Text of WA SB 6284 (2026)
Providing consumer protections for artificial intelligence systems.
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
39,506 characters
AN
ACT
Relating
to
consumer
protections
for
artificial
1
intelligence systems; amending 2024 c 163 s 2 (uncodified); adding a
2
new chapter to Title 19 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 42 RCW;
3
creating a new section; and providing expiration dates.
4
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
5
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that artificial
6
intelligence is a dynamic technology that is changing the way
7
Washingtonians
live,
learn,
and
work.
Emerging
artificial
8
intelligence technologies seek to enhance information gathering and
9
decision making, create new efficiencies throughout the economy, and
10
advance scientific discovery. The legislature also recognizes that
11
there are potential risks associated with the rapid development and
12
deployment
of
artificial
intelligence
systems,
including
the
13
generation of bias and unintentional discrimination. These risks are
14
especially profound when an artificial intelligence system is used to
15
make decisions that have a material or legal impact on someone's
16
life.
17
The legislature recognizes Washington's role as a leader and
18
innovator within the high-technology economy. The legislature intends
19
to adopt an artificial intelligence regulatory framework that
20
continues to promote innovation, reduce risk, and protect residents
21
S-3753.4
SENATE BILL 6284
State of Washington
69th Legislature
2026 Regular Session
By Senators Liias, Boehnke, Shewmake, and Harris
p. 1
SB 6284
from discriminatory actions. The legislature further recognizes that
1
regulatory frameworks that align with national standards and specify
2
clear compliance requirements provide developers with certainty to
3
support continued innovation while also protecting consumers from
4
unfair or unclear artificial intelligence decisions.
5
Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to protect
6
Washingtonians from algorithmic discrimination by establishing a
7
comprehensive
risk-based
approach
to
artificial
intelligence
8
accountability. The legislature intends to regulate deployers of
9
artificial intelligence under the presumption that they are acting in
10
good faith when they comply with the provisions of this act. The
11
legislature also intends to ensure that government agencies are
12
transparent and accountable by requiring disclosure when consumer
13
interactions are supported by an artificial intelligence system.
14
Finally, the legislature intends to extend and expand the work of the
15
artificial intelligence task force to develop a framework for the
16
adoption of artificial intelligence in the workplace in a way that
17
centers workers and protects fairness and opportunity.
18
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. The definitions in this section apply
19
throughout
this
chapter
unless
the
context
clearly
requires
20
otherwise.
21
(1) "Algorithmic discrimination":
22
(a) Means the use of an artificial intelligence system which
23
results in any unlawful differential impact that disfavors any
24
individual or group of individuals on the basis of chapter 49.60 RCW
25
or federal law; and
26
(b) Does not include the following:
27
(i) Any offer, license, or use of a high-risk artificial
28
intelligence system by a developer or deployer for the sole purpose
29
of: (A) The developer's or deployer's testing to identify, mitigate,
30
or prevent discrimination or otherwise ensure compliance with state
31
and federal law; or (B) expanding an applicant, customer, or
32
participant
pool
to
increase
diversity
or
redress
historic
33
discrimination; or
34
(ii) Any act or omission by or on behalf of a private club or
35
other establishment not in fact open to the public, as set forth in
36
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000a(e), as
37
amended.
38
p. 2
SB 6284
(2) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning
1
and related technologies that use data to train statistical models
2
for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks
3
normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as
4
computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content
5
generation.
6
(3) "Consequential decision" means any decision that has a
7
material legal or similarly significant effect on the provision or
8
denial of any consumer's access to:
9
(a) Pardon, parole, probation, or release;
10
(b) Education enrollment or opportunity;
11
(c) Employment;
12
(d) A financial or lending service;
13
(e) An essential government service;
14
(f) Health care services;
15
(g) Housing;
16
(h) Insurance; or
17
(i) Legal service.
18
(4) "Consumer" means any individual who is a resident of this
19
state.
20
(5) "Deploys" or "deployed" means to put a high-risk artificial
21
intelligence system into use.
22
(6) "Deployer" means any person doing business in this state that
23
deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system in the state.
24
(7) "Developer" means any person doing business in this state
25
that develops, or intentionally and substantially modifies, a high-
26
risk artificial intelligence system intended for use within the
27
state.
28
(8) "High-risk artificial intelligence system":
29
(a) Means any artificial intelligence system designed by its
30
developer to, when deployed, make, or is a substantial factor in
31
making, a consequential decision; and
32
(b) Does not include:
33
(i) Any artificial intelligence system that is intended to:
34
(A) Perform any narrow procedural task;
35
(B) Improve the result of a previously completed human activity;
36
(C) Perform a preparatory task to an assessment relevant to a
37
consequential decision; or
38
(D) Detect any decision-making pattern, or any deviation from any
39
preexisting decision-making pattern;
40
p. 3
SB 6284
(ii)
Any
antifraud
technology,
antimalware,
antivirus,
1
calculator, cybersecurity, database, data storage, firewall, internet
2
domain registration, internet website loading, networking, robocall-
3
filtering, spam-filtering, spellchecking, spreadsheet, webcaching,
4
webhosting, search engine, or similar technology; or
5
(iii) Any technology that communicates in natural language for
6
the purpose of providing users with information, making referrals or
7
recommendations, answering questions, or generating other content,
8
and is subject to an acceptable use policy that prohibits generating
9
content that is unlawful.
10
(9) "Intentional and substantial modification" or "intentionally
11
and substantially modifies" means a deliberate change made to an
12
artificial intelligence system that materially increases the risk of
13
algorithmic discrimination.
14
(10) "Person" means any individual, association, corporation,
15
limited liability company, partnership, trust, or other legal entity.
16
(11) "Substantial factor" means a factor that is:
17
(a) Considered when making a consequential decision;
18
(b) Likely to alter the outcome of a consequential decision; and
19
(c) Weighed more heavily by a deployer of the applicable high-
20
risk
artificial
intelligence
system
than
any
other
factor
21
contributing to the consequential decision.
22
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. (1)(a) Beginning July 1, 2027, each
23
deployer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system must use
24
industry-standard means to protect consumers from any known or
25
reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.
26
(b) In any enforcement action brought on or after July 1, 2027,
27
by the attorney general pursuant to section 9 of this act, there is a
28
rebuttable presumption that a deployer of a high-risk artificial
29
intelligence system used reasonable care as required under this
30
section if the deployer complied with this chapter.
31
(2)(a) By July 1, 2027, and at least annually thereafter, a
32
deployer or third party contracted by the deployer shall review the
33
deployment of each high-risk artificial intelligence system deployed
34
by the deployer to ensure that the high-risk artificial intelligence
35
system is not causing algorithmic discrimination.
36
(b) If a deployer subsequently discovers that the high-risk
37
artificial intelligence system has caused algorithmic discrimination,
38
the deployer, without unreasonable delay, but no later than 90 days
39
p. 4
SB 6284
after the date of the discovery, shall send to the attorney general,
1
in a form and manner prescribed by the attorney general, a notice
2
disclosing the discovery.
3
(3) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a
4
deployer to disclose any trade secret, or other confidential or
5
proprietary information.
6
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. (1) Beginning July 1, 2027, and except as
7
provided in section 5(6) of this act, each deployer of a high-risk
8
artificial intelligence system shall implement and maintain a risk
9
management policy and program to govern the deployer's deployment of
10
a high-risk artificial intelligence system.
11
(2)(a) The risk management policy and program must specify and
12
incorporate the principles, processes, and personnel that the
13
deployer uses to identify, document, and mitigate known or reasonably
14
foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination. The risk management
15
policy and program must include an iterative process that is planned,
16
implemented, and regularly and systematically reviewed and updated
17
over the lifecycle of the high-risk artificial intelligence system.
18
(b) A risk management policy and program implemented and
19
maintained
pursuant
to
this
subsection
must
be
reasonable,
20
considering:
21
(i) The size and complexity of the deployer;
22
(ii)
The
nature
and
scope
of
the
high-risk
artificial
23
intelligence systems deployed by the deployer including, but not
24
limited
to,
the
intended
uses
of
such
high-risk
artificial
25
intelligence systems;
26
(iii) The sensitivity and volume of data processed in connection
27
with the high-risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the
28
deployer; and
29
(iv) A risk management framework that either:
30
(A) Adheres to the guidance and standards set forth in the latest
31
version of the artificial intelligence risk management framework
32
published by the national institute of standards and technology,
33
ISO/IEC 42001, or another nationally or internationally recognized
34
risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems, if the
35
standards are substantially equivalent to or more stringent than the
36
requirements; or
37
p. 5
SB 6284
(B) Complies with any risk management framework for artificial
1
intelligence systems that the attorney general, in the attorney
2
general's discretion, may designate.
3
(c) A risk management policy and program implemented and
4
maintained pursuant to this subsection (2) may cover multiple high-
5
risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the deployer.
6
(3) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a
7
deployer to disclose any trade secret, or other confidential or
8
proprietary information.
9
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. (1) Except as provided in subsection (6)
10
of this section, a deployer that deploys a high-risk artificial
11
intelligence system on or after July 1, 2027, or a third party
12
contracted by the deployer for such purposes, shall complete an
13
impact assessment for:
14
(a) The high-risk artificial intelligence system; and
15
(b) A deployed high-risk artificial intelligence system no later
16
than 90 days after any intentional and substantial modification to
17
such high-risk artificial intelligence system is made available.
18
(2) Each impact assessment completed pursuant to this section
19
must include, at a minimum, and to the extent reasonably known by, or
20
available to, the deployer:
21
(a) A statement by the deployer disclosing the purpose, intended
22
use cases and deployment context of, and benefits afforded by, the
23
high-risk artificial intelligence system;
24
(b) An analysis of whether the deployment of the high-risk
25
artificial
intelligence
system
poses
any
known
or
reasonably
26
foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination and, if so, the
27
nature of such algorithmic discrimination and the steps that have
28
been taken to mitigate such risks;
29
(c) A description of the following:
30
(i) The categories of data the high-risk artificial intelligence
31
system processes as inputs;
32
(ii) The outputs the high-risk artificial intelligence system
33
produces;
34
(iii) Any metrics used to evaluate the performance and known
35
limitations of the high-risk artificial intelligence system;
36
(iv) A description of any transparency measures taken concerning
37
the high-risk artificial intelligence system, such as any measures
38
taken to disclose to a consumer that such high-risk artificial
39
p. 6
SB 6284
intelligence system is in use when such high-risk artificial
1
intelligence system is in use; and
2
(v) A description of the postdeployment monitoring and user
3
safeguards provided concerning such high-risk artificial intelligence
4
system, such as the oversight process established by the deployer to
5
address issues arising from deployment of such high-risk artificial
6
intelligence system.
7
(3) In addition to the information required under subsection
8
(2)(c) of this section, each impact assessment completed following an
9
intentional
and
substantial
modification
made
to
a
high-risk
10
artificial intelligence system on or after July 1, 2027, must include
11
a statement disclosing the extent to which the high-risk artificial
12
intelligence system was used in a manner that was consistent with, or
13
varied from, the developer's intended uses of such high-risk
14
artificial intelligence system.
15
(4) A single impact assessment may address a comparable set of
16
high-risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by a deployer.
17
(5) If a deployer, or a third party contracted by the deployer,
18
completes an impact assessment for the purpose of complying with
19
another
applicable
law
or
regulation,
such
impact
assessment
20
satisfies the requirements established in this section if such impact
21
assessment is reasonably similar in scope and effect to the impact
22
assessment that would otherwise be completed pursuant to this
23
subsection.
24
(6) A deployer shall maintain the most recently completed impact
25
assessment for a high-risk artificial intelligence system as required
26
under
this
section,
relevant
records
supporting
the
impact
27
assessment, and prior impact assessments, if any, for a period of at
28
least three years following the final deployment of the high-risk
29
artificial intelligence system.
30
(7) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a
31
deployer to disclose any trade secret, or other confidential or
32
proprietary information.
33
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. (1) The requirements in section 5 (1)
34
through (3) of this act and section 3(2) of this act do not apply to
35
a deployer if, at the time the deployer deploys a high-risk
36
artificial intelligence system and at all times while the high-risk
37
artificial intelligence system is deployed:
38
(a) The deployer:
39
p. 7
SB 6284
(i) Employs fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees; and
1
(ii) Does not use the deployer's own data to train the high-risk
2
artificial intelligence system;
3
(b) The high-risk artificial intelligence system:
4
(i) Is used for the intended uses that are disclosed by the
5
deployer; and
6
(ii) Continues learning based on data derived from sources other
7
than the deployer's own data; and
8
(c) The deployer makes available to consumers any impact
9
assessment that:
10
(i) The developer of the high-risk artificial intelligence system
11
has completed and provided to the deployers; and
12
(ii) Includes information that is substantially similar to the
13
information in the impact assessment required under section 5 of this
14
act.
