Compare IA HF 258 (2019) and IA SF 436 (2021)
The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.
- IA HF 258 (2019) · Iowa · 2019 · Failed
- IA SF 436 (2021) · Iowa · 2021 · Failed
578 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.
This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.
| IA HF 258 (2019) | IA SF 436 (2021) |
|---|---|
| A BILL FOR An Act relating to the standard of judicial review and 1 providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a 2 person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date 3 provisions. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB | A BILL FOR An Act relating to the standard of judicial review and 1 providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a 2 person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date 3 provisions. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB |
| F. 258 Section 1. NEW SECTION . 675.1 Short title. 1 This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the 2 “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” . 3 Sec. 2. NEW SECTION . 675.2 Legislative purpose and intent. 4 The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the 5 following: 6 1. To restore the compelling interest test as set forth 7 in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 8 Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), and to guarantee its application in 9 all cases where the free exercise of religion is substantially 10 burdened by state action. 11 2. That this chapter be interpreted consistent with the 12 Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. §2000bb et 13 seq., federal c… | F. 436 Section 1. NEW SECTION . 675.1 Short title. 1 This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the 2 “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” . 3 Sec. 2. NEW SECTION . 675.2 Legislative purpose and intent. 4 The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the 5 following: 6 1. To restore the compelling interest test as set forth 7 in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 8 Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), and to guarantee its application in 9 all cases where the free exercise of religion is substantially 10 burdened by state action. 11 2. That this chapter be interpreted consistent with the 12 Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. §2000bb et 13 seq., federal c… |
| F. 258 applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion is 1 in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is 2 the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 3 governmental interest. 4 2. A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened 5 in violation of this chapter may assert such violation as a 6 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding 7 and obtain appropriate relief. Standing to assert a claim or 8 defense under this chapter shall be governed by the general 9 rules of standing under state and federal law. 10 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION . 675.5 Applicability. 11 This chapter applies to all state and local laws and the 12 implementation of… | F. 436 applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion is 1 in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is 2 the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 3 governmental interest. 4 2. A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened 5 in violation of this chapter may assert such violation as a 6 claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding 7 and obtain appropriate relief. Standing to assert a claim or 8 defense under this chapter shall be governed by the general 9 rules of standing under state and federal law. 10 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION . 675.5 Applicability. 11 This chapter applies to all state and local laws and the 12 implementation of… |
| Sec. 7. EFFECTIVE UPON ENACTMENT. This Act, being deemed of 20 immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment. 21 EXPLANATION 22 The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with 23 the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. 24 This bill relates to the standard of judicial review when a 25 state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion. 26 Under current law, a court is not required to apply 27 heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a 28 person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally 29 applicable. The bill provides that a court shall apply the 30 compelling interest test set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 31 U.S… | Sec. 6. EFFECTIVE UPON ENACTMENT. This Act, being deemed of 16 immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment. 17 EXPLANATION 18 The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with 19 the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. 20 This bill relates to the standard of judicial review when a 21 state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion. 22 Under current law, a court is not required to apply 23 heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a 24 person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally 25 applicable. The bill provides that a court shall apply the 26 compelling interest test set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 27 U.S… |
| a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive 1 means of furthering that interest. The bill provides that a 2 person whose exercise of religion has been burdened by state 3 action may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a | a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive 32 means of furthering that interest. The bill provides that a 33 person whose exercise of religion has been burdened by state 34 action may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a |