Compare IA HF 229 (2023) and IA SF 436 (2021)

The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.

520 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.

This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.

IA HF 229 (2023)IA SF 436 (2021)
A BILL FOR An Act relating to the standard of judicial review and 1 providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a 2 person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date 3 provisions. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSBA BILL FOR An Act relating to the standard of judicial review and 1 providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a 2 person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date 3 provisions. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB
F. 229 Section 1. NEW SECTION . 675.1 Short title. 1 This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the 2 “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” . 3 Sec. 2. NEW SECTION . 675.2 Legislative purpose and intent. 4 The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the 5 following: 6 1. To restore the compelling interest test as set forth 7 in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 8 Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), and to guarantee its application in 9 all cases where the free exercise of religion is substantially 10 burdened by government action. 11 2. That this chapter be interpreted consistent with the 12 Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. §2000bb et 13 seq., fede…F. 436 Section 1. NEW SECTION . 675.1 Short title. 1 This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the 2 “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” . 3 Sec. 2. NEW SECTION . 675.2 Legislative purpose and intent. 4 The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the 5 following: 6 1. To restore the compelling interest test as set forth 7 in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 8 Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), and to guarantee its application in 9 all cases where the free exercise of religion is substantially 10 burdened by state action. 11 2. That this chapter be interpreted consistent with the 12 Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. §2000bb et 13 seq., federal c…
State law” includes without limitation a law, ordinance, 29 or resolution ofState law” includes without limitation a law, ordinance, 29 or resolution of
Sec. 4. NEW SECTION . 675.4 Free exercise of religion 32 protected. 33 1. Government shall not substantially burden a person’s 34 exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a ruleSec. 4. NEW SECTION . 675.4 Free exercise of religion 31 protected. 32 1. Government shall not substantially burden a person’s 33 exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule
applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion 2 is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and 3 is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 4 governmental interest. 5 2. A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened 6 in violation of this chapter may assert such violation as a 7 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding 8 and obtain appropriate relief. Standing to assert a claim or 9 defense under this chapter shall be governed by the general 10 rules of standing under state and federal law. 11 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION . 675.5 Applicability. 12 This chapter applies to all state and local laws and the 13 implementation of state…applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion is 1 in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is 2 the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 3 governmental interest. 4 2. A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened 5 in violation of this chapter may assert such violation as a 6 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding 7 and obtain appropriate relief. Standing to assert a claim or 8 defense under this chapter shall be governed by the general 9 rules of standing under state and federal law. 10 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION . 675.5 Applicability. 11 This chapter applies to all state and local laws and the 12 implementation of state a…
action may assert such violation as a 1 claim or defense in aaction may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a
judicial or administrative proceeding. 2 The bill takes effect upon enactment. 3 -3- LSBjudicial or administrative proceeding. 1 The bill takes effect upon enactment. 2 -3- LSB