Text of WV HB 2985 (2019)

WEST virginia legislature 2019 regular session Introduced House Bill 2985 By Delegates Porterfield and Bibby [Introduced February 11, 2019; Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.] A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article, designated §5-11C-1, §5-11C-2, §5-11C-3, §5-11C-4 and §5-11C-5, all relating to establishing the West Virginia Faith Freedom Act to ensure that, in all cases where state action is alleged to substantially burden the exercise of religion, that a compelling interest test is mandated, and, strict scrutiny is applied; including a short title; providing definitions; and addressing applicability, construction, remedies, and severability. Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: ARTICLE 11C. WEST VIRGINIA FAITH FREEDOM ACT. §5-11C-1. Short title. This article may be known and cited as the “West Virginia Faith Freedom Act”. §5-11C-2. Purposes. The purpose of this article is to reaffirm the rights of West Virginians as enumerated in section 15 of Article III of the Constitution of the State of West Virginia; to codify the application of the compelling interest test and strict scrutiny standard set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), and affirmed by State v. Everly, 150 W.Va. 423 (1966); and to guarantee its application in all cases in which free exercise of religion is alleged to have been substantially burdened by state action. §5-11C-3. Definitions. As used in this article: “Exercise of religion” means the sincere practice or observance of religion under the rights enumerated in section 15 of Article III of the Constitution of the State of West Virginia; and the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. “State action” means action by a branch, department, agency, board, commission, instrumentality, official, or other person acting under color of law, of the State of West Virginia or any political subdivision thereof. §5-11C-4. Applicability; construction; remedies. (a) State action may not substantially burden a person's right to exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, unless it is demonstrated that applying the burden to that person's exercise of religion in this particular instance: (1) Is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) Is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. (b) A person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, in violation of this article may assert the violation or impending violation as a claim for injunctive or declaratory relief or as a defense in any judicial or administrative proceeding. The person asserting a claim or defense may obtain relief against the state or its political subdivisions: Provided, That the relief is limited to injunctive or declaratory relief and reimbursement of costs and reasonable attorney fees. Nothing in this article creates a cause of action by an employee against a nongovernmental employer; nor does anything in this article constitute a defense to any claim based upon a refusal to provide emergency medical services. (c) This article applies to all state and local laws, and the implementation of those laws, whether statutory or otherwise, and whether adopted before or after the effective date of this article. This article does not apply to any local or regional jail, or any state or federal correctional facility, nor any facility that treats civilly committed sexually violent offenders. §5-11C-5. Severability. If a subsection or portion of this article is declared invalid, that declaration does not affect the validity of the remaining portions. NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to create the West Virginia Faith Freedom Act to ensure that, in all cases where state action is alleged to substantially burden the exercise of religion, a compelling interest test is mandated, and, strict scrutiny is applied. Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.