Litigation
Court cases in the project's archive about laws and policies that affect transgender and other LGBTQ+ people. Each case page links its dockets, its court documents, its opinions and any oral arguments, with the originals on CourtListener. Charts show the cases by issue, year, court and place.
Also: a finding aid to experts who testified for the side defending the laws.
97 of 664 cases match.
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe v. Todd Blanche | D.C. Cir. | Circuit | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Prisons & detentionalso Gender-affirming care, Federal executive actions | Mostly adverse | 336 |
| Jansen v. Trump | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Identity documentsalso Federal executive actions | Adverse | 37 |
| Jones v. Trump | D.C. Cir. | Circuit | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Prisons & detentionalso Gender-affirming care, Federal executive actions | Favorable | 53 |
| Kansas, State of v. United States Department of Education | D. Kan. | District | 10th Cir. | 2024 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Athletics, Federal executive actions | 4 | |
| Kingdom v. Trump | D.C. Cir. | Circuit | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Gender-affirming carealso Prisons & detention, Federal executive actions | Favorable | 302 |
| Massapequa Union Free School District v. RosaNo. 2:25-cv-05892 | E.D.N.Y. | District | 2nd Cir. | 2025 | Bathrooms & facilitiesalso Schools & education, Federal executive actions | 16 | |
| McComb Childrens Clinic, LTD. v. FinkNo. 5:24-cv-00048 | S.D. Miss. | District | 5th Cir. | 2024 | Health coverage & benefitsalso Gender-affirming care, Speech & religious objections, Federal executive actions | 23 | |
| McCrory v. United States of America | E.D.N.C. | District | 4th Cir. | 2016 | Bathrooms & facilitiesalso Employment, Federal executive actions | 16 | |
| Moe v. TrumpNo. 1:25-cv-10195 | D.C. Cir. | Circuit | 1st Cir. | 2025 | Gender-affirming carealso Prisons & detention, Federal executive actions | 81 | |
| National Urban League v. Trump | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2025 | Federal executive actionsalso Speech & religious objections | Adverse | 3 |
| Neese v. BecerraNo. 23-10078 | 5th Cir. | Circuit | 5th Cir. | 2023 | Health coverage & benefitsalso Gender-affirming care, Federal executive actions | Favorable | 50 |
| Nicolas Talbott v. United States | D.C. Cir. | Circuit | D.C. Cir. | 2025 | Militaryalso Federal executive actions | Adverse | 90 |
| Orr v. TrumpNo. 1:25-cv-10313 | 1st Cir. | Circuit | 1st Cir. | 2025 | Identity documentsalso Federal executive actions | 345 | |
| Parents for Privacy v. Dall. Sch. Dist. No. 2 | D. Or. | District | 9th Cir. | 2018 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Family & parental rights, Federal executive actions | Favorable | 1 |
| PFLAG, Inc. v. Donald J. TrumpNo. 25-1279 | 4th Cir. | Circuit | 4th Cir. | 2025 | Gender-affirming carealso Federal executive actions | 370 | |
| QueerDoc PLLC v. United States Department of Justice | 9th Cir. | Circuit | 9th Cir. | 2026 | Gender-affirming carealso Federal executive actions | 37 | |
| Rapides Parish v. Health & Human Services | W.D. La. | District | 5th Cir. | 2025 | Federal executive actionsalso Schools & education, Health coverage & benefits | 2 | |
| Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights v. McMahon | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Federal executive actionsalso Gender-affirming care, Immigration & asylum | Mostly favorable | 23 |
| Ryan Karnoski v. Donald Trump | 9th Cir. | Circuit | 9th Cir. | 2020 | Militaryalso Federal executive actions | Favorable | 7 |
| San Francisco A.I.D.S. Foundation v. TrumpNo. 4:25-cv-01824 | N.D. Cal. | District | 9th Cir. | 2025 | Federal executive actionsalso Speech & religious objections | 142 | |
| Schlacter et. al. v. U.S. Department of State et. al. | 2026 | Identity documentsalso Federal executive actions | 37 | ||||
| School Board Rapides Parish v. Education | W.D. La. | District | 5th Cir. | 2024 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 3 | |
| Scott v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsNo. 1:25-cv-10580 | D. Mass. | District | 1st Cir. | 2025 | Gender-affirming carealso Prisons & detention, Federal executive actions | 1 | |
| Seattle Children's Hospital v. United States Department of Justice | W.D. Wash. | District | 9th Cir. | 2026 | Gender-affirming carealso Federal executive actions | 29 | |
| Shilling v. United States of AmericaNo. 2:25-cv-00241 | 9th Cir. | Circuit | 9th Cir. | 2025 | Militaryalso Federal executive actions | 284 | |
| State of Arkansas v. EDUCNo. 24-2921 | 8th Cir. | Circuit | 8th Cir. | 2024 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 15 | |
| State of California v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesNo. 1:25-cv-12019 | D. Mass. | District | 1st Cir. | 2025 | Health coverage & benefitsalso Gender-affirming care, Federal executive actions | 98 | |
| State of Kansas v. EDUCNo. 24-3097 | 10th Cir. | Circuit | 10th Cir. | 2024 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Athletics, Federal executive actions | 61 | |
| State of Louisiana v. EDUCNo. 24-30399 | 5th Cir. | Circuit | 5th Cir. | 2024 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 38 | |
| State of New York v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesNo. 19-4254 | 2nd Cir. | Circuit | 2nd Cir. | 2019 | Health coverage & benefitsalso Speech & religious objections, Federal executive actions | 11 | |
| State of Tenn. v. Linda McMahonNo. 24-5588 | 6th Cir. | Circuit | 6th Cir. | 2024 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 128 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Department of EducationNo. 22-5807 | 6th Cir. | Circuit | 6th Cir. | 2022 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Athletics, Federal executive actions | 57 | |
| State of Tennessee v. U.S. Department of Agriculture | E.D. Tenn. | District | 6th Cir. | 2023 | Federal executive actionsalso Schools & education, Public accommodations | Favorable | 14 |
| State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | N.D. Tex. | District | 5th Cir. | 2022 | Employmentalso Gender-affirming care, Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | Adverse | 23 |
| State of Texas v. KennedyNo. 24-40568 | 5th Cir. | Circuit | 5th Cir. | 2024 | Health coverage & benefitsalso Gender-affirming care, Federal executive actions | 5 | |
| State of Washington, et al. v. Trump, et al. | 9th Cir. | Circuit | 9th Cir. | 2026 | Gender-affirming carealso Federal executive actions | 84 | |
| Stockman v. Trump | C.D. Cal. | District | 9th Cir. | 2018 | Militaryalso Federal executive actions | Favorable | 3 |
| Stone v. Trump | D. Md. | District | 4th Cir. | 2021 | Militaryalso Federal executive actions | Favorable | 14 |
| Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Educat | N.D. Ill. | District | 7th Cir. | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 20 | ||
| Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Education | N.D. Ill. | District | 7th Cir. | 2016 | Schools & educationalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | Favorable | 1 |
| Talbott v. Trump | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Militaryalso Federal executive actions | Favorable | 426 |
| United States v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONNo. 1:25-cv-00173 | D. Me. | District | 1st Cir. | 2025 | Athleticsalso Schools & education, Federal executive actions | 51 | |
| United States v. Minnesota Department of EducationNo. 0:26-cv-02078 | D. Minn. | District | 8th Cir. | 2026 | Athleticsalso Schools & education, Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 2 | |
| Whitman-Walker Clinic, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2021 | Health coverage & benefitsalso Gender-affirming care, Speech & religious objections, Federal executive actions | Mostly adverse | 2 |
| Withrow v. United States of AmericaNo. 1:25-cv-04073 | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2025 | Employmentalso Bathrooms & facilities, Federal executive actions | 60 | |
| World Professional Association for Transgender Health v. Federal Trade Commission | D.D.C. | District | D.C. Cir. | 2026 | Gender-affirming carealso Speech & religious objections, Federal executive actions | Favorable | 116 |
| Z.A. v. Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford | 9th Cir. | Circuit | 9th Cir. | 2026 | Gender-affirming carealso Family & parental rights, Federal executive actions | 79 |
Each case has one main issue and may raise others (shown as “also”); the Issue filter finds a case by either. Choose a column heading to sort by it, and again to reverse the order. A blank cell means the archive has no entry for that case yet.
The outcome is this project's own coding of how a case turned out, made from the court's record; it is not the court's finding. How it is coded, and how to ask for a correction, is on the About page.
Litigation
Court cases about transgender and other LGBTQ+ people · federal & state courts
Cases tracked
| Case | Court | Level | Cir. | Year | Issue / type | Outcome | Docs |
|---|
Archive stats
Cases by issue
Every tracked case once, under its main issue, split by the coded direction of its final ruling (the same reading as "Reached a final ruling" below): favorable or adverse to the LGBTQ-rights claim, or mixed. The empty part of each bar is cases with no coded ruling at the trial, circuit or Supreme Court stage yet, which is most of them; it is not a claim that they have no outcome. Choose a bar to list its cases.
Reached a final ruling
The coded direction at the HIGHEST stage a case reached — trial-level, circuit-court or Supreme Court only. A preliminary-injunction ruling never counts as final, and a "procedural, no direction" or "unclear" coding is excluded rather than shown as an outcome.
Case duration
Filed to terminated, from real CourtListener docket dates, among cases where EVERY tracked docket has terminated (an open appellate docket alongside a closed district one is pending, not resolved). No stage-by-stage date exists in this corpus, so only this one span is shown; dates cover only the tracked-docket tier — see the coverage note below the numbers.
Cases by circuit
A real geographic map, states shaded by their circuit's case count relative to the busiest circuit (linear). The Federal Circuit has no state territory of its own (its jurisdiction is subject matter, not geography) and so never paints here, but still appears in the list and the table. Select a circuit below for its final-ruling mix.