essential authority to define the
17
marital relation’’ rests with the States and criticized
18
Federal actions that ‘‘put a thumb on the scales and
19
influence a state’s decision as to how to shape its
20
own marriage laws’’.
21
(4) Congress recognizes that current actions by
22
the Federal Government to afford benefits to certain
23
relationships not recognized as marriages by a per-
24
son’s State of residence go beyond the Supreme
25
Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor. These
26
VerDate Mar 15 2010
22:38 Feb 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2024.PCS
S2024
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3
•S 2024 PCS
Federal actions create ‘‘two contradictory marriage
1
regimes within the same State,’’ in direct contradic-
2
tion of United States v. Windsor.
3
(5) Actions taken by the Federal Government
4
to grant recognition of marital status for persons
5
not recognized as married in their State of domicile
6
undermine a State’s legitimate authority to define
7
marriage for its residents.
8
SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE FOR
9
FEDERAL PURPOSES.
10
Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended
11
to read as follows:
12
‘‘§ 7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’
13
‘‘For purposes of determining the meaning of any Act
14
of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation
15
of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the
16
United States, as applied with respect to individuals domi-
17
ciled in a State or in any other territory or possession of
18
the United States, the term ‘marriage’ shall not include
19
any relationship which that State, territory, or possession
20
does not recognize as a marriage, and the term ‘spouse’
21
shall not include an individual who is a party to a relation-
22
ship that is not recognized as a marriage by that State,
23
territory, or possession.’’.
24
VerDate Mar 15 2010
23:06 Feb 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6652
Sfmt 6201
E:\BILLS\S2024.PCS
S2024
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 308
113TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
S. 2024
A BILL
To amend chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code,
with regard to the definition of ‘‘marriage’’ and
‘‘spouse’’ for Federal purposes and to ensure re-
spect for State regulation of marriage.
FEBRUARY 24, 2014
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
VerDate Mar 15 2010
22:38 Feb 24, 2014
Jkt 039200
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6651
Sfmt 6651
E:\BILLS\S2024.PCS
S2024
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS