Compare IA HR 47 (2011) and IA HR 50 (2011)
The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.
- IA HR 47 (2011) · Iowa · 2011 · Failed
- IA HR 50 (2011) · Iowa · 2011 · Failed
344 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.
This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.
| IA HR 47 (2011) | IA HR 50 (2011) |
|---|---|
| House Resolution 47 - Introduced HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 47 BY SHAW , ALONS , DE BOEF , MASSIE , and PEARSON A Resolution impeaching Supreme Court Justice Brent R. 1 Appel for malfeasance in office. 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 3 That Supreme Court Justice Brent R. Appel is impeached 4 for malfeasance in office, and that the following 5 article of impeachment be exhibited and presented to 6 the Senate: 7 That Supreme Court Justice Brent R. Appel in 8 violation of his constitutional oath undertaken before 9 taking office to support the Constitution of the United 10 States and the Constitution of the State of Iowa, has 11 committed malfeasance in office through his action to… | House Resolution 50 - Introduced HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 50 BY SHAW , ALONS , DE BOEF , MASSIE , and PEARSON A Resolution impeaching Supreme Court Justice David S. 1 Wiggins for malfeasance in office. 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, That 3 Supreme Court Justice David S. Wiggins is impeached 4 for malfeasance in office, and that the following 5 article of impeachment be exhibited and presented to 6 the Senate: 7 That Supreme Court Justice David S. Wiggins in 8 violation of his constitutional oath undertaken before 9 taking office to support the Constitution of the United 10 States and the Constitution of the State of Iowa, has 11 committed malfeasance in office through his act… |
| delegated solely and exclusively to the legislative 1 department of declaring public policy, through his 2 judicial declaration of a new public policy contrary to 3 long-standing public policy acknowledged by society and 4 established in Iowa Code section 595.2, subsection 1. 5 (3) By his action in the Varnum case, Justice Appel 6 has improperly required the executive department to 7 issue marriage licenses to parties of the same sex in 8 direct contravention of Iowa Code section 595.2. 9 (4) By his action in the Varnum case, Justice Appel 10 has created a constitutional crisis regarding the 11 enforcement of the Varnum ruling by allowing different 12 interpretations of the definition of ma… | delegated solely and exclusively to the 1 legislative department of declaring public policy, 2 through his judicial declaration of a new public policy 3 contrary to long-standing public policy acknowledged 4 by society and established in Iowa Code section 595.2, 5 subsection 1. 6 (3) By his action in the Varnum case, Justice 7 Wiggins has improperly required the executive 8 department to issue marriage licenses to parties of the 9 same sex in direct contravention of Iowa Code section 10 595.2. 11 (4) By his action in the Varnum case, Justice 12 Wiggins has created a constitutional crisis regarding 13 the enforcement of the Varnum ruling by allowing 14 different interpretations of the defini… |
| state pursuant to the procedures set out in Iowa Code 29 chapter 68. 30 -2- LSB 1524YH (11) 84 jm/rj | state pursuant to the procedures set out in Iowa Code 1 chapter 68. 2 -3- LSB 1466YH (4) 84 jm/rj |