15
(2) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a
16
deployer to disclose any trade secret, or other confidential or
17
proprietary information.
18
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. Beginning July 1, 2026, each time a
19
deployer deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system to make,
20
or be a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision
21
concerning a consumer, the deployer shall:
22
(1) Notify the consumer that the deployer has deployed a high-
23
risk artificial intelligence system to make, or be a substantial
24
factor in making, a consequential decision before the decision is
25
made; and
26
(2) Provide to the consumer a statement disclosing:
27
(a) The purpose of the high-risk artificial intelligence system
28
and the nature of the consequential decisions;
29
(b) The contact information for the deployer; and
30
(c) A description, in plain language, of the high-risk artificial
31
intelligence system.
32
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. (1) Nothing in this chapter may be
33
construed to:
34
(a) Restrict a developer's, deployer's, or other person's ability
35
to:
36
(i) Comply with federal, state, or municipal law;
37
p. 8
SB 6284
(ii) Comply with a civil, criminal, or regulatory inquiry,
1
investigation, subpoena, or summons by federal, state, municipal, or
2
other governmental authorities;
3
(iii) Cooperate with law enforcement agencies concerning conduct
4
or activity that the developer, deployer, or other person reasonably
5
and in good faith believes may violate federal, state, or municipal
6
law;
7
(iv) Investigate, establish, exercise, prepare for, or defend
8
legal claims;
9
(v) Take immediate steps to protect an interest that is essential
10
for the life or physical safety of a consumer or another individual;
11
(vi) Engage in public or peer-reviewed scientific or statistical
12
research in the public interest that adheres to all other applicable
13
ethics and privacy laws and is conducted in accordance with 45 C.F.R.
14
Part 46, as amended from time to time, or relevant requirements
15
established by the federal food and drug administration;
16
(vii) Conduct any research, testing, or development activities
17
regarding any artificial intelligence system or model, other than
18
testing conducted under real world conditions, before such artificial
19
intelligence system or model is placed on the market, deployed, or
20
put into service, as applicable;
21
(viii) Effectuate a product recall;
22
(ix) Identify and repair technical errors that impair existing or
23
intended functionality; or
24
(x) Assist another developer, deployer, or person with any of the
25
obligations imposed under this chapter;
26
(b) Impose any obligation on a developer, deployer, or other
27
person that adversely affects the rights or freedoms of any person
28
including, but not limited to, the rights of any person to freedom of
29
speech or freedom of the press guaranteed in the First Amendment to
30
the United States Constitution;
31
(c) Apply to any developer, deployer, or other person:
32
(i) Insofar as such developer, deployer, or other person
33
develops,
deploys,
puts
into
service,
or
intentionally
and
34
substantially
modifies,
as
applicable,
a
high-risk
artificial
35
intelligence system that has been approved, authorized, certified,
36
cleared, or granted:
37
(A) By a federal agency, such as the federal food and drug
38
administration or the federal aviation administration, acting within
39
the scope of such federal agency's authority; or
40
p. 9
SB 6284
(B) In compliance with standards established by any federal
1
agency including, but not limited to, standards established by the
2
federal office of the national coordinator for health information
3
technology;
4
(ii) Conducting any research to support an application for
5
approval or certification from any federal agency including, but not
6
limited
to,
the
federal
aviation
administration,
the
federal
7
communications
commission,
or
the
federal
food
and
drug
8
administration, or otherwise subject to review by such federal
9
agency;
10
(iii) Performing work under, or in connection with, a contract
11
with the United States department of commerce, the United States
12
department of defense, or the national aeronautics and space
13
administration, unless such developer, deployer, or other person is
14
performing such work on a high-risk artificial intelligence system
15
that is used to make, or as a substantial factor in making, a
16
decision concerning employment or housing; or
17
(iv) That is a covered entity within the meaning of the health
18
insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, P.L. 104-191,
19
and the regulations promulgated thereunder, as both may be amended
20
from time to time, and providing health care recommendations that:
21
(A) Are generated by an artificial intelligence system;
22
(B) Require a health care provider to take action to implement
23
such recommendations; and
24
(C) Are not considered to be high risk; or
25
(d) Apply to any artificial intelligence system that is acquired
26
by or for the federal government or any federal agency or department
27
including, but not limited to, the United States department of
28
commerce, the United States department of defense, or the national
29
aeronautics
and
space
administration,
unless
such
artificial
30
intelligence system is a high-risk artificial intelligence system
31
that is used to make, or as a substantial factor in making, a
32
decision concerning employment or housing.
