Compare HI HB 1004 (2014) and HI HB 1933 (2010)
The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.
- HI HB 1004 (2014) · Hawaii · 2014 · Failed
- HI HB 1933 (2010) · Hawaii · 2010 · Failed
156 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.
This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.
| HI HB 1004 (2014) | HI HB 1933 (2010) |
|---|---|
| LEGISLATURE, 2013 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT proposing an amendment to | LEGISLATURE, 2010 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT proposing an amendment to |
| the Hawaii constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. The purpose of this Act is to propose an amendment to article I, section 23, of the | the Hawaii constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. The purpose of this Act is to propose an amendment to article I, section 23, of the |
| to define marriage as only between a man and a woman, as husband and wife. The legislature finds that the unique social institution of marriage involving the legal relationship of matrimony between a man and a woman is a protected relationship of fundamental and unequaled importance to the State, the nation, and society | to define marriage as only between a man and a woman as husband and wife. The legislature finds that the unique social institution of marriage involving the legal relationship of matrimony between a man and a woman is a protected relationship of fundamental and unequaled importance to the State, the nation, and society |
| Constitution by adding a new section relating to marriage. The proposed | constitution by adding a new section relating to marriage. The proposed |
| The proposed amendment was ratified by Hawaii voters in the general election of November | The proposed amendment was ratified by Hawaii voters in the general election of November |
| the legislature "shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite sex couples | The legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples |
| only between a man and a woman." SECTION | only between a man and a woman?" SECTION |
| between a man and a woman?" SECTION 4. Constitutional material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New constitutional material is underscored. SECTION 5. This amendment shall take effect upon compliance with article XVII, section 3, of the | between a man and a woman?" SECTION 4. Constitutional material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New constitutional material is underscored. SECTION 5. This amendment shall take effect upon compliance with article XVII, section 3, of the |
| INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________ Report Title: State Constitution; Marriage Description | INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________ Report Title: State Constitution; Marriage Description |
| only between a man and a woman. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent | only between a man and a woman. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent |