Text of WV HB 2917 (2021)
Require anyone participating in high school or middle school sports to play per their biological birth gender
Legislative text is a public record. Where LegiScan supplied it, the CC BY 4.0 credit applies.
Source: LegiScan. Bill data and text from LegiScan (legiscan.com), licensed CC BY 4.0 and used in modified form. LegiScan does not endorse the Trans Data Initiative. License: CC BY 4.0(opens another site). Source page(opens another site)
As introduced
9,953 characters
WEST virginia
legislature
2021 regular session
Introduced
House Bill 2917
By Delegates Burkhammer, J.
Jeffries, Worrell, Pinson, Hanna and Clark
[Introduced March 04,
2021; Referred to the Committee on Education]
A BILL to amend the Code
of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated
§18-9A-27, relating to creating the “Save Women’s Sports Act;” requiring, for an official or unofficial
school-sanctioned athletic or sporting event, that each athlete’s participation
in the athletic or sporting event be based on the athlete’s biological sex as
indicated on the athlete’s original birth certificate issued at the time of
birth; providing a revised designation for sporting events; and providing a
means by which civil actions can be commenced.
Be it enacted by the
Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 9A. Public
school support.
§18-9A-27. Clarifying
participation for sports events to be based on biological sex of the athlete at
birth.
(a) Legislative
findings. -
(1) This section shall
be known as the “Save Women’s Sports Act.”
(2) The legislature
finds that there are “inherent differences between men and women,” and that
these differences “remain cause for celebration, but not for denigration of the
members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual’s
opportunity,” United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 533 (1996);
(3) These “inherent
differences” range from chromosomal and hormonal differences to physiological
differences;
(4) Men generally have “denser,
stronger bones, tendons, and ligaments” and “larger hearts, greater lung volume
per body mass, a higher red blood cell count, and higher hemoglobin,” Neel
Burton, The Battle of the Sexes, Psychology Today (July 2, 2012);
(5) Men also have higher
natural levels of testosterone, which affects traits such as hemoglobin levels,
body fat content, the storage and use of carbohydrates, and the development of
type 2 muscle fibers, all of which result in men being able to generate higher
speed and power during physical activity, Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Sex in
Sport, Law and Contemporary Problems 63, 74 (2017) (quoting Gina Kolata,
Men, Women and Speed. 2 Words: Got Testosterone?, N.Y. Times (Aug. 21,
2008));
(6) The biological
differences between females and males, especially as it relates to natural
levels of testosterone, “explain the male and female secondary sex
characteristics which develop during puberty and have lifelong effects,
including those most important for success in sport: categorically different
strength, speed, and endurance,” Doriane Lambelet Coleman and Wickliffe Shreve,
“Comparing Athletic Performances: The Best Elite Women to Boys and Men,”
Duke Law Center for Sports Law and Policy;
(7) While
classifications based on sex are generally disfavored, the Supreme Court has
recognized that “sex classifications may be used to compensate women for
particular economic disabilities [they have] suffered, to promote equal
employment opportunity, [and] to advance full development of the talent and
capacities of our Nation's people,” United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S.