33
(2) If a developer, deployer, or other person engages in any
34
action pursuant to an exemption set forth in this section, the
35
developer,
deployer,
or
other
person
bears
the
burden
of
36
demonstrating that such action qualifies for such exemption.
37
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. (1)(a) The attorney general may bring an
38
action in the name of the state, or as parens patriae on behalf of
39
p. 10
SB 6284
persons residing in the state, to enforce this chapter. For actions
1
brought by the attorney general to enforce this chapter, a violation
2
of this chapter is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce
3
for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter
4
19.86 RCW. An action to enforce this chapter may not be brought under
5
RCW 19.86.090.
6
(b) The office of the attorney general, before commencing an
7
action under the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW, must
8
provide 45 days' written notice to a deployer or developer of the
9
alleged violation of this chapter. For the first violation, the
10
developer or deployer may cure the noticed violation within 60 days
11
of receiving the written notice.
12
(2) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit or
13
otherwise affect the obligations of developers and deployers under
14
applicable laws, rules, or regulations relating to data privacy or
15
security.
16
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. (1) A government agency that makes
17
available an artificial intelligence system intended to interact with
18
consumers must disclose to each consumer, before or at the time of
19
interaction, that the consumer is interacting with an artificial
20
intelligence system. The disclosure must be:
21
(a) Clear and conspicuously posted;
22
(b) Written in plain language; and
23
(c) May not use a dark pattern.
24
(2) The disclosure may be provided by using a hyperlink to direct
25
a consumer to a separate web page.
26
(3) A person is required to make the disclosure under subsection
27
(1) of this section regardless of whether it would be obvious to a
28
reasonable consumer that the consumer is interacting with an
29
artificial intelligence system.
30
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. Sections 1 through 9 of this act
31
constitute a new chapter in Title 19 RCW.
32
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. Section 10 of this act constitutes a new
33
chapter in Title 42 RCW.
34
Sec. 13. 2024 c 163 s 2 (uncodified) is amended to read as
35
follows:
36
p. 11
SB 6284
(1) ((Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for
1
this specific purpose, a)) A task force to assess current uses and
2
trends
and
make
recommendations
to
the
legislature
regarding
3
guidelines and potential legislation for the use of artificial
4
intelligence systems is established.
5
(2) The task force is composed of an executive committee
6
consisting of members as provided in this subsection.
7
(a) The president of the senate shall appoint one member from
8
each of the two largest caucuses of the senate.
9
(b) The speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint one
10
member from each of the two largest caucuses of the house of
11
representatives.
12
(c) The attorney general shall appoint the following members,
13
selecting only individuals with experience in technology policy:
14
(i) One member from the office of the governor;
15
(ii) One member from the office of the attorney general;
16
(iii) One member from Washington technology solutions;
17
(iv) One member from the Washington state auditor;
18
(v) One member representing universities or research institutions
19
that are experts in the design and effect of an algorithmic system;
20
(vi) One member representing private technology industry groups;
21
(vii) One member representing business associations;
22
(viii)
Three
members
representing
community
advocate
23
organizations that represent communities that are disproportionately
24
vulnerable to being harmed by algorithmic bias;
25
(ix) One member representing the LGBTQ+ community;
26
(x) One member representing the retail industry;
27
(xi) One member representing the hospitality industry;
28
(xii) One member representing statewide labor organizations; and
29
(xiii) One member representing public safety.
30
(d) The task force may meet in person or by telephone conference
31
call, videoconference, or other similar telecommunications method, or
32
a combination of such methods.
33
(e) The executive committee may convene subcommittees to advise
34
the task force on the recommendations and findings set out in
35
subsection (4) of this section.
36
(i) The executive committee shall define the scope of activity
37
and subject matter focus required of the subcommittees including, but
38
not limited to: Education and workforce development; public safety
39
and ethics; health care and accessibility; labor; government and
40
p. 12
SB 6284
public sector efficiency; state security and cybersecurity; consumer
1
protection and privacy; and industry and innovation.
2
(ii)
Subcommittees
and
their
members
may
be
invited
to
3
participate on an ongoing, recurring, or one-time basis.
4
(iii) The executive committee in collaboration with the attorney
5
general shall appoint members to the subcommittees that must be
6
comprised
of
industry
participants,
subject
matter
experts,
7
representatives of federally recognized tribes, or other relevant
8
stakeholders.
9
(iv)
Each
subcommittee
must
contain
at
least
one
member
10
possessing relevant industry expertise and at least one member from
11
an advocacy organization that represents communities that are
12
disproportionately vulnerable to being harmed by algorithmic bias
13
including, but not limited to: African American; Hispanic American;
14
Native American; Asian American; Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
15
communities; religious minorities; individuals with disabilities; and
16
other vulnerable communities.
17
(v) Meeting summaries and reports delivered by the subcommittees
18
to the executive committee must be made available on the attorney
19
general's website within 30 days of delivery.
20
(3) The office of the attorney general must administer and
21
provide staff support for the task force. The office of the attorney
22
general may, when deemed necessary by the task force, retain
23
consultants to provide data analysis, research, recommendations,
24
training, and other services to the task force for the purposes
25
provided in subsection (4) of this section. The office of the
26
attorney general may work with the task force to determine
27
appropriate subcommittees as needed.
28
(4) The executive committee and subcommittees of the task force
29
shall examine the development and use of artificial intelligence by
30
private and public sector entities and make recommendations to the
31
legislature regarding guidelines and potential legislation for the
32
use and regulation of artificial intelligence systems to protect
33
Washingtonians' safety, privacy, and civil and intellectual property
34
rights. The task force findings and recommendations must include:
35
(a) A literature review of public policy issues with artificial
36
intelligence, including benefits and risks to the public broadly,
37
historically excluded communities, and other identifiable groups,
38
racial
equity
considerations,
workforce
impacts,
and
ethical
39
concerns;
40
p. 13
SB 6284
(b) A review of existing protections under state and federal law
1
for individual data and privacy rights, safety, civil rights, and
2
intellectual property rights, and how federal, state, and local laws
3
relating to artificial intelligence align, differ, conflict, and
4
interact across levels of government;
5
(c) A recommended set of guiding principles for artificial
6
intelligence use informed by standards established by relevant
7
bodies, including recommending a definition for ethical artificial
8
intelligence and guiding principles;
9
(d) Identification of high-risk uses of artificial intelligence,
10
including those that may negatively affect safety or fundamental
11
rights;
12
(e) Opportunities to support and promote the innovation of
13
artificial intelligence technologies through grants and incentives;
14
(f) Recommendations on appropriate uses of and limitations on the
15
use of artificial intelligence by state and local governments and the
16
private sector;
17
(g) Recommendations relating to the appropriate and legal use of
18
training data;
19
(h) Algorithmic discrimination issues which may occur when
20
artificial
intelligence
systems
are
used
and
contribute
to
21
unjustified differential treatment or impacts disfavoring people on
22
the basis of race, color, national origin, citizen or immigration
23
status,
families
with
children,
creed,
religious
belief
or
24
affiliation, sex, marital status, the presence of any sensory,
25
mental, or physical disability, age, honorably discharged veteran or
26
military status, sexual orientation, gender expression or gender
27
identity, or any other protected class under RCW 49.60.010 and
28
recommendations
to
mitigate
and
protect
against
algorithmic
29
discrimination;
30
(i) Recommendations on minimizing unlawful discriminatory or
31
biased outputs or applications;
32
(j) Recommendations on prioritizing transparency so that the
33
behavior and functional components artificial intelligence can be
34
understood in order to enable the identification of performance
35
issues, safety and privacy concerns, biases, exclusionary practices,
36
and unintended outcomes;
37
(k) Racial equity issues posed by artificial intelligence systems
38
and ways to mitigate the concerns to build equity into the systems;
39
p. 14
SB 6284
(l) Civil liberties issues posed by artificial intelligence
1
systems and civil rights and civil liberties protections to be
2
incorporated into artificial intelligence systems;
3
(m) Recommendations as to how the state should educate the public
4
on the development and use of artificial intelligence, including
5
information about data privacy and security, data collection and
6
retention practices, use of individual data in machine learning, and
7
intellectual property considerations regarding generative artificial
8
intelligence;
9
(n) A review of protections of personhood, including replicas of
10
voice or likeness, in typical contract structures, and a review of
11
artificial intelligence tools used to support employment decisions;
12
(o)
Proposed
state
guidelines
for
the
use
of
artificial
13
intelligence to inform the development, deployment, and use of
14
artificial intelligence systems to:
15
(i) Retain appropriate human agency and oversight;
16
(ii) Be subject to internal and external security testing of
17
systems before public release for high-risk artificial intelligence
18
systems;
19
(iii) Protect data privacy and security;
20
(iv) Promote appropriate transparency for consumers when they
21
interact with artificial intelligence systems or products created by
22
artificial intelligence; and
23
(v)
Ensure
accountability,
considering
oversight,
impact
24
assessment, auditability, and due diligence mechanisms;
25
(p) A review of existing civil and criminal remedies for
26
addressing potential harms resulting from the use of artificial
27
intelligence systems and recommendations, if needed, for new means of
28
enforcement and remedies; and
29
(q) Recommendations for establishing an ongoing committee that
30
must
study
emerging
technologies
not
limited
to
artificial
31
technology.
