Compare IA HF 229 (2023) and IA HF 258 (2019)
The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.
- IA HF 229 (2023) · Iowa · 2023 · Failed
- IA HF 258 (2019) · Iowa · 2019 · Failed
508 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.
This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.
| IA HF 229 (2023) | IA HF 258 (2019) |
|---|---|
| A BILL FOR An Act relating to the standard of judicial review and 1 providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a 2 person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date 3 provisions. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB 1424YH (3) 90 cm/ns H.F. 229 Section 1. NEW SECTION . 675.1 Short title. 1 This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the 2 “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” . 3 Sec. 2. NEW SECTION . 675.2 Legislative purpose and intent. 4 The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the 5 following: 6 1. To restore the compelling interest test as set forth 7 in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 8 Yoder, 4… | A BILL FOR An Act relating to the standard of judicial review and 1 providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a 2 person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date 3 provisions. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB 1099YH (2) 88 asf/jh H.F. 258 Section 1. NEW SECTION . 675.1 Short title. 1 This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the 2 “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” . 3 Sec. 2. NEW SECTION . 675.2 Legislative purpose and intent. 4 The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the 5 following: 6 1. To restore the compelling interest test as set forth 7 in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 8 Yoder,… |
| State law” includes without limitation a law, ordinance, 29 or resolution of | State law” includes without limitation a law, ordinance, 29 or resolution of |
| Sec. 4. NEW SECTION . 675.4 Free exercise of religion 32 protected. 33 1. Government shall not substantially burden a person’s 34 exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule | Sec. 4. NEW SECTION . 675.4 Free exercise of religion 31 protected. 32 1. Government shall not substantially burden a person’s 33 exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule |
| applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion 2 is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and 3 is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 4 governmental interest. 5 2. A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened 6 in violation of this chapter may assert such violation as a 7 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding 8 and obtain appropriate relief. Standing to assert a claim or 9 defense under this chapter shall be governed by the general 10 rules of standing under state and federal law. 11 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION . 675.5 Applicability. 12 This chapter applies to all state and local laws and the 13 implementation of state… | applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion is 1 in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is 2 the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 3 governmental interest. 4 2. A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened 5 in violation of this chapter may assert such violation as a 6 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding 7 and obtain appropriate relief. Standing to assert a claim or 8 defense under this chapter shall be governed by the general 9 rules of standing under state and federal law. 10 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION . 675.5 Applicability. 11 This chapter applies to all state and local laws and the 12 implementation of state a… |
| This Act, being deemed of immediate 17 importance, takes effect upon enactment. 18 EXPLANATION 19 The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with 20 the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. 21 This bill relates to the standard of judicial review when a 22 state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion. 23 Under current law, a court is not required to apply 24 heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a 25 person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally 26 applicable. The bill provides that a court shall apply the 27 compelling interest test set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 28 U.S. 398 (1963), and Wisconsin v. Yod… | This Act, being deemed of 20 immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment. 21 EXPLANATION 22 The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with 23 the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. 24 This bill relates to the standard of judicial review when a 25 state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion. 26 Under current law, a court is not required to apply 27 heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a 28 person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally 29 applicable. The bill provides that a court shall apply the 30 compelling interest test set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 31 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yode… |
| a compelling governmental interest and is 33 the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. The 34 bill provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been | a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive 1 means of furthering that interest. The bill provides that a 2 person whose exercise of religion has been |
| action may assert such violation as a 1 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding. 2 The bill | action may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a 4 judicial or administrative proceeding. 5 The bill |
| The bill takes effect upon enactment. 3 -3- LSB 1424YH | The bill takes effect upon enactment. 9 -3- LSB 1099YH |