515, 533 (1996);
(8) One place where sex
classifications allow for the “full development of the talent and capacities of
our Nation’s people” is in the context of sports and athletics;
(9) Courts have
recognized that the inherent, physiological differences between males and
females result in different athletic capabilities. See e.g. Kleczek v. Rhode
Island Interscholastic League, Inc., 612 A.2d 13 734, 738 (R.I. 1992) (“Because
of innate physiological differences, boys and girls are not similarly situated
as they enter athletic competition.”); Petrie v. Ill. High Sch. Ass'n,
394 N.E.2d 855, 861 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979) (noting that “high school boys
[generally possess physiological advantages over] their girl counterparts” and
that those advantages give them an unfair lead over girls in some sports like “high
school track”);
(10) A recent study of
female and male Olympic performances since 1983 found that, although athletes
from both sexes improved over the time span, the “gender gap” between female
and male performances remained stable. “These suggest that women’s performances
at the high level will never match those of men.” Valerie Thibault et al.,
Women and men in sport performance: The gender gap has not evolved since
1983, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 214, 219 (2010);
(11) As Duke Law
professor and All-American track athlete Doriane Coleman, tennis champion
Martina Navratilova, and Olympic track gold medalist Sanya Richards-Ross recently
wrote: “The evidence is unequivocal that starting in puberty, in every sport
except sailing, shooting, and riding, there will always be significant numbers
of boys and men who would beat the best girls and women in head-to-head
competition. Claims to the contrary are simply a denial of science,” Doriane
Coleman, Martina Navratilova, et al., Pass the Equality Act, But Don’t
Abandon Title IX, Washington Post (Apr. 29, 2019);
(12) The benefits that
natural testosterone provides to male athletes is not diminished through the
use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. A recent study on the impact of
such treatments found that even “after 12 months of hormonal therapy,” a man who
identifies as a woman and is taking cross-sex hormones “had an absolute
advantage” over female athletes and “will still likely have performance
benefits” over women, Tommy Lundberg et al., “Muscle strength, size and
composition following months of gender-affirming treatment in transgender
individuals: retained advantage for the transwomen,” Karolinksa Institute
(Sept. 26, 2019); and
(13) Having separate
sex-specific teams furthers efforts to promote sex equality. Sex-specific teams
accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate
their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with
opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and
the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic
endeavors.
(b) Designation of
Athletic Teams. --
(1) Interscholastic,
intercollegiate, intramural, or club athletic teams or sports that are
sponsored by a public school or any school that is a member of the West
Virginia high school activities association or a public institution of higher
education or any higher education institution that is a member of the national
collegiate athletic association (NCAA), national association of intercollegiate
athletics (NAIA), or national junior college athletic association (NJCAA) shall
be expressly designated as one of the following based on biological ex:
(A) Males, men, or boys;
(B) Females, women, or
girls; or
(C) Coed or mixed.
(2) Athletic teams or
sports designated for females, women, or girls shall not be open to students of
the male sex.
(3) If disputed, a
student may establish sex by presenting a signed physician’s statement that
shall indicate the student’s sex based solely on:
(A) The student’s
internal and external reproductive anatomy;
(B) The student’s normal
endogenously produced levels of testosterone;
(C) An analysis of the
student’s genetic makeup.
(c) Protection for Educational Institutions. --
A government entity, any
licensing or accrediting organization, or any athletic association or
organization shall not entertain a complaint, open an investigation, or take
any other adverse action against a school or an institution of higher education
for maintaining separate interscholastic, intercollegiate, intramural, or club
athletic teams or sports for students of the female sex.
(d) Cause of Action.
--
(1) Any student who is
deprived of an athletic opportunity or suffers any direct or indirect harm as a
result of a violation of this chapter shall have a private cause of action for
injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law against
the school or institution of higher education.
(2) Any student who is
subject to retaliation or other adverse action by a school, institution of
higher education, or athletic association or organization as a result of
reporting a violation of this chapter to an employee or representative of the
school, institution, or athletic association or organization, or to any state
or federal agency with oversight of schools or institutions of higher education
in the state, shall have a private cause of action for injunctive relief,
damages, and any other relief available under law against the school,
institution, or athletic association or organization.
(3) Any school or
institution of higher education that suffers any direct or indirect harm as a
result of a violation of this chapter shall have a private cause of action for
injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law against
the government entity, licensing or accrediting organization, or athletic
association or organization.
(4) All civil actions
must be initiated within two (2) years after the harm occurred. Persons or
organizations who prevail on a claim brought pursuant to this section shall be
entitled to monetary damages, including for any psychological, emotional, and
physical harm suffered, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and any other
appropriate relief.
NOTE: The purpose of this bill is
to require that each athlete’s participation in the athletic or sporting event
be based on the athlete’s biological sex as indicated on the athlete’s original
birth certificate issued at the time of birth.
Strike-throughs indicate language
that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring
indicates new language that would be added.