32
(5) The executive committee of the task force must hold its first
33
meeting within 45 days of final appointments to the task force and
34
must meet at least twice each year thereafter. The task force must
35
submit reports to the governor and the appropriate committees of the
36
legislature detailing its findings and recommendations. A preliminary
37
report must be delivered by December 31, 2024, an interim report by
38
December 1, 2025, and a final report by July 1, ((2026)) 2027.
39
p. 15
SB 6284
Meeting summaries must be posted to the website of the attorney
1
general's office within 30 days of any meeting by the task force.
2
(6) Legislative members of the task force shall be reimbursed for
3
travel expenses in accordance with RCW 44.04.120. Nonlegislative
4
members are not entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses if they
5
are elected officials or are participating on behalf of an employer,
6
governmental entity, or other organization. Any reimbursement for
7
other nonlegislative members is subject to chapter 43.03 RCW.
8
(7) To ensure that the task force has diverse and inclusive
9
representation of those affected by its work, task force members,
10
including subcommittee members, whose participation in the task force
11
may be hampered by financial hardship and may be compensated as
12
provided in RCW 43.03.220.
13
(8) The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this
14
section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
15
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning
16
and related technologies that use data to train statistical models
17
for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks
18
normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as
19
computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content
20
generation.
21
(b) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an artificial
22
intelligence system that generates novel data or content based on a
23
foundation model.
24
(c) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial
25
intelligence
is
developed
using
data
and
algorithms
to
draw
26
inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy
27
without explicit programming.
28
(d) "Training data" means labeled data that is used to teach
29
artificial intelligence models or machine learning algorithms to make
30
proper decisions. Training data may include, but is not limited to,
31
annotated text, images, video, or audio.
32
(9) This section expires June 30, ((2027)) 2028.
33
NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. The artificial intelligence workplace
34
advisory
group
is
established
for
the
purpose
of
developing
35
artificial
intelligence
policy
related
to
the
workplace.
The
36
artificial intelligence workplace advisory group shall report to the
37
artificial intelligence task force established in section 2, chapter
38
163, Laws of 2024 as prescribed in subsection (4) of this section.
39
p. 16
SB 6284
(2) The attorney general shall appoint the following members to
1
the artificial intelligence workplace advisory group:
2
(a)
Two
members
representing
different
statewide
labor
3
organizations;
4
(b) Two members representing the business community;
5
(c) One member representing public sector employees;
6
(d) One member representing private sector employees;
7
(e) One member representing higher education institutions with
8
expertise in artificial intelligence and the workforce;
9
(f)
One
member
with
expertise
in
ethics
and
artificial
10
intelligence; and
11
(g) Other members as deemed appropriate by the attorney general.
12
(3) The artificial intelligence workplace advisory group is
13
responsible for developing guiding principles for the use of
14
artificial intelligence in the workplace. At a minimum, the guiding
15
principles must prioritize the responsible and ethical use of
16
artificial intelligence tools in ways that protect an individual's
17
privacy and minimize the risk of bias in the workplace.
18
(4) The artificial intelligence workplace advisory group shall
19
deliver an interim report on the development of guiding principles
20
for artificial intelligence in the workplace to the artificial
21
intelligence task force by December 1, 2026, and a final report by
22
March 1, 2027. The final report must be included in the artificial
23
intelligence task force's final report as required by section 2(5),
24
chapter 163, Laws of 2024.
25
(5) This section expires June 30, 2028.
26
--- END ---
p. 17
SB